Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

1162916301632163416351834

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Their hands are somewhat tied given they don't control the House, or the Senate, I'll give them that.

    But that being said, it can also be said that their leaders in the House and Senate (Jeffries and Schumer) have almost completely failed to perform to the level their roles desired. There's no question Schumer was involved in the Democrats voting to bring to an end the government shutdown of last autumn and all Jefferies really offers is strong words on talk shows every now and then.

    It has annoyed me how performative many Democrat leaders are and it very much indicates the legacy wing of the party being both too cosy with legacy influences (corporate/lobbyists) and against true progressives (Mamdani/David Hogg etc) who could move the party away from this position.

    Another thing that has specifically annoyed me is that I've seen a couple of Democratic people speak almost as if they are giving orders to the UK or others telling them how they should deal with and act to hold people (Trump/The artist formerly known as Prince Andrew/Mandelson) to account for their connections with Epstein etc with a tone of simplicity and authority. I've seen Gavin Newsome do this to the whole of Europe at Davos with respect to Trump and Ro Khanna did it with respect to the UK and Epstein people in the last few days.

    America is in no position to be telling people how to uphold the law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Have seen a few clips of Bondi in action today.

    It really is an indictment of where the US finds itself that someone can behave as she did given the role she holds. It's stunning. One Senator flat out accused her both of perjury and failing to investigate a possible crime. She used her time to respond to questions ignoring them entirely and attacking the people who questioned her directly with completely irrelevant side quests.

    This hasn't happened in isolation because of Trump, absolutely Trump and his impact on standards and decorum in office are absolutely a part of it and Bondi herself is responsible for her actions. But the slow walking of holding Trump to account after his first term, primarily by Merrick Garland is a big part of why we are where we are.

    Before Jan 6th I didn't really think the US institutions would act appropriately against a President to account unless they were literally caught with a smoking gun in their hand. After Jan 6th, I thought they might, but I was still dubious and once they refused to actually vote for his impeachment, I knew that they wouldn't.

    And here we are. America is in the sh*t Trump appointees are flat out acting at his behest and ignoring almost entirely the checks and balances of congress or the responsibilities they owe to the office they hold. And Trump is having the FBI, the DOJ and the DNI interfere with the records of previous elections while he talks about the Federal Government controlling future elections. Kash Patel and Pam Bondi should be charged with impeding investigations at the least, possibly aiding and abetting criminals if the truth be told.

    Today was an easy to clip reminder of the impact of Trumpism on American institutions and all congress can do, is pretty much talk within their time. From what I saw of the Democrats who questioned her, they did well, but Democratic leadership should contest the mid-terms promising to act if they get the House/Senate and then (and this is key) act appropriately if they do so. Who has confidence that they will? As long as Jefferies and Schumer are the chief strategists, I don't believe they will do everything that needs to be done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 390 ✭✭Bocadilloo


    Bondi is an utter embarrassment. Her responses to committee members were disgraceful. Basically her testimony was to insult, make up excuses and what about statements to use up each members 5 mins.

    Hope she gets a long time behind bars for her actions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,545 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Trump receives a trophy of a coal miner that resembles him with a plaque that reads "The Undisputed Champion of Clean Coal"

    1000033093.png

    He looks annoyed. They brought him the wrong type of miners....

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    When Marjorie Taylor Greene spoke like this in interviews from 2019 to 2024, we called her a nutcase. And she was.

    But that was a Representative of the House, not the holder of the highest attorney position in the country and 7th in line to the Office of President.

    And the most depressing thing?

    The People in the 1st, 5th and 6th positions as successors to the Oval office, JD Vance, Scott Bessent and Pete Hegseth are 100% as deranged as she is.

    I said in 2016 Trump would lower the bar of acceptable behavior in the office of the President. I have long proven correct, but this 2nd term is off the charts.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,575 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    I've said it before, if the Democrats want to actually be a force for change and set themselves up for the next elections, they need to cop themselves on and appoint a leader now who can act as the unquestionable leader of the opposition. Be the Democrat spokesperson on everything. Be front and centre all the time. Make it a no brainier that they will be the candidate in 2028.

    The way American politics works this still never happen, the egos of all of the politicians won't allow it.

    But they should.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,599 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Far as I`m concerned the only thing you are Ireland first on is the same as the MAGA America first, immigrants.

    Everything else stems from that with your admiration for Trump and your constant, often ludicrous, attempts at defending him and your "what about Biden". Playing the typical MAGA playbook, so nobody here believes your are not an Irish MAGA want-to-be.

    The funny side is that from your own posts you have shown just how poor Trump`s record on deprting illegals has been even with an extra spend of $19 billion per annum of taxpayers money on his own private army of thugs where there were more illegals in the U.S. end of 2025 than the beginning of 2025.

    "But what about Biden….?" Biden deported more people in 2024 than Trump in 2025 and did it without a private army of thugs and did it for $19 billion less.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,543 ✭✭✭Billy Mays


    And doing all that with victims of Epstein sitting directly behind her.

    A despicable individual

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Trump orders intelligence services to share classified information with Kurt Olsen, one of his 'Stop the Steal' lawyers who challenged the 2020 election results.

    “The president has asked Mr. Olsen to look at intelligence related to the 2020 election and the agency is ensuring that he has the access necessary to do his work,” a CIA official said in an emailed statement.

