Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Russia-Ukraine War (continuing)

1694695697699700859

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,452 ✭✭✭brickster69


    It is very possible. Euroclear's Director General echoed what has been pointed out by some for a long time. An institution that safeguards €42.5 trillion worth of securities and processes 330 million transactions each year.

    She points out the extreme risk involved and does not rule out taking the EU to court if forced to disperse Russian assets.

    Quite scary that politicians are even considering this given the risk, just as it is that people wish for it to happen. If it went wrong it could literally affect millions of people in a bad way.

    https://archive.is/20251115152041/https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2025/11/15/euroclear-the-belgian-institution-managing-frozen-russian-assets-that-will-not-rule-out-suing-the-eu_6747484_19.html#selection-2237.649-2237.743

    The old world is dying, and the new world struggles to be born: now is the time of monsters. — Antonio Gramsci



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,481 ✭✭✭Rawr


    Very invested in protecting the Russian’s money, aren’t we Bricky? How very neutral of you.

    You do know why we like news of the Russian’s ill-gotten cash being taken from them, don’t you? Less cash available means few funds for munitions. Munitions that they use to bomb civilians..and children in their beds. Don’t you agree that it is a good thing to limit their ability to do this?

    Oh and don’t forget…continued silence on this speaks volumes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,682 ✭✭✭Deub


    You know what else speaks volumes?
    All these « neutral » posters are only talking about how Ukraine is corrupt or collapsing on the battlefield or how the west is weak (or warmonger, depending of the week). However, they never gives positive things about Russia. That tells you all you need to know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 902 ✭✭✭eoinbn


    There are endless articles on the struggles of the German car sector and chemical sector. Feel free to Google.

    Cheap Russian gas is 1 of the main reasons German was so competitive in these areas. The rise of China's car industry will wipe out the German car outside of Europe which the EU will try and protect with tariffs.

    Mario Draghi published avery detailed report on the lack of European competitiveness and how to solve. It was commissioned by the EU but a year later it is largely ignored. The European solution to an European problem - do nothing until it's far far too late.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,864 ✭✭✭zv2


    Lots of people say Ukraine is corrupt and I can't help seeing the subtext; they are corrupt so it's ok to kill their children. Utterly moronic.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,481 ✭✭✭Rawr


    For sure. It’s part of why I always reply to them.

    I know it’s repetitive, and I know it can get annoying (hell even I feel it, and I’m the one writing these) but my goal is to highlight how biased the post is and how everything written in it should be taken with that bias in mind.

    The Russians and their fan club would love nothing more than to have their scuttle to be framed as “neutral” and “common sense”. It delights me to ruin this intention every single time. There is no moral foundation for anyone who posts in support of a nation who bomb innocent children, and such posts should always get called out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭Jizique


    The debt might not be counted under balanced budget rules but is still there, still needs to be funded and paid back (or rolled over).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,040 ✭✭✭rogber


    Fair response, I hope you're right and that Ukraine can hold out till then



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,040 ✭✭✭rogber


    The US under Trump is clearly at best indifferent to the fate of Ukraine. Maybe not that surprising that they seem more closely aligned to Russia - amoral scum tends to find its own level, and Putin is the kind of pathetic dictator Trump has always admired.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,027 ✭✭✭macraignil


    I'm sure Germany is very appreciative of your concern for their economic situation. They are currently on their own the third largest economy in the world with a GDP greater than India which supports almost 1.5billion people. They are also part of the largest single economic area in the world as a member of the EU. I think they should be able to deal with the funding issues you have mentioned and increase funding for Ukraine in future years to help them deal with issues caused by putin's terrorist state.

    Meanwhile efforts by the armed forces of Ukraine continue to clear putin's terrorists from Kupiansk.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,812 ✭✭✭oceanman


    But Ukraine is a corrupt country….its just that now they have been invaded by an even more corrupt country so people feel bad for them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,153 ✭✭✭Paddigol


    all former soviet nations have had to grapple with legacy corruption issues. No prizes for guessing who left them with that legacy. Efforts to tackle it and sign with regulated, liberal democracies in the EU should be applauded by any right minded person. Those who hold any evidence of corruption (on a scale minuscule compared to Belarus and Russia) as a stick to beat them with are really just unmasking their own agendas. Pitiful really.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,682 ✭✭✭Deub


    The level of corruption has nothing to do with people feeling bad.

    People feel bad for them because they were invaded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,375 ✭✭✭Jizique


    I hope they are because as a frequent visitor and worker in Germany for over 30 years, they have very serious structural issues and by hiding the head in the sand and saying everything will be fine, they will just end up in the same boat as france, with slightly older retirement age for its workers.

