Advertisement
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Importing from the UK - definitive guide (Q and A)

1179180181182184

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,460 ✭✭✭extra-ordinary_


    "…not sure this will work as I booked the appointment so it is now in the system"

    What difference will that make? Surely you made no formal import declaration at the booking stage? For all Revenue knows, you haven't even purchased the car yet, and may never do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53 ✭✭Lottie125


    The new rule came in on the 19th November apparently, my appointment was 2 days later. the nct centre didn't tell me this but saw others saying it on an online forum.

    Yes as he said he was going to mark me as missed vrt appointment I'm hoping they can say I booked the appointment before ever buying the car. Will let you know how it unfolds when I hit the 180days in 2 months time.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,628 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    I posted about it last month but I had no official confirmation. You’re the first I’ve heard to get caught with it.

    I’d just book it again and have a “receipt” dated over the 6 months.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,569 ✭✭✭Redsoxfan


    Is this new rule for new or used cars or both?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,030 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    Even if not posting as a mod, surely advocating fraud (the creation of a false instrument with the intention of inducing someone to accept it as genuine) is against many boards.ie rules if not simple common sense?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,352 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    The only one I tend to remember is about not being a d¹ck.

    Revenue have been clear as mud on this issue.

    Stay Free



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,628 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,628 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    New cars are irrelevant as they always attracted vat once under 6000km and or 6 months or so.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭User1998


    Come on, give it a rest. The VRT staff even marked him as a no show, knowing full well he will have the car in Ireland for the next 3 months



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,030 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    Seriously, they are not VRT staff, they are employed by Appplus and have clearly been giving out statements not backed by Revenue given their roll back on supposed 90 day rule. Relying on them is silly, even more so given that there is a notation of the car etc. I have cited elsewhere recent instances where motorists have incurred huge fines through dodgy dealers and dodgy dealings. Gumbo’s suggestion is incitement to defraud which could border on criminal piracy to defraud if he actually knew it had direct contact with the other poster. The other poster might get away with it or might not. If not, they’ll have to reexport the car and likely suffer a loss.


    I know you are a small time dealer and importing a lot. You have been stating this as a 90 day rule repeatedly and some may have followed you. You have acknowledged here many times that you misrepresent yourself as a private seller and seek to avoid meeting your lawful obligations to provide warranties or stand over the cars you sell. Do you not think that maybe it’s time for you to wind your head in as your unsubstantiated “advice” merely exposes other boardsies to potential costs.


    You have plenty of anecdotal instances of your approach being accepted but that does not mean that it’s genuine or supportable and I don’t see you even acknowledging the impact of the anecdotal 90 becoming the anecdotal 180.

    Maybe if you ran a legitimate business there would be less of this.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭User1998


    It's Revenue who tell the VRT staff what to accept or not to accept as proof the car was in private use. Obviously it goes through management and not directly to the VRT staff, but it's like when they stopped accepting customs clearance slips and started requiring full SAD documents. Its Revenue who passes the advice onto the staff on what is required to VRT a car. So ultimately its Revenue deciding what is acceptable, not the VRT staff member themselves

    First it was 3 months, then it was 3 months with an MOT, then it was 3 months with no MOT, but the logbook had to be issued 3+ months ago. Now seemingly it's 6 months, and I have no idea about the logbook or MOT. At the time of posting, my info was correct. Its hardly my fault Revenue have changed their stance on it again? It's up to each individual importing a car to do their own research.

    But come on, telling Gumbo his comments are incitement to defraud and criminal piracy? And your telling me that I need to wind it in😂

    And what does me selling a few cars from my garden have to do with any of this?😂



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,030 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    There’s no evidence whatsoever that revenue ever gave those instructions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭feckwunker


    Just to share my experience of importing earlier this year:

    I imported my first ever car back in 2007 from the UK and the process was straightforward. It was a 1977 Land Rover Defender 100 Inch (Defender body on a Range Rover chassis) and bringing it in and registering it was all grand. So flash forward to this year and the bug bit me again and I decided to import another one (I'm a glutton for punishment) to have as my daily driver. The reason for vintage is obvious - 200 on VRT and 56 a year on tax. So I found a 110 station wagon and bought it. Flew over, saw the car, paid the guy and drove it home.

    Now at this point, I had not declared to Revenue that I was going to import the car as, being honest, I wasn't sure if I was going to actually buy it until I saw it. So when I landed back into Dublin Port that night, I went straight to Customs and told them the story and they were completely grand with it. The noted it on their system and said I had 30 days to register the car. So I went and booked the VRT appointment locally and that's when the fun began.

    As the officer was doing the inspection, she opened the front door and hopped up into the vehicle and looked back into it. The seating configuration was 3 seats in the front, 3 in the middle and then your standard "boot" in the back (it was a station wagon). However, she had a look on her face that suggested some kind of bureaucratic shitstorm was brewing and I'd have done well to heed that warning. Once she opened the boot door, she turned to me a and said "Yeah that is just what I thought; it's a 12 seater mini bus, isn't it?". I was totally perplexed and asked her what she meant. "See here (pointing to the rectangular metal over the wheel arches), well those are seats and you can sit 3 either side so that's 6 people in the back. That makes this a 12 seater so it's a mini bus". To say I was dumbfounded was an understatement. I pointed out that 1) there were no seats there and, more importantly, 2) there were no seatbelts or mountings for seat belts there so there was absolutely no evidence of this being a 12 seater mini bus. "Well, we're trained to a high standard and I've seen these before so I have to document what I see and the day" was what I was told. I knew then that I'd have a battle on my hands.

