Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1758759761763764859

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭riddles


    We are spending billions funding bogus asylum seekers which is the equivalent of pouring money down the toilet. Spending money on military is also money in tbe bin. Additional drones and radar for drugs monitoring border policing yes etc.

    Future public sector pension commitments represent 500 billion plus largely unfunded. High paying tech roles on the slide. America first investment geopolitical restructuring, low cost countries prioritised for recruitment / AI displacement of jobs. We have a long list of medium to future things to prepare for but wasting money has to.stop.

    Cyber attacks and undersea cable cutting is the most realistic threat. Anything else is tin foil hat stuff.

    Post edited by riddles on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    I can’t fathom the mentality of those that think spending on defence is wasted money.

    So, car insurance, life insurance, burglar alarms.. anything that is considered defence against something is a waste of money?

    wtf is wrong people like this?

    These would be the same people that if something did happen would be “oh Jaysus sure the Brits can help us”

    We aren’t neutral. The fact we have an agreement with the UK on air defence disproves this bollocks immediately.

    1.7b to 2030 is a joke. That’s nothing.

    If it was that amount every single year then We’d get heading somewhere.

    We cannot keep relying on others to save our asses because the government is afraid of the backward mentality of some of the populace regarding defence.

    What can we defend ourselves against if we can’t stop drones? Should we use harsh language?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,710 ✭✭✭yagan


    Can you provide the text to the air defense pact with the UK?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,759 ✭✭✭orangerhyme


    The majority of asylum seekers just want to work and make money.

    I know asylum seekers who in less than a year of arriving here were working and paying taxes, many in vital services like healthcare.

    But anyway that's not relevant here.

    We do need to increase spending in defense, particularly in radar and sonar and other intelligence gathering areas.

    It would be great to stop the drug trafficking also.

    I think it's fear mongering anyway.

    Russia have to intention of invading Europe.

    Trump is a disaster for NATO and Europe and Ukraine but he's gone in 3 years and I hope to God someone normal gets elected, whether that's Democrat or Republican.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,864 ✭✭✭zv2


    As usual Kasparov is a rock of common sense

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,682 ✭✭✭Deub


    Spending money on military is also money in tbe bin

    Agree to disagree. Like I said it is like an insurance. You think you are wasting money until you need it.

    Look at Ukraine, on paper, they didn’t really need it. There was a pact where Russia said they would not invade them and the US guaranteed their security. Look at where they are now. You may think asylum seekers is a more important issue right now but if all EU countries not bordering Russia followed your advice, trust me that asylum seekers would be the least of your problems right now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,071 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    We should have learned by now that what Russia says it's intentions are, and what they actually are, are often two different things. They said they had no plans to occupy Crimea, only days before it happened. In 2022 Putin said they had no plans to occupy Ukraine, and then faked referendums to claim four regions, much of which they did not even have possession of. Our economy made US a tempting target in a way it didn't in WW2. The Dutch in 1940 felt they should be neutral because they we're neutral in WW1 and hadn't been invaded, and that backfired.

    If someone asks someone to sign over their house, and has a gun pointed at their head while one does so, that would not stand up in court, and neither should Putins annexations.

    It's no coincidence that many in the Putin regime have ties to organised crime. They think this is all ok, after all they are gangsters too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭riddles


    We dont however border with Russia and theres no threats in our vicinity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    I’d like to see the EU saying to all member states that a minimum level of military spending will be required for continued membership. If you don’t like GDP as a measure, fine, use something else but the money has to be spent. No more freeloaders.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,071 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    The drones are clearly a threat as we saw a few days ago. If they dropped bombs we would have been defenceless. The EU says it was Russia. France has opened an investigation into the drones over their nuclear submarines.

    We share a border with the UK. For centuries Ireland was seen as the back door to Britain, and Russia likely feels the same way.

    We have a history in this country of waiting for disasters to happen instead of making preparations for them. It's "out of sight out of mind". The 2008 crash is one example.

