Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

1131713181320132213231868

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,916 ✭✭✭threeball


    Get rid of the old ones now. The US is in a death spiral. All ties need to be cut ASAP. The FED has started printing money again despite stocks being through the roof and inflation above acceptable levels. They're pouring petrol onto a house fire. We don't want to own part of the mortgage.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,904 ✭✭✭aero2k


    Not having a go at you here, but anecdotage tends to be used in a derogatory sense. One doctor who has done a lot of work on adverse drug effects, David Healy, believes that no one knows more about the effects of a drug than the person taking it, and that if you have the name and address of the person then their story is no longer an anecdote, it's data. FWIW the people I was referring to would have all the details of their vaccination and positive PCR tests on record with the HSE, so they are part of the data you are referring to. And of course the sample size is too small to make a scientific conclusion from, but you yourself said we need to make our own decisions based on our own situation, so comparisons with people of similar age, similar lifestyles etc. can inform. I would have liked to see more stratified age group data, along with more details on vaccine harms.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,904 ✭✭✭aero2k


    Glad to be of assistance - IIRC you mentioned that Pubmed was acceptable to you in the past.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,350 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    believes that no one knows more about the effects of a drug than the person taking it,

    I wouldn't be so sure about that. Yes, in a way, maybe, but i would have concerns about the objectivity of someone communicating their experience in a factual way.

    I feel some form of training is required to ensure consistency, to prevent embellishment or understatement, to rule out bias, to identify influencing factors, etc and then to determine findings based on the data.

    Part of medical and scientific training is not just the hard data, but how and why to perform adequate research.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,904 ✭✭✭aero2k


    I get you and agree particularly with your last paragraph. Healy has an unusual way with words, and it takes a bit of reading of his books, and website, to get your head around it. Once you do though it's very coherent, and compelling. I think what he's really saying is that when a patient says "doctor, since I started on the meds I have x, y, or z symptom. I think it's the drugs", the doctor should take them seriously, even if the symptoms are not usually associated with that particular drug. Of course you have to be as objective as possible, but good doctor will help the patient there, rather than just parroting drug company spiel.

    Incidentally Healy has made a great argument that rather than banning problematic drugs, we'd be safer if they were made otc, as then the patients wouldn't be pressured by doctors to stay on drugs that didn't suit them.

    It's also important to realise that what we know about drugs is not just clinical trials and lab tests, but accumulated clinical observations from clued-in doctors.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,904 ✭✭✭aero2k


    If you've read and understood the points I've made across a number of threads, the common theme is that I'm looking for truth, or as close as we can get to it. I'm very wary of certainty when there's no evidence to justify that level of confidence. I do realise that health organisations need simple messages, but I think we've gone a bit far with trusting people who have a vested interest in us following their recommendations.

    I'm arguing for informed consent.

    I want the highest standard of medical care for all.

    On medical experts: when they're not unanimous, I'd tend towards those who are not funded by the makers of the drugs they're promoting.

    On medical journals: they tend to get a lot of their income from advertising, so they're unlikely to rock the boat. Marcia Angel has written at length about how the New England Journal of Medicine, once revered, totally lost it's way.

    Have a Google about study 329 - it's been totally undermined, but the campaign to have it retracted has been unsuccessful to date.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,216 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    He just can't help himself, someone in the press really needs to call him out on these lies.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,392 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    You're moving the goalposts. I was talking a out vaccines. It says a lot that the link you dumped is from over a decade ago from some obscure Polish journal. You also don't seem to know what PubMed is.

    Looks like you're just pushing antivaxxer nonsense.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    You keep going back to prescription drugs to justify the claim that the CDC recommendations are somehow corrupted in relation to vaccines. The policy the US is moving towards is that of a vaccine conspiracy theorist. The white house has pushed the claim that vaccines cause autism... The idea that is a remotely positive direction for US public health policy is nonsense. In fact pushing such claims is a negative for the public in the same way as falsely attributing random drugs as cures for COVID.

