Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

1129913001302130413051871

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,589 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Kind of puts pay to the whole "officers are free to chose to disobey an order if they think it's illegal" schtick. It's clear this administration couldn't give two ****s if it's illegal or not. It's a case of "do it, or you're fired. Where's the discretion for the officer?

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,785 ✭✭✭amandstu


    I always think of Jim Carrey if I see Hegseth.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,569 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Never really existed in any military anyway. The whole "just following orders" not being a defence for the Germans was only a means of getting as many prosecutions over the line as possible. There was plenty of illegal orders going around in the Second World War by all of the combatants.

    These days, however, you'll only lose your job for refusing to carry out a direct order. In WWII you could be shot for insubordination.

    As to the point about the admin not giving two shites whether something is illegal or not with regards to military ops, it shouldn't surprise anyone that they don't care to murder people with their military apparatus, because they couldn't care less about legalities in any other facet of life either.

    However, blowing Venezuelan boats to pieces in international waters under the flimsy pretext of "oh they were carrying drugs" is one thing. But going back and murdering two survivors to, effectively, silence them is something else entirely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,161 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    someone had to pull the trigger on the two survivors clinging to the wreckage. Brave brave warriors thank you for your service. Muderous ****



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭MoodeRator


    FFS, I can't even watch the FIFA World Draw tomorrow (which I was really looking forward), as the event is now also ruined by the orange pos. BBC reports that "in a break with tradition, the draw ceremony will feature the awarding of a new FIFA Peace Prize, with Trump widely expected to be the recipient."

    Why the hell are FIFA handing out prizes for anything other than football? The very least FIFA should do is keep their corruption to football. Where does it stop?

    CFTrump will prob try and make at least one stadium change its name to something of his choosing, he will want a financial cut from any cities hosting. He will make sure he is centre of attention for the opening game, he will act as if Canada and Mexico are not even playing a part.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,569 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Why the hell are FIFA handing out prizes for anything other than football?

    Considering who's rumored to in line to be the recipient, I'd say it was Trump that made it a pre-requisite. If there's any opportunity for self aggrandisement, he'll be all over it or demand it.

    Post edited by Tony EH on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,540 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    Because the orangutan has made it clear he desperately wants a nobel peace prize purely because Obama got one, FIFA being the corrupt human trash pile they are spotted an oppurtunity to give him a very public metaphorical blowjob via a made up peace award so as to ingratiate themselves in advance for what will be a chaotic mess of a world cup thanks to the orangutan



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,856 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    I'm sure the narrative will be the second strike was to sink the boat and the 2 survivors were just collateral damage or when the survivors climbed back into the flaming wreckage they were back into the action and a valid target.

    I wonder in light of this will the US stop using kinetic weapons and just use live ordinance to make sure the people boat is destroyed in one hit.

    I still think the better optics is the navy intercepting the boats, seize the drugs and then perp walk the terrorists (before they apparently send them home) and be able to show the US public the tonnes of coke they seized.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,802 ✭✭✭randd1


    "Can't wait for the adults to be back in charge and change all of this nonsense back."

    See, this is what annoys me. Not that I disagree with the sentiment, or want the adults back in the room.

    What annoys me is people think that the adults are going to be back in the room. They're not. They never will be.

    Trump's America isn't Trump's America, it's simply America with Trump at the helm. If it wasn't Trump, it'd be some other degenerate lunatic. America is where it is because America wants people like Trump, like Hegseth, like Musk, in charge. People know Trump and his ilk are a disaster, Trump is a deranged lunatic, a conman, a racist, a rapist, and will happily sell anyone and the whole country down the river. And they will still vote for him, and for it, because him and his acolytes curse at reporters and has a go at smart people and spend their time owning the libs.

    The adults aren't going to be back in the room. America is too far gone in it's current fall for that to happen.

    The only way the adults are ever going to get back in the room in the US is for the red half of the country to experience real pain at the hands of their republican whip holding masters. I'm talking great depression, fall of religion, national humiliation, possible break up of the Union, national psyche-scarring pain.

    Then, and only then, will the US recover its adulthood. There is no point in thinking it will otherwise, it isn't going to happen. You're far more likely to see America conned and manoeuvred into a third Trump term, and a Trump dynasty, than the adults get back in charge.