    One major issue in Ireland is this attitude of "oh, Germany is wealthy, they will always be able to pay for everything" when the reality is very very different. Crumbling infrastructure (roads, bridges, rail), ageing population, expensive electricity and industry which is suited to the 20th century rather than the 21st.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,400 ✭✭✭Addmagnet


    Germany (and other countries) would still have these issues to deal with now, and in the future, if Russia hadn't decided to **** the bed.

    Ignoring Russia and all the problems it's currently causing in the here'n'now doesn't lessen their impact now, and has the potential to make them greater in the future.

    Deal with problems now, don't put them on the long finger. No point bailing the boat until you've fixed the hole.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,605 ✭✭✭Large bottle small glass


    If you look at corruption perception index pre 2022 war there was very little difference between Russia and Ukraine.

    We are talking Zambia, El Salvador and the like for company.

    The USA is significantly worse than Europe but it is still light years ahead of Russia/Ukraine and the like.

    Ireland is typically Top 10 or close enough.

    The corruption in Ukraine was impossible to miss be it large infrastructure projects, dealing with large public bodies.

    Anyone down playing Ukrainian corruption has never been there. You only need to drive there to understand it.

    You can be very pro Ukraine and acknowledge the endemic corruption within the state.

    Corruption in the USSR took off like a wild fire after the death of Stalin; purges are great to keep a lid on things. 😁

    Reading this thread you would be unaware of the huge increase in Russian drone attacks, 800 per so nightly with their own home produced drones. Ditto advancement in FPV drones on the front.

    NYT, CNN, etc are reporting this.

    In this thread a Financial Times report was discounted as propaganda😁

    https://archive.ph/nQQzl

    Irish times even

    https://archive.ph/u2aWV



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,074 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Update from Denis Davydov. Takeaways:

    • Russian forces briefly infiltrated Rusyn Yar but were destroyed. They wanted to drive north from there to Kostyantinivka.
    • Russia successfully infiltrated Novopavlivka but many killed afterwards. The Ukrainians didn't notice them for a while. This is some way from the southern front.
    • Russia increasingly resorting to infiltration with small groups. Thats what happened in Pokrovsk and Kupiansk originally.
    • In Huliapole in the southern front in Zaporizhia, the Ukrainian commander was eliminated, and the new one was not as effective. Davydov blames some Ukrainian reverses on this front on this.
    • Says there are Russians in Danylivka. Says fasted Russian advance since 2022.
    greyzone.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,027 ✭✭✭macraignil


    I'm very confused by how you think it is appropriate to bring criticism of EU economies into a discussion thread related to the russia-Ukraine war. It is like you are trying to make an argument that somehow putin's terrorist state has a hope of maintaining it's economic viability longer than the EU does, when it is plane to see he is in charge of an economic basket case of a country that once had a hope of economic and social development due to is rich natural resources, but has now pissed those prospects away by following the deranged logic of a senile dictator. The EU can see that putin winning in Ukraine will cost them more than any other outcome to the conflict so funding for a defeat of putin's terrorists will continue to increase.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,074 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Russian authorities have prohibited electric and hybrid vehicles from crossing the Crimean Bridge, fearing that large EV batteries could conceal powerful explosive charges, according to UNITED24.

    Ukraine sabotaged the Trans Siberian Railway close to the North Korean border. Some months ago, Zelensky said I think about 40% of Russian munitions were supplied by NK.

    Russian logistics is highly dependent on rail.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,130 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Certain posters are so heavily focused on micro-movements that I think every now and again you have to reset and look at the overall picture.

    Russia is the invader looking to conquer another country.

    The war is going on for almost 4 years. They've made, in the overall scheme of things, completely negligble gains and sustained horrific losses.

    Russia is performing horribly. Russia's economy and oil infrastructure is taking a severe battering. Russia's demographs are taking a severe battering.

    Yes obviously Ukraine is suffering but they're fighting a different style of war - a war of survival for the Ukrainian state.

    It is Russia's war to lose effectively considering their indescribably collossal advantage in February 2022.

    Trying to frame WW1 style advances - small parcels of land gained at back-breaking human cost - as some sort of strategic plan is as transparent as a sheet of glass.

    For Russia to "win" it would take a hundred years at the current pace and even if that were to magically happen sooner, they'd then have to occupy and pacify, which in itself would be equally as difficult.

    Equally idiotic is people comparing this to the US in Vietnam and Afghanistan. Russia has taken more than 10x casulties than the US suffered in both those conflicts over a 20 year period, putting aside the fact the US was not fighting a war of survival of any kind.

    Russia military expenditure per year up to 2022 was about 50 billion. Ukraine was about 10% of that. The difference is Ukraine invested in western tech and NATO style training. Russia probably lost half of their spend to corruption.

    It's just a no-win scenario for Russia. For their economy, their population, everything. The sooner someone deposes Putin the better for both sides.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,864 ✭✭✭zv2


    Well, there's a world of a difference between internal corruption and a murderous invasion. Let Russia keep its corruption within its borders or deal with it.