    Simple question, have you any research to prove that US vaccine policy has been in some way detrimental to the US public? You already tried to dodge it in your response to @ancapailldorcha .

    Btw, the claim that vaccines cause autism related to Andrew Wakefield pushing non combined vaccines which was his own vested interest. Trump actually pushed the claim that separated doses were fine. You seem far less concerned that Trump and RFK have their own vested interests that are defining these policies.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,924 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    You can't just take one person's medical history and assume their response to treatment will be replicable across the wider public or even a similar cohort.

    Everyone as individuals are unique full of complex webs of comorbidities and lifestyle differences

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Yep I've got a preexisting illness. I was on a pretty advanced treatment for a number of years and developed pretty debilitating issues towards the end of my time on it. My body built up antibodies to it. My physical reaction, my doctor had never seen. There was one journal article on the reaction but it was very much so considered rare. This wouldn't mean that I would ever recommend against somebody using it, it was highly effective when it worked and I had a unique negative reaction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,392 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Sometimes you can use a case study in place of a large dataset because there simply is no other option. My undergraduate research project was heavily based around one man in Ireland with a very rare antibody condition. I still remember the fella's name after almost 2 decades. There just isn't the kind of data you would expect from something like back pain or influenza.

    In this case, it's clearly that user posting anti-vaxx drivel and nothing more.

    Post edited by ancapailldorcha on

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Not a hope I would believe in the idea that "the person taking the medication knows best" with the amount of shte I have heard over the years. The amount of wild exaggeration and wild dot connects people come out with are ridiculous.

    "The doctor put me on these tablets and then I got hit by a car. I never got hit by no car before I started taking them. You wouldn't know what they would be giving you"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,326 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    I recently heard a very, very similar argument from a relative. It completely shut me up as there really was no response.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,392 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    This was the issue with the Wakefield scandal. The media would pit mothers of children against scientists so that the scientists would come across as cold and uncaring for speaking the truth. The hidden premise that being a parent turns on into a paediatrician was one that never got questioned or pulled out. It's impossible to counter such a powerful emotional argument with sterile facts and statistics.

    To be clear, I am not having a go at parents of autistic children here. I am having a go at one of the worst human beings of the twentieth century and corporate media.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,676 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Is this the Trump thread or the vaccine thread?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,904 ✭✭✭aero2k


    Go back and read the first paragraph of the post you quoted. I'm not moving anything.

    BMJ any better?

    9 years old, do you have a source contradicting this im the intervening years?

    You could also look here - this book has over 700 references. In the years since publication, nobody has asked for corrections or denied any quotes attributed to them. You'll probably say you don't know who Bob Whitaker is- he's an award winning journalist.

    Re you anti- vax accusation, it's further evidence that you're not reading my posts properly, or your confirmation bias is making you see things that are not there. Given that you still haven't retracted or stood up your allegation of lying against me, that's not really surprising. Vaccines should be available for those who want them, I'm happy for my taxes to pay for that. It's the almost religious devotion to some sort of perfect idea of vaccines in particular and prescription drugs in general that I'm questioning.

    Do you have a source to contradict mine, or are you limiting your responses to personal insults as per previous interactions?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,930 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Will Indiana turn out to be, an inflection point, for Trump?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,904 ✭✭✭aero2k


    That's exactly the point I'm making. Individual bad experiences are being written off as anti- vax, or some conspiracy theory, because of benefits for the majority. Every administration of a drug or vaccine is an experiment with n=1.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,601 ✭✭✭Economics101


    I think that Trump has got someone to start a discussion on vaccines on this thread so that we get distracted from his idiocy. He is after all the master of distraction, if nothing else. 😎



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 45,566 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,327 ✭✭✭✭LambshankRedemption


    If someone from the press called him out on his lies, that person would have their press credentials cancelled and would no longer have any access. That wouldn't benefit the individual or the greater public.

    It's better to let him keep lying and u-turning and recording what he says and writing about what he says.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,904 ✭✭✭aero2k


    I agree re Wakefield and Trump.

