Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1170217031705170717081835

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 360 ✭✭big-al


    I think (& have for most of his career) that Tommy O’Brien is a bit of a military medium player. He got found out badly last night.

    This generations Fergus McFadden.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    Not even the 6N but for the rest of this year we need to prove that we are “the best of the rest”


    Over the last 12 months we’ve lost 4 matches but 3 of them were SA/France who in my mind are clearly 1 and 2 in the world right now.

    I know there’s doom and gloom from last night but realistically Ireland are still probably in the next bracket with England and NZL which I think the results show, with all 3 games involving the 3 being 1 win each. Obviously of that 3 I would have England slightly ahead in 3rd but would like to see more from them this championship before nailing them in. Ireland’s aim has to be in the short term win the rest of their matches and then reassess where we are come the championship end.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,020 ✭✭✭50HX


    England are a level above us at moment.

    They have adapted to the aerial game alot quicker than us & thats going back 12months ago..they have improved another notch since imo



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    Not really, they lost to Ireland the last time they played. They’ve improved, but I’ve still yet to see enough evidence to show they are “a level above” just yet. If they beat us in 2 weeks and then go toe to toe with France I think we can safely assume they are a level above. Right now it’s


    1. SA

    -

    2. France

    -


    3-5

    England, Ireland, NZL with England probably 3rd atm due to consistency and their impressive dismantling of NZL but I’ve yet to see that WOW moment from them that would separate them from the rest.

    6-8

    Argentina, Scotland, Australia



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    The problem is so many players played terrible last night that it’s hard to single out which players aren’t up to it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 679 ✭✭✭CONSI


    Really need to shake things up but we have been saying that since the last world cup. Every other squad seems to be refreshed, we are flogging the same lads, watch Furlong come back next week v Italy, shouldnt be anywhere near the team, it wasnt the scrum that was the issue last night…If the game plan v Italy is kick kick kick then we are in serious trouble.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 926 ✭✭✭no.8


    Post edited by Lost Ormond on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 87 ✭✭Knowall1


    I think we have t o have a closer look at Farrell. The general atmosphere in the team has been to make things comfortable and enjoyable. Bringing the families in, having extended retirements for aging players,giving not rewarding form has contributed to a diminishing of standards.His coaching of the Lions,in retrospect, was poor.The gameplan last night was basic but not to change it when it was obviously not working was simply poor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,291 ✭✭✭TRC10


    I thought Osborne did a solid job at 15. His positioning was good, he tidied up loose balls well (tricky in the conditions) and he kicked very well. And if that’s all you want from your 15 then fair enough. But personally I’d like someone who is a threat on the counter attack and has pace. I’d love to see him start at 13 next week. Put Stockdale to 15 where he’s been playing well and actually play some rugby.

    I get that the game has changed since 2023 and you need to kick more. France kicked a lot last night. But when they got into attacking positions it got forward momentum, they kept it in hand and were able to punch holes and find space. When we got forward momentum, we just kept kicking. It seemed like when we got into their half, we had no idea what to do with the ball. The regression of our attack over the last 2 years is incredible



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,291 ✭✭✭TRC10


    Also, I think it’s time we have a grown up conversation about Joe McCarthy. Has the raw materials to be excellent. Is capable of delivering outstanding performances. Physically a bit of a beast. But fundamentally, might just be a bit stupid. How long do we persist with him in the hope that he might develop some brain cells?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 294 ✭✭jimbob955


    great post, I never get these long winded retirements, rarely happens in any other sport or other T1 rugby teams.

    I also never get "credit in the bank" Osborne (who did well last night) gets jettisoned in after months out. Keenan the same if he was fit. Pick the best performing players and get the inured lads to work their way back in after a long time out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    So you're saying a player that is inferior to Keenan should keep playing when Keenan is available again?

    He's the best full back we have by a country mile. When he's fit he plays until that changes. There is nothing wrong with that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,020 ✭✭✭50HX


    Limited number of test matches, head coaches esp Ire because of our smaller playing pool will always put value in credit in the bank re a player....it basic trust in a player that a coach know will perform for him.

    This in turn leads to a higher % of winning = revenue (esp 6n's) = win % for head coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 oso92


    I'd move Crowley to 15 for this series. In the absence of Keenan but moreso Hansen we need another playmaker to take pressure off Prendergast (or AN Other 10), and Crowley can do that from full back.

    We do not have the bodies to bully our way over the game line, nor the gamebreakers who can repeatedly step people in phone boxes. It makes defending too easy because if you can stop the first couple of phases, defending from there becomes straightforward with our current attacking structure.

    A double pivot makes things trickier because you're not sure where we're going to strike from, and teams can't overload on a single attacking fulcrum.

    To my mind, it's no surprise we looked the most fluid against Australia with Hansen on the pitch who can do that role (I accept that they were the weakest opposition). Nor is it a surprise that Leinster looked their most fluid against the LAR when Prendergast went to 15 and Byrne was at 10 (given the Leinster <> Ireland overlap).

    Thoughts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,020 ✭✭✭50HX


    Interestingly there hasn't been much or any chatter about the impending apocalypse of having to go to 4th & 5th choice loosehead that didnt transpire.

    Credit to both of them & Clarkson also, such a shame we didnt move away from kicking into tne air so much when our scrum went well enough & lineout improved hugely along with discipline.

    2 steps forward & 3 steps back in some respects



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 675 ✭✭✭jeff bingham


    We badly badly need some pace. We are far too easy to defend against on the outside.