    It looks like history is starting up again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 124 ✭✭ElektroToad


    You hit the right notes but are only focusing on Russia's performance. Yes, this been a grinding war for both sides and yes, no doubt Russia has suffering horrific losses by any standards, but it appears that Ukraine has too suffered horrific losses, and has as the smaller nation, it is Ukraine who runs the risk of breaking first on the battlefield.

    There is a sense that something across the frontlines that feels different. Russia is now making advances across multiple fronts at the same time, advances that were impossible for them to achieve only a year or 2 ago. Combine that, with the fact that now Ukraine's manpower problems are openly discussed in western media (it's no longer about needing Leopard tanks, F16s, or artillery shells, but rather actual soldiers who can hold ground and fight), there is a sinking feeling that if Russia cracks through the final few fortress belt cities that have been place since 2014, then the momentum of this frontline could very much pick up speed.

    Ukraine is now going "all in" in terms of these drone and missile strikes on Russian refineries and other infrastructure, as it appears that AFU commanders themselves have accepted that they are no longer capable of any large scale offensive actions against Russian positions This appears to be the smart move, but it's really hard for us to accurately measure the success or how quickly it can inflict enough economic pain for Russia before Putin will even think about opening real negotiations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,074 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Putin now turning on some of his Z-cheerleaders. While they strongly support the war, they also criticise commanders for military failures.

     The pro-war bloggers that fell out of Putin’s grace and patience:

    • Roman Alekhin — accused of misusing funds after flaunting luxury cars and watches. He has now been designated a "foreign agent".
    • Sergey Markov — once a trusted Kremlin pundit, punished after publicly supporting Azerbaijan. Now designated a "foreign agent".
    • Tatyana Montyan — former Ukrainian lawyer turned pro-war propagandist, added to “terrorists and extremists” list
    • Oksana Kobeleva — detained after criticizing Chechen Akhmat commander Apti Alaudinov


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,842 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    For Russia to "win" it would take a hundred years at the current pace

    Are you talking about annexation of all Ukraine here? Not clear that Putin is realistically aspring to that, or what would constitute an aceptable 'win' in his eyes. Perhaps if he could grab the bulk of the legendary 'four oblasts' he might cash in his chips?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,074 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    The precedent of the thing down the road is a threat to all democracies, and the principle of sovereign borders. I have felt for years that the hints from both the Biden and Trump administrations (in the first case more briefing to the press) that Ukraine has to cede territory, even if not recognising the ceding of it, really incentivises big states to keep doing this. So far its only Russia doing it. But tomorrow it might be China. This is a bad idea. Reagan didnt offer the USSR part of Afghanistan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,027 ✭✭✭macraignil


    The war in Ukraine is not some perverse game of cards where war criminal putin gets to put down his winning hand and claim he has won something. What makes you think the Ukrainians will simply let him keep his terrorist forces in Ukraine and not hunt down his murderous scum for decades to come?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,275 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    That's all well and good but Denys Davydov in his latest video highlights how Russia is gaining momentum and will likely be attacking Zaporizhia city next year. It's a massive blow if Russia takes this city which hosted a million people. It'll give him a huge platform to expand control further up the Eastern bank of the Dnipro.

    There is a feeling Ukraine is running out of soldiers but Russia is a long way off running out of meat wave recruits which could cost the advancement to accelerate.

    I'm hoping this isn't the case and technically attacking a huge city like Kharkiv as we seen already or Zaporizhia will be advantageous to Ukraine.

    But how would the battle of Zaporizhia play out. The vast majority of the city is on the wrong side of the river. How will Ukraine support it logistically. Similar to how Russia struggled with Kherson. Have they built underground tunnels under the Dnipro? Enough to bring whatever supplies would be needed. Food, weapons, drones, ammunition etc. If this has to be done by boats it'll be a disaster.

    A positive of the river will stop the Russians flanking the city and threatening an encirclement so they'll be forced to attack it head on. If current trends continue this battle will be a huge talking point next year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,074 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Of course the US sanctioning Rosneft and Lukoil could be a gamechanger.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,275 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    Call me deluded but until a settlement actually falls I still cling on to hope that Ukraine will hold the current lines.

    Povtrosk for example we're half way through November and Russia still hasn't closed the pocket. 6 weeks ago we were sure it'd be gone by now. Could it hold another week, another month or maybe into 2026?

    Denys is glass half empty this guy half full.

    It's painful for Ukraine but Russia has to finish this job. Ukraine I'm sure are enjoying hitting the endless Russian assaults and their vehicles being thrown at this. I'd say they'd love to keep this battle going into snow season.

    Russia would have to seriously up the vehicle to soldier ratio like they did with Andiivka which creates a target rich environment.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,074 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Reports that the fog has cleared in Pokrovsk. Thats good for Ukrainian drones.



Advertisement
Advertisement