Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

1127012711273127512761877

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,937 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    We all know Trump molested underage girls. He has been accused of sexual misconduct by dozens of women.
    He bragged about barging into changing rooms so he could see underage girls naked in the miss teen pageants that he owned

    image.png

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_sexual_misconduct_allegations We all know it, He has admitted being a sexual predator many times. His supporters all should know it. They just don't care.

    Maybe at some point they will all come to some mass realisation that they were being played the entire time. But these people completely brain washed. They might ditch Trump en-masse, but they'll move to someone else just as bad if not even worse.

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,628 ✭✭✭TinyMuffin


    gets away with it coz


    IMG_1797.jpeg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,112 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Trump in the 1980s was a critic of Reagans policy towards the USSR.

    Trump’s early critiques generally fell into three categories:

    Cost of the Arms Race

    1. Argued that Reagan’s military buildup and Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) were too expensive and burdened taxpayers.
    2. Believed Reagan relied too much on military posturing rather than deals.
    3. Advocated for negotiation and transactional diplomacy, consistent with his business background.
    4. Claimed that Reagan sometimes exaggerated the Soviet threat for political purposes.

    The fall of the Soviet Union showed that Reagan was (with some mistakes in Latin America) overall correct.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,773 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    The fall of the Soviet Union mostly proved that Trump was right about point 1, 2 and 4.

    Wrong about 3 though. USSR was always gonna collapse and die as it was built on a totally unsustainable house of cards. No need to negotiate or worry about them at all really because all that was needed was to wait for them to collapse in on themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,412 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,112 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Many analysts say the arms race brought down the USSR because they couldn't afford it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭randomcorkman


    Any time you want to say Trump was right replace Trump with Rush Limbaugh or possibly another pundit. The idea that Tiny had original geopolitical opinions is laughable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,412 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    He just happened to be right. It's more like predicting the lottery numbers than making an informed analysis from a place of expertise. It's pretty easy in hindsight to cite the Soviets as the pathetic paper tiger that they were but Trump was coming from this weird strongman place of glorifying the opposition in order to attack the President.

    He was also an abysmal businessman who trades in scams and ostentation rather than actual sustainable models.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,773 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Well yes but that's true of most of us. I don't think anyone was implying that he formulated that idea.

    That's a very simplistic analysis. There were so many aspects of the set up that were batsht.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,112 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    The proposed amnesty for war criminals is a slap in the face to the victims.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,773 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Kinda hard to do a peace deal with people you are threatening to arrest.

    It's a fake deal anyway full of things Ukraine can't agree to so that Trump can claim the war is Zelenskys fault and Putin is the good guy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,112 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    However, the Slobodan Milosevic case was an exception. There are rumours though that the assassination of the Serbian PM who extradited him, Zoran Djindic involved the Russian intelligence services.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,054 ✭✭✭10000maniacs


    We'll have food banks like no ones ever seen before, big beautiful food banks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,218 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Ukraine and indeed Europe would be stupid to accept this "deal"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,773 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    That deal was very much done with the threat of NATO annihilation.

    Serbia was in Zelensky's position not Putin's.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,435 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    As a tweet below says;

    "So, to sum it up, "Ukraine is expected to effectively surrender to Russia and neuter its ability to ever defend itself from aggression again, while giving up its autonomy in terms of joining alliances.""



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,773 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Also the US agrees to "help" in unspecified terms but the EU is tied to a monetary value. The US does receive 50 billion though.

    Also seems strict on locking out any European defense guarantee.

    Post edited by breezy1985 on


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators Posts: 54,696 CMod ✭✭✭✭Retr0gamer


    The Ukraine already had security guarantees before the invasion. Look how well that worked out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,786 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Why post a fake meme? (if that is what they are called)

    Are you trying to give fodder to Trump and Republican apologists?



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,726 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    The operative word here is "may" because right now, it's an intangible, and it's also status quo.

