Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

1384385387389390405

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,477 ✭✭✭1800_Ladladlad


    Carol Nolan in the dail today, demanding the immediate deportation of all non-nationals convicted of violent crimes, including those committed by Josef Puska in Tullamore. She called for an end to the pandering to such people's so called 'right' to remain here indefinitly. Of course they interupt her

    The Department of Justice is supposed to be introducing a new process for stripping citizenship from Irish citizens. This system will allow the State to revoke the Irish citizenship of the likes of Algerian Islamist terrorist Ali Charaf Damache. This same process should be used to get rid of non nationals committing crime.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,766 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    The reason is the same reason Spain helped us in Hugh O'Neill's rebellion. Namely that we are the backdoor to the UK. Except this time its the backdoor to NATO.

    We have no deterrence unlike Article NATOs Article 6.

    Theres also reason to believe some of the outspoken pro Russian figures might collaborate with Russia. Remember Cobalt?

    Many on the Irish Left are outspoken critics of the US and NATO or even the EU. On the extremes, a few praise Marxist dictatorships like Maduro and Cuba.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,766 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    It was the arms race and containment that brought down Communism.

    Other Neutrals do spend heavily on defence.

    We may have to choose between our independence and our neutrality, if we are invaded.

    And remember, in WW2, the allies occupied Iceland to stop it falling into German hands. If in a NATO-Russia war, it was felt we were being too difficult in cooperating against Russia, that might happen to us. It led to Iceland getting independence from Denmark, but also to it being part of NATO. many countries that had been neutral in 1940 ended up in NATO after WW2. Also Denmark initially asked the US to leave Greenland and they refused.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,766 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Also predicting Belarus' actions is difficult. They were a springboard to invading Kyiv region in 2022.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Ah stop. I know my history thanks. If (and it's a huge If) Ireland is invaded for some obscure strategic reason then a lot of factors have gone very very very wrong and there are likely going to be nukes in the air which is game over anyway. I have absolutely zero fear of invasion and nothing you say will change that fear level. If it is a superpower doing this imaginary invasion then we are not stopping them anyway and nukes will follow. Trump is more likely to invade Ireland than Putin by the way 🙂

    You'll be telling me Strongbow is on the march next.

    Let's spend our money on housing, infrastructure first eh...

    I do want Rockall back though 🤔

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,766 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    We achieved an outcome we could live with against a superpower in 1922. Finland survived a Soviet invasion. We are less likely to be invaded if we have Article 5.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I think we have done more than enough for the Ukrainians, particularly when you look at other countries in the EU. In fact we went way too far with our support for a country so far removed from us, not even in the EU. We owe them nothing and the idea we will need them if we are invaded is laughable. There is no threat of invasion here and any mention of is just an effort to justify spending a shed load of money on arms..under the guise of defense....of a neutral country.

    EU do not get to dictate our neutrality or how we defend ourselves, or not… and we should not let than happen. FFG have a fight on their hands if they continue to push down that road. Nobody voted for a militarized EU or were ever asked...we did vote for the triple lock as part of an EU vote though...and FFG can jog on in that regard as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,348 ✭✭✭creedp


    Personally I think a lot of the clamouring to get rid of neutrality stems from modern thinking Irish people more than anything don’t want to be embarrassed on the international stage by old Irish traditions. They want to proudly walk tall with their international brethren and be patted on the back for being so generous and compassionate and supportive of pretty much anything that benefits other jurisdictions. It was well put by the German ambassador when we were prepared to sell our souls to the ECB…why do the Irish always want to be loved!


    It’s a costly business by the noisy minority for the rest of use this wanting to be loved



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,190 ✭✭✭TokTik


    So Hitlers coming for us? Should we be importing vast amounts of peroxide and blue contact lenses??



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,190 ✭✭✭TokTik


    I’ve seen the ukrs are holding a protest about their accommodation being reduced. Ungrateful is not the word.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,746 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    It's not Ireland's (or more importantly the Irish) responsibility to solve the world's problems or take in anyone who arrives with a sad story - Ukrainian or otherwise.

    I feel sympathy for anyone who is struggling or suffering elsewhere, but that's not the same as obligation or responsibility.

    We have enough problems right here that the Government can't (or won't) deal with, let alone tens of thousands of randomers and especially opportunists looking for a better life.

    What do WE get from all this? What's the benefit to US - because as I've said before, the benefits shouldn't all be one way!

    Is it to add massive pressure to our services, infrastructure, and supports? To have them take and take until they're ready to go home? (as happened during the recession years). To bring their cultural, political, religious, and behavioural problems with them?

    Sorry, but that doesn't seem like a great deal to me!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,373 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Are you still maintaining there is parts of Ukraine that bombs aren’t being dropped on and using Lviv as an example?

    That’s what you stated which is a lie.


    Ukrainian tourism page saying parts are safe and please come to our country.

