Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Mass shooting on Bondi Beach

1181921232431

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,595 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    I don't see anyone "making excuses for terror attacks in the West". There are some who are explaining their thoughts alright but there's nothing negative about that. Before making up your mind, at least be informed.

    But what I do see, is many people justifying and/or excusing Israel's actions in the ME as a reaction to this "existential threat" they keep banging on about. Existential threat my backside - "Israel has built about 160 settlements housing some 700,000 Jews since it occupied the West Bank and East Jerusalem" - BBC

    And many are sick to the back teeth of accusations of antisemitism for simply being critical of a severely damaged Israeli regime.

    How anyone can justify the Genocide of Gaza is beyond me.

    In fact more so, as these attacks are happening here and these people are new arrivals causing trouble.

    Care to clarify your post? Where is "here", who are these "new arrivals" and what "trouble" are they causing?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,997 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    It's crazy that you don't respond to posts. Your MO seems to be trotting out stuff that nobody said and then running away. You owe me a response on the 5 Whys. You are not interested in understanding/learning anything beyond the Black&White viewpoint you have already decided to adopt no matter what. Quite shallow.

    Post edited by Cluedo Monopoly on

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Miniegg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,603 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    One of my few encounters with an Israeli was decades ago while on holiday and her attitude to Ireland and me as Irish was similar to attitudes from Arabs, Ireland had and was fighting the British (1970s) so we were the 'good guys'.

    People make up their own minds often based on erroneous ideas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,148 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    What hoops? I honestly haven't watch the video, so can't acknowledge anything. Which is why I didn't comment on the video.
    I have my opinions about Gaza, but the thread is about Bondi. So I'm just focused on that.

    I commented on the AI images only. Seemed like that you attempted to discredit as being AI. Maybe you didn't look at them closely. For the sake of clarity, do you still think that are real?
    You don't have to answer, but as you said, we can all see it for what it is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,400 ✭✭✭mountain


    it suits a lot of people to equate anti semitism with anti Israel opinion.
    this attack was based on a fundamental dislike of Jewish people, and as such was appalling and should be condemned as such.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,603 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Shooting at a crowd of individuals that are Jewish in Australia is clearly anti-Semitic terrorism.

    When you get closer to the actual conflict in Israel/Palestine the definition becomes more confused. What's a 'legitimate target' or legitimate definition of 'terrorism' or 'anti-Semitism' depends a lot on your life experience as either a Palestinian or an Israeli.

    What does this mean for people in Ireland? Probably that 'anti-Semitism' is just an oratorical/rhetorical weapon.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,220 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I didn't discredit anything, I asked a question. But genuinely, why would I focus on an image when I have a video by which to form my opinion? It shows more, it adds context, it includes the words of the subject.

    Why you would choose to ignore that, is your prerogative.

    The thread is about Bondi, but there are several angles from which it is natural that Gaza is forming a significant part of the discussions around this. Even people who were on Bondi on Sunday have brought Gaza (and Palestine) in to the discussion, and that aside, this particular individual who was in the media we are discussing here was immersed in what is happening in Gaza and that alone would justify it being discussed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,220 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    this attack was based on a fundamental dislike of Jewish people, and as such was appalling and should be condemned as such.

    But how do you know that this is the case? How do you know that this was the motivation rather than a response to what is happening in Gaza. For the record, I don't know which it was but I am genuinely curious on what basis you can be so sure you know what the motivation was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,068 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    No one owes you a response, I’m not sure what response you expect. The whys don’t really matter if the problem persists. Why is it only Islamic migrants launching terror attacks in countries they migrated to? They do, so you stop accepting any of them for the greater good of your own country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,603 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


     this particular individual who was in the media we are discussing here was immersed in what is happening in Gaza and that alone would justify it being discussed.

    Presuming you're referring to the younger of the two shooters, aren't we all 'immersed in what is happing in Gaza'? What makes him so special?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,997 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    "The whys don’t really matter if the problem persists."

    That is probably the shallowest statement I have ever read on Boards. It's like you are choosing to be deliberately ignorant of the root causes. Are you afraid to try the 5 Whys?

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,444 ✭✭✭Cordell


    To quote one of the best characters in one of the best tv series: Scientists... and your obsessions with reasons. When the bullet hits your skull, what will it matter why?

    It doesn't matter why we have islamic terrorism, that's a matter for historians. What it matters is that it's real. What matters is what we do to stop it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,220 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Why is it only Islamic migrants launching terror attacks in countries they migrated to? 

    At least some portion of the reason for this must be the level to which they have experienced violence in their community/home country. I mean for 30 years now since I started paying attention to current affairs, there has always been serious conflict happening in a lot of the countries from which a lot of migrants originated.

    Is it unreasonable to suggest that violence begets violence?

    And once you start excluding some people because of the actions of a few, then where do you stop? The vast majority of Islamic migrants bring nothing but good things to the countries they move to, should they be excluded? Should all Irish people be banned from Australia because X amount get drunk and start fights or whatever?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,220 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    I'm not, I'm referring to the individual focused in this video.

    I think this would constitute a deeper level of immersion than what most of us have experienced.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,997 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,148 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    You asked for proof it was AI. That's an odd question, when it was obviously AI. Again, jut so we're clear, do you now agree it was AI?

    But genuinely, why would I focus on an image when I have a video by which to form my opinion? It shows more, it adds context, it includes the words of the subject.

    Why you would choose to ignore that, is your prerogative.

    I would suggest that they are both relevant in different ways.
    People making fake images shows there is a conscious effort to try and justify the attack. The fact that people would do that is absolutely deplorable.

