Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1160016011603160516061848

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    There was absolutely no one good enough to take Healy's shirt. It was a huge position of weakness across the provinces, and arguably we've rushed two guys in Boyle and McCarthy to this point.

    Henderson hasn't featured a lot since the RWC - he hasn't started once for Ireland since then, and has played under 200 minutes across 7 appearances off the bench; mostly driven by injury to Ryan & McCarthy at different times.

    They clearly were keen to get the likes of Tom Ahern involved, but every time they called him into a squad he got injured.

    I would have liked to see Craig Casey and the likes of Baird/Izuchukwu/Prendergast get more minutes from Murray & O'Mahony over the past couple of seasons, but I think both of them were playing well right up to the end.

    They are gradually rotating and evolving the squad - it's just not always with the players certain people want to see.

    The team that started last weekend had 7 changes in the starting XV from the team that played NZ 12 months ago, and another 5 changes on the bench. We had Jamie Osborne starting at 15, Tommy O'Brien making just his third cap on the right wing, McCloskey & Crowley's form rewarded at 12 & 10; a debutant 22-year-old loosehead prop on the bench.

    It's not wholesale changes, but this notion that we're making no changes isn't the case either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 255 ✭✭JeanRasczak


    Tommy started on Saturday

    Bala was injured and just back wasnt he?

    Stockdale came on, which was a huge plus as I love the guy and hopefully he gets an extended run.

    Hansen was injured, Keenan was injured

    Does Farrell just want speed? or do fans think that?

    That team won a 6 nations so not sure you could say out of form after the World Cup



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,000 ✭✭✭almostover


    2 things in your posts I'd like to challenge.

    First is that bringing in Ross Byrne or Crowley for the last 15 mins against NZ wouldn't have sparked anything to get us over the line. It would have had a better chance of doing so if either or both of those guys had seen some decent match time in that tournament or in the 12 months leading up to it. But we kept using Sexton in every game where we wanted a result. Not to mention that it was a free roll of the dice even with those players not having seen much prior game time. Why? Because Sexton could barely walk in the last 15mins of that game.

    Secondly, you are correct in saying that Cian P is ahead of Coombes in Farrell's books. I'm questioning why? Cian P is a good player but I think its fair to say he hasn't had the same consistent impact as Coombes at URC and CC level over the past 2-3 seasons. It's clear he does something in camp that Farrell prefers to Coombes and their in lies my issue. The coach prioritises what happens in camp over what guys are doing on the pitch with their provinces. And on top of that Cian P hasn't played a game of note with Ireland since the 2023 6N. He too is a victim of the selection policy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,642 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    We could've won without Healy, POM or Murray imo.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,437 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    If I had to choose to make 3 changes to the starting 15, and 3 to the bench:
    Starting changes: (1) Stockdale for Lowe, (2) Sam Prendergast start and Crowley bench, (3) Aki for McCloskey.
    Bench changes: (1) Clarkson for Bealham, (2) Ahern for Henderson, (3) Farrell at 23.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Bart97


    Tommy is a good start, you’ve also got JOB. I understand that long term some of these players may not be the solution but you can’t whinge about about pace and then select Osborne and Lowe in the back three. Osborne should be in the centre and no back three.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Bart97


    There absolutely was in Boyle, much better engine and ball carrier. Again, conservatism took hold.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Nah, I disagree. I still don't think he's ready now realistically, his scrummaging is not up to the level required IMO. He absolutely wasn't ready back in the 6N immediately after the RWC, when he was 21 years old.

    It's a position with virtually no options, so we've accelerated Boyle & McCarthy (after McCarthy did a serious year of S&C from his U20 days, where he put on enormous size in c. 12 months), and I think McCarthy will become a really good long term option there for Leinster & Ireland, but I don't think either were really an option in the 2024 Six Nations.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 255 ✭✭JeanRasczak




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 597 ✭✭✭Tommybojangles


    I mean I did point out that Crowley, Byrne and Carbury had all started games in the previous 12 months. byrne and crowley numerous games and against tier 1 nations. In the world cup the only real gripe was leaving sexton on so long against romania and those minutes would hardly have turned Crowley into Dan Carter. Sexton was taken off at half time in the last 2 group games if I remember correctly.


