Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 12.02.26

1140414051407140914101655

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,535 ✭✭✭kowloonkev


    I don't think we're missing De Ligt or Maguire at all. Both are quite average and wouldn't have been first choice in any SAF PL team. They wouldn't even be as good as his second choice pairing of Smalling and Jones back in the day. Martinez and Heaven are doing ok and have way more potential once our attacking players return.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,625 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    The league has certainly become stronger since Oles time, and for sure since Ten Hags to a lesser extent, Ten Hag finished 8th in his second season, regressed and got sacked. Should have been sacked in the summer but wasted last year also by hanging on with him. Things don't happen in a vacuum anyway.

    I don't think there is a sense the team are not good enough to qualify for European football? I don't think it's unreasonable to say there will be a building process when completing tearing something apart and going from scratch where you will see some incredibly frustrating moments. Having to be so reliant on the likes of Casemiro, Dalot, Shaw etc still is hardly an ideal situation but the drop off from them to the next level in terms of quality we have all seen

    Champions league is possible this year and the team are in contention for it factually. If we don't improve consistency in the second half of the season it will fall away if course right now? United are 1/2 points from a champions league place at the half way point.

    If you want to dismiss underlying data we will have to wait until the end of the season to see whether he has outperformed Ten Hag in simple terms of where the team finishes. Would you have taken being within a win of champions league spots half way through the campaign? If Amorim fails to finish in the top 6, maybe 7 - I don't think 8 saves his job - he will have failed and will lose his job. The target for the year as given to him by his employers was European football. They are bought in to him, there have been no rumblings of any discontent or patience under pressure behind the scenes, so as much as it may upset anyone I don't think there will be any change any time soon.

    If he does achieve European football next year, he will be backed to ship out and bring in more players and the expectations will increase. I have faith in Amorim, but I'm not married to him. He gets a pass from me at the moment, that we have lost so many points from winning positions and turned down chance after chance to be an outside title contender let alone cementing champions league ambitions and the risk averse tendancy opposed to a risk seeking one being my biggest gripes.

    The positives are there to see, I wouldn't try to lay them out and convince others of them as if they don't see them with their own eyes a randomer on the internet is hardly gonna be persuasive. The important thing is that at the half way point, he is getting a pass but there is plenty of scope to improve. The consistency and ability to see out games when we do get ahead for one, but also to take more risk when we are the team trying to break down a low block opponent. The squad is obviously extremely thin right now, this month will be a tough one but it is what it is. The first half of the season has had ups and downs, the second will surely have more but needs to have some more ups if this manager is to survive.

    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,144 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    I'm not sure how you gauge if they have personally improved but they have improved the team.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,297 ✭✭✭talla10


    Quickly get this sent to Amorim and his scouting team!! Why has no one thought of this in the last 13 years??

    🙄



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,721 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    I’ve been saying it for five years: if you don’t have the players, you don’t have the players. No manager is fixing that. You could appoint anyone in world football and it wouldn’t change the fundamentals. We’ve been one of the worst-recruited teams of the last 15 years, maybe tied with Chelsea… and that’s the real issue.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,721 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    People keep saying “just get the right manager” but we’ve been here before.

    Look at the recruitment. Pogba for a world-record fee with no structure around him. Maguire made the most expensive defender ever, then dropped into systems that exposed his weaknesses. Sancho bought years too late, for huge money, with no clear role. Antony as a panic buy at an inflated fee. Alexis Sánchez signed on massive wages for optics, not need.

    Then more of the same. Onana brought in to play out from the back, only to spend a season shot-stopping behind a team that still can’t control midfield. Højlund bought for huge money as a raw project striker and immediately asked to carry the attack. Zirkzee signed without a clear idea of where he fits or who he complements.

    Add Lukaku, Di María, Fred, Casemiro, all expensive, all misprofiled, all part of the same cycle: buy high, no plan, sell low or stagnate.

    This isn’t about bad players. It’s about bad recruitment, wrong profiles, wrong timing, inflated fees, no long-term squad build. You can change the manager all you want, but if this is how the squad is built, the result doesn’t change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,404 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    Maresca gone from Chelsea.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,614 ✭✭✭Charlie69


    This is absolutely spot on . And it’s the fairest and most accurate assessment of the job Amorim has done or is doing so far that I’ve read on here.

    I understand your reasons for being reluctant to “present anything that looks like mitigation “…. but yet you did, why ? because they are simply the facts. But unlike a few on here , to see those completely unambiguous or mitigating facts you have to be fair enough to want to see them.

    As you alluded to ,naming four or five players any manager would be delighted to have in their team is just a ridiculous argument for obvious reasons. Of course we have some good players but everyone knows it’s not as simple as that.

