Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

1165416551657165916601836

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,555 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    In truth theyre a dime a dozen. Both throughout history as powerful people and throughout humanity for the many like them that get nowhere near power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,740 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    No no, it will only be a "special military operation"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,615 ✭✭✭Dr Robert




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,067 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    As they ramp up positioning assets in the Gulf to strike Iran. Has to be one of the largest movements since the threatened attacks on North Korea in 2017



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,355 ✭✭✭ZeroThreat


    With regard to Iran I reckon we're very soon going to see a TACO to rival all TACOs. In fact people in the future will go up to trump with tears in their eyes and say 'sir, I've never seen anyone do a better TACO than you, ever'….



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,716 ✭✭✭combat14


    he's not going to invade iran they dont have the troops for that in the region - he will simply bomb the place for weeks if they dont sign his deal and hope the iranian people rise up to topple the religious/military regime



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,615 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    Invade Iran? 🤣 🤣

    Good luck with that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,889 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Just because he got away with that in Venezuela doesn't mean he will in Iran. I've been around long enough to see wars that were supposed to be quick in out strikes turn into decades long quagmires

    Iran will only allow so many attacks on its territory before they counter attack.

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 927 ✭✭✭bored65




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,484 ✭✭✭z80CPU
    Darth 8-bit


    And believe it or not, this notion has precedent, in the US.

    In the 1950's USAF General Curtiss LeMay recommended that America "Bomb the $HIT out of the Chinese".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,889 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    I've deleted that from my signature

    Chomsky can go **** himself now.

    Doesn't mean the republicans are any less evil (and a sizable proportion of democrats and political 'elites' in most countries)

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,310 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    On the Andrew Windsor arrest, I suspect this is not so much about bringing him to justice, though it looks as though it needs to be done, its about unravelling Trump and his role in an international scandal. A situation that would still possibly be going on if it were not so necessary to stop Trump in his irrational and irresponsible roiling of international affairs in an effort to disguise his own part.

    At some high diplomatic level, the British government and the king have been convinced by international leaders that the nonsense needs to be stopped, even at the expense of the reputation of the king and royal family. Starmer does not seem like someone who wants to open this all up, but the investigation would not have happened without tacit government approval. It could well be that the king has indicated that it should happen. The groundwork has been laid for Windsor's removal, and the government would look worse if the Epstein business opens up and the British government had not done anything about him.

    There does not seem to be any limits to the lengths Trump will go in order to distract from the files, and has now shown he is prepared to (again) resort to invasion and war to protect his own skin. Along with the financial and trade turmoil, the rest of the world has had it with him and is prepared to co-operate to bring him down. Windsor is the guilty scapegoat, the key to getting into the whole sordid business. I wonder has Britain/Europe/someone outside the USA got hold of a copy of the orignal, unredacted files?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,779 ✭✭✭amandstu


    "

    On the Andrew Windsor arrest, I suspect this is not so much about bringing him to justice, though it looks as though it needs to be done, its about unravelling Trump and his role in an international scandal"

    A gut feeling that this is completely off the wall and that this arrest is for purely internal reasons.

    I would be overjoyed if it was for the reasons you suggest but my flabber would be truly ghasted if it was in any conceivable way.

    Selling state secrets is a really shity crime to commit and I can see why he (and Mandelson) may deserve to be prosecuted.

    (quite aside from the Epstein angle)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 562 ✭✭✭pad406


    I do hope Andrew is practicing his do-re-mi in preparation for some singing (not that I want him to get off or a reduced sentence in any way)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,595 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    not 1 person in the Trump Epstein administration held to account yet.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,416 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    It seems that he's effectively being charged with a form of "insider trading" in that he's alleged to have shared a private briefing about a trade mission or something that Charles was part of to Asia which potentially would have given Epstein the inside track on investment opportunities.

    But the charge of "misconduct in public office" carries a maximum sentence of Life in prison , so the stakes are a LOT bigger..

    For Trump , the DOJs "nothing to see here" stance just gets worse and worse every day as people all over the rest of the world are being held accountable for things that appear to not be anything like as bad as some of the accusations against Trump.

    They've arrested Andrew for dodgy dealing , but he clearly has a LOT more to answer for as well.. Maybe now they have him in custody they can dig in on the other stuff as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 562 ✭✭✭pad406


    Even if they don't find anything, or not enough to convict, on the other stuff, he may still sing like a canary to get a sentence reduced if what they do have is rock solid (which I'd expect given the immediate arrest, not an interview followed by arrest. Or come down to the station and save the embarrassment of a public arrest)

    Edit:

    I really don't see him as someone likely to 'take one for the team'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,063 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Secretary of State Marco Rubio is reportedly holding secret discussions with the grandson of Raúl Castro, the de facto dictator of Cuba, as the United States seeks to pressure the country into regime change.

    The backchannel discussions between Rubio and 41-year-old Raúl Guillermo Rodriguez Castro, first reported by Axios, indicate that the U.S. is looking to influence the elder Castro and his inner circle into rapprochement with the U.S. Despite being 94 years old, the administration still see the revolutionary as the island’s real “decision-maker,” the outlet says.

    "Our position — the U.S. government's position — is the regime has to go. But what exactly that looks like is up to [President Trump], and he has yet to decide. Rubio is still in talks with the grandson,” a senior Trump administration official told Axios.

    It comes as Cuba faces a dire energy crisis, having had its access to subsidized oil from Venezuela cut off since the U.S. captured leder Nicolás Maduro in January. The country is facing a growing humanitarian crisis with food scarce, schools closed, hospitals reducing service, trash piling up, fights unable to take off, and near total darkness at night.