    The whole thing isn't exactly a topic of dinner table conversation. I mentioned beef, because that's what the wife was complaining about yesterday after buying some chuck roast. And, yes, the 'stakes' are also high. I'm sure other houses talk about other things, news report came out this week that folks pay more on average on childcare than rent right now, that's gone up. When friends come over, whatever is being talked about over a beer while the kids are playing, it's not the Epstein files, even when politics does come up.

    The entire subject is currently somewhat hypothetical. It's being tracked as a topic, but more as background noise. As Peregrinus observes, there's nothing 'new' here, and attitudes are already baked in, plus it's all 'past tense.' If the files are released and it turns out the President has molested children, I suspect people will start to care. Or more likely they may start to care more about whoever is in the files. But until that happens, it's not something many folks are particularly pressed about.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,360 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    The results of a snap poll on Trumps popularity might be telling if it was based on one question: would you leave your pre-teen daughter home-alone at night with Trump?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,595 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    To be frank, not giving a sh1t about the character of your politicians and disassociating from politics in general is exactly what has gotten your country into the utter mess it is currently in.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 184 ✭✭randomcorkman




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,786 ✭✭✭amandstu


    You don't think the people that elected Trump just looked in the mirror and felt Trump was a good match and what they aspired to in their personal lives.?(He also trashed the same people they hated)

    People who live in the gutter and are happy there .

    They look up to Trump .

    Is AI going to turbocharge all this when (or if) unemployment skyrockets?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,360 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    It seems Trump is Pro-A.I. providing the rules on which it operates is set to a federal standard, that individual states would not have the right to set their own regulations on how A.I. would operate within the individual states. There seems to be a difference of opinions within the GOP on how the states would individually control A.I.

    Trump’s renewed push to block state AI laws sparks another GOP split.

    The MAGA movement is once again divided over artificial intelligence — and this time, the fight is escalating inside the Republican Party.

    President Donald Trump has revived an effort to stop states from regulating AI, calling state-level rules a threat to innovation and urging the creation of “one Federal Standard instead of a patchwork of 50 State Regulatory Regimes.” His post on Truth Social this week echoed language from the administration’s earlier attempt to curb state AI authority, a move that sparked a major Republican revolt over the summer.

    A draft executive order viewed by Business Insider shows the White House preparing to go even further. The order would empower the Justice Department to sue states with “onerous” AI laws and direct federal agencies to explore ways to block or override them.

    A White House official said any talk of executive orders remains speculative until formally announced.

    https://www.msn.com/en-ie/news/world/trump-s-renewed-push-to-block-state-ai-laws-sparks-another-gop-split/ar-AA1QSDR1?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=b95e2214f18241c2de0d95c47c7131b5&ei=17



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,786 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Yes,the GOP made such an effort to repeal Roe v Wade by using (cynically it now seems) the powers of the States to act independently.

    Now they are hoist on their own proverbials as Trump is not interested in Dictatorship in any one State but wants the whole country to follow the mad piper.

    It has always seemed to me that the US is too big to be considered as one democratic entity.(not that they seem too interested in democracy in the first place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,108 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    People might not be talking about politics as much as we think. But that's going to change next week on Thanksgiving, when families come together that haven't seen each other much, if at all, during the year. Plenty of people who have made MAGA their identity are avoided by their relatives the rest of the year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,804 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Just reflecting on Trump and how he’s treating the world- he kisses the asses of despots and ridicules the heads of democratic countries - this “deal” is bang on the money in terms of where Trump has been heading since January - make no mistake, America right now, is not a “friend” of democratic countries- it has more in common now with Russia or China or North Korea and most of South America than it does with Germany or Ireland or France or Spain



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,791 ✭✭✭Glencarraig


    Well Mini Mike is quite fond of having guys "stand behind him"…….wink wink…ya know what I mean !!!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,773 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Some ex-servicepeople who are now elected officials believe the military have an obligation to "refuse illegal orders"

    Trump declared it “SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH!”,

    Surely a big topic around your kitchen table. Would be very odd not to be.



Advertisement
Advertisement