    The idea that we didn't do all we could to have an alternative to Sexton at the world Cup is just Sh1t stirring imo. The options weren't there. Carbery was the man and was injured and out of form to the extent that Crowley forced him out at Munster and Crowley then got fast tracked (rightly) into starting that Australia game in 2022.

    I think it's clear and obivous that Club form gets you into camp and then you have to earn a spot on the team so I disagree on your second point. My oriningal point was that talking about coombes is wasting time is behind Prendergast who is 3rd choice 8 more than likely. I wouldn't expect the third choice 8 to get much game time not to mind the 4th choice, if that's what Coombes is. It's totally derailing the conversation talkign about a position where we are very well stocked for no apparent reason



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,069 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    It perfectly captures the selective nature of so many of these criticisms that five days ago, Paddy McCarthy played against the All Blacks after a grand total of 5 professional starts, but people still need to hark back to Healy as evidence of conservatism.

    It also raises the question that if Boyle has already been overtaken by McCarthy for both Leinster and Ireland (and that remains to be seen, of course), did we really lose that much by not giving him more minutes last year?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Bart97


    There’s not a single area of Cian Healy’s game that he’s better than Boyle at, not to mention that he doesn’t have the engine Boyle has.

    If you don’t think Boyle is ready than fair enough but if he’s not ready than Healy, who’s inferior, shouldn’t have been anywhere near an Irish side to begin with.

    There are no options because we’ve ensured there are no options by not blooding anyone and wasting all the potential minutes or caps on a 37 year old who was nowhere near good enough. What I saw from Boyle last season he was clearly better than Healy and if Healy was good enough to make an Irish 23 than so was Boyle.


    A concept that we seem to struggle with in Ireland is a word called “patients”. What we do in Ireland is cap a young player, expect them to be amazing straight away, and then when the unrealistically high expectations aren’t reached they are chucked out and the older option (who ironically never reach those heights either) is drafted in because they make fewer mistakes. It’s this sort of mindset that leads Ireland to having 35/36 year olds constantly in the 23 and has plagued Irish rugby for years.


    Likes I’ve said before, I’ve seen Boyle plenty for Leinster and he’s comfortably ready to make the step up…those who think otherwise either haven’t actually watched him or have made their mind up before even giving him a chance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Bart97


    It is evidence, if Healy was still around do we think he would have been left out of the squad on Saturday? The last 6N was the chance to prove that Healy was droppable and the coaches failed…it’s no good dropping him in the Italy game when the championship is gone.


    Well we did, Boyle is still a potential option in 2027…Healy is not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 460 ✭✭Bart97




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 255 ✭✭JeanRasczak




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Cian Healy, likely right now today if forced to go put the boots on, would still be capable of holding up a scrum at the highest levels. That's a pretty fundamental part of the props job description, and it's something he is way way better still than Jack Boyle at.

    I'm not saying Boyle won't get there, but he isn't there yet, and definitely wasn't back in February 2024 as an undersized 21-year old.

    Boyle definitely is pacier, better around the field, a better ball carrier at that point in Healy's career etc, but Boyle's biggest weakness remains his scrummaging, and the only reason Healy was still being selected until the end was because he remained a capable and competent scrummager.

    We didn't "chuck Boyle out" for the older option - he never really got a place in the main Irish 23 to begin with, directly because of the weaknesses I'm describing above. He's lost his role (very early sample tbc) to a guy who is younger and less experienced too, so unsure how that figures into your logic here.

    Also, fwiw, I'm pretty sure the spelling of the word you're looking for is 'patience' - patients are people who are receiving medical treatment.

    Does any part of you accept that people who know a lot more than you (namely the Leinster & Irish coaches) about Jack Boyle's scrummaging and all around game, simply felt he wasn't ready and held him back because of that? When an even younger player has emerged now who looks like he can do the most fundamental requirement of a prop, he's been elevated.

    I don't realistically see how Paddy McCarthy could have been expected to make the leap he has any earlier than he has - he needed to put on a lot of size coming out of underage rugby, but now they look to be fully backing him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,642 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    You say Boyle's struggles scrummaging justify his exclusion in place of Healy, when Porter gives away game losing penalties match after match. Porter has many world class attributes, but it's a fact that as an elite professional, he is diabolical at the most fundamental role of his position. The fact he hasn't corrected it is a damning indictment of him and his various coaches



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    I haven't been but I probably would start a little bit. Playmaking ability mattered far more in our multiphase possession gameplan, but if we really are going to a more kick heavy approach (and all signs point to both us doing that and international rugby in general) then I think we are missing out on a lot by not having much pace in the back 3.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Porter isn't getting physically outmatched, and there are days (and under certain referees) where he is the one dominating his opponent.