    I understand fans are angry and it’s easier to just say “he hasn’t a clue” and “sack him tonight “..
    I’m just as frustrated with how things are going as any other United fan ( his stubbornness/arrogance with how he set us up versus Wolves was a new low for me) but I do think the work he has done to date on and off the field deserves patience and time to see at least where we are at the end of the season.

    I’ve said it here before but for me there’s absolutely no doubt the enormity and difficulty of the job this man took on is being massively underestimated by a lot of fans and the media.

    Of course it suits the media to jump on his back and Manchester United and their struggles always give you headlines but for me , while I understand fans frustrations , I believe he deserves more patience from us Manchester United supporters. I also know this won’t be a popular opinion with his detractors on here but this is not an easy job lads, any manager we appoint is going to need more than a little over twelve months to solve all of our problems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,225 ✭✭✭Acosta


    Other than Zirkzee, all those players were basically signed by accountants, who had absolutely no business making football decisions at the club. Considering we had over a decade of Woodward and then Arnold, it's no surprise whatsoever the club is in the state it's in. With INEOS, there is at least a plan with recruitment. Not that they're not also making mistakes. The signing of the aforementioned Zirkzee, made no sense. And not signing a CMF in the summer - instead of the two AMF - was a mistake that the team is paying for now. If you listen to some of The Athletic journalists, the word is that a couple of midfielders is the next priority.

    But when it comes to signings in the near future. I'm really not sure of the calibre of player that they will be able to attract, with a manager in place that doesn't look up to the task, is wedded to a system that isn't working, and will probably not be there in the long run.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,552 ✭✭✭CantGetNoSleep




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,359 ✭✭✭NITRO95


    For midfield signings I'd be looking at signing one of Anderson/Wharton/Baleba, then someone with PL experience but a lesser profile like Garner (never should have been sold but thats a different argument). I'd be looking towards the Bundesliga then for a solid CM, look how well Stach & Tanaka have adjusted to PL for Leeds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,225 ✭✭✭Acosta


    The only truly bad signings I think they've made is Zirkzee and Ugarte.

    De Ligt, Mbeumo and Cunha are excellent signings. The latter needs to improve his numbers a bit though.

    Yoro has mostly been excellent, but is going through a bit of a tough period. Which is always going to happen with young players. Heaven is a serious prospect. And his confidence has shot up over the last few games. Mazraaoui is struggling a bit this season with injury and form. But he has already shown last season that he was a good, solid signing and a decent price too. The jury is still out on Sesko. The team could utilise his height at lot more. I think he looks a lot more of a player than Hojlund. He's good on a ball and links up well with the other new forward signings. But he needs goals. Lammens isn't top of the range. At least, not yet. But he has very good potential and is soooo much better than what we had before him. The defenders are lot more at ease to have at least a competent keeper behind them.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,899 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7


    In terms of why I don't want to present mitigation, or to be blunt excuses for Amorim is due to that issues I have seen with him in his own right and also the other times managers at the club have struggled repeatedly. It is really hard to say right now if it is the overall players, the manager, or both right now that are the issue.

    Regardless, we all know United need two midfield players, two full backs and another striker/forward in the short term for any manager to make something significant happen. So the squad is clearly a problem regardless of the coach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,918 ✭✭✭DataDude


    I’ve found it all really hard to assess. Some of our good results recently (Newcastle, palace away) were terrible performances. And some of the good performances were poor results.

    West Ham, Wolves (away), Bournemouth, Villa (plus Newcastle fiest half) is the best run of actual performances we’ve had since OGS days. Despite that the results weren’t great, but think it’s important to look beyond that.

    With ETH, even when our league position was ‘ok’. I was very adamant the underlying metrics were beyond appalling and would not sustain…and that **** storm came pretty swiftly after. Not sacking him post FA Cup remains the biggest INEOS red flag for me. We were obviously awful in every facet of the game and getting worse.

    On the contrary now, despite feeling really negative about things post Wolves. The underlying stats are pretty solid. Most have us around 4th best in the league with one of the best attacks around. Our quality across the back 5 is absolutely absymal, so hard to pin that on Amorim currently for me.

    I think our overall squad quality is being incredibly overstated on here. We are not the 4th best squad in the league (so for me there is an argument Amorim IS getting the best out of this squad). Against Wolves we had Shaw, Dorgu, Ugarte, Dalot, Zirzkee, Sesko (on his current form before anyone goes mad) all starting and Fletcher playing 45 mins. I genuinely don’t believe many/any of those start for a team in the top 8.
    Bruno is the only world class player in the squad. With Cunha, Mbuemo, Mount (when fit) and maybe Amad the only other players who would be of even remote interest to a team like Arsenal & City.

    I’d probably have sacked him after the spurs game. We were beyond awful last year. But this year it feels like there might be some small green shoots appearing…but then games like Wolves & Everton come along and bash you over the head. Don’t know what to think. Could understand keeping him (and I think we’ve been wayyyyy too slow to sack every single manager since Fergie bar Moyes), but I also couldn’t really argue with sacking him.

