Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1788789791793794858

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,730 ✭✭✭rolling boh


    There seems to be a lot of assumptions about Putin running out of money and soldiers can we think does Ukraine have the bodies to outlast Russia ,hopefully they do but we hear little about their numbers good or bad ,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Some mad Ukraine bastard in Kostiantynivka setting off multiple fireworks. Hopefully a happier new year for Ukraine. Happy new year to all the Pro Ukraine posters here. I've nothing good to say to the Russian supporters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,060 ✭✭✭thomil


    Ukraine isn’t in the bodies game to the same extent that Putin is. From what I can see, Ukraine’s approach is centred around weathering Russia’s human wave attacks with as few losses as possible, whilst at the same time striking far in the rear of the Russian front lines in order to cripple their logistics and supply lines. Are they taking losses? Certainly, and they’re painful, no doubt about it. But from what I can tell, Ukraine is suffering fewer casualties, has better unit cohesion and organisation on the front lines, and their approach seems to be paying off. I mean, they still have an operational air force, a working air defence grid, and are, on the whole, able to rotate entire units into and out of the front lines for R&R and training and replenishment. That alone leaves me hopeful, not to mention that Ukraine has access to solid supply lines providing some of the most advanced military equipment on the planet, and in decent quantities no less.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,730 ✭✭✭rolling boh


    I suppose I am just wondering can Ukraine cripple Russia's suppy lines and energy to really bring Putin to a situation where he comes to the table it doesn't look like it .Russia is such a vast areaI really can't see it happening much as I want it to .I still think some sort of deal will come about eventually unfortunately ,just very hard to see Russia beaten out the gate .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,065 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Putin is not interested in peace. He's announced he wants a 'buffer zone' expanded in Sumy and Kharkiv regions

    Screenshot_2025-12-31-18-22-33-698.jpg


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭MerlinSouthDub


    1000065479.jpg

    Post from Trump on Truth Social - sounds like he doesn't believe Putin re the drone attack



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,065 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Reports a sanctioned ship transporting Iranian oil avoided interception by the US coast guard by painting itself the colours of the Russian flag. The US coast guard tried to interrupt until the ship, the Bela-1, turned around, possibly heading for Iceland or Greenland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,876 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Syrski recently said the ratio of Orcs lost to Ukrainians is 6:1. A Ukrainian commander in the field recently claimed it was 8/9:1 and Trump some months back said it was 11:1.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,988 ✭✭✭✭Strumms


    if the Ukraine give the Donbas to Russia, do people honestly think that Russia in time won’t be back looking for another chunk of the Ukraine ? The old saying, give an inch take a mile…..after that, what’s the plan ? Take other former USSR states ? Into the eastern fringe countries of the EU…?

    The next US election isn’t until November ‘28… an awful lot of shît can hit the fan between now and then. I’m very skeptical of Trumps motives. He has been openly hostile in the press towards the EU and it’s leadership even as recently as a couple of weeks back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,065 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Lenin, in a bayonet analogy, said if you encounter mush, keep pushing, and if you encounter rock, stop. That's Putin's mentality.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,060 ✭✭✭thomil


    I actually agree with you insofar as that I seems unlikely that Putin can be brought to the negotiating table, and even more unlikely that he'd stick to anything negotiated at said table. But here's the thing: If Ukraine is able to properly degrade Russia's logistical capabilities to the point where Russia physically can't even get the poor level of supplies to the front that they're currently managing, or to the point where they can't refill the ranks in the front line any more because there aren't enough bodies left, a point that may already have been reached if certain reports on this thread a few pages back are to be believed, Putin's wishes become immaterial.

    Germany didn't surrender in 45 because Hitler didn't want to fight anymore. The single-balled Bohemian corporal would have gladly sent every man, woman and child to their death. The war ended because he couldn't control his forces in the way that he, in his deluded mind, was convinced they could, and should, still be able to operate. That's what drove him to suicide and allowed more sane minds, primarily Admiral Dönitz, to take over and surrender. One possible end game for the Ukraine war is similar, with Putin simply being sidelined by events "on the ground" and someone else taking over and raising the white flag.

    Thing is, Putin is nowhere as internally secure as Hitler was. The attempted Wagner coup clearly showed how fragile his position actually is. I can easily see a scenario where the desperation of individuals within his inner circle gets to a point where the price of failure is seen as acceptable, if not trivial, compared to staying on a sinking ship. And, to paraphrase a certain organisation here in Ireland back in the day, these individuals only need to get lucky once. Putin needs to get lucky every single time.

    Good luck trying to figure me out. I haven't managed that myself yet!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,213 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    The other thing is that Russia is playing an away game here. A peace deal would not entail murderous hordes invading Moscow. Only Putin and a few of this cronies are personally invested in the venture. Admittedly, that’s a big ‘only’. He knows his prestige is on the line.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    The problem with this vector is it'll put the Russians behind the strong Ukrainian defences in the south and east. We'll see how it plays out but you'd hope Ukraine have a plan here. As far as I'm aware they've not fully built the defenses for Zaporizhia or the north to cover attacks from here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,141 ✭✭✭Widdensushi




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 780 ✭✭✭Bitcoin


    Ukraine won't be giving anything to ruzzia.

