Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Aer Lingus Fleet/ Routes Discussion Pt 2 (ALL possible routes included)

1295296297298299301»

Comments

  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,345 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    He weighed in by disallowing cabin crew to sit in business when the agreement is they can do so where available on a positioning duty. He did they because they were not Unite union members and had operated despite an ongoing strike.
    This was brought to the attention of management.

    Any experienced pilot here knows well it make absolutely no odds to the cockpit crew where a positioning cabin crew sit during the cruise of a ferry flight.

    This was punishment to honor the striking crew.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,865 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    From what I've heard it was an instruction, not a clarification. In fact the manual actually says the opposite of what the manager instructed: positioning crew are required to stay in the cabin they were assigned and not move to another one during the flight.

    Another point: If all the crew had sat in business class, who is keeping an eye on things down the back should, God forbid, a fire break out in the rear galley? Wonder if there's a requirement for someone to be back there just in case?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,990 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    They’d “****” them out of it just as I expect most pilots would!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,064 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    The “manual” doesn’t require the crew to stay anywhere. The actual sop for a ferry flight has no specification for where crew sit for departure (A321N excluded), additionally cabin crew are entitled to a business seat if one is available. Simply put, trim is not an issue on an A330

    Regarding issues down the back, there is a requirement for regular checks, which is a written sop and would have been performed.


    Without knowing what exactly was said and how it was phrased it’s very hard to come to any conclusion but safety was never in jeopardy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,713 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 412 ✭✭user060916


    The Pilot and the Union come across very poorly from that article.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,345 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Read like a classic power struggle to me

    “I’ll show you who’s the real boss here” (shakes fist angrily)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 153 ✭✭Lapmo_Dancer


    Apparently MAN based crew do not have a collective working conditions agreement with the company. ROI based crew may well have entitlement to position in Business but that would be irrelevant here.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,345 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Would there be any other legitimate, operational or safety reason why, on an entirely empty aircraft, an entire positioning crew would be prohibited from sitting in a business class seat ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,929 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    So far they seem to have confidence to continue flying.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8 dean333


    @Locker10a weight and balance of ‘positioning/ferrying’ aircraft criteria parameters also as someone mentioned above CAA states movements shouldn’t be rearranged mid flight, remain as per load sheet



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,345 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    So you’re telling me an Airbus 330 aircraft is so precariously balanced inflight that 8 adults could cause a serious offset to its trim while in the cruise ?
    Interesting!
    And I wonder how this issue has never been highlighted before, as this exact type of flight has happened many times in the past.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8 dean333


    Aer Lingus does have specific rules for positioning/ferry flights to avoid carrying ballasts to maintain ‘flight envelope’ it’s never been as issue before because cabin crew have never sent an email behind the back of a captain complaining, if a captain feels that it’s more safe to remain crew in accordance with load sheet seat when such as ferrying/positioning with flight envelope already achieved , it’s his decision as he’s responsible



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,345 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    So surely if this explanation was given to the crew ? And they would have been briefed by the captain ?And it wouldnt have escalated and their management contacted ?

    Where in accordance with the load sheet would the crew have to be positioned?

    Why on previous flights has this not happened?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 46 StakeholderValue


    I suspect the UK CAA and the IAA are taking a very close look at the events of the past week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,929 ✭✭✭✭Jamie2k9


    As you would expect from authorities. All are entitled to file such a report even if the motives for doing so might be questionable.

    The union should have allowed it conclude before throwing the toys out of the pram!



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,190 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    As mentioned above, during a ferry flight there must be periodic walk through of the cabin and galley to ensure nothing untoward is occurring. The cabin crew were onboard for this purpose.

    I think its either every 15 or 30 minutes.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,345 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Nothing to prevent staggering or assigning of break or rest periods where some could have taken a seat in business, say two at a time.

    Mind you, no more than 2 at a time, so not to tip over the aircraft, you know, for trim and the precision of weight and balance which is seemingly dreadfully precarious on an A330



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 10,190 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Yeah, the trim concern seems somewhat oveblown.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,865 ✭✭✭lintdrummer


    Well I'm only going on what I was told but it was that it's in the operations manual that crew should not move from their assigned cabin.

    I think where some confusion is arising here is whether the crew were positioning or operating? I read that they were listed as operating crew on the load sheet, in which case they wouldn't be entitled to any passenger seat because they are not positioning. Granted, there are no passengers, so it's a strange situation. But it should be clear whether or not the crew were positioning or operating.

    The point was made earlier that they didn't check in or have boarding cards. In that case it seems to suggest they were operating crew, not positioning, and thus it's entirely up to the captain whether they could, in fact, sit in business class.

    Finally, it's not for you or me to say whether safety was ever in jeopardy. We weren't there. All the media reports say that the captain filed a safety report after the flight, so those who are qualified to make that determination, will.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 153 ✭✭Lapmo_Dancer


    Aer Lingus pilots resign safety roles in support of suspended colleague

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/2025/11/12/aer-lingus-pilots-resign-safety-roles-in-support-of-suspended-colleague/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    if 8 people sitting in business rather than economy can cause balance issues, would you not need to know the weight of all passengers on a regular flight? Can’t see how 8*75kg would cause an issue on an A330, but would welcome any pilot views on if it would. Have seen some comments say “if in the captains view, it was needed for safety, then that’s what’s needed”. Trying to see if all captains would see it that way - that it is an issue.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,345 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    a8ec3f48-35e7-4eb4-a2f4-74575399365e.jpeg

    This is doing the rounds on WhatsApp !!

    Of course 8 people wouldn’t make any difference to an A330 inflight!
    During the pandemic EI regularly sent empty A330 flights and the outbound crew positioned home in business class.
    It’s never been an issue before

    Curiously it just happened to become an issue when a crew who were non Unite members were positioning back!!



Advertisement