    On balance I’d personally probably keep him at this point. There’s enough progress in our attacking play to point to for me. And this squad is another 10 players (3CMs, 3CBs, 2ST, 1LB, 1RB) & €500m+ away from seriously competing for trophies. That’s multiple years. Top 4 is probably 2-4 players away and could be attainable next year. I’m hoping with our new recruitment structure that it shouldn’t really matter if Amorim oversees that spend and still goes as he won’t be allowed to decimate the club like ETH did. I also have zero idea who we should appoint. If Alonso came free and was interested, I’d probably pull the trigger on him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,609 ✭✭✭✭josip


    With the dismissal or Maresca, Amorim moves up to 13th in the table.

    https://footballrates.com/longeststaymanagers/premierleague



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,552 ✭✭✭CantGetNoSleep


    I'd agree on Zirkzee and Ugarte, but not on everyone else. I'd put Dorgu, Sesko, Yoro in the highly doubtful category. Would we ever sell them for a profit for example? Would you ever see them in a title winning team?

    For the transfer fee and wages involved, De Ligt and Cunha are only ok so far. City win the title with a load of 60m signings. De Ligt and Cunha might be at home in a team fighting for the top five.

    Mbuemo does look like a great buy, as does Heaven especially for the money paid, Lammens looks decent, and I'd say the same about Mazraoui if we played 4-4-2



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,918 ✭✭✭DataDude


    One thing that struck me on squad depth with all their injuries of late. This is roughly Arsenal’s second XI

    Kepa

    White Hinicape Mosquera Lewis-Skelly

    Merino Noorgard

    Havertz

    Martinelli Jesus Trossard (or Madueke)


    Who from the United squad gets in that team? Lammens (maybe for Kepa, not sure), Bruno (for Noorgard), Cunha (for Havertz) Mbuemo (on either wing)

    3 or 4 of our players get in Arsenals second XI. Insane gulf in depth of quality.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,457 ✭✭✭✭Nalz


    He was November Manager of the month. Soccer eh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,225 ✭✭✭Acosta


    I forgot about Dorgu in my last post. He hasn't been great. But he is versatile, and showed against Newcastle that he might be capable of a lot more when the team aren't playing in a 5-2-3. As I said with Yoro, he's not in great form and looks to have lost a bit of confidence. He's still only 20 though. It's a pity his dip in form has come at a time when there's injuries to more experienced players.

    Only time will tell with Sesko. The big problem there is that there's no senior back up in his position. As was the case with Hojlund last season. When you see how well Calvert-Lewin is currently doing at Leeds, and remember the rumours in the summer, that United might go in for him, that would probably have been ideal. However, I don't think many were too keen on it at the time.

    I was against the signing of De Ligt at the time. When I saw him for Juve and Bayern, he looked fairly sluggish and unreliable a lot of the time. But he's really surprised me with how consistent he's been. While he's capable of a mistake, there few and far between compared to Maguire, in his first few seasons at the club. De Ligt is also experienced and has shown excellent leadership. And he's still only 26. Hopefully he won't be going anywhere for some time yet. As for the fee, I think they paid about 20 million less to get him from Bayern, than they did when buying him from Juve, a couple of years earlier. So not too bad. However ,this back injury, the lack of information about it and how long he's been out is worrying.

    I think City are a plastic financially doped up, sports washing entity, masquerading as a club. But nobody can fault how well the recruitment side of things is run. Even with all their wealth, they never seem to get ripped off or over spend on players.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,614 ✭✭✭Charlie69


    And I agree with that. What has become very frustrating on here lately though is there seems to be some sort of Amorim in camp versus Amorim out camp war going on and a lot of posts seem more about scoring points against the other side other than actually engaging properly.

    It’s completely fair to have concerns about Amorim and it’s even fair to want him sacked if you believe it will benefit the club, but it’s also fair to believe in him and back him on here and have that opinion respected by posters who believe otherwise.
    Some of the juvenile stuff on here after the Wolves game , it was hard to believe it was coming from grown adults.

    It seems like any nuanced discussion on tactics, squad limitations, injuries or decisions being made with long term planning in mind, gets lost or filtered through whether or not it will help one “side “ win an argument or not.

    As I said disagreeing on the manager is obviously fine, there are valid arguments on both sides… but its absolutely soul destroying when every win or loss just becomes ammunition on here for days as an opportunity to say “I told you so”rather than a chance to talk about the tactics, squad issues or what’s realistically achievable.

    Post edited by Charlie69 on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,397 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    You were the one taking potshots about people enjoying the fact that United dropped points.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 18,899 Mod ✭✭✭✭DM_7


    One thing that does shine through is United are better often better when the other team have more of the ball and United have less.