    And even if they do, say the Democrats will it out next year and in 2028, they'll spend the next 4-6 years doing harm through austerity to keep the country's head just about floating over the water, that another Trump will come along and drag them back under with the full weight of the American people, because Americans are so focused on singular selfishness that an $500 extra a year in their arse pocket from tax cuts is worth ending economy for, so they'll vote again for the grift.

    As a people, they've become incredibly stupid, and incredibly stupid people will not allow the adults back in the room.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,802 ✭✭✭randd1


    The whole FIFA Peace Prize is purely to stroke Trump's ego, and so Trump can claim the FIFA prize means more than the Nobel Prize.

    It's also a good move by FIFA to give Trump recognition from the world's biggest sport, so he can parade it around as an achievement.

    And it has nothing, absolutely nothing whatsoever, to do with distracting Trump via ego fellating from his suggestion that FIFA should give 20% of the tournaments earnings to the US for hosting it. Nothing whatsoever at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,212 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    First I've heard of it. The ongoing corruption in FIFA is sickening. People were hoping Blatter might be the end of it, but Infantino is a slimy, corrupt POS also. FIFA also quick to ban Russia, but no action taken against Israel.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,731 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Who would be surprised if the FIFA peace award quietly disappeared and was never heard of again between now and the next World Cup.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,719 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I don’t see a law has been passed to make it unlawful either. The joys of a legal system where generally I can do anything as long as it it not prohibited in law, combined with a governmental organisation with somewhat broad delineations of authority. I have little doubt that the situation will eventually be resolved either in the courts or Congress over the coming time, but that time is not today or two months ago.

    I’m not suggesting they weren’t clinging to the boat either. Our Trekkie contributor has hit the nail on the head: The argument is indeed that target of the second strike was the boat and that if the two survivors were killed as a result of it, so be it.

    Admiral Bradley is well respected by politicians of both sides and pretty much everyone he has served with. Even Senator Kelly, of the “disobey unlawful orders” video describes him as having a stellar reputation and the man’s been in his current position at the head of special operations forces for three years. Yet some of us are being asked to believe that he made a decision to give an order which the most junior troop out of basic training would know is unlawful. It’s possible.. but does seem a little unlikely.

    Well, as we type, the first set of questioning by Congress is going on. Doubtless something will leak, or we will get statements by politicians of both parties.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,356 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    What I'm waiting for is a loud exclamation from Washington if both Canada and Mexico, as host nations, win through to the finals and the venues are stadiums in the U.S. and if the third host nation team does not match expectations….



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,731 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    "We were shooting the boat but sadly it had people in it" 🙄

    I remember working in nightclubs and there would always be boats parking up in the toilets to sell drugs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,785 ✭✭✭amandstu


    https://www.rte.ie/news/courts/2025/1204/1547263-drug-seizure-cork-court/

    You couldn't make it up.Why were these terrorist lowlifes not summarily executed either in international waters ,in Irish waters or in their beds before they left the country?

    Politicians here have it easy !@!

    As for tobacco retailers they have it coming too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,856 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Bradley will be briefing a Senate and House committee so they should know more about the strikes.

    I think it's mainly down to the orders. Was he ordered specifically to 'kill them all' and/or was the second strike only ordered when the survivors were spotted (which could point to them being targeted rather than the boat etc...)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,152 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    Admission price for "entry" will be very expensive, doubt they will take crypto………



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,212 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    The argument is indeed that target of the second strike was the boat and that if the two survivors were killed as a result of it, so be it.

    This still doesn't make any sense to me.

    The order was to destroy the boat and its cargo, and kill the occupants.

    What is the relevance of how many strikes it took?

    The suggestion seems to be that if the boat and cargo were destroyed and all the occupants were killed in the one strike, it's all perfectly legitimate. That's bananas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,802 ✭✭✭randd1


    There is no hoop to small, too on fire, too loopy and too mental that a Trump supporter will not jump through it in defence of the dear leader.

    As long as daddy says it's ok, it's ok. And Trump is very much their daddy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭randomcorkman


    How mental is it that David Squires can do the brilliant cartoon below and not one mention by a Guardian commenter that there is 1 proven and 4 accused sexual predators (3 of whom paid off their accusers, the other said who didn't do something stupid when they were young) on that single page?

    https://www.theguardian.com/football/picture/2025/dec/02/david-squires-on-making-world-cup-great-again-fifa-trump-infantino



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,152 ✭✭✭Stanley 1


    As if confirmation was needed that Infantino is a corrupt cant, John Delaney was all in on him, Irish vote went to Infantino without reference to the Board (no surprise) Delaney was well on his way to the main Board.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,212 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio




  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,719 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Why would it be bananas?