    The Wall Street Journal first reported last year on the hiring of Olsen, saying he was seeking intelligence reports from U.S. spy agencies. Politico first reported that the president had directed intelligence agencies to cooperate with Olsen’s efforts.

    Olsen does not have a background working in the intelligence world. But the press secretary for the Office of the Director National Intelligence, Olivia Coleman, said: “Every individual who is granted access to classified information goes through an extensive background investigation, including record checks and personal interviews, with a trained investigator to ensure that the individual is trustworthy and does not pose a threat to national security.”

    Trump’s decision to provide potentially sensitive intelligence to Olsen coincides with concerns raised by Democrats in Congress and legal experts that his administration is seeking to revive claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election to justify the president’s calls for the federal government to assert control over ballot counting in the upcoming midterms

    ....

    Last year, a federal court upheld sanctions against Olsen in a case involving Republican Kari Lake’s unsuccessful legal challenge to her electoral defeat in the 2022 Arizona governor’s race. A three-judge panel ruled 2 to 1 that Olsen and another lawyer had made “false, misleading and unsupported factual assertions” when they argued that Arizona’s electronic voting system failed to protect voters’ rights.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,599 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    In the 1960s, far as I recall, they came close to launching a nuclear strike on Russia believing the moon rising was an incoming attack from Russia. Doesn`t appear much has changed since.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 791 ✭✭✭PixelCrafter


    It's rather grim and terrifying to think this is the calibre of people who have control of the nuclear button.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,348 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    “The president has asked Mr. Olsen to look at intelligence related to the 2020 election and the agency is ensuring that he has the access necessary to do his work,” a CIA official said in an emailed statement.

    It's all part of building a justification for influencing elections in the mid-terms and 2026.

    It's stunning, at how seamless this has all been for Trump. Boy did he learn his lessons from his first term and get people around him that would do exactly what he wanted and stand by him in term 2.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    House has passed the SAVE Act 218-213. It goes to the Senate where it wil have a tougher time because of the 60 vote rule. However the Senate can overturn the filibuster rule by changing Senate rules, which had happened several times since Trump's first term where they abolished it for SCOTUS judge appointments.

    The SAVE Act would require proof of American citizenship to vote including photo id. While most Americans support voter ID, concerns have been expressed at obstacles erected to getting the ID, including charging for it in some states, which could amount to a poll tax which is banned by the Voting Rights Act. Also concerns that married women might be disenfranchised because their surnames usually would have changed compared to their previous ID. Also, the bill explicitly excludes admissibility of Student ID. They are trying to stack the deck.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I didn't defend the content in that video. The question is over the intention. Did he intend for that additional second to be included on the voter fraud video.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I'd have no problem admitting it in person never mind anonymously. People here think I would anyway so there's no reason not to.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭dePeatrick


    This is from Tuesday, apologies if anyone else has posted it.


    “"In theory we've gotten everything passed that we need," Trump said in an interview with Fox News Business' Larry Kudlow. "Now we just need to manage it. But we've gotten everything passed that we need for four years."

    https://www.politico.com/news/2026/02/10/trump-reconciliation-package-00774834?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=dlvr.it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    What's with the whole giving Biden a free pass thing?

    https://prismreports.org/2025/01/15/biden-immigration-migrant-deaths/

    I get it you don't like Trump, not many of us here do but where's the balance?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭dePeatrick


    Very trumpian to bring Biden into it, this thread is about Trump and no amount of whataboutism will deflect from that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,067 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    It would blocked in appeal to the Supreme Court, at least if they adhere to the Constitution. It's clearly a poll tax. Of course Trump's minions of the court would probably be too busy until after the Nov elections to rule on it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    The guy I replied to brought it up in this case. All Trump does though is yap on about Biden so the two are very connected.

    I don't think I've ever seen Trump yap on about the war in Ukraine without ending it with "that's Bidens war, it would never have happened if it was me".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Some new information surfacing on this.

    Maybe there's two Seamus Culletons from that villagen



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭dePeatrick




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,062 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Republican House bill would gut regulation of toxic chemicals. The chemicals regulators are now lobbyists for the chemical industry. Also guts worker and consumer protection. Also requires regulators to meet industry representatives when drawing up regulations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,210 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Another morning where you wake up and just think to yourself this cannot be real.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,090 ✭✭✭✭castletownman


    Trump hasn't just lowered the bar, he is the bar



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,804 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    Its impressive and a real show of Trumps eye for talent that in under a decade Greene went from the token lunatic of the party to a beacon of competence for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,490 ✭✭✭✭fits


    is there any way you could copy in the text so we don’t have to click into the Xithole

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie

    Subscribe and save boards.ie



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,416 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    Things that Gallup are known for:

    1. Presidential Approval Ratings
    2. ….

    Absolutely insane move. Independent approval ratings are vitally important because it puts pressure on the President (and other elected officials) to serve the people by notifying them that their approval rating among the people is tanking. Now all Trump will see is Fox giving him an approval rating of 147% and pretending like he's doing great.

    I'm sure the heads at Gallup probably got a little "gift" in support of their decision which would more than make up for anything they'd lose if Gallup folds, which again, is probably likely considering the Presidential Approval Ratings were the main thing they were known for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭aero2k


    That's concerning, things are bad enough over there with regard to regulation of chemical (and other) industries without making them worse. I linked upthread the retraction of the study that was used to falsely claim that glyphosate is safe - I wonder how many substances are in use due to similarly dodgy "science"?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭aero2k




Advertisement
Advertisement