    We also have some public figures - not in the goverment - who in my opinion might collaborate with a Russian occupation.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    IMO, Trump is worse than Vader. At the very end, when he saw the Emperor killing his son, he turned. I doubt Trump has the compassion, the empathy, the decency to care if he saw Melania, Eric, Don Jnr. and Ivanka, even Barron, being horribly murdered. Well, maybe Ivanka….he might think ''Too bad, I never got to shag her first''.



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 98,173 Mod ✭✭✭✭Capt'n Midnight


    4 days ago Trump threatened to increase tariffs on Canadian Potash. At the time the claim was to increase domestic production in the US. :rolleyes:

    Belarus used to export via Lithuania. But that option is long gone.

    image.png

    A strong president could have put pressure on China and India and gotten the hostages released ages ago.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,632 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    ….and not only Putins gang. Many believe Trump couldn't have got away with all his murky shenanigans in New York wthout help from the mob (take note of the scene in 'The Apprentice' where in a NY restaurant he is introduced to Tony Salerno and his associates). He thinks of dividing up the world into three fiefdoms (Him, Putin and Xi) like the Five Families divided up New York.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,682 ✭✭✭Deub


    So you are ok to let these countries spending money on military that benefits you long term but you don’t want to spend a cent.

    If tomorrow cables were cut and drones were sent to airports and energy facilities, I am not sure you would be happy to see UK and France just watching on the side.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,071 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    He walked out of an interview when the interviewer asked him about Felix Saters ties to the mafia, and his business deals with him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,876 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Another Turkish ship hit by the Orcs.

    The Ukrainian Navy said in a statement that the Turkish-flagged ship "VIVA" hit on Saturday was carrying sunflower oil to Egypt, there were no casualties among the 11 sailors on board and the cargo ship was able to continue its movement.

    The same statement also mentions that the ship was hit off the Black Sea, in Ukraine's exclusive economic zone, but outside the range of Ukrainian air defense.

    Another Turkish-flagged merchant ship was damaged on Friday in a Russian airstrike near Odessa, in the Ukrainian port of Chornomorsk.

    Is Putrid trying to send a message to dissuade them from getting rid of their S-400s in order to be allowed back in the F-35 program, as rumoured?

    Putrid had a meeting with Erdogan yesterday…he could have just told him, like a normal person…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,705 ✭✭✭fly_agaric


    Saw the US is lifting more sanctions on Belarus, one of their new friends. Lukashenka must be pleased.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c4gpwlkklyxo

    The US has agreed to lift sanctions on potash, a key ingredient in fertiliser and an important export for Belarus, which is a close ally of Russia.

    Coale said: "As relations between the two countries normalise, more and more sanctions will be lifted."

    Trial run for when the US ends sanctions on Putin and Russia, maybe early next year regardless of what is happening in Ukraine?

    edit: just noticed someone else posted it!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,361 ✭✭✭beggars_bush


    Back door to Britain for centuries but yet nobody has ever managed to pull off an attack on Britain via Ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭riddles


    So a ship stalling around north atlantic cables would theoretically be blown up by an Irish naval vessel? The doctor would say too much internet as the diagnosis for punters on here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    You can easily use google. Don’t let me stop you



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    And the point is? Because of that, we don’t need a defence force?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,710 ✭✭✭yagan




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,267 ✭✭✭Sandor Clegane


    It beggars belief how we left ourselves get into this position regarding defence, to be utterly defenceless and soley relying on our neighbour is unforgivable really considering the money this country has seen and pissed away over the years…to neglect defence as badly as we did is unforgivable and its not as if we had to spend enough to become a new superpower, just a few basic essentials would of done, radar, decent navy etc…as an Island it would be fairly easy to have a decent deterrent.

    But the reality here is it'll take something real and drastic for us to pull the finger out and even then I wouldn't have much faith tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/feb/14/high-court-to-hear-claim-of-secret-ireland-uk-terrorism-defence-pact


    think this sheds a bit of light on certain aspects. You’d have to be mad to think the UK would be ok with Ireland not being able to do jack **** without even asking the UK to do something.

    I assume you believe Ireland has the ability and expertise to defend itself without external help? and therefore no money should be spent?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,971 ✭✭✭✭bear1


    And let’s be fair, they’d have every right to say “told you so”.

