Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Tesla Talk 2

1616264666794

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    looking at the financial forecasts, Tesla has amassed $40bn in cash or equivalents from selling cars, and are planning to increase capex in 2026 to $21bn from $8bn in 2025(!!), all on humanoid robots, FSD & robotaxis. revenue dipped in 2025 for the first time ever, and let’s face it it’s likely to decline again this year.

    Strikes me that it’s (fiiiinally) very much sh1t or bust in the non-car stuff, with a few years of runway to get them revenue generating in a meaningful way (I.e. billions).

    Currently trading at a p/e of around 300x.

    I wonder how many more years of making the 3 and Y will they realistically get?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,148 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,510 ✭✭✭✭TitianGerm


    How many robotaxis are actually out on the road testing? 100+?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 42,148 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭tppytoppy


    That is cash, cash equivalents and investments. I can't figure out how they added over 2 4 billion in the quarter when their margin fell down to 4%. I don't think they have as much liquid runway as they would want the world to believe they have. But nobody with a financial stake in the company is going to sue them as long as the share price stay high.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,762 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    It's real. Not big news though imho. Tesla was being quite careful and responsible at first, slowly easing off that. The cars are now L4 autonomous driving. Same as Waymo. But obviously the progress on the Teslas is far quicker and scalability is exponential at zero marginal cost (very unlike Waymo)

    Waymo starting in London though in a few months time, that is cool

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,073 ✭✭✭JOL1


    Margin/profitability is different to Cash position. Tesla generate both profits and cash each quarter. Even allowing for sizeable Capital Expenditure ($10.9 billion for 2025) they continue to generate surplus cash and have grown their cash position every quarter - started with $36.5b and ended with $44.1b…a sizeable runway. Attached Table may provide greater clarity

    Screenshot 2026-01-30 at 01.14.55.png


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,872 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Seeing the huge number of Waymo's in SanFran was weird with just the passenger and no driver, but seeing them empty driving around was ultra weird to say the least, and they are not slow!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,762 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Waymo have done a fantastic job and it is a wonderful achievement all their robotaxis are driving around safely, causing little to no trouble. I don't think they set out on a sustainable path though. The cars costing $200k is one thing. Not too bad at all if every car is replacing 3-4 full time human taxi drivers. But if there is a competitor who can do it with cars costing €25k to make, you have a problem…

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There are certain things I'm sceptical about with FSD.

    I find the software is not very good at seeing in the dark. I mean rural you can see the milky way pitch black dark. Dark and in rain and all the warning notifications pop up, "lane departure disabled", "cameras blocked", "auto braking disabled", "auto parking degredated" etc. I'm not worried there is anything wrong with the car because in normal conditions everything is perfect. Drive into a town with lights and all is good.

    I mean it makes sense, the cameras are the cars eyes and if it can't see sh!t then it can't see sh!t and its functionality diminishes greatly. You can see this for yourself in the heavy rain the blind spot cameras are like trying to see under water. In pitch black its just a dark gloom.

    FSD is about self driving isn't it? Basically much better autopilot. But they don't have better vision locked behind it. Its no better at seeing in pitch black downpours that we get in Ireland.

    I'd wish they'd choose Ireland to do their EU testing. The shi!test roads and the sh!test weather. It's got to be the ultimate test.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,762 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    You make the same mistake many Tesla owners on here are making. The software in your car is many years old and has literally NOTHING in common with the FSD beta software

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,498 ✭✭✭MojoMaker


    I don't think he realises that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 316 ✭✭tppytoppy


    I saw that table before posting. It still doesn't make sense and I fear their cash position will deteriorate dramatically in the next 18 months.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,872 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    Had a long Athlone to Clonmel trip yesterday during bad rain and lots of puddles on the roads, told the car I wanted to get home with 10% charge, it took me into Ballacolla for 3minute charge on the way home and I arrived with 9%, Tesla FTW in terms of trip accuracy



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,121 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    i actually thought this too when I posted it last night, it seemed like some of the cash equivalents weren’t accessible - low and behold Bloomberg just had some analyst saying the very same thing - that Tesla could burn their cash pile in the short term as it’s not $44bn at all, and it relies on the car business remaining cash flow positive, which he says is a separate real risk to the business over the next 18 months.