    I stated earlier in the thread, and nobody contradicted it, that US health metrics are worse than European metrics. Based on the precautionary principle, or do no harm, I think it would be better to follow the European vaccine protocol than the US one. I'm on the phone so not so great with the sources, but I don’t think I've said anything too controversial.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,400 ✭✭✭The Raging Bile Duct


    Can we knock the vaccine talk on the head? It's getting tedious and fairly off topic at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    The European protocols don't make sense in the US because their health system isn't remotely similar to ones in Europe. Individual European countries even vary. So nope, policies will and should vary based on local factors. That's normal for health policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,676 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Another Trump pardon…

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-tina-peters-pardon-colorado-b2883197.html

    President Donald Trump has announced a pardon for former Colorado county clerk Tina Peters, currently serving a nine-year jail sentence for her part in the plot to overturn Joe Biden’s 2020 election win.

    However, Trump’s clemency gesture carries no weight, as Peters, 70, was convicted on state charges, not federal charges.

    In a post on Truth Social on Thursday evening, the president attacked Democrats for ignoring “Violent and Vicious Crime” and encouraging immigration from “the worst countries so they could rip off American Taxpayers” while failing to address perceived injustices at home.

    Turning to Peters, he wrote

    : “Democrats have been relentless in their targeting of TINA PETERS, a Patriot who simply wanted to make sure that our Elections were Fair and Honest. Tina is sitting in a Colorado prison for the ‘crime’ of demanding Honest Elections. Today I am granting Tina a full Pardon for her attempts to expose Voter Fraud in the Rigged 2020 Presidential Election!”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,619 ✭✭✭CelticRambler


    And herein we see the true genius of Donald Trump, or rather the puppeteers in the shadows pulling his strings.

    To stick with (vaguely) scientific analogies: Trump is grain of impurity around which the molecules in a saturated solution crystalise. We've reached the point where our social space - virtual and real-world - is so saturated with all kinds of "information" that it only takes a one small piece of nonsense to precipitate a chain of events (or tangential discussion) that distracts us all from things that we'd should be looking at and being seriously worried about.

    Trump is the useful idiot, the lightning rod, the turd around which all flies congregate - but he's not really the problem. Take the oft-cited lament "when are journalists going to call him out on [insert stupidity here]?" when the Trump puppeteers have evidently made it impossible to do so. But no-one has doorstopped Infantino and asked him to justify how he could have awarded Trump a "peace prize" while he's actively engaged in warmongering with Venezeula and deliberately encouraging Russia to keep battering Ukraine.

    These people who suck up to Trump on a daily/weekly basis are his enablers and drag "our" interests and communities into his orbit. And though a much easier target, they get away with stroking his balls in public while the doddery old fool falls asleep again. I have no interest in soccer (absolutely zero, even if Ireland are playing) but I find it shocking that the whole soccer world has accepted Infantino speaking on their behalf, sucking the shrivelled mushroom in their name and done … … … nothing. But hey, vaccines, Baby!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,599 ✭✭✭joseywhales


    I mean it's not impossible, it's just that as a society we validate emotional considerations when it comes to argument and debate. It's fine to recognize that a topic is sensitive and to understand that that will invite natural bias but when I comes to argument and the business of decision making, the emotional considerations are not valid, only statistical analysis from properly designed study that is peer reviewed. I know what I am saying is reasonable and well known but for some reason we accept emotional blackmail of our own process for the sake of media revenue. We also enable lazy thinking by giving lay people the green light to "judge by feel" when it's well established we can't trust our own senses, let alone our own interpretation with regard to any non trivial observation. It's not an elitist thing either , the elites in this case , the scientists, are saying that they don't trust their own senses either , that's why there is method.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 54,685 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    They aren't written off as being anti-vaxx, they are being written off as anecdotal evidence. If you know anything about science you would realize why this evidence is dismissed and deemed unreliable.



Advertisement
Advertisement