    FWIW, I skipped over your link your link to the video because I was in work. I can get away with checking out a thread/article, I can't really sit there watching a videos.

    The thread is about Bondi, but there are several angles from which it is natural that Gaza is forming a significant part of the discussions around this. Even people who were on Bondi on Sunday have brought Gaza (and Palestine) in to the discussion, and that aside, this particular individual who was in the media we are discussing here was immersed in what is happening in Gaza and that alone would justify it being discussed.

    It's obviously going to be discussed. It's likely one of the reasons for the attack. I have my own opinions on Gaza/Israel, but I draw a line between adding that discussion for context, and justify a terrorist attack.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,603 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


     think this would constitute a deeper level of immersion than what most of us have experienced.

    Right so you're talking about one particular individual who was one of those killed.

    But likewise, this attack was on a group of Jews celebrating an annual Jewish festival in Australia not an individual{s} who were involved in the Israel/Palestine conflict. Picking one victim to focus on is ridiculous.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,444 ✭✭✭Cordell


    No not really, for example we successfully treat a lot of diseases without fully understanding them, and in some cases we don't really understand how the treatment works either.

    Having a full understanding of reasons wouldn't have stopped this attack. Actionable intelligence would. And of course, in hindsight, having a much stricter immigration policy with regards to certain backgrounds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,220 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Why is it ridiculous? I haven't said that it justifies the attack, but I have made the point that some argue that it is pointless attacking Jews thousands of miles away from Gaza with the implication being that they couldn't have anything to do with the actions there. This individual (and at least one more who was injured) shows that that is a false premise.

    This attack offers evidence that Israel's actions in Gaza are supported by a wide number of Jews worldwide and I am not saying that that justifies the attack, it absolutely does not, but it does weaken the argument that there is not widespread support for Israel's actions within the Jewish community.

    (And for the record, I absolutely am not saying that all Jewish people support Israel's actions, I know they do not, in the same way I know that not all Israeli's support the actions of their government/armed forces) But a significant portion of both communities do, significantly so within Israel, obviously.

    Say it was possible to prove that this attack was solely motivated by anger at what Israel is doing in Gaza (again, I'm not even suggesting it was) is that not something that should be discussed?

    In the last few days, worldwide and even on this thread, we've seen people advocating for the harsh judgement and treatment of all Muslims because of the action of a few within their community. If this is a reasonable and rational approach, why should Jewish people not be judged in the same way with respect to Israel's actions given how much Israel ties its existence to the religion.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,220 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Those diseases are treated with the best available knowledge of their origin and how to prevent them happening. There isn't a single disease that we know nothing about that someone somewhere isn't attempting to gain knowledge about it to prevent it harming or impacting people.

    Absolutely having a full understanding of why the attack happen can help with preventing future ones. If you had a much stricter immigration policy to certain backgrounds, the person who stopped one of the attackers wouldn't be available either and neither would the countless medical professionals who I suspect help treat the injured.

    And introducing blanket bans on immigration when such an infinitesimally small proportion of them are harmless will only create more distrust/hatred/acrimony between communities and that in turn will bring violence, possibly at even larger scales.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 41,148 ✭✭✭✭Mellor


    I believe I said you asked a question. Not that you asked me specifically. Something like "Maybe they were 'radicalised online". It sounds like you were openly asking about the situation, I provided additional info.
    Strictly, it's a statement not a question, but that seems a bit of a pedantic argument. You also asked "So what if his name was on a list?". Again, I'm not sure why the defensiveness.

    Okay, you seem to be based in Australia from what you post now.

    Just because you do doesn't make you an expert on anything.

    I didn't say I was an expert. I said you don't need to try explain Australian firearm law to me. Especially a copy and paste job.

    BTW, not that it matters, I've been to Bondi Beach, decades ago and found it a pretty underwhelming experience but no doubt it has changed a lot since. I've been to Sydney many times and other places in Australia (and surrounding places) that you've likely never been. But as I say this is all irrelevant.

    I'm really not sure what you are trying to say here, irrelevantly or otherwise. Places I've never been? Ok. 👍️



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,399 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    The medical profession are well known for saying "We don't know what's causing your pain and we're not interested in finding out"

    Followed up with "We know this treatment hasn't ever actually worked, so what we'll do is keep prescribing it.

    Yeah, figuring out what's happening is for those scientists.

    You'll admit to be ignorant of the causes of a situation. And you're happy to remain ignorant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,591 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    In fairness, I'm pretty sure at least a few of these posters view ethnic cleansing as a good thing. They've frequently claimed non white Irish people aren't truly Irish etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    You have been very active telling us "why" they do it all over this site on multiple threads (your reason being "cuz their Muslims"). Must have seen that from you a dozen times.

    So what you really mean is, you don't want anyone to discuss what the real causes are. For some reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,997 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Some of that is just daft. Potatoman could defend his willful ignorance himself you know.

    "Having a full understanding of reasons wouldn't have stopped this attack".

    I never said that. We need to understand the hatred to reduce or eliminate the radicalised hatred. Hatred breeds violence and violence breeds hatred. I am talking about the future.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,997 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Well said. The mind boggles really. I hope these folks don't have problem solving jobs.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,523 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    If you are going to stop accepting people to a country based solely on their religion because of the actions of a small minority of that religion, then to follow that logic, should we not stop accepting anyone of the Jewish faith as well ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,678 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    You're comparing apples and oranges though.

    A small minority of one religion is commiting acts of violence in one specific place on earth, the other small minority commits acts of violence in places all over the world.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,370 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH




Advertisement
Advertisement