    Hadn't realised Osbourne was as slow as he is. Got left for dead once or twice. I know he is effectively a centre playing full back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,026 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    Yeah the set-piece as a whole went very well and Loughman, Clarkson and Milne deserve their fair share of credit there. TBH I don't think anyone was overly worried about the French scrum, they had a fairly green set of props too, but our lads did well nonetheless. Milne in particular carried well in the tight exchanges when he came on.

    The lineout did drop off a bit when the subs came on, whether that's on Kelleher or not I don't know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 oso92


    That WOW moment is coming, and I fear it will come on the 21st. The England team is EXTREMELY good, and I think they are close to solving their centre issue which has been a 20+ year conundrum.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    Are England good? Yes, EXTREMELY good? On current evidence I’ve yet to be convinced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    We’re easy to defend on the outside because we aren’t drawing men in…pace outside isn’t going to fix that. Like I pointed out earlier TOB and Stockdale are very pacey, but there’s only so much they can do when there is no space to work with due to the pack/centres not doing their job.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    The actually basics of our game was good, the LO,Scrum and discipline. Unfortunately, having a 60% tackle rate in the first half just isn’t going to cut it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,020 ✭✭✭50HX


    They are 11 games unbeaten, won all 4 AI's & you could see 30mins out how they turned the screw on NZ & it was game over.

    Just look at the bench impact they had that day.

    I think they will do a number on France scrum & win the championship.

    They are building v v nicely...extremely good...maybe not yet but in a far better position than most.

    If we don't have a hugh reaction to last night in the Italy game I would be really concerned going to Twickenham.

    We have regressed since last years 6n's, England have improved



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 850 ✭✭✭ShineyShiney


    A few thoughts, Joe McCarthy was MIA and Sam Prendergast had his best game for Ireland ( Not great but better).

    The A game offers us a glimpse of what is left in the cupboard. If you aren't shooting the lights out at this level you certainly aren't going to do it a level up.

    Wouldn't it be great to see a proper winger performance in an Ireland shirt from JJ or Ward?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25 oso92


    I fear you could be convinced by the end of the 6n 😅 but I hope you're right.

    They have class, and depth everywhere bar THP, and probably #15. I think we caught them cold last 6n but to your point, this is the first time they are coming into a tournament expecting things. Will be interesting to see how they go.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,966 ✭✭✭almostover


    I've been saying this for a while now. He's a physical powerhouse but if the game is going against him he resorts to conceding brain dead penalties. The last 2 games against France are a case in point.

    The other 2 locks last night haven't the same physical power as Joe but they at least both dug in and slogged it out. Beirne made some great turnovers and Ryan worked his socks off and hit hard.

    Joe has an issue with his attitude and could learn a lot from the other 2.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 596 ✭✭✭thamus doku


    for the Italy game I think we can’t change too much.
    I would bring in Ryan and put beirne to 6, Timoney at 7.
    maybe Crowley at 15 and give Osborne a go at 13.

    O’Brien and stockdale were very poor so if either or both of Kenny and ward go very well in the A game I would start them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,966 ✭✭✭almostover


    I'd like to see the 23 below selected for the Italy game. We have to reward the guys last night who played well and look like they actually want to play for Ireland.

    1. Loughman

    2. Sheehan

    3. Clarkson

    4. Ryan

    5. Beirne

    6. C. Prendergast

    7. Timoney

    8. Doris

    9. Casey

    10. S. Prendergast

    11. Stockdale (getting close to last chance saloon)

    12. McCloskey

    13. Osborne

    14. TOB

    15. Crowley (we need 2 playmakers and Hansen is injured)

    16. Stewart (this guy is better that the current iteration of Kelleher)

    17. Milne

    18. Bealham

    19. Edogbo (McCarthy needs a timeout until he sorts the discipline out)

    20. Conan

    21. VdF

    22. JGP

    23. Ringrose (Also coming close to last chance saloon)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 312 ✭✭Kerry_2008


    Armchair rugby fan here so excuse my ignorance or stupidity or if these have already been covered. And I don’t want to go mad into a Crowley v Prendergast v Byrne debate

    If as most people seem to accept that there are issues around tackling / defence in Sam’s game is that not something that should be sorted out / fixed at Leinster before he was called up to the international team? People go on about this ‘high ceiling’. Is this really just another way of saying potential and if so how long do you give him to reach the potential.

    Crowley on the other hand seems to lack the ability to control a game consistently especially in an Ireland shirt or so the argument goes). If this is the case should he be looked at as an option for 12 / 13 the irish setup?

    Harry Byrne seems to be a hybrid of the 2 in terms of decent at everything but, not exceptional. Is it better to go with a steady player for the immediate term? Obviously, our options are limited in terms of choice as we only have 4 provinces to pick from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Rayray98


    I will be, one way or the other. They are the masters of getting high on their own supply so until I see it with my own eyes I remain unconvinced.

    They’ve may very well have class and depth everywhere…I’ve just not seen it yet.

    No they caught us cold in the 1H, in the end half we outclassed them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,599 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    The idea of picking the same team again, to give lads a chance to redeem themselves is such a poisonous concept. You can't reward failure like that.

    Change both wingers, Frawley to FB. Osborne 13. Start Casey with Doak on the bench. Drop McCarthy and have Edogbo on the bench. Drop Beirne, have C Prendergast and Izuchukwu in the 23.



Advertisement
Advertisement