Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

1381382384386387398

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 112 ✭✭_Quilombero_


    There are hardly any asylum seekers in tents these days (the Athlone tent centre has just been closed down). Even the people in tents have access to a huge range of services such as professional catering, cleaning, laundry, transport, etc.

    That said, I dont like the "solution" of charging occupants for IPAS accommodation. Even the highest proposed rate wouldn't cover costs and chances are most occupants will be charged a lesser amount. In return for a small fee we're creating a sense that they're tenants and that this emergency accommodation is a social housing solution only available to those who have arrived by breaking the law.

    It discriminates against everyone else who can't find or afford accommodation. If you're going to create subsidised hostels, then legal citizens should have the option to use them. I'm sure plenty of students out there who would be glad of a bed near their university, for example, with food, laundry, Wifi and recreation areas.

    There are also thousands of people with refugee status living in IPAS centres. They should not be charged rent. They should be moved out and dealt with by homeless services and the NGOs that want open borders. We need to stop confusing systems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    He also opposed the changes to our citizenship law in the referendum in 2004, which 80% voted for.

    I am 45 and all my life most of the Irish media has been approaching the immigration issue too emotionally in my opinion. I have empathy for people actually fleeing danger. But I think the system is being abused, and a big part of this is the free legal aid for asylum appeals going on for years. We are an outlier in the EU regarding free legal aid for every avenue of appeal.

    If we were only starting down this road, as in the 1990s, the Left would have a point that we should be generous given our history. But we are now in 2025 and we have already been generous.

    While I condemn attacks on IPAS centres and asylum seekers, I think we know from Northern Ireland that when peaceful outlets for democratic debate are shut down, that unfortunately, a fringe sometimes engages in violence instead. If there are "myths" as claimed by some, then the solution to them is debate so they can be debunked. Instead every single criticism of the current system is branded "Far Right". A government which has legalised same sex marriage, abortion, granted 120,000 people citizenship is suddenly "Far Right"? A ludicrous assertion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,679 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    interesting to see how Matt Carthy deals with immigration on VM1 tonight. Shinners doing their damnedest to stay out of the current war of words . Here’s a lengthy journal article about the latest exchanges and not a peep out of sf. https://www.thejournal.ie/simon-harris-migration-comments-6864311-Nov2025/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    They know their base is deeply divided on this. An Irish Times poll in 2024 found SF voters to be the most anti-immigration. 72% said the immigration system should be "more closed". 68% of FF voters and 58% of Independent voters say they same. Among FG voters its closer, with 44% favouring a more closed system, 23% more open, and 28% saying the system is "just right".

    Theres a big class divide but even among the better off ABC1 group, 51% want a "more closed" system and 21% more open. Among the working class C2DE group, its 68% saying it should be "more closed" with 10% saying "more open". Among the poorest F class, 70% want a "more closed" system and just 8% "more open".

    Source here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 129 ✭✭Thorny Queen


    That says it all...that the housing refugee industry is now more lucrative than the drugs industry!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,679 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    they usually find a way to make sone comment on the immigration story of the cast, even if it’s do carefully worded as to be barely saying anything. I think they’re particularly anxious to stay out of this one because it’s mostly focused on comments by Simon Harris, and they don’t want to be dragged by the other left parties into attacking Harris purely for ‘saying edgy stuff’…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I dont favour deporting legal immigrants. I do support more of an emphasis on upskilling and less on work permits. The low unemployment rate has to be seen in the context of a larger population, which means that in absolute numbers, its not as low as it may seem. There are also many working-poor, and competition for low skilled labour does not help. It is true that without existing migrant workers, the nursing home system would collapse. Almost all the workers in my local nursing home are from developing world.

    But I support summary deportation of those not entitled to be here. The rigmarole about judicial reviews has to stop.

    Also I think RTEs coverage of this issue is biased.

    Post edited by Ozymandius2011 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,408 ✭✭✭plodder


    I heard Eoin O'Broin earlier and he was saying what you might expect, charting a middle path between the raving loony left (including Labour and Soc Dems) and the government parties who have suddenly woken up and changed tack, but he referred to one interesting thing I wasn't expecting. I didn't learn until recently that the university sector is being propped up by foreign students from wealthy backgrounds, paying outlandish fees, and in return getting residency here. O'Broin referred to this, and it wasn't clear if he thought it is a problem. But to me it is a problem, if employment and residents permits are being given to people not on the basis of actual employment need for the economy, but instead to provide funding for the under resourced university sector. It reminds me a bit of the old passports for sale scandal back in the Albert Reynolds era, but few people seem to know about it.

    “Fanaticism is always a sign of repressed doubt” - Carl Jung



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 283 ✭✭Perseverance The Second


    When you look over to the likes of England i reckon deporting Legal Immigrants is the rational decision. Would not want to end up like them. Our high trust society has already slid - We cannot afford for it to go away forever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,328 ✭✭✭✭Francie Barrett


    A law was signed a few years ago declaring this as being discriminatory, and therefore illegal.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I get what you say. But I think some of the tensions - and especially the tensions between some migrants and the police - in the UK come from the colonial history in many of the country's of origin.

