Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

1131513161318132013211868

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,553 ✭✭✭arctictree


    That list is crazy, especially the family members stuff. I know that my siblings would not consent to me sharing their phone numbers, addresses etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 809 ✭✭✭PixelCrafter


    He and his henchmen and henchewomen seem to actually viscerally hate everything that post WWII Europe is and not just the EU the UK and others too. It's bizarre stuff.

    The requirements for entry to the US are exceeding North Korean levels of paranoia. You'll basically see a complete flatlining of international tourism into the US if that is what they're rolling out. Those requirements are utter insanity.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭randomcorkman


    It's like Homer on the lie detector machine. Do you understand? Yes. Machine explodes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,392 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I said this here recently but there's been a concerted attempt on the American right to roll back the values of the Enlightenment and the postwar consensus. They aspire to become an upper caste which controls all property and political power. Vast swathes of the population seem content to go along with this because they mistakenly see themselves as part of said caste.

    I've never been and I don't see myself ever going. It's just too much. For less money, I could go somewhere like India, Thailand or Indonesia, ie places with an actual culture.

    I don't see tourism flatlining but it will definitely take a hit if it hasn't already. I find it impossible to justify a country heading into totalitarianism with so little resistance or even debate.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 809 ✭✭✭PixelCrafter


    The problem with that in the US is when the easily led element of population eventually decides it's been duped, things could turn VERY nasty. It will be driven by finances and cost of living issues eventually.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,392 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    They won't. We've bee here before. He was President from 2017-2020, he wrecked countless livelihoods and they voted for him again in greater numbers.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,681 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    There is no indication that the recommendations for vaccines were negatively impacting health. There's every indication that it's drastically improved health across the board. So including it as part of a problem is not representing the reality.

    You are very much so pushing a particular line though. When medical experts and medical journals are saying this will have a negative impact on the health of the public. I think it's pretty reasonable to say RFK's personal views are dictating policy and endangering public health.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,392 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 987 ✭✭✭steinbock123




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,285 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    Average yank is all hat and no cattle, great at talking about what they would do, useless at actually doing anything



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,802 ✭✭✭randd1


    They're more likely to shoot themselves with than anything else.

    The whole "second amendment" thing is nuts. They're not the only country in the world that legalises guns, they're just the only ones who fetishize owning a gun.

    And what use is the second amendment anyway? There's no way some fat fcuk playing militia at a shooting range on a Saturday is ever going to take on a trained soldier of any description, never mind a soldier of the most powerful military ever assembled an the arsenal they have behind them.

    And the second an autocratic government did raise it's head and try and strip away civil liberties (as the current administration one has done, especially their much loved first amendment), they lay back and took it with accepted ease like crack whore desperate for cash for the next fix.

    Their guns, and the reasons for their sheer numbers of guns, have been made utterly pointless by Trump and his goons.

    At this stage the only thing their second amendment protects, and their only practical use for guns, is their national sport of mass shooting.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,392 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I've seen people on this very site tell me with what I presume was a straight face that the only thing standing between them and the US government stealing all their stuff was their firearm. It's just become this cultural totem that's lead to an odious degree of toxic individuality and worship of violence that mask an incredible degree of conformity and servility.

    Guns don't protect people from tyranny. People protect people from tyranny. Americans instead have decided to adopt one of the worst Presidents of all time as some kind of God figure and have rolled over accordingly.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,083 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Ohio gubernatorial race is now close. Vivek Ramaswamy is now ahead only ahead 1% over Democrat Amy Acton. He leads 55-35 among men, but Acton leads 54-36 among women in an Emerson poll.

    In a previous Emerson poll in August, Acton only led among women 44-42.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,601 ✭✭✭Economics101


    This thread has turned into a bit of an anti-US rant. The economic history of the past 80 years is definitely not what you state. "Used Britain's desperation to bankrupt the country": that's total nonsense. Britain went more of less bankrupt having to fight WW2: it and much of Europe were bailed out by the USA. Ever heard of the Marshell Plan?

    Don't confuse the USA with the MAGA nuts. Look at how badly Rebublicans are doing in special elections if you want an indicator.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,285 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    Where did they find this root vegetable Glasheen (remembering Trump only appoints "the best people")



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,285 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    Fairly sure lying to Congress used to be considered a felony,

    Noem has been absolutely incinerated there.

    Probably had more important matters to attend to, like shooting a puppy or getting her botox topped up

    Post edited by For Forks Sake on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,564 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Actually Roosevelt stated that he wanted to destroy the British Empire and was against it both in principle and practice. His belief was that Empires were an outdated concept and sought to dismantle them. He agitated for an independent India saying that "India should be made a commonwealth at once. After a certain number of years – five perhaps, or ten – she should be able to choose whether she wants to remain in the Empire or have complete independence."

    He also said "As a commonwealth, she would be entitled to a modern form of government, an adequate health and educational standard. But how can she have these things, when Britain is taking all the wealth of her national resources away from her, every year? Every year the Indian people have one thing to look forward to, like death and taxes. Sure as shooting, they have a famine. The season of the famine, they call it."

    He specifically said to Churchill, who was very much pro Empire, that he believed that an imperial approach was an 18th Century method that "…recommends a policy which takes wealth in raw materials out of a colonial country, but which returns nothing to the people of that country in consideration. Twentieth-century methods involve bringing industry to these colonies. Twentieth-century methods include increasing the wealth of a people by increasing their standard of living, by educating them, by bringing them sanitation – by making sure that they get a return for the raw wealth of their community.'

    Roosevelt made no secret to Winston Churchill or anyone else in political circles that he despised the British Empire and said to the PM that British Imperial trade agreements were responsible for making "…the people of India and Africa, of all the colonial Near East and Far East, still as backward as they are."