    One shoots at a manned piece of equipment, one don’t much care (at least from a legal perspective) if everyone involved dies immediately (think HMS Hood) or nobody almost dies (think more HMS Valiant).

    Just because there is an obligation not to target personnel who are surrendering or hors de combat does not mean there is any obligation to spare lives of anyone who does not meet that state.

    Chaplains, doctors, etc, are all protected categories under the Geneva Conventions. But if you kill them because they’re in a ship you’re attacking, it’s no crime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,212 ✭✭✭✭J Mysterio


    But you're suggesting the order was to destroy the ship and it's cargo, whereas the order was to destroy the ship and it's cargo, and kill the occupants.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,920 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,291 ✭✭✭✭For Forks Sake


    That's quite the graphic, to paraphrase Andy Warhol , in the future everybody will have been pardoned by Trump



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,338 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    Lots of drugs get into the US on planes, they should be shot out of the sky too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,633 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    You really have lost the plot entirely if you believe you are legally entitled to do whatever you wish because no law has been specifically passed to stop you doing so.

    The facts are that your own U.S. Department of Defense Law of War Manual, your own U.S. 1996 War Crimes Act plus the Geneva Convention are all very clear on the subject of those hors de combat. Not that it was ever a work manual for me to abide by, but it being so for you then you should be able to give a definitive answer to this.

    Does the U.S. DoD Law of War Manual not oblige the same being shown too even terrorist fighters hors de combat as it does anyone else or not ?

    I have said this repeatedly to you but for whatever reason you refuse to recognise it. The has no law been passed by the U.S. Congress sanctioning any of those strikes let alone this particular strike that killed two survivors clinging to the wreckage of a boat. Trump deciding he will use any broad term that comes to mind - in this case narco-terrorists - and then get Bondi to comply with his wishes that everyone he decides is a narco-terrorist should be summarily killed is not a law, it`s a wish list. A wish list to further his political aims using a military, that is supposedly apolitical, to do so. Congress is the the only branch of the executive that can propose and pass laws, and Congress hasn`t even been shown this wish list. Never mind being asked to pass it into law. .

    If Trump decided tomorrow that all those traveling on a green painted bus - for whatever bullshit reason he came up with - were then summarily killed then really what you are saying is that would also be legal is it not ?

    Our trekkie contributor completely missed the nail because there is no nail there to hit.

    The fact, that even you do not contend, is that there were two people seen clinging to that wreckage before the second strike was ordered. Their resulting deaths by your own Law of War Manual, your own 1996 War Crimes Act and the Geneva Convention were not collateral damage. They were due to a decision being made after observing them clinging to that wreckage and a decision made while knowing that and then carried out by launching that second strike. And that is a war crime.

    I know nothing about Admiral Bradley`s character or his reputation but it does not really matter. He or anybody else that played and part in that second strike, orders or no orders, are now looking at the very real possibility of being tried as war criminals. In fact anyone that played any part in any of these sinkings that claimed lives who avoid being charged under the same can count themselves very luck.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,856 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Does the AUMF passed back in 2001 not allow the president of the US designate who is a terrorist and enable him to use what ever means to eliminate them?

    What ever law that Bush, Obama, Biden etc .. used to target and elimate designated terrorist organizations is the very same law Trump used in his first term and his second term.

    In your example if any US president designated the green bus club as terrorists then he's legally allowed elimate them.

    Now this is all under US law, don't confused an illegal strike under US law with an illegal strike under international law. All the debate about the legality of the strike is wrt US law.

    If the boat and cargo was the target and the boat and cargo was destroyed, under US law it's a lawful act and the people (even innocent) were collateral damage.

    If the terrorists were targeted and killed, it's a legal act under US law. However if some terrorists survived and were wounded and didn't present a threat to the US, targeting them would be unlawful under US law.

    The laws the US brought in to fight terrorism is designed for a threat to the US. Imagine it was a dirty bomb on the boat heading to the US and not coke. That's what the law was intended for. The entire issue is around what orders were given and what the target was. It's certainly not black and white under US law until those facts are released.



Advertisement
Advertisement