Donaghmede thread and immigration

I am being serious. And you still haven't answered my question. I asked how we can have the Donaghmede topic without immigration naturally forming part of the discussion, considering it's literally our immigration policy that lead to this incident. Saying "it's not a natural flow / same people discussing same stuff over and over and over" doesn't answer my question. So I'll ask again?

I was also asking Necro why there are still general immigration posts present, or what is their threshold here? They couldn't distinguish either.

For what it's worth, Necro has also privately accused me of lies in saying that they left our conversation. I'd like to clarify that Necro did not click the button to "leave the conversation" (which I did not know existed at the time of my statement). I was going by when they privately told me "I am declining to further engage. I won't be responding further", which to my understanding was leaving a conversation.

I didn't say that a Somalian IPA murdering a Ukrainian IPA was widely reported though, did I?

I said the victim being Ukrainian is widely reported. This wasn't quite the gotcha you thought it was.

Yes. Somali reported by Newstalk. Murder is alleged. Victim being Ukrainian is widely reported.

I only said the victim being Ukrainian is widely reported. Not a gotcha 👍

Sorry but is this satire or do you always go down swinging? I didn't say victim in OP, I literally used it as a phrase in the last reply (unrelated to the original point that you're still wrong on) but if it makes you feel better I can change it "deceased" for you?

Give me strength.

Agree. Another raft of deletions since, it's almost as if the thread would naturally flow in/out of migration. Still no rational answers for doing so, all we've gotten are "same thing over and over and over again" and "duplicating the discussion", as two presidential threads rest on the top page all week.

It'll obviously close once the courts come around anyway, my point is suppressing a significant part of the issue in Donaghmede only leads to an incomplete and misleading dicussion, orchestrated retrospectively by Necro.

Not sure what point you're attempting to make here. In my view, what difference if the dispute was about phone charger or food (as was reported)? A bus would endanger the public even moreso than a Tusla apartment. FWIW people are discussing the apartment aspect.

Policy on the other hand. Are you claiming Ireland's immigration policy played zero part in the occurance of this incident?

Was responding to a query.

The appropriate place to talk about this would be the Donaghmede thread, where the discussion about the incident is happening, but no mod has been able to substantiate a legitimate reason for censoring the immigration aspect of the discussion other than their personal feelings. Duplication doesn't work as its not being discussed in the immigration thread.

Incorrect, I asked about policy to bring us back to its actual relevance rather than the speculation about phone chargers.

I only want policy to be allowed as part of the discussion - not BE the discussion - considering it has contributed to this incident. Censoring the discussion from this aspect is inauthentic, and a poor reflection of the moderation. I also never said that I don't want to discuss the incident, you've made that part up.

All I'm saying is there are multiple components to this particular case and an open discussion should be allowed to cater for this, rather than funneling immigration policy away to the immigration thread. There's probably a Tusla childcare thread we can further break away into if we wanted to. If you don't like immigration talk, there's nothing stopping you diverting to another direction i.e. if there were grounds for it being over a phone charger - it's all relevant to the incident in my book.