Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Northern Ireland 2125?

1105106108110111188

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,873 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    Stupid argument. A dialect is a form of a language. Every language evolves like a tree over time. The irish language today evolved from all the irish dialects of Ireland. Not one of the original dialects is the exact same as the irish we use today. Does this mean all irish spoken today is imported by your crusty logic.

    This is the same with every other language and not just irish. English would have had numerous dialects that evolved into modern English. Ditto for german, french, italian, danish...... etc. Dies that mean all these places dont have indigenous languages as its not spoken today with the exact same dialect as when born?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Fair criticism is fine, but the descent into sectarian smears and abuse is typical of O’Snodaigh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Typical @blanch152 tactics. Put the sectarian label on something to try and deflect legitimate criticism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You are the one deflecting from the sectarian element to focus on what was said elsewhere. The clear implication from Sinn Fein is that HH doesn’t understand Irish heritage because of who she is. It is a disgrace.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    She talks the talk but in practice it is all there, doesn’t matter who she is.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,219 ✭✭✭Fionn1952


    Even more amusingly in my own home county, the Ulster Gaeilge that originated in Donegal was taking precedence and would've been more widely spoken at the time of partition.

    According to Blanch's logic, a fella speaking Ulster Gaeilge there on May 2nd 1921 was speaking a native language but the next day he wasn't. The hoops he jumps through to demean and diminish the Irishness of anyone from NI is pretty repulsive, particularly given his penchant for screaming sectarianism at everyone else at the drop of a hat.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Interesting discussion and a marker for where the discussion will be when we come to a BP.
    And it ends with yet another call out to those responsible here for the making of a Plan/Proposal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,672 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    If you are so desperate for a plan, why has'nt the SF party you follow come up with one. Because you know it is totally unrealistic.

    After Brexit, people will not vote in a border poll untill all the details are ironed out and agreed. A BP / U.I. would be a lot more complicated / problematic than Brexit. As well as trade, you would have security, rioting, finance, taxation, health, policing, nato, parades, bonfire, culture, language, flags, national anthem, cost of living differences, pay differences, pensions, loss of free trade between N.I. and Britain etc etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    It will be an Irish government that will present the referendum here. It is up to a government to propose.

    It won't be a single political party's proposal. Willing political party's (north and south)will take part in that Plan/White Paper process and make their own individual cases during a BP campaign.

    Why that penny hasn't dropped with some utterly defeats me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,672 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    And a BP here will not happen until and if a majority of those in N.I. want a U.I.

    There is a reason S.F. has not a clue what would happen in a U.I. As noted before, as well as trade, you would have security, rioting, finance, taxation, health, policing, nato, parades, bonfire, culture, language, flags, national anthem, cost of living differences, pay differences, pensions, loss of free trade between N.I. and Britain etc etc

    And as we see this year SF is not a party of compromise, after refusing to allow a British government stand at a jobs fair in Derry, and after pushing Irish language in to PUL areas against the wishes of most people there. FACT.

    N.B. a month ago SF had not a clue who would stand for them in the Presential elections, but leaked some days before the Saturday announcement it would be someone with strong GAA connections. That did not happen. Neither will a U.I.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    And a BP here will not happen until and if a majority of those in N.I. want a U.I.

    A BP before there is a BP you mean?😁😁

    Old Monaghan proverb - Those who keep their heads firmly in the sand. emerge shocked and unprepared for a world that has changed overnight.

    The world under you feet is changing @Francis McM



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,672 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    At the time of the GFA, the bearded one said there would be a U.I. by 2016. It is 2025 now and as far away as ever.

    Old proverb - never trust a man with a beard : he is always hiding behind something.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Seem to remember a lot of Never Never Never Never's from folk you align with. how did they work out?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,672 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    I have voted FF, FG, even Labour (for Robinson as President many years ago ) and independents. Not sure who you mean about Never Never Never? Maybe FG joining FF in government? Nothing to do with this thread IMHO.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    On that BBC Middle ground discussion, the NHS one was very interesting. While the lady spoke well on the 'intrinsic' value of the NHS to her, it didn't really look at or ask where the British health system is going or at outcomes - I.E. What's the value of it being free if the outcomes are worse.

    Seems to me as the British system evolves inexorably into a mixed system (Universal + Private) that this key argument against a UI will only diminish in strength.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,672 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    It should not come as any surprise our national childrens hospital, still to be opened, is so expensive. Even a decade ago, Medicines 12 times more expensive here than in the UK

    No wonder our VAT, excise duties, vrt on cars etc etc is so expensive to pay for that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    As a patient what would I be more worried about, the cost or the outcome?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,672 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Despite high costs here ( high taxation, high VHI etc ) there are often long delays.