    He was very clear though that no one should be looking at Tesla now as anything but an ai/robotics play, and they will burn cash shirt like all the others, such as the $2bn(?) invested in xAi



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    Bloomberg reporting of talk of merging space x into Tesla.

    No doubt to shore up the cashflow problems space X being heaped with government contracts



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    So you're saying FSD improves its ability to see in the dark, torrential rain, fog etc.

    It just doesn't make any sense that they don't want to bring those improvements to the car outside of FSD. Why not give everyone the software, but disable self driving?

    Can you point me to where this is documented? The overall improvements FSD brings to the car outside of self driving?



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    It's been mention on here to me before. But I'm not in the habit of blindly believing people on the internet.

    I have never once heard anything official about FSD improving general camera functions, specifically the obvious shortcomings I have pointed out.

    Show me something and I'll start to believe it.

    There is no way I would sign up for FSD based off my experience with the car (yes i know, without FSD). I'll need more than people on the internet saying trust me bro.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 274 ✭✭evftw


    How do you drive your car in the rain yourself with just two eyes? With partially blocked cameras it still has more working eyes than you have and can probably see more details in the unlit areas than you can after being partially blinded by the headlamps of your car and any oncoming traffic.



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Right. But it doesn't. It shuts everything down.

    So I get the argument that the newer software is better. Its just bizzare they would intentionally leave the basic.(non fsd) cars borked when they have software at hand that.has solved all these problems.

    Where are you getting this information that these issues are resolved with the FSD package?

    To be honest, if that is true. That my car could be a million times better. A million times safer, but they've put it behind a really hefty pay wall, that just pissese off.

    Edit: Also, your comparison is not accurate. My eyes are dry and inside the car. A more accurate comparison would be how do you drive your car yourself while wearing goggles full of water.

    Post edited by [Deleted User] on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Mr Q


    Waymo are apparently down to $70k per car for their new ones, so they have come a long way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,762 ✭✭✭✭unkel


    Any link to that? They have indeed come a long way, but that is 3 times as much as their competitor's car cost and it is simply not possible for Waymo to catch up with that. There is zero extra hardware or software in a current robotaxi Tesla like a Model 3, which costs Tesla no more than $25k to make. And now they are slowly starting to mass produce a far cheaper again car with no pedals or steering wheel. I'd say wouldn't be much over $15k to produce before long when economies of scale are optimal

    "Make no mistake. The days of the internal combustion engine are definitely numbered" - Quentin Willson, 1997



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭listermint




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,116 ✭✭✭Mr Q


    It's the new Zeekr version, the price was on a Forbes article.

    You're assuming Tesla won't need more hardware. They have done zero paid unsupervised rides yet, when they've done tens of millions of unsupervised miles like Waymo then it's a fair comparison. Maybe the current hardware will work, but they've lied about it so many times now who knows until an actual fleet is out there.

    Have they started to make the cab? I didn't think they would actually make that in the two seat format.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 34,882 ✭✭✭✭listermint


    No FSD rides so far despite announcement. Even from pro Tesla content users.

    Tesla's 'unsupervised' Robotaxis vanish a week after pre-earnings announcement | Electrek https://share.google/qzcBDxuZMR1IADJgU



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 342 ✭✭speedfreak


    so glad I saw this regarding the NCT failures. Mine is a MIC March 22 m3 RWD. 79300 on the clock and NCT due March 26. Booked an NCT slot yesterday for today and it failed! Rear bushings worn. Also failed because he couldn’t open frunk 😬. I had it in valet mode.

    Poor though for a 4 year old car driven normally.



  • Posts: 0 ✭✭ [Deleted User]


    How could they tell that without taking it apart?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 342 ✭✭speedfreak




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,647 ✭✭✭sk8board


    space X has bonified value, so merging it with Tesla might make sense now that they’ve started down the path to end the car manufacturing, and will be valued as a $1.4tn ai/robotics business with zero revenue and no products in the market, so meaningful revenue streams are a few years away at minimum

    Why risk space X in this way though?

    At least now we can finally stop talking about a roadster, semi, model 2 etc etc etc 😂



Advertisement
Advertisement