Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1171617171719172117221818

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,916 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    You can't run a team with a defensive hole in the middle of the field. I don't care whether it's Byrne or Crowley at 10 TBH.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,049 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    He wasn't playing quite well. He was pretty poor against NZ (and yes, obviously Frawley was much worse, but his international career basically ended that day), was playing pretty terribly for Munster and while he was good in the first half against Argentina, if I recall correctly he had a couple of howlers kicking out of hand. Being dropped after that should galvanise a player to do better, not to get worse.

    Now, I think he did get better, he was noticeably improved in January. And I think the argument that Farrell caused his poor form is basically doing him a massive, massive disservice.

    Prendergast has also clearly not been phased by playing for Ireland so young. There is zero indication it has done him any harm whatsoever, bar having to put up with a significant amount of bleating online that he hopefully ignores.

    Also, ultimately, people are overcomplicating this. Farrell clearly just thinks Prendergast is a better player. You can disagree with him, but that is simply what his decision boils down to.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,049 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I think that was weird yes.

    Suggesting Farrell caused some kind of permanent damage with it is just silly though and would reflect incredibly poorly on Crowley were it true (which it isn't).



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,049 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Indeed. England probably have 4 10s who would all be better than either of them and France 3.

    On the plus side Scotland only have 1, and Wales zero. But that is already both of them struggling to get into the top 10.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,091 ✭✭✭Paddy_Mag


    Jalibert didnt cruise by prendergast. The Ireland defence was static because the scrum was under pressure, Jalibert ran onto the ball at pace without breaking stride and stepped back inside.

    Players will make mistakes, in this instance it was all about the French scrum giving their backs free reign. Not a lot any player would be able to do in that situation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,837 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i disagree, neither are in great form at the moment but they both are both great players

    sorry but that is just absolute revisionism, he was not 'pretty poor' against NZ, ireland were leading while he was on the field and while it was far from a perfect game from JC, he was fine overall. the idea that he was playing badly for munster at the time is simply untrue also, his goalkicking was not good enough but his overly play was pretty decent



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭almostover


    I agree it was a very poor performance.

    1. He should never have been given a CC when he was.
    2. Joe can be given that chance from the bench.
    3. Has he? Not in the last 12 months for Ireland has he anyway. Maybe for Leinster but certainly not Ireland.
    4. We seemed to cope fine without his bulk when James Ryan replaced him.
    5. Very questionable. Giving away needless penalties destroys cohesion.
    6. Edogbo not ready for a start, but ready for 20mins off the bench for sure. Same goes for Cormac Izuchukwu. Why not give them the no.19 jersey for a home game vs. Italy. And start Beirne and Ryan as the locks with Conan or Cian Prendergast at 6.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭almostover


    Hard to argue with any of that really. The one thing I'll say in defence of Cian Prendergast is that he was very reliable in the lineout. We need a very good lineout forward in the 6 position at the moment with our recent lineout woes. Ryan Baird filled that role before his injury and I think Cian Prendergast suits it now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭almostover


    A little harsh with that. Granted Loughman isn't really a long term option but he did his job very well at set piece on Thursday after several years in the international wilderness. He's the fourth choice LH prop and did very well for someone that far down the pecking order. I do agree he was pedestrian enough in open play though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 197 ✭✭longjohn200


    There was a reason why TOB was taking off after 50mins, and it wasn't because he was having a decent game.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,761 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    He started well over the first ten minutes but regressed quickly after that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 197 ✭✭longjohn200


    Not sure how you think Prendergast and TOB defence was credible, certainly in that instance anyway. TOB is a good URC player. He's really not at the this level. Age is on Prendergast side but he's verging on the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭darkened_scrum


    The glaring problem with this, is Crowley has largely been absolutely rubbish this season.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,924 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    I fully expect edogbo to make his debut against Italy. I think we'll continue with the kick heavy strategy.