    Needless to say, Roosevelt and Churchill didn't see eye to eye on such things and, in fact didn't agree on a great many items despite the public perception being one of complete agreement on all matters.

    As to the Marshal Plan, be aware that that only became a reality when it was pointed out the US policy makers that the Morganthau Plan would have rendered Europe vulnerable to Soviet expansion. Herbert Hoover's data concluded that it would end up starving millions and probably driving millions more into the hands of Communist influence. There was nothing really altruistic about the Marshal Plan. It was purely a practical arrangement.

    There's a very interesting book by FDR's son Elliott that gives great insight into what his father thought of Britain, the British and their empire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,106 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    You don't want to chalk the Marshall Plan down as entirely altruistic either. But Western Europe and the USA were closely aligned. It's a shame Trump has done so much damage to a relationship cemented over such a long period. The US under Trump can't be trusted by anyone. Trump's natural instinct is to **** over anyone dumb enough to trust him. This carries over to his administration. TheThere's no line between his personal dealings and his presidency; everything is motivated by personal gain.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,564 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Running away seems to be a popular thing to do with right wingers when they're confronted with mildly difficult questions to answer.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,717 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    "And what use is the second amendment anyway?

    In the modern context (since we don't normally expect the militia to provide their own weapons any more) the most direct analogue right now is arguably enacted in 32 USC 109(c ), the State Defense Forces. 2A was developed so that the federal government could not prohibit the states from raising their own armies for their own purposes and to reduce the reliance upon a standing federal army which was a concept the founding folks didn't really trust.

    The 2A is arguably the most mis-represented piece of the Constitution today, being incorrectly argued by almost any side of the firearms debate given it was created for a national structure which hasn't existed in almost century at the least, nearly two centuries at the outset. It's a square peg in a round hole, and is a foundation law being argued for a purpose for which it was never intended. The text, however, remains, and so people are trying to retroactively apply meaning to the text to gain their desired outcome. Unsurprisingly, this means that everyone arguing 2A today is inherently wrong in applying its meaning, but it's the text and legal structure we get to work with at the federal level.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Irelands EU presidency next year will be a complete sh1tshow - not only will we be subject to Russian and Chinese cyber threats, ships of dodgy origins and more rogue drones than a midges gathering on a damp evening in Connemara - we now have to contend with the USA wishing to disrupt the EU.
    Will be interesting to see if Italians are treated with suspicion over the coming months too, politically - the only way to deal with this is unite unite unite within EU and UK- it’s the MAGA playbook - play off one country against the others - thankfully we’re not thick - stay strong and stay together is my mantra !



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    You sir are not going to the USA next year….

    Come to think of it, neither am I 🤪



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 15,541 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    What, you don't trust her to review the case and return those people she deported? She wasn't running off to make it happen? /s



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,106 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    That's the problem I have with these constitutional originalists; the constitution taken out of context and stripped of its original intent is just a jumble of words waiting for someone to apply their own meaning to it to suit their agenda. But this is the price you pay for a system that makes it hard for the constitution to be a living document that can be tailored to the times.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    “People protect people from tyranny. Americans instead have decided to adopt one of the worst Presidents of all time as some kind of God figure and have rolled over accordingly.”

    It’s not just America though - yes from a western world perspective the rot has started there- but it’s growing - the genie is out of the bottle -money, jobs, economies, national securities are all under risk - EU have rolled over to a degree too. America’s position has given other countries “ideas”- if they can behave like that- then so can we.


    It’s a wake up call around just how delicate a balance, democracy really is.
    It sounds like the race for world dominance has become overt vs covert - resources of all kinds are becoming either scarce or difficult to obtain or are required now and will be taken by force -the superpowers are no longer pretending - America is showing its teeth - I reckon China and Russia will follow suit - Europe isn’t seen as important except to be dominated and belittled and neutralised



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,106 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    I can see Trump continuing to misunderstand how the EU works again and threatening individual nations in the EU with tariffs. We'll be in the crosshairs during our presidency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,282 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Mcentee was on the news launching our new military spend, we're in safe hands.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,282 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Trump doesn't seem to know what his guys are doing, knows nothing about the boat ops, doesn't know anything about the tanker...I take it there's a maga team running the show



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 595 ✭✭✭midlander12


    It may be no harm if it brings home to our happy-clappy peacenik types the reality of the world we now live in. But we can probably rely on them to miss the point completely.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,717 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Sortof?

    The argument applies to the originalists, but it applies just as much to others also. The originalists are trying to twist the words to meet the original intent, which seems about as morally supportable, if not more so, as trying to twist the words to meet a perceived modern policy goal.

    With respect to 2A in particular, the reason it hasn't been changed isn't so much that it's hard to change it as much as that there is no appetite to change it. With 44 states having their own constitutional right to arms, and a number of them are far less open to interpretation than the federal 2A, with the late 20th Century trend being to add to that right (12 of them date from the 1980s or later) even if a simple majority of the states were needed to remove 2A, it seems unlikely that there would be sufficient votes to do so.

    Then even if that somehow happened, you would then have the fun case of a federal law existing, and most of the states having a constitutional prohibition on enforcing those laws. It's the situation we currently see existing with marijuana or immigration laws in some states, but it would be almost all the states in this case.

    People who are focusing on 2A as being either the overriding problem to remove or overriding solution to rely upon are not being particularly honest (or accurate, in the case of simple lack of knowledge) in the large scheme of things. But I certainly agree with you that it's all legal wrangling over words divorced from what the words themselves say.



Advertisement
Advertisement