    So much of United possession, when they are possession dominant, is balls moved around between CBs and Wing backs with nothing of worth happening.

    They had a nice little patch when Lemmens started kicking it long and United were able to pick up the ball in advances areas but that is not sustainable.

    In some more recent games without wins:

    58% possession v Villa

    64% v West Ham

    70% v Everton

    59% v Forest

    Then to compare the type of stats in the good little run just 42% possession v Brighton (at OT) and 38% v Liverpool.

    Even Newcastle game that United managed a win saw a low ball possession for United.

    A few wins in there with better possession, like at Palace but that day he first half was really poor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,614 ✭✭✭Charlie69


    I was actually calling you out on yet another (imo) disengenous post and an obvious attempt to misquote me.
    I did say you seemed to be excited about our loss but thats genuinely how you come across after a bad result.
    This is exactly the type of stuff I’m talking about, you are firmly Amorim out and have been from very early in his tenure which I thought was unfair to say the least.

    I mean no ill will towards you at all and as I’ve explained before , when I disagree with your point I’m not dismissing you or disrespecting your opinion, It’s just that I don’t agree with it… no more or no less than that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,918 ✭✭✭DataDude


    Yeah there’s definitely something to that. We really struggle to break down low blocks at times. I think there’s some random variation in there too though.

    If we played that Liverpool game out 10 times. I think we lose more often than not. They had tonnes of chances to bury us and we were fortunate at how wasteful they were.

    West Ham on the flip side, we weren’t amazing but did more than enough to win the game. Villa similarly we should have created more but we win the game if not for Yoro and Sesko being more clinical. First half we were good and created enough.

    Palace was an absolutely shambles of a performance I agree and two freak goals bailed us out. Bad vs forest too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,173 ✭✭✭Caustic


    I think ugarte and zirzkee signings both make sense for what ten hagg was trying to do with his tactics, he wanted goal scoring wide players and a forward to drop in, link and create, then we had big huge gapping holes in the middle of the pitch in transition and ugarte was suited to that destroyer role.

    Not sure ten hagg even ended up using them TBH he certainly didn't use ugarte much if my memory is correct and neither have much use for Amorim it seems. Neither seem good enough for the league but I can see why they were signed at least.

    At least zirzkee seems like he can be moved on easy the ugarte signing annoys me a bit more because he was getting frozen out at PSG and we should have been able to get him much cheaper or even a loan option and maybe we never end up buying him



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,225 ✭✭✭Acosta


    We did PSG a huge favour by spending all that money on Ugarte. I seem to recall that the word was that Ten Hag wasn't keen on the signing at all. And that it was being driven by INEOS. Once better replacements are found, I doubt they'll manage to sell him. He'll probably end up being a squad player and going out on loan.

    Zirkzee was decent in Italy. Not surprised he's going back. Probably at the expense of Evan Ferguson at Roma, who I'd much rather in the United squad for the rest of the season than Zirkzee, if a deal could be done with Brighton. I've watched Ferguson play for Roma several times, and while he is still lacking the almost Harry Kane levels of all around brilliant forward play, that he had when playing at his best for Brighton a couple of years ago, he general play is pretty good. Only 4 goals so far though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,144 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    City have many many duds that they've spent vast sums of money on but nobody, especially the media, seems to care. They spent 140 million on wide players this summer and are going to drop another 70 this month and nobody is asking why? Grealish was bought for 100 million, scored 1 goal in a full calendar year and yet it's never brought up what an expensive flop he was. If that was Utd it would be back page news constantly.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,614 ✭✭✭Charlie69


    Exactly, and that type of focus on our club makes it an even more difficult job for the manager. Of course he has made mistakes but there’s no doubt that there’s more pressure on every decision he makes compared to any other manager.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,225 ✭✭✭Acosta


    Fair point. But they usually manage to move players on easily enough, when it's not working out. United should have signed Grealish when Villa got relegated. It was a bit of a sliding doors moment, as they ended up going for Sancho instead.

    As for the attention the media gives city when a transfer doesn't work out. The first thing is, they still have managed to be very successful during this period, while United haven't. Grealish won a treble, after all. The other thing is, once you go past Stockport, not many people are too bothered about Man City. They are a small, but very rich club.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,676 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    Yoro was a poor signing and it's nothing to do with his ability or form. We finished the 23/24 season with Dalot as our first choice LB and you had AWB and Amrabat playing there that season. Then over £200M was spent that summer but a quarter of that was spent on a CB to come in as a squad player.

    So our first choice RB was still our first choice LB and the back up RB we bought to cover Dalot was now also second choice LB covering Dalot. And you also had Collyer, Martinez, and Evans who played there during the season.

    Move along to this season and Dalot is still our first choice to play on the left more or less.



Advertisement
Advertisement