    Personally the first player I'd drop due to lack of form is ringrose. He's been playing poorly since his return from Australia. We could be looking at a Midfield and back three of

    12. Big stu.

    13. Osbourne.

    11. Lowe.

    14. TOB.

    15. Stockdale.

    If I was picking the team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 934 ✭✭✭johnh6767


    Agreed , if anything it was the kick chase that was off



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,837 ✭✭✭sprucemoose




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,588 ✭✭✭ersatz


    This is meaningless, the defence is static because they are defending a scrum on the 5. The scrum was rotating but the ball came out fast and the defence did not move back, Jalibert moved to the blind side (from deep behind the scrum) as the ball came back to Dupont and Prendergast tracked him but moved too late and then overshot. It was an absolute howler of a missed tackle, caused by him not moving to track Jalibert's run quickly enough. Jalibert runs an outside line which brings on the Irish winger and then straightens to cut inside Prendergast, who misread both Jalibert and TOB. I thought Prendergast had an ok game but that particular try was 100% on him. We don't have a decent fly half, and we need a second play maker on the field. Maybe Crowley at 15 is the answer. The French game didn't suit Prendergast very well and he's a liability against strong counter attacking teams.
    https://youtu.be/E4d7AIPSpOA?t=75

    On the discussion of the impact breakdown laws have had and how France have adapted by playing a faster more off loading game, its notable that French players stick one or two players almost every single time, before they pass, and then pass very often right before the tackle rather than in the tackle. These are basic schoolboy skills elevated to a high art by the French team, but they are basic for professional players. Both Ireland's tries were marked by short off loads. When we think about off loading its a mistake to imagine its all arms stuff like Snyman, its not. Most of the time its short passes in traffic right before a tackle or punching through a tackle, ideally the player stays on their feet and can support. These players are plenty capable of it, it's just not part of the strategy they are playing. I'm not sure why the rest of the strategy is though, kicking the ball back to that French team without a buttoned up means of contesting and at least preventing them getting their unstructured attack going was suicidal. I assume we will bounce back and bring some intensity against Italy but a performance like that in the first half on Thursday and I'd fancy Italy to rack up tries and beat us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,759 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Disagree, Prendergast's effort on Jalibert was extremely weak, imo. I think in that scenario, the most likely outcome is a French try, but Prendergast has to do much better there. (It's mad that's even up for debate, to me…)

    I'd agree that the scrum was under pressure, but I also think that was part of the play from France to setup that scenario; to wheel the Irish scrum away from the blindside to afford them that platform to attack Prendergast.

    You'd be hard pushed to say it didn't work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,761 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    It was his struggles in the air and with that being a big part of the game plan it was no surprise that he was taken off. He did everything else well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭almostover


    That specific instance was total system failure. Between JGP, TOB and both Prendergasts they badly messed up the defence of a simple blindside move. It was symptomatic of the general mess we were in defence.

    I give Cian Prendergast some forgiveness in this instance as the scrum wheeled him away from where the ball went.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭almostover


    He scrummaged a lot better than what we've seen from the more front line LHs in the last few games. And maintained that until he was replaced. As did Michael Milne. Was eye opening in that respect. Clarkson went well too at scrum time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,500 ✭✭✭almostover


    I say this as a Munster fan, but the whole team has largely been rubbish this season. Barring the period pre autumn internationals we've been very poor. Crowley was flying it before then and his form has dipped along with the teams. Munster pack is being beaten up in most games so its tough for the 10 to look good.

    Same as happened Sam last Thursday. It takes a truly world class 10 to influence the game behind a beaten pack.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 197 ✭✭longjohn200




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,766 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    I think he's found the step up difficult and has looked pretty ordinary at this level. Turns over a lot of ball (and it's not all aerial 50/50s). 4 the other day, 3 v South Africa, 2 v NZ. Even the hammering against Japan he turned over 3. The way some were going on here about his pace and being in with a chance for the Lions I thought we had a serious speed merchant on our hands, maybe he looked very fast compared to a pretty pedestrian Leinster backline of SP/Lowe/Henshaw/Ringrose/Osbourne, he hasn't really used this searing pace a whole lot to date, maybe we're just not giving him the opportunities. I do think his tackling is solid mind.

