Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

112891290129112921294

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    The obvious solution is to not play Bruno in a midfield 2 though. For a team in rebuild it's strange to stick with 2 players in midfield that probably won't be at the club next season. The Everton game should be a watershed moment for RA to not play him there again but of course he will and we'll continue to see PL teams dominate midfield as a result. There is no fixing Bruno in midfield no matter who you play in there beside if we are sticking with 2 in there.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,961 ✭✭✭✭Zeek12


    I'd have to respond to:

    "If you're not part of the solution you're part of the problem"

    What has Amorim brought to show he's even the solution?

    Over a year in the job, and we're nothing more than a mid-table team. In a season where we have no distractions outside of PL Games.

    No European games. No Carabao cup since August. That should have been a huge advantage to us.

    The minor improvements we've seen have come from the signing of Mbeumo (who has been largely very good) and from having a fairly competent keeper at last. That's it.

    Otherwise, it's the same story.

    The two man CM remains a huge problem, forcing a square peg into a round hole, like Bruno, will never work. And that's on the Coach.

    Defensively we are fragile, we continue to leak very soft goals.

    The Coach has a frightening reluctance to adapt or improve things with his in-game management.

    And the end product from the WBs continues to be really poor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,341 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    It's such an obvious weakness and causes issues with the overall team structure.

    The fact Ruben ignores it week after week makes me think he probably isnt cut out for the very top level of the game.

    You need to be ruthless and aggressive with your decision making. If something clearly isn't working you have to find a solution that does AND FAST

    After a year I don't think Ruben has it in him unfortunately

    There's no way a top manager doesn't tweak his team in that match against Everton to put them under more pressure. To gain more control. To stretch them. To make them work for their lives to keep Utd out of their net.

    It was handed to him on a plate and he couldn't come up with an answer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,918 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    We don't have the wing backs for it, imo, and inconsistent at CB for it. I think that is part of the issue. We are still relying on Bruno for creativity and progression, because Dorgu and Dalot aren't doing it at LWB. and I think we need Shaw to be more aggresive in joining and starting attacks - Martinez was starting to do that before injury, but I fear the impact that will have had on him now.

    IMO the central midfield is partly a response to the inability of the wide CBs and WBs (anyone not named Amad) to be the primary point of progession.

    If you put Case and Gomes in CM, with Dorgu LWB? Its going to be defensively better but horrendous going forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 481 ✭✭kyleman


    We are badly stuck in midfield and Amorim must look at his system.

    Any system that has Dalot, Dorgu and Mazouri continually trying to make crosses into the penalty area is doomed to failure.

    And at the same time Bruno who is still one of the most creative players in the PL is expected to sit in front of the back 3.

    Bruno needs to be back playing at 10 and if that means rotation with Mbeumbo and Cunha so be it.

    Unfortunately neither Ugarte or Mainoo have stepped up to the challenge.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,918 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I was thinking about his post match quote - about its his fault, cause he needs to tell the players how to play in every situation.

    that… can't be true. Players have to have agency and initiative. Within a general structure and game plan, where coached patterns etc are important… but something struck me odd about him saying that.

    What I would love to know is what he was saying to the players during the game.

    IMO there is a logical explanation for the players on the pitch being in those positions, but how they were playing in them is where i have the issue. I know people have just screamed '3atb vs 10 men!' but IMO that is not really the issue. The issue is how deep the defenderds sat, for much of the match. How conservative Yoro was on the ball, where Shaw pushed to (and how slowly) in attacks etc.

    i KNOW i have seen him scream at Dalot for 90 minutes cause he's been in the wrong place most of the time, so I don't immediately think what the players are doing is what they are being told to do.

    So I'd love to know if he was telling Yoro to be braver (he's commented on De Ligt still being too safe with his passing), was he telling Shaw to push higher and wider?

    Maybe he wasn't, and they were pretty much where he wanted them. But then even if he was asking for more, not subbing the players who simply aren't doing it would be an issue as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,918 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Bruno is not expected to sit. in possession he is expected to join the attack.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 481 ✭✭kyleman


    He was definitely told to play the Casemiro role in the second half of the Everton match with Mainoo licence to go forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,341 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    Maybe instead of telling defenders to be braver and to push higher he should have taken 1 off when he was up against 10 men and added a player who's natural ability lends himself better to being braver and to sitting higher up the pitch naturally.

    He's the manager. The players who were on the pitch were on it because he put them there.
    If Dalot isn't doing what he needs then he needs to reshuffle

    No more excuses



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,918 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    But it should have been two wing backs acting as wingers, so not defenders. And then you have 2cbs and Shaw. If Shaw pushes up more aggressively then it is 2cbs?

    This is what I am getting at - its the actual position and aggression, not the named role imo.

    and I'm not actually defending Amorim - i just think the debate should be on something else - the general atttitude of the team and not whether Yoro was subbed off or not. Also, the fact Lacey was the only offensive sub we didn't use (we only had 3…) would point to why Yoro wasn't taken off imo. Maybe Heaven would have been braver than Shaw, but thats about it. I know we aren't asking for Ugarte to have been brought on!

