Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

1126112621264126612671881

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,787 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    No surprise at all. FIFA allowed Qatar to walk all over them too.

    The pantheon of the gods at FIFA was always the advertisers known as the "FIFA family" so when Qatar were allowed fuk over Budweiser who have been one of the biggest and most loyal of gods you knew all bets were off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,365 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    He'll survive it no matter what. 1st off, its almost impossible to get rid of a POTUS in office. 2nd, the only thing that will derail Trump is the loss of MAGA support.

    The biggest issue Trump has is the loss of his power of the GOP. If they don't fear him, and his MAGA base, then he becomes a lame duck POTUS. That is the thinking behind the talk of running again. It isn't about running again, its about creating the impression that he is still relevant, and this must be listened to.

    You'll quickly have the likes of Vnce etc out running campaigns once it is clear that Trump is no longer a runner.

    And we all know that Trump hates being irrelevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,680 ✭✭✭Dr Robert


    If it transpires he's a paedophile he won't survive.

    Not a hope that evidence is there though. It would be out years ago.

    The Democrats will probably **** this all up and make Trump stronger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,788 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Knowledge that Epstein (Rapestein would be a nice name for the execrable PotUS) was trafficking underage girls should be enough to permanently cement his reputation -participation is not necessary imo.

    Here is hoping his downfall from here on in can be our Mme Lafarge moment (was she one of the tricoteueses at the guillotine?)

    edit: Mme Defarge (and she was fictional it seems)

    Mme Lafarge was another person that Putin might have found a use for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,787 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Anything except explicit proof will be spun as total vindication and innocence.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,944 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    add to that Schumer is a useless old plodder

    Jasmine Crockett and Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez seem to be the only ones with a pair of cojones on them. They are afraid of no-one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,636 ✭✭✭ilkhanid




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,419 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    There's no direct evidence though. There's nothing strong enough to enable someone to say conclusively that he raped children. There'll be plenty of circumstantial stuff but there's enough ambiguity for anyone to just say that he didn't do it. Same with Mountbatten as things stand.

    The Democrats can't make Trump stronger. It's an odd claim to make. How would they do that, even?

    We all know what he is now. There's no ambiguity with regards to his character. Anyone who defended him yesterday will defend him tomorrow.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,788 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Spin all you like ,you cannot spin your way out of (negligent) complicity.

    We have been here before with other actors.

    Scott Jennings was opining that Trump may have reported him .Best of luck with that (kudos if true but I somehow doubt it)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,787 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    He spun his way out of insighting an insurrection.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,365 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Were he to survive this with support from a sizeable part of the US adult population would read that they are OK with their elected head of state having the freedom to rape and molest their children, long after a percentage of those same adults agreed that he was guilty of rape and sexual assault. It's a shame that he's dragging the USA down the shithole with him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,605 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Clearly *he* thinks there is enough in the files to sink him, and he knows what is in the files, so I think that proves the content important enough...

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,419 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Why did you put he in asterisks?

    Yes, of course. He knows the story but proving it in court is a different matter. I don't think it would sink him politically because we've passed that point.

    Yes. Look at their response to the E. Jean Carroll trial. They will defend him regardless or claim Democrat hoax, as if the Democrats could organise a round of drinks in a bar.

    Conservatives have always been like this. The bar just got a bit lower. Family values for you, adultery for me and an abortion for my girlfriend. Don't even start me on the GOP's nonce problem.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,788 ✭✭✭amandstu


    I think people seem to care less about democracy than the chance to stigmatize others for what is almost universally accepted as deviant and repugnant behaviour.

    I don't see the stain washing off if he was any way complicit or lacking understanding of the depravity of what happened.

    Hope I am proved right.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,419 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I'm reminded of a quote from Harlan Corben:

    “America was waking up, as Germany once did, to the awareness that one-third of our people will kill one-third of our people while one-third of our people watches.”

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,605 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Asterisk, for emphasis.

    One must also consider, in addition to what is in the files, what he will do to prevent their release.

    Arguably, he may be driven to do something that might sink him in circumstances where the content might not.