    It's infuriating how frequently he gets pinged for the same thing, but a lot of that is his reputation preceding him at this point. One of the most high profile examples of a day where he was pinged repeatedly was the 2023 RWC QF, but I 100% believe those were the wrong decisions. The commentary and analysis of relatively noteworthy scrummagers like Alex Corbisiero & Mike Ross supported that view.

    Boyle is getting physically out-matched still at this point, and there is very little you can do about that IMO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,069 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    But that is utterly irrelevant in Boyle vs Healy (which itself is utterly irrelevant now)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 6,675 ✭✭✭P.Walnuts


    "Diabolical "

    " Game losing penalties"

    Come on now, you can criticise a player without that nonsense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,865 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    ignoring the form thing for now, but can you show where youre getting the 60/40 split at 10 from? JC didnt get much gametime in the 6Ns and apart from England and Italy it was in different positions?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,051 ✭✭✭50HX


    Healy 2025 6 nations

    7min v England

    11min v Scotland

    12min v France

    He got subbed after 19mins in the CC semi final.

    I don't see where in these minutes that Boyle couldn't have done a job & minute's far more beneficial to him. Was Boyle that awful v Wales that they hurried back to Healy?

    Healy around the pitch in his last year offered zero...i don't understand the suggestion that they played him purely for his scrum ability & thought we'll manage around the field with 14 when he's on



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,865 ✭✭✭sprucemoose


    i know people say he was fast tracked into the team against aus in 2022, but really it was more a freak run of injuries to Frawley, Carbery and Sexton that lead to Crowley starting that game. I'd imagine if Sexton was fit he would have gotten little to no gametime

    Its debateable as to where club form gets you into camp also to be honest. Crowley and Prendergast are good examples of this, neither had that much gametime at senior level before being brought in and JC had mainly being playing 12/15. you then go on to mention coombes who has shown pretty great club form over the years despite not getting into numerous squads - much as i take the point that the 3rd choice is unlikely to get much gametime



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Yeah, but you don’t know when you pick a bench if you’re going to lose a player in the first minute or whatever will happen.

    My sense was, they thought the possibility of having Boyle potentially in that situation was too big a risk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,384 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    In the past 12 months, Crowley has gotten 425 mins, Prendergast has gotten 551.

    That works out as 44% of the mins for Crowley.

    Some of those mins weren’t at 10, but I don’t have that detail. It’s still a fairly even distribution of mins however you shake it out.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 45,346 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    surely the fact that Boyle got similar numbers from the bench against italy and wales, and started against both Georgia and Portugal (getting 55 mins in each game)… and YET still has been leap frogged by Paddy Mc shows that the mins given to him were enough to measure him up.

    is your argument that if he got Healys minutes he would have become a better player?

    if thats not your argument, what is it?

    as for Healy offering zero around the park, he got 6 mins against England and had one carry for 4 meters. Thomas Clarkson who was on the pitch for 21 minutes carried twice for 1 meter.

    Similarily against France Healy got 11 minutes and Clarkson got 20. Healy carried 4 times for 8 meters in those 11 minutes whereas Clarkson carried 3 times for 0 meters.

    Against Scotland he was anonymous for the 12 minutes he got, but similarly the sub TH also made 0 ground with ball in hand.

    So while he wasn't his barnstorming Church circa 2010 he was far from an empty jersey and saying we played with 14 men is far more damning on those players who were less impactful over longer minutes than he was.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,865 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    While I get this logic, I would have been deeply worried about putting Healy on early as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,990 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    This is correct; excluding Crowley's mins that weren't at 10, it still works out as 59% Prendergast vs 41% Crowley.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,990 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    For me it was defensively in particular where I'm not sure the benefits of Healy at scrumtime were outweighing the downsides. Top of my head, but I think there were 2 occasions where he was stepped pretty badly, leading to tries in the 6 Nations.



Advertisement
Advertisement