    Yeah no balance there, imagine a tourism page trying to promote their country which is in desperate need of financial assistance at the moment as they fight a war.

    Anyway your safe place in Ukraine below.


    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czjvlgzmp4wo.amp

    Post edited by Jinglejangle69 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Figures show that there are 80k here that need accommodation , 54k not working require welfare and accommodation . 26k working most in low paid jobs after time they may find they are better off on welfare . Hardly a resounding success like you say , do you recommend the same should be given to Gazans and in the same number .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,871 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Travel advice from the UK foreign office these regions are listed as the safest .

    • Zakarpattia  
    • Ivano-Frankivsk 
    • Ternopil 
    • Chernivtsi 
    • Lviv 

    https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/ukraine



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,792 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    WTF are you talking about?

    I never mentioned Lviv and don't appreciate being called a liar.

    I told you twice now about a site run BY UKRAINIANS IN UKRAINE and you are too stubborn to admit you are wrong encouraging tourism to the SAFE PARTS of the country.

    But hey the guy on Boards knows better than the people who own that site

    Let's just leave it be now because I'm very close to saying something that could get me another month's ban from here



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,245 ✭✭✭Archduke Franz Ferdinand


    Simon Harris is now concerned about high immigration. Be da holy. Remember Verona Murphy’s was fkd out of Fine Gael for expressing the same views which at that time was deemed racist. Harris is a husk of a man , stands for nothing only keeping himself in power.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,387 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    It was mainly Irish citizens who left during the last recession. Net inward migration of non-EU nationals continued during the last recession, albeit at a lower rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,769 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Lviv was heavily bombed as recently as October 5th - hit by 140 drones and 23 missiles. So even a supposedly "safe" area in Ukraine is not safe at all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,373 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Your first quote:

    “parts of the country where there are no Russian soldiers or bombs being dropped and come to countries like Ireland as refugees”

    Your Ukrainian tourist board quotes Lviv as being relatively safe.

    You’re quoting and using their guidance as saying parts of Ukraine have no bombs being dropped on them.


    Are there bombs being dropped on Lviv? Are civilians dying, yes or no?

    Say what you want, really doesn’t bother me.

    You’re the one who started by saying Ukrainians shouldn’t be here as parts of Ukraine aren’t being bombed and then went on to quote a Ukrainians site saying Lviv is safe.


    Again you and the Ukrainian tourism website safe area of Ukraine below.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/czjvlgzmp4wo.amp



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,373 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    According to our experts here it’s safe. Of course they would go with their families for a holiday.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 22,074 Mod ✭✭✭✭Leg End Reject


    Mod - please take the general Ukraine discussion to the dedicated thread. While discussion of the changes for Ukraine refugees is relevant, discussion of the war/safe areas isn't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 858 ✭✭✭BP_RS3813


    We sorely need to stop caring about our international/EU good boy image - be willing to tell outside interests to f*ck off.

    That way we would dictate our own policies regarding immigration whether that be African/Ukrainian asylum seekers/refugees.

    The ability to not care what people think and not fall to pressure from outside interests is a great asset and we really should be making use of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    That's very easy to say but we are an EU member state and are bound by directives such as BOTP. We also signed up to a lot of the EU Migration Pact which starts in June next year. Are you suggesting we leave the EU?

    The only people to blame for the terrible processing system and generous benefits system is FFG. Yet they were voted in again last year.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,348 ✭✭✭creedp




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,389 ✭✭✭PokeHerKing


    We can dictate and do whatever we like. We are a sovereign nation first and foremost.

    This constant narrative from the extreme left of obligations or responsibilities or the EU says this or a 1950s document says that.

    Reminds me of my parent's asking me when I was younger if id stick my hand in a fire just because my mates did.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,921 ✭✭✭Nermal


    We can choose not to conform to EU law without leaving. There is no mechanism by which we can be ejected. As a net contributor we can ignore fines. On any aspect of EU law which we would be likely to disapply we would easily find allies within the bloc to support us.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Ok. What would you suggest we do? Where would we start with say the BOTP folks? Gueze had a plan to send 40k back to Ukraine for example but he wouldn't answer questions about it.

    Sorry this was a reply to @Nermal

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,039 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    You can see their logic. They are opposed to the 'share the burden' element of the pact because they have already done so for BOTP. They took the most Ukrainian migrants by far at the beginning of the war in particular.

    The article states "Poland has argued that it would be unfair if it were expected to do this because it welcomed millions of Ukrainian refugees after Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022, and still houses almost a million of them."

    They should be given an exemption on that basis. The Pact kicks in next June.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Thats all well and good, but other countries are taking their "obligations" quite differently. Poland, Netherlands, Hungary.

    This international obligations thing really needs to be looked at. Our "yes sir, no sir" approach to Europe isn't really what we signed up for, but thats more an FFG/NGO issue than a Europe issue imho. Its very easy for the government to point the finger at Europe for everything they don't want to accept responsibility for too.



Advertisement