    Even if Zelensky somehow went rogue (he won't), he doesn't have the authority to just handover a chunk of sovereign Ukrainian territory. That would require a referendum and you can be sure as sh1t the Ukrainian people who have stood fast against the poisonous moscovites won't be signing any deal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,065 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Donald Trump reportedly lashed out at his then–special envoy Keith Kellogg for publicly supporting Ukraine and praising President Volodymyr Zelensky, according to The New York Times.

    The paper says the dispute erupted after Kellogg described Zelensky as a courageous leader and expressed clear support for Ukraine. During a private conversation, Kellogg reportedly tried to explain that Zelensky was fighting for his country’s survival and even compared him to Abraham Lincoln.

    That comparison infuriated Trump. Shortly afterward, Kellogg was removed from his position and replaced by Trump’s close associate Steve Witkoff — despite Trump later admitting that Witkoff “doesn’t know anything about Russia or negotiations.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,836 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    If there's a proper security guarantee along these lines

    https://www.rte.ie/news/ukraine/2025/1230/1550896-russia-ukraine/

    Russia might not be in a position to come back for more. That's why 'land for peace' might be a deal worth cutting for Zelensky…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 959 ✭✭✭junkyarddog


    https://bsky.app/profile/specialkhersoncat.bsky.social/post/3mbcxbyxhbk2p

    Ilsky oil refinery, Krasnodar region, 6.5 million tons of oil per year. The first Russian oil refinery targeted in 2026

    Ukraine ringing in the new year with a bang!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,779 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Do people trust American guarantees?

    I would see it as a stopgap until Europe can defend its backyard.

    If there is no change in the midterms I expect America to back and front stab as many of its "allies" as it can get around to doing.

    Am I too cynical?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    A good strike.

    Be interesting to see what damage that large drone swarm did by morning.

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,254 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I seen this report on Playfra telegram. Overall 2025 territorial losses were similar to 2024. Although December this year lost a little more than December 2024.

    IMG_20260101_004448_303.jpg

    In December, the enemy occupied 445 km2 of Ukrainian territory - 12% less than in November

    At the same time, the number of assault operations decreased by 9%, which in turn is associated with personnel problems that are increasingly appearing in the enemy's army.

    If we look at the sectors, the largest advance, namely 35%, falls on Slavyansk. The loss of Siversk was a serious blow, which they decided to simply forget about, moreover, this sector accounts for only 5% of assault operations, which confirms the fact, unfortunately, of the presence of problems and a high level of effectiveness of the Russian assaults.

    On the Pokrovsky sector, 26.5% of territorial losses and 32.5% of assaults fell. At such intensity, and despite the larger than usual territorial losses, the defense here is still effective. Rounding out the top three is the Gulyaipol sector, where 10% of losses fell and 11% of assaults occurred. The situation with the 102nd Motor Rifle Brigade of the Troops was very bad, but despite this, the defensive actions here cannot be called bad.

    Additionally, it's worth noting the Novopavlovsky (Alexandrovsky) sector, where in the area of responsibility of the 20th Army Corps, 8% of territorial losses and 11% of assaults occurred. Until October, this sector was very problematic. Over the past two months, the dynamics of the battles has fallen by a third, but the amount of lost territories has fallen significantly. We attribute this improvement to the arrival in the corps of one of the most talented generals in the Armed Forces of Ukraine - Nikolyuk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,384 ✭✭✭✭AndyBoBandy


    IMG_8223.jpeg

    the work stops not for hours, but for minutes…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,354 ✭✭✭aidanodr


    check out zelenskys new year's speech, just epic. This will go down in memory. Everything stark and true



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,192 ✭✭✭eire4


    No I think your just being realistic. Plus I would say even if there is a change after the midterms it doesn't change the fact that the US can longer be trusted and relied on. They voted for this back stabbing of allies and turn towards fascism despite knowing full well what they were voting for and still did it anyway. So even if they back track a little bit you can't trust them not to resume back stabbing of allies at a later date.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,535 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Here is the entire speech. Brilliantly done



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 940 ✭✭✭mike_cork


    Ukraine also sent happy new year greetings to this oil storage plant in Tatarstan

    Screenshot_2026-01-01-09-40-49-643_com.android.chrome-edit.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,231 ✭✭✭Field east


    what’s of interest is that since the end of WW11 , if not well before it , China has not been threatened by invasion by any country and there is ABSOLUTLY no sign of such an event taking place anytime in the future. The opposite. Of course may happen re acquiring bits of Russia, Taiwan and some islands and sea between it and Japan. Likewise re the US. Again where the opposite might be the case either directly or by proxy eg Panama Canal, Greenland, Gaza, Maduero’S country!

    So, if every country minded its ’own Business’ and looked after its people within each states sovereign boarders , I reckon that the world would be in a MUCH SAFER PLACE



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭riddles


    I’m sure the Ukrainian people would agree with your last point. As regards China they see 14 year of resistance against Japans aggression in their schools text books from 1931 to 1945 as essentially the duration of WW2 from their perspective and suffered tremendously under the invasion by Japan.

    It created a launch pad for communism and I’m sure they would not mind a dose of revenge on Japan but seem at least a bit more strategically focused than the current cabal of rogues pick pocketing in Washington.

    A Chinese blockade on Taiwan would be an interesting step as 60% of the world’s Micro chips are made there and all of NVIDIAS as an example. Something the US would need to be mindful of regarding Venezuela and Chinese interests there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,231 ✭✭✭Field east


    what about the GATE OUT OF AFGANISTAN or the GATE OUT OF SYRIA??????????



Advertisement
Advertisement