    To be fair to him, it's not easy being a 14 outside Ringrose also, been saying that going back to Keith Earls' days. Ringrose passed the same amount of times (3) as Joe McCarthy in the game. Distribution has never been his strength (or at times even a feature) of his game. We could have prime Jonah Lomu out there and he'd be cracking up. The likes of Hansen go looking for work because it won't come their way, Balacoune needed to learn to do that. Nash was starting to regularly come in off his wing to midfield or looping around to the left half of the pitch before he got injured/lost his place. Would like to see TOB do a lot more of that if he's the one at 14. I'm not sure he's much of an upgrade on Calvin Nash at all, who I don't consider an elite international winger either.

    Mad that this far out from the World Cup that 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 (less so, I'm assuming Hansen will be back in) are positions (IMO) we haven't got someone nailed on for the jersey (or are we going with Dad's Army of Lowe/Henshaw/Farrell/McCloskey and a Ringrose with a load of miles on the clock). Think this is what happens when you keep the same players in situ for years and they all regress at once. We're cutting it tight to be trying out others, that A match (and u20s) was particularly deflating the other night. Ward and Kenny didn't put their hands up at all. I like the look of the young Ulster backline personally and a couple of lads in Connacht might be worth a punt.

    I just have a feeling the current iteration of our backline isn't going to all of a sudden dial it up a few notches

    .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭jimbob955




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 202 ✭✭jimbob955


    This is what annoys me massively.

    If 2 of Porter, PMAC, Boyle no way in hell Milne/Loughman would be in the squad?

    Why? Farrell would see them as too risky a pick, irrespective of their provincial form.

    The same can apply to Stewart, Jude, Timoney,.

    If we just pick the same players over and over again (Kelleher, VDF) and never give the next man up a proper shot how will we ever know they are good enough. Andy should be builiding in more depth through a little bit more rotation, not relying on an injury crisis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 352 ✭✭VayNiice


    In fairness in this case, the Leinster scrum has been largely very good this season. Particularly relevant here, they mullered the Munster scrum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 197 ✭✭longjohn200


    My selection includes dropping VDF out of the 23 to get debut minutes into Ward. Timoney comes in at 7. Think Tom Stewart is a must this week from the bench. More energy is needed and Kelleher looks like a drain right now. Dropping Osbourne to 23 to provide cover. I don't think he adds huge connection in the back line but I would have him coming on 55 mins for mccloskey/Ringrose if no enforced changes.

    I would love to get a debut for Doak but that may have to wait till Wales. Casey to start with JGP benched.

    Lowe comes onto the left and stockdale move to 15. Stockdale just can't do a wingers role anymore. Looks more comfortable at 15. Lowe brings energy and experience to that backline.

    Not going with Edogbo, Izzy, Prendergast, bryne, TOB, Farrell, Jude this week, potentially wales or scotland.

    1 Loughman,

    2 Sheehan,

    3 Clarkson,

    4 Ryan,

    5 Beirne,

    6 Conan

    7 Timoney

    8 Doris

    9 Casey

    10 Prendergast

    11 Lowe

    12 mccloskey

    13 ringrose

    14 Balacoune

    15 Stockdale

    16 Tom stewart

    17 Bealham

    18 Milne

    19 McCarthy

    20 Ward

    21 JGP

    22 Crowley

    23 Osbourne



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,203 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    Ireland’s scrum greatly exceeded my expectations. For a group cobbled together under dire circumstances they saved us from being routed and deserve high marks for that. At provincial and national levels we’ve seen what can happen. England’s scrum will pose a sterner test?

    Dupont, Jalibert and LBB are going to make most defences look silly at times. I wouldn’t get too wound up about that. Box-kicks seem to be an overused option for us but teams must have data telling them they’re a good idea.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,138 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    So you're saying that Crowley buckled at the first sign of competition? And you think that's good enough for test rugby?

    Honestly, agreeing with me that he fell out of form and lost his place would do a lot more in his defence then the excuse you just provided there.



Advertisement
Advertisement