    Until we get someone serious about this in government we are going to keep bullshit increases.

    The fact Bertie Ahern asked after 9/11 what we need and still did nothing doesn’t fill me with any hope.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,650 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 569 ✭✭✭midlander12


    Yep, very obvious who America's true friends in Europe are now, and no doubt 'broadly aligning' with their National Security Strategy as the Kremlin would say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,061 ✭✭✭✭Say my name


    All the one's worried about Russia invading and the same US nazi, Russia nazi alliance could take over Ireland using the US military.

    It'd be simpler than taking over Canada, Greenland, etc.

    All excuse trump or his successor would use is defending the US and Russian interests here from the left wing president and anti Israel politics of the country. Military asset would be air and naval bases to protect the Atlantic trade between Russia and the US.

    We are an embarrassment compared to Denmark. We at least should be able to detect all threats. We are in a world now where the US is voting with China, Russia in the UN.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,740 ✭✭✭Infini


    Gonna go on a long rant here but: It's Psychological really, we're not an aggressor nation we're a peaceful one, we only ever really wanted to live in peace and because we're basically far from any major aggressor powers and as far back as WW1 wanted nothing to do with the imperial shenanigans of the time in Europe, hell the English lost control of this country in the end because they threatened to draft the Irish into WW1, it didnt happen but the mere threat was enough for Sinn Fein at the time to win the General Election here and the rest was history. We stayed out of WW2 not because we supported Nazis or such but for pragmatic reasons, we were poor, had limited resources and didn't want to get dragged into a war after less than 20 years of independence (we actually quietly "deported" Allied PoW's over the border while the Germans got locked up till the end of WW2).

    We've stayed out of NATO mainly because of the complications over the North and because for much of our existence we were a rather poor country. it was only with the takeoff of the Celtic Tiger that we began to actually have some serious wealth and this was in the post cold war era when most were thinking of peaceful ideals and a hope for the future thus we focused on infrastructure and building things. The 10 years between the fall of the Soviet Union and September 11th could be considered a golden age for civilisation in our part of the world even. It's only when the crash happened in 2008 that things really went to shít for us here.

    The Ultimate problem is that until the start of this decade the biggest possible threat to us was the Islamic Terrorists going on a run against us despite it being extremely low, we had no adversaries and our most pressing concerns were economic and dealing with the fallout of the crash hence Defence wasn't a priority, Covid changed things though it seemed to be some kind of collective event that broke the minds of the world and might have been what made that Vatnik PoS Putin decide it was a good idea to invade Ukraine after years of low level "separatist" shenanigans. He thought he could overrun Ukraine, instead he exposed Vatnik Russia as a depraved incompetent Fascist Kleptostate that's put even the Brits at their worst to shame and started the worst land war in Europe since WW2. Only for Biden being president at the time and not that Orange Piece of Shít that Ukraine had enough time along with the rest of Europe to organise an effective response. Between Zelenskyy's defence of Kyiv and the right people being in power at the time I'd dread to think of what kind of situation we'd be in if Trump had won 2020 even.

    This is the ultimate problem for our leaders, the world is changing and what once made us safe is no longer so, Our Neutrality is Worth jack squat it's our relative geographical location that's protected us more so than anything. We need to either fix our military to a standard that can at least ensure effective defence against future potential threats effectively or look at joining an EU led Military Alliance or NATO if the US ever manages to survive the Orange Bollocks and get rid of him or it becomes European Led instead.

    Vatnik Russia in no uncertain terms is a threat to us, they've been reported to have attempted to Run a terrorist bombing campaign on cargo aircraft in Europe (something we'd be vulnerable to given we're an island) and potentially civilian aircraft as well, they consider us an "unfriendly" nation, they likely launched those drones last week from a ship they had running dark in the Irish Sea considering the reports that have come out and could do something far more sinister as time goes on (they we're responsible for the HSE hack as well as the attackers came from Russia). If the Russian's decided to create serious problems here we'd be in serious danger as we are now. We need to take defence seriously and take absolutely no BS from idiots here who are completely disconnected from the reality that's going on in the East of Europe.



Advertisement
Advertisement