    Desperation brings recklessness.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,211 ✭✭✭Hoop66


    I suspect that his calculation is that he can brazen out whatever's in the "files", claim it's a hoax, planted by George Soros etc. But to actively block the release is harder to spin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,577 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    There's times I think that Chuck Schumer is a Republican plant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,365 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    I don't agree. He has been forced to release the files. This was never part of the plan. The plan was to make hay out of it in the election and then simply forget about it. Hence, Bondi claimed that the entire thing was done and nothing to see here.

    And despite Trump looking to strongarm GOP'ers and telling everyone to move on, this story hasn't gone away, and now he is forced, and forced it is, to suddenly 180 and look to release the files.

    It's a panic move to try to win back the narrative because up to now, nothing has worked. Either he will become more embroiled in it, or more likely Bondi and Patel will be forced to resign over their handling of it (which everyone knows is just following orders).

    But there is no plan here, apart from trying to put out the latest fire.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,271 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    His mind is deteriorating, he is going to lash out like this more and more in public in the coming months. He won’t be in office this time next year.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,419 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I think he has more in common with actual plants, honestly. I've never seen someone so useless in politics and I live in the UK.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,577 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    There's too many people placing too much hope in these Epstein files as if they're going to be the straw that breaks the camel's back. The thing is, if there's nothing solid in them connecting Trump to using underaged girls, then nothing will happen to him. NOTHING.

    And if he's saying "yeah, release them", and it comes to pass that there's no definite evidence he'll just use it as a victory, claiming that the Democrats were just out to get him, like he's done with every court case he's been involved in.

    Trump is a slippery eel and one who's been extremely careful in covering his tracks. Sure, there's been slip ups here and there. But they're never enough to do him in, not even with the majority of Republican voters, never mind MAGA clowns.

    Think about that. The man is an adjudicated rapist, guilty of sexual assault, a proven fraud and one of the most corrupt individuals that has ever walked on the planet with a long history of fucking people over…and still Republican voters gave them their X. If and when it transpires that there's no damage to him from releasing the Epstein files, it will only end up strengthening him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,862 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    He'll probably claim he can't release them because his 5th amendment right protects him against self incrimination!

    But on a more serious note, there hasn't been much talk about the GOP senators and how they would vote. Maybe he feels he has them lined up to vote against it because there's active investigations ongoing... Or some reason like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 44,419 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    I would disagree that he's been careful. He's just never, ever held to account by anyone. The tabloids of New York made him out to be a character and that just stuck. Even when he ran a casino into the ground, he convinced the governor of Georgia to refuse Deutsche Bank the licence if they repossessed it, making them worthless if they foreclosed. That's just one example.

    The rest of your post I agree with. MAGA worship him as a God and it means that what's in the Epstein files ultimately doesn't mean much. We know he's cancer in a suit but for some people this is what they want.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,271 ✭✭✭EltonJohn69


    he is a lame duck president who has various health issues including dementia. He is not in a position of strength.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,117 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    He's an Israeli agent, which is often the same thing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,117 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    The same Maga voters support their pastors who get done for raping kids. There's a certain cohort who will back him no matter what.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,365 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    I've got to the point in this debate about Trump and his presidencies that I can split what he did before he became president and what he has avoided doing since he became president into two segments.

    The first segment are his unlawful sexual activities. No one worth his or her salt can stand and say with truth that those activities have to be taken as part of a duality while considering if he is now a fit person to serve as the President of the U.S. and say that as that president, he must be obeyed above all.

    His post-election presidential activities are the second segment. IMO, as stand-alone activities, they should have been enough for the GOP to take him by the scruff of his collar and eject him from the office of the president as a thundering disgrace. He never, from day one in 2016, had any loyalty towards the U.S., it's future and its citizens.

    One's vote is to determine the future of the country one lives in as a citizen and not to suit the privileges of the character Trump has revealed himself to be since 2016. He is not worth the salt of any other U.S. citizen, adult or child.

    Trump has deserted the loyalty oath he swore to the people of the U.S. He disgust's me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,682 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    Am I right in saying no one in Epstein survivors group has actually named Trump and if so why? Fear of what Trump would do?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 470 ✭✭tarvis


    The Saudi prince is is the Oval Office and is not wearing a suit!!! Shock horror - NOT. That sort of abuse is just reserved for presidents of invaded countries -

    America it seems is red hot - Looks like Trump is selling that hot property to any passing Sheik.



Advertisement
Advertisement