    The only player he could have brought on to do what you are asking them to do… is Lacey. for his debut. And yeah, if you've put him on the bench there is no excuse to not use him. He's either ready to play, or it was performative nonsense, arguably.

    I think the team, regularly, puts in these limp performances.

    I don't think Amorim is planning on them being second to every ball and two yards off every tackle. I don't think Amorim asked Bruno and Casemiro to not complete a single tackle in the first half. I don't think he was asking the players to make dumb fouls all second half.

    So, imo, there is something other than the tactical set up that is an issue - but then it is still on Amorim to correct that - even if it makes taking Bruno off for Ugarte, or Shaw for Heaven or Dalot for Lacey. The lack of agression isn't a tactical set up, the lack of tempo isn't a tactical set up, imo. But his failure in 12 months to address those consistent issues is an issue that should be questioned and criticised.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,341 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    But my counter to that is if Ruben did think that way then why did he sub Dorgu who wasn't doing what he wanted for Dalot? Dalot is not an attacking sub unless he is replacing Yoro or Deligt in that situation.

    Why didn't he sub Dorgu for Manioo, add an extra body to midfield and move Shaw out to the left side? Take control of the middle and add a goal threat at the same time?

    At that stage Everton were sat in two banks of 4 all within very short distances of each other with 1 player left up top as an outlet. Yoro and DeLigt would have been fine to handle that.

    He had 30 min to overturn a 1-0 against 10 men at home. That's the time to go for it.

    He didn't do it because he's welded to the general formation and that is the single most frustrating point about Amorim.

    Better moves were staring him in the face but he couldn't or wouldn't make them.

    To put it bluntly I don't think he's brave enough or able to adapt well enough to be a success at this club. He has failed many tests before but Monday night was so basic it's infuriating.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,831 ✭✭✭ericzeking


    If the wing backs are meant to be wingers providing width in this particular scenario or in any scenario where you play two number 10s, what is the logic behind using wrong footed wing/backs? If the tactic was to get crosses in to the box as it became on Monday night surely you want the lads crossing it on their correct foot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,677 ✭✭✭Caustic


    Just on this he did (very late) in the game move deligt to rcb and put yoro in the middle and it may have been because yoro wasn't doing what he wanted in terms of ball progression.

    i know I'm also beating a dead horse put Bruno coming to stand on the players to take the ball didn't help things, Adam clearly said on his YouTube video that Bruno had to do this but I completely disagree the player could easily find him with a 10 yard pass in the middle of he was there but he wasn't.

    I'm also not sure why mainoo isn't used deeper when he comes on he is what you want in terms of taking the ball under pressure then Bruno also.

    The last game was an absolute cluster **** and actually after reading your post I'm hoping the reason for us was because the manager was working on something in training but the lads just didn't get it, understand it and just froze. And while that isn't great at least it's be some sort of excuse for literally every player **** the bed

    Edit: just to touch on the Adam clearly video again I didn't agree with a lot of it but the most damming thing was he showed 3 clips of ous shape in the uefa cup final, against grimbsy and the Everton game having kick outs against a team sitting back and each time we are in the back 5 essentially against a team happily sitting back and it does leave you wondering why I guess surely the fbs can both be pushed up further. That's a question id love answered



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,699 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    I don't think the drop off attacking wise would be that bad moving him out of that midfield 2 though and we need more in defence for now.

    For me, I don't think the defence trust Bruno enough when he's in there and that's causing the apprehension from the back 3 to push up or be braver on the ball because they know 1 small error and they are going to be straight under pressure again.

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,677 ✭✭✭Caustic


    This is one thing over I never really understood especially when it's all the time, like it's even another thing that could have been tried the other night switch Amad and dalot you can make the pitch wider.

    Two left footers on the one side isn't great either even mbeumo could switch with his other 10 now and again and they could drift wide let the wbs come inside.

    I've no problem with 3atb it's just the lack of any sort of variation in the attack that makes no sense especially when chasing a game



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,918 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Who would you have brought on for Dorgu? Lacey is the only option right? Maybe that is the sub that should have been made, but I don't think Dalot instead of him is insane.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,816 ✭✭✭DellyBelly


    Rumours of Zirkzee going to Roma in January



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,341 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    At 60 min when he made the Dorgu to Dalot sub I would have instead made the sub Dorgu to Mainoo and lined up as follows

    Everton at that stage were bedded in around their own box in a 441 shape. Two banks of 4 and a single striker as an outlet up the pitch

    ———————Lemannes——————-

    ————Yoro——————-DeLigt———

    Amad——-Case———Mainoo———-Shaw

    ————————Bruno————————

    Mbeumo——-—-Zirkzee————Mount

    - Get Amad and Mbeumo out on that right side running at their defence.
    - Get Shaw overlapping Mount on the left.
    - Tell Bruno he is free to roam and pick up space. A nightmare when Everton are trying to keep 2 flat lines of 4.
    - Casemiro and Mainoo in midfield with 2 CBs still behind them, one supports attacks from deeper the other supports the CBs - switch around to pull Everton out of shape.
    - I know Urgate is shite but if Casemiro is dead on his feet then sub him in for Case, make Mainoo the permanent player to support attack from the middle then. Keep Urgate doing the simple job, win it and off load it to a better player (all you can do with him).
    - Get Lacey on for the last 10 min if still needing a goal - often teams have't prepeared for the likes of Lacey coming from the youth team so Everton defenders will be less likely to know his strengths / weakness. Sometimes the innocence of youth can spark something - less fear etc..