    Once we went inside, I continued to plead my case but to no avail, I knew it was a lost cause. I was told that my vehicle was going into the system as a 12 seater mini bus and that it was up to me to apply for a conversion document once it was registered. I refused to sign the declaration she gave to me. I was told to not return to the VRT office until I had resolved the issue through corresponding with and officer via MyEnquiries online. Response time initially was good - about every 2 to 3 days. This then grew to a reply once every 2 weeks. Bear in mind that I was very conscious of late penalty fees that I was accruing during this time.

    Finally, after 3 and a half months of back and forth, engineers reports, cover letters, invoices from the UK and the original factory sheet from Land Rover themselves, I got confirmation that the car could be registered as what it actually was. When I went back to the VRT office, the guy who should have been there originally (was on a long period of sick leave), burst out laughing when he opened my file. He said that usually when a vehicle is registered here, there may be up to 4 pages worth of correspondence on their system between the individual and Revenue - I had amassed 13 pages. He also commented that had he been there on day 1, all of this would have been avoided. And that's the annoying thing about this whole process; it really does depend on the person that you get on the day.

    I learned a lot of very valuable lessons as a result of this fiasco. It wouldn't put me off importing from the UK again but it would really make me ensure that I had all my stuff in order down to the tiniest detail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 809 ✭✭✭RCSATELLITES


    The main question I have is did ya one get any telling off for that stupidity.

    I hope you didn't have to pay the late penalty fees as a minimum good will gesture.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,963 ✭✭✭wassie


    "Well, we're trained to a high standard and I've seen these before so I have to document what I see and the day" was what I was told. I knew then that I'd have a battle on my hands.

    That is some serious Grade-A BS. I feel for you. Normally a check of the compliance plate would show the payload of the car wouldnt support that many passengers, but your car, given its age, may not show that.

    These are the typical low-level clock watching civil servants that give their colleagues who actually get things done a bad rep.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭User1998


    No late penalties on vintage vehicles thankfully?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,628 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Just to update.
    Im just out of VRT in Ballymun.
    3 months is the reasonable period. Revenue rolled back on the 6 month rule and issued the guidance to VRT staff on 3rd December.

    The 6 month rule was in place for a few days!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,352 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    You're a gent. Thanks for that.

    Is there anything written anywhere, or is it just what was said? I'll be there for NCT tomorrow.

    Stay Free



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,628 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    It’s revenue. Nothing is ever wrote down 😂

    But I had a good chat with them about it. A few different scenarios as I had one bought from a dealer!

    Just make sure (as you know) if buying from a dealer, the dealer has the original V5 in the private owners name sand they haven’t transferred it into the dealers name.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,352 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    Nothing is ever wrote down

    Yeah, I know that, but there was mention of a 4 month sign on the wall in the Ballymun office before?

    Stay Free



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,628 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    That was also me. There was an A4 page on the right as you faced the counter. I didn’t see that yesterday.

    Post edited by Gumbo on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,352 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    Closed for lunch when I was in there today. Oh well. Not to worry.

    Stay Free



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 409 ✭✭damemcd


    For what its worth USER1998 is one of the more helpful and knowledgeable contributors to this forum over the years and I think we should reconsider criticizing people who add to the debate in a positive way…….and no , Ive never met the man and he doesnt drink pints with me either…….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭User1998




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,865 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    I am considering buying a used car from a dealer in NI.

    I have a Revolut account and physical card, which has a UK bank account with sort code and account number.

    In am wondering how to pay GBP 15k to a NI dealer.

    Is it possible to transfer euros from my euro Revolut wallet into the GBP wallet, and then make a bank transfer from the Revolut UK bank account to the dealer's bank account?

    Thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,569 ✭✭✭Redsoxfan


    Yes. It is.

    Might be worth looking at Transfermate and other options given the amount.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,352 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    As its back to 90 days, have you brought it back up?

    Post edited by ...Ghost... on

    Stay Free



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 41,628 Mod ✭✭✭✭Gumbo


    Basically buy the sterling on your Revolut app. It will sit there in the sterling vault or whatever it’s called.

    You can then transfer that to the dealers account and it’s usually there in a few mins. It took 7 mins when I done it in NI a month or so ago.

    There’s a fee, about €20 (£17.77 for me) so make sure to add that bit extra to the UK sub account. But you can get around these if the seller has Revolut or if you have a pro account so maybe take one of their free trials if there’s any going at that time. Or pay for it and just cancel it afterwards as it may still be cheaper than the fee.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭feckwunker


    No I got hit by no penalties but you can be assured that I was ready to go to war had they tried that on.

    And as for someone getting told off - I think we all know that there is zero accountability.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭feckwunker


    You hit the nail on the head - the plate didn't have the info on it. I appreciate that old Defenders can be kind of Frankenstein vehicles but it's more that they weren't using their eyes to see what was in front of them, let alone what was on the paper. They just made stuff up and we're all expected to bend the knee to their whim.



Advertisement