    President Donald Trump has accused Cuba of harboring enemies and warned allies that those who provide or sell oil to Cuba will face steep tariffs – that’s left Mexico, one of the few countries that sold oil to Cuba, in a bind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭PixelCrafter


    It's a bit of a wooly area of law in their system, and will be interesting to see where it leads - there isn't really a whole lot of precedent for senior public office holders being convicted of this, it's mostly stuff like police officers and council related stuff and it's typically 12-18 months, with one sentence of 4 years, and a lot of suspended sentences. It's a Common Law offence, rather than one defined by legislation, so it's a bit of a stretch to say it 'carries up to life imprisionment' - the offence just doesn't have a defined maximum sentence.

    The could yet be further charges though, particularly around the Official Secrets Act and so on. My prediction is there'll be further charges as the investigations continue and more evidence is unearthed. The initial charge gives police more scope to dig. Much like our system, they have to build a water tight case before they bring charges. You can't go in with vague evidence and do a court-led investigation like the French inquisitorial system for example, so the headlines won't be as dramatic.

    I don't think the UK has any grand international strategy on this tbh - it's just normal police work and cleaning house. There's huge reputational damage to the government and institutions of state by what went on and how they proceed with holding individuals to account will be of huge importance domestically. If they fail to investigate and hold to account, I think there would be a major loss of public confidence and not just at a party-politics level, but in the institutions of the UK state at a much broader level.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,200 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    Did you ever hear anything more ludicrous in your life "But what exactly that looks like is up to President Trump" as if Trump's there, poring over maps and intelligence reports. I dare someone to ask him "what's the capital of Cuba?".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,779 ✭✭✭amandstu


    "There's huge reputational damage to the government and institutions of state by what went on and how they proceed with holding individuals to account will be of huge importance domestically. "

    Absolutely.When the most highly trusted betray that trust(and privilege) that compounds the damage.

    I am not sure if anyone is interested in whether the government prodded the justice system to arrest Andrew .It would be interesting to see who who bring that up, but the government could surely have had no interest in impeding the investigation (or aligning it with American concerns)

    It is a happy coincidence, though that it might flush out what Epstein's game was and who else was involved.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,230 ✭✭✭Field east


    it will be of interest to see what Trump attacks , if and when he ‘gets started ‘ in Iran. If he is GENUINELY interested in assisting Ukr and SAVING THOUSANDS OF LIVES then he can kill ‘TWO BIRDS with the one stone’ by bombing the Iranian SHAHED production facilities . If The US does not know where they are then he need only ask Israel.

    If The US does not target these facilities then we have further proof of which side Trump is on. To get rid of such facilities should be a doddle to the US . The dropping of a few small bombs should suffice

    If the shared situation is to be solved diplomatically then part of the agreement that they come to might include the I’m mediating seizing of their production



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,230 ✭✭✭Field east


    I wonder any of the Russian ‘call girls’ given a camera as a going away present by Putin when they went to work for Epstein ,,””,,,…”,””, and if they took some photos I wonder who has them now



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,091 ✭✭✭✭castletownman


    Kinda shows how warped a mindset US has that invading a country IMPROVES public opinion.

    Most other countries in the world would be rightly aghast at such actions.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,538 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Looks like I've been wrong for not bothering to watch Melania's movie…

    image.png

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,779 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Not really.I am sure that the British(and Irish) people supported the government when it was involved in wars and military actions in the Empire -and that support went up in such times.

    USA has taken over the British and Eutopean colonialist role since WW2 ended and the same mindset must affect the population.(not all,of course, but ,ironically "America Sinn Fein" seems to legitimise lashing out at "shithole countries" and espousing "might makes right".)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,340 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    When the Epstein files revealed that Lord Mandelson was in receipt of funds from Epstein it showed that backhanders were being paid to persons in privileged positions in the UK. Another quid pro quo situation. Who else was being provided with beneficial business information from London by Mandelson?

    The questions now are who was the go-between the former Prince and a possible funder in the U.S AND what to do with Andrew himself. The Bahamas currently have a governor and I don't see France allowing him retire there, too troublesome a package. The only use he would be to Trump would be as a spoon to stir it with the UK.

    Ref the original unredacted files, the idea that the present FBI director is likely to be like J Edgar and kept them in the filing cabinets might be putting the **** up persons in the Swamp.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,416 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Indeed - Everything we know about him suggests that he's a needy , entitled , self important arsehole.

    Him choosing to stay quiet and take the hit to "protect" someone is extremely unlikely.

    And clearly Charles has utterly cut him loose - It's no coincidence that this arrest has happened after the last of any and all of his possible "royal protections" have been removed.

    Charles won't lift a finger to help him so he will throw anyone and everyone under the bus if he thinks it will keep him out of jail.

    I mean they arrested him on his Birthday , zero favours being done here…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,974 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Never let it be forgotten how weird a timeline we're living in where the President of the USA drops in some promotion for his wife's vacuous vanity documentary during a supposedly serious speech. President Camacho would be an upgrade.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,211 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    The Chomsky connection is very disappointing. In mitigation, if not defence, the man is 97 now and probably had a fair bit of atherosclerotic damage in his brain before the massive stroke a few years ago. This sad story illustrates why some degree of ageism is appropriate in politics and the bench, not that Chomsky had a post like that. With a few notable exceptions like Bernie Sanders, people over 80 should leave the stage. There’s no shortage of replacements.



Advertisement
Advertisement