    1-0 with 30 to play at home. Create some chances, get the crowd on their feet.
    Increase the atmosphere in the stadium and pressure on Everton.

    Ya know, play like you are Man Utd



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,918 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I think Mainoo for Case was the right call tbh. But I would have been actively moving Shaw into more of a LWB role, given dalot was going to come inside anyway.

    Given Dorgu was poor thought it was either Dalot or Lacey then, imo, in that case.

    I don't think we are a million miles from agreement, really. Bruno dropping back to play QB is a consistent issue in this respect, so yeah - i'd want Mainoo deeper and bruno further forward.

    imo in a normal attack we should normally have 6 players in properly attacking positoins - LWB - L10 - 8 - ST - R10 - RWB.

    Your 6 and the and the wide CB on the side of the ball should be pressed up, the CB and the other CCB should be covering.

    With Everton a man down and us a goal down, I'd have been pushing Shaw more in that scenario. But at it is, the LWB was terrible, no matter which is was. Shaw didn't push, Bruno sat too deep, Zirkzee was rubbish and I thought Mbeumo had a poor game.

    So I dont think we were attacking well enough/with enough numbers even if Everton had 11 - and I just can't imagine Amorim wanted everyone to be so deep, and so cautious. But then if he didn't want that - why is that what we so for most of hte match? Why could he not get the players to set up their game.

    Again, I'm not defending Amorim, I just don't think the players we ended up on the pitch with were massively wrong - but where they were was.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,247 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    i'd try cunha as a WB and stick bruno back to 10. at least he can dribble and take on players.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,924 ✭✭✭Whatsisname


    Imagine if it was Cunha LW, with Bruno in the 10 and Mbeumo RW. All 3 behind Sesko with Kobbie and Casemiro DM. Maz RB, De Ligt and Yoro CB and Shaw LB. Ahh a man can dream.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,918 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I do think Cunha being out was so damaging - cause we are crap. We had not threat on the left without him, so Everton could overload and shut down the right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,469 ✭✭✭CantGetNoSleep


    Because the system matters more than the result, and he hasn't accepted that it only works against farmers yet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,254 ✭✭✭✭Nalz


    100% losing to Palace. Surely they're odds on favourties



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,217 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,488 ✭✭✭✭StringerBell


    It was a hard watch Monday from inside the stadium and it was very little to do with a system. The lack of urgency and intensity is beyond woeful, it was an appalling performance and result. The manager takes flack because he didn't effect change from the sidelines but can we please elevate the conversation away from 3 at the back? Or 5 as some like to claim. This isn't the issue. It's lazy analysis and the greatest **** stain sky sports has ever given us.

    Actually, on systems I think I'd have probably switched it to more of a traditional 352 as Zirkzee offers absolutely nothing as a lone striker, maybe if we had Mbuemo close to.him and running off him if we ever played a quick ball before Everton were set. All 3 of them wanting to come to feet drove me mad. Ambling up the field letting Everton get set before trying the same attacking patterns that failed 24 times in a row was soul destroying. Shaw was so cowardly in his passing, so many times in both halves he had the quick switch option but choose to just jog up the pitch and wait till Everton dropped back and got ready. Zirkzee and movement are total strangers to each other, no double movements from a y of them, no threatening runs in behind to stretch the defence.

    ------Yoro---—--De Ligt--------Shaw

    Amad----Cas----Mount----Bruno---Dalot

    --------------Mbuemo------Zirkzee-----

    Missing Cunha was a nightmare, be Ruben has got to find a way of getting a win against 10 man Everton at home, it's not good enough from the managers and it's not good enough from the players.

    Would be nice if we didn't feed into this emotional rollercoaster either, it cannot swing from everything is awesome to everything is **** every two weeks. Mentally exhausting. More dropped points ahead of afcon isn't good so we need to make up for it again, 2 steps forward 1 step back, we are a middling premier league team right now and there will be more days like that ahead before we get clear of this ****.

    "People say ‘go with the flow’ but do you know what goes with the flow? Dead fish."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,039 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,602 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    I see we've thrown our support behind Old Trafford’s bid to host matches at the 2035 FIFA Women’s World Cup with the new 100k seat stadium. Nothing concrete yet, but a positive sign.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 967 ✭✭✭jayo44




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 489 ✭✭GolfPar


    Sesko to be out for slightly longer than expected. Cunha & Maguire still out this weekend. Cunha back for West Ham next weekend.



Advertisement