Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

1365366368370371389

Comments

  • Posts: 3,065 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I'd be strongly of the view that the country needs less immigration, however I always felt the protests about unvetted men were completely alarmist and often racist. Basically I thought they were terrible.

    But now I'd find it hard to tell anyone protesting about one near their house that they are wrong.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 7,621 ✭✭✭Allinall


    That's like saying "Just 2 billion while St. Pats couldn't beat Bohemians last night"

    The lack of connectivity between the events are the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,423 ✭✭✭Quags


    That lot swing whatever way the wind goes so wouldn't be looking at them for opinions



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,542 ✭✭✭dmakc


    The government can't fund St. Pats but they can sure put funding to somewhere more worthwhile than IPA centres. It's a very relevant connection.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,325 ✭✭✭creedp


    It’s possibly to be fanatically pro immigration and still admit that the current system is broken and a far more effective way could be found to reduce the massive waste of taxpayer money to shore it up.

    But obviously easier to shut eyes and stick finger in ears while continuously shouting no other game in town



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,779 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    A referendum is to change the Constitution.

    Is migration mentioned in the Constitution?

    What article of the Constitution requires change?

    There are no EU rules forcing us to accept bogus AS.

    If we wanted, we could process their claims within a week, and remove them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,782 ✭✭✭DebDynamite


    Well no, they're not really… 45,000 asylum seekers arrived here since 2020 - a marked increase on the number of applications we were receiving previously. 45,000 people (plus their dependents who have since joined them) who are entitled to medical cards, and many come from countries where access to dental and medical care is limited or costly – certainly not free - so they will be taking full advantage of what’s on offer.

    This surge in numbers suggests that something is attracting people to Ireland. Maybe if we didn’t have to pay out for the types of services that 2 billion euro per year get you, we wouldn’t be such an attractive prospect, and we wouldn’t receive so many people. Providing only the most basic standards/opportunities might reduce the volume of arrivals.

    Alternatively, if we weren’t forking out €2 billion a year on services for people who, in many cases, do not contribute economically, that funding could be redirected to strengthen our health system. We could improve service delivery, offer better wages to attract international medical professionals, and retain our own talent.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,919 ✭✭✭✭lawred2


    It's not at all broken once you realise that the core aim is unbridled clientelism, racketeering and profiteering.

    Post edited by lawred2 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,302 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    We keep hearing we have obligations but what exactly are those? Are we obligated to allow AS to be housed on arrival while their application is being heard (current waiting time 18 months) and then spend years making appeals?

    Why exactly can’t we build or renovate accommodation for AS and investigate their application within weeks, allow one appeal and that’s it, you’re gone. You’re held until a deportation flight is ready. Flights might be expensive but far cheaper than putting up someone for 6 years or more.

    Why are we so afraid of what will happen if we adapt a stricter approach with AS?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 399 ✭✭sekiro


    I think, at any point in the last decade or so, if you made the argument on here that men in general were dangerous you'd get plenty of support. Plenty of discussion about masculinity and the problems it introduces into society. The danger it poses to women and children.

    A few cases down through the years have led to campaigns like "YesAllMen" and questions about women's safety or even wild suggestions like a curfew for men.

    Make the argument that if men are so bad then the last thing we need is to be bringing more and more of them into the country and suddenly you are a total racist and how dare you even suggest that these men are going to cause any kind of problems at all.

    Everyone can see that bringing guys in from certain specific parts of the world is going to cause certain specific issues. You'd only need to spend a day or two in those places to conclude that we probably shouldn't invite a whole bunch of those lads to live in Ireland at the taxpayers expense.

    The trick for the government has been to make it uncomfortable for anyone to point out the bleeding obvious.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,124 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    how could you remove them in a week? even if they were say a genuine AS from palestine with no documents, it would take a long time to figure out who they are and where they're really from and if they're telling the truth. meanwhile you can't send them anywhere if they've no papers.

    i'm pretty sure most just come over the border from the north and the UK is flooded with people coming on boats etc. every day, some trickling through to here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,803 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    We dont need one do we? Does our constitution have anything relating to taking in as many unskilled misogynists as we can fit into tax payer funded accommodation?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,542 ✭✭✭dmakc


    I just hope nothing crazy happens tonight. Disingenuous immigration needs to be discussed and is at a crossroads now.