    Can you explain, why even a decade ago, medicines were 12 times more expensive here than in the UK? For the exact same medicines? Rip off republic.

    Do you enjoy paying a higher % VAT here, higher excise duties, vrt on cars etc etc compared to the UK. There is even VAT on new housing here : there is none in N.I. or the rest of the UK. So we are even getting screwed on housing here.

    If there was a U.I. will they have to put VAT on housing too?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Economies of scale and bad government (we need a change)

    Increasing the scale of the Health Service to an all island one will bring the benefits.

    There are always going to be +'s and -'s on direct comparisons.(You are reduced to that) But again, your health is not a matter of 'cost' it is a matter of better outcomes. And that is a big + here now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,672 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Take your first three words.

    "Economies of scale". So you think, because medicines were 12 times more expensive here than in the UK, for the exact same medicines, it would financially be better for our HSE medicine purchases if it was part of the NHS, and the NHS was purchasing medicines for the whole geographicac area kown the world over as the British Isles?

    Never thought I'd hear you say we'd be better off if the islands were united.

    We'd have economies of scale then, you are right. And the government here is elected by the people, and has been for 100 years : if you are blaming the government you are blaming the people?

    Why would people in N.I. want to pay 12 times more for their medicines?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Some of the people.

    What I am saying is there are + and - factors when assessing where you are better off and I think the 'better outcomes' one will triumph eventually every day of the week.

    Especially as the other service (NHS) continues to decline and fail to deliver and successive governments hollow it out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,672 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    Ireland is the only part of the EU without universal healthcare, so you are right, we have a fair bit of work to do in some areas to get our house in order.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    The opportunity a UI presents is a whole new system for Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,672 ✭✭✭Francis McM


    They said the same about Brexit. The opportunity Brexit presents is a whole new system for Britain. And a U.I. would be a lot more complicated, plus we would have to pay many billions per year, plus it would probably re-ignite the troubles. I suppose Gardai looking under their car every morning would be a new system for them too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    They said the same about Brexit.

    The Brexit ref. shows what happens when you bury your head in the sand and fail to Plan.
    There is NOBODY who wants a UI want to do it without planning.
    There is nobody suggesting that information be distorted or held back.

    And there is nobody who truly wants a UI with their head in the sand ignoring where we are heading.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 203 ✭✭sdiff


    As it stands NI should not join us unless they want a load of IPAS centres and a substantial proportion of their budget to be spent on them + the NGOs that support them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 28,406 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    Nobody mentioned anything about a "hasty unplanned abandonment" if the majority of people wanted a U.I.

    You did. I pointed out that the British held the referendum without having made any plans or preparations for removing NI from the UK, and without even having spoken to Dublin, and you replied that if the referendum had been carried they would have left anyway. How would that not be a hasty unplanned abandonment?

    When the UK left other places in the world were there any complaints from the majorities there about "hasty unplanned abandonment"? No.

    Oh God, yes. Have you never read anything at all about the partition of India? Does the name "Palestine" ring no bells in this context? Burma? Aden? Kenya? There's a litany of cases of the UK clinging on as long as they can until they suddenly realise they no longer want to, and then walking away from a complete shambles and washing their hands of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,156 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    You'd have to wonder at this stage where some got their historical knowledge from.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,219 ✭✭✭itsacoolday


    If 1973, in the referendum in N.I., if the British government offer people three choices (a) fast withdrawal of N.I. from UK, and to join a U.I. (b) slow withdrawal of N.I from UK, and to join a U.I. or (c) remaining in the UK, most people would have wanted to stay in the UK because they were unionists. Unionism had a clear majority in N.I. then, no dispute about that.

    If you look at the facts, without your anti-British goggles on, you will see that many former British colonies ( Canada, Australia, India, New Zealand, South Africa, India, Singapore, Barbados, Hong Kong...) seem to be better of than colonies of let's say France (Morocco, Algeria,...), Germany (Cameroon, Togo,...), the Netherlands (Indonesia, New Guinea), Italy (Ethiopia) and Belgium (Zaire/Congo). Not to mention the Spanish and Portugese etc.

    Post edited by itsacoolday on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,219 ✭✭✭itsacoolday


    The British government held a referendum for Scotland about a decade ago and nobody had any issue there if it was to be a hasty unplanned abandonment or not if a majority voted for it. It was not an issue or even crossed peoples minds, because the British behave fairly. If the majority of people in N.I. wanted to join a U.I. as a result of the 73 referendum, the British would have abided with their wishes.



Advertisement
Advertisement