    But I also think some of it comes from scandals like Rotherham and the grooming gangs cover up, which has led to many British people feeling theres a two tier system of justice.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,374 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Laws can be changed ,this one should.

    Also it could easily be done by stealth and nobody would be any the wiser.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,818 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    Matt Carthy (and some other Sinn Fein TDs) have to walk a tightrope of balancing strong local disquiet in their constituency with national SF policy.

    Sticky.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 666 ✭✭✭DaithiMa


    How can any word that is uttered by the current government regarding immigration be believed when one (if not more) of the independents propping up the government is directly profiting from the AS/IPA industry.

    It beggars belief.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,531 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Tim Dooley TD on The Tonight Show said he does not think we should reduce the number of work visas.

    SF's Matt Carthy said that the wishes of corporations should not be the sole consideration in deciding on work visas.

    The government is handing out 30,000-40,000 non EEA work visas a year.

    The Irish Dental Association has called for a big reduction in the percentage of courses going to non-EEA nationals, saying that they tend to leave after they complete the courses.

    I think we should have a middle way. For a start Leo Varadkar's government was wrong to leave so much EU retraining money unspent. We need to rebalance the ratios of Irish/EU to non-EEA work permits for filling labour shortages, in order to avoid aggravating social tensions more through putting more pressure on strained housing and public services. We need to upskill Irish/EEA workers too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,869 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,430 ✭✭✭Quags


    IMG_6907.jpeg

    20 tents roughly there. What stage does someone step in and decide enough is enough! Outside people’s homes, walkway to and from work & school



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,358 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Absolute bunkers.


    People barely making ends meet, child assessment waiting lists, no money for carers, no cuts to income tax for PAYE workers while inflation is through the roof.

    The list goes on, yet we have 3.4 billion for a group of scan artists which has been proven 80% are here illegally and manknh bogus applications.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,609 ✭✭✭Viscount Aggro




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,430 ✭✭✭Quags


    I’ve a fair idea and so does everyone else 🫣



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,958 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Not a bit surprised. Which TD is that?

    A lot of landlords in the Dail too.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,170 ✭✭✭csirl


    This is now happening in the second level sector as well. Sone of the private secondary schools have very high % of rich non-EU students. Generally speaking these "kids" are over 18s who have already done the equivalent of the LC in their home country. They then do the Irish LC and get into college here via the domestic CAO system.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,770 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    O Callaghan seems to be the only one in FF who is prepared to talk about immigration.

    Billy Timmins was on VM1 last night and unsurprisingly he didn't have the balls to agree with what Harris said.

    It was the usual guff about needing doctors and nurses and how immigration is a good thing.

    He knows god damn well nobody is saying people who come here to work in the health service should be deported.

    TBH I think we are doomed to failure on this, we will continue to see an average of 15,000 AS coming here every year and very few sent back.

    Post edited by Galwayguy35 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,430 ✭✭✭Quags


    Only when the **** hits the fan fully will those who keep telling us that everyone coming here is bettering themselves realise how much their head was in the sand



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,906 ✭✭✭dabbler2004


    The CSO should be able to provide data that shows two tables, work visas granted total and a breakdown of the sectors involved, medical, construction etc and a second table showing successful asylum seekers' breakdown in the same sectors / unemployed/ state supported.

    That would answer very simply if the asylum process is a means to fill these particular jobs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,810 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    I don't agree with reducing work visas, at least not first.

    Hare my priorities for reducing immigration.

    We should start with AS, not work visas, because at least the work visa people were genuine.

    (1) start with the bogus AS - aim to reduce the inward flow towards zero

    (2) remove the existing stock of bogus AS, even if their origin country doesn't co-operate (this is about 20,000 I think)

    (3) maybe see if we can remove the bogus AS who have already been given leave-to-remain (this is 100,000+)

    Next, the UKR refugees, who are BOTP.

    (4) reduce the inward flow to zero

    (5) send half the stock home now, that is 40,000 approx

    (6) send the remaining home when the war ends

    ** allow maybe 5,000 - 10,000 UKR to stay, but they must work in new house construction, and they can never qualify for social assistance**

    (7) in parallel with (1) + (4) + (5), reduce the flow of study visas to zero.

    (8) investigate the removal of EU citizens who don't work, e.g. the Puska families, and thousands more like them.

    The ICT and healthcare sectors should be unaffected by the above, other than some of the (3) people might work in social care.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,959 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    ** allow maybe 5,000 - 10,000 UKR to stay, but they must work in new house construction, and they can never qualify for social assistance**

    Most of the Ukrainians are women and children.

    But lets say they were to get injured building your new houses, tough, absolutely no social supports?

    That sounds worse then the slave labour they have in the middle east.

    send half the stock home now, that is 40,000 approx

    They aren't cows.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,810 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    I said no social assistance.

    Work injuries are covered by Illness Benefit, Invalidity Pension, etc. - these are social insurance.



  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 14,346 Mod ✭✭✭✭pc7


    If you reduce the benefits and support the numbers will slow themselves.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 42,959 ✭✭✭✭Boggles


    That is all under social protection.

    Would their children be able to enrol in schools or creches? Children's allowance, school books, etc?



Advertisement