    When Puska killed Aisling Murphy, we had a week of Irish media discussing how we can fix Irish men, starting with discussing sexual behaviour in Irish schools.

    When the Irish citizen Algerian stabbed the schoolgirls, the stores getting looted and cars set on fire were apparently the worst thing to happen that day.

    These scammers need to stay in focus.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,495 ✭✭✭emo72


    Interesting thought regarding " we have obligations". That's just a choice the government has made and is glad to sign us up to it.

    Take for example another law. The illegal VRT car tax, thats illegal in Europe and the EU fines Ireland every year for it. Now the government doesn't mind ignoring that "obligation" because it suits them.

    The government will ignore laws when it suits them. Why they pick the hill of illegal immigration to die on is beyond me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,124 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    well if you're pro-EU, i don't think you'd expect greece, italy and spain to have to deal with 100% of the immigrants that come from the middle east and africa, it's not really fair on them, so the obligations are probably there to spread them out.

    i'm not really sure how people can be stopped entering med countries either, the coast is so vast and they can also just walk in from turkey etc. not even the USA can keep migrants out of their land border. so the numbers are only going to keep increasing until we get crazy authoritarian governments, and i don't think life will be nice for anyone under those governments, immigrant or not.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,302 ✭✭✭Patrick2010


    So just accept the status quo? Put AS up for years ?

    Not a week unless your case is obvious. Come from the likes Georgia, Albanian or one of the newest visitors Vietnam (over 500 so far this year) and no entry. Hold them until we can ship them home . Whatever the cost it will be cheaper than housing them for for years.

    Currently we are taking in males from countries like Somalia and Afghanistan who view woman as inferiors, not to mention gays. How on earth are these lads going to contribute anyway to Ireland? Minimal English and education along with medieval values like FGM, these lads won’t be paying too many pensions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,124 ✭✭✭✭Thelonious Monk


    i was responding to someone saying we can send them home within a week, i'm not sure how that's possible if you have no idea where they're from or if they're telling the truth. and we've no holding centres now where people will be kept or any plans to build any, so they'll continue to flow in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,542 ✭✭✭floorpie


    A referendum is to change the Constitution.

    Is migration mentioned in the Constitution?

    What article of the Constitution requires change?

    Referendums may be called for reasons other than amending the constitution



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 22,803 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,542 ✭✭✭floorpie


    Yeah any bill can be voted on via referendum, it's just never been done afaik, Article 27



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,333 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    The Greeks and Italians should be sending them back where they came from.

    Everybody can't live in Europe or USA the world at large needs to accept this.

    Maybe if the UN, IMF , WHO etc actually did something constructive and fixed a lot of the issues causing people to want to emigrate en masse to Europe and the USA it might improve things, but they just sit back and do nothing.

    Providing the option of sterilisation and greater contraceptive programmes should be part of any aid sent to Africa over the decades, it would gsve helped control the population and reduced rhe need for aid going forward.

    Post edited by Jack Daw on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 794 ✭✭✭Phat Cat


    It was only a matter of time before it kicked off out in City West. This isn't the answer but the government really need to take accountability with their handling of immigration, and not start blaming the far right boogyman again, as people are obviously beyond annoyed at this stage, and rightly so



  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 12,941 Mod ✭✭✭✭igCorcaigh




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,333 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    A person who clearly can't read.

    I said contraception and voluntary sterilization programmes.

    The alternative of never-ending population growth hasn't exactly worked has it.

    If Africa's population was at the same level it was 60 or 70 years ago alot of the problems impacting it and impacting the rest of the world would be reduced.

    Would you prefer the policy of doing nothing and leaving us with the shitshow we have now?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭spakman


    why would large numbers of a population volunteer to be sterilised ffs



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,732 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    Anyone who has no documents should be put in a detention centre and left there until they admit who they are and where they came from.

    And it should be a building with just the most basic of facilities to make it as uncomfortable as possible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,333 ✭✭✭Jack Daw


    Because they dont want to have any more children , loads of women in the west get their tubes tied, loads of men get vasectomies why wouldn't people in Africa want similar treatments if they were available for free.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,149 ✭✭✭c montgomery


    Large numbers of men get the snip every year in Ireland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,457 ✭✭✭spakman


    Not enough to have an impact on population numbers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,149 ✭✭✭c montgomery


    And you have those figures?

    I won't hold my breath



Advertisement