Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1155715581560156215631641

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    The problem with this logic is that, for example, you could apply it to Wales circa 2023, and you're left with a massive re-build regardless, when those players all age out at the same time.

    Now, I'm not remotely saying I expect us to go the same way as well, they have fairly massive fundamental problems that we don't have thanks to how comparatively well-run the IRFU is, but it is indicative that persisting with an aging squad can be problematic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,171 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    Henderson is 33, if he's well past it then about half a dozen others are as well



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,171 ✭✭✭✭bilston


    It's completely unsustainable for all three squad hookers to be at one province.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,133 ✭✭✭Paul Smeenus


    My goodness. If that were the squad, even without any endless, tedious comparisons of new caps, I might think Farrell were "conservative".

    To be clear, Thornley was been way off the mark. I suspect it's just outright wrong, when it comes to fringe selection.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 31,778 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Utterly, but I suspect one of them will move on for next season and I have an inkling it will be Kelleher - which would be a huge boon for whoever got him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,298 ✭✭✭Former Former Former


    I count 33 names in that squad. Considering we have two games a week apart on different continents, I would expect either a lot more to be named tomorrow or another announcement to supplement the squad in a week or two.

    So maybe not worth freaking out just yet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,239 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    it's not his age alone, he's been playing like a drain in green for years



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I’m saving that til after the AI’s, Paul. The goalposts might become more difficult to shift 😉



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,471 ✭✭✭✭El_Duderino 09


    Ahern and coombs would feel hard done by. Neither of them in the squad is strange. Have they done something to upset the coaches or are they not as good as I think they are?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,552 ✭✭✭leakyboots


    If the above is true (and I'll withhold full judgment until then) I'm surprised AF is at least not having a look at Tom Farrell, best player for Munster last year. Maybe his age is going against him and he's thinking of the future. From a Munster point of view Coombes and Tom Aherne could be considered hard done by also. Nash appears to have been leap-frogged without having done a whole pile wrong, TOB has been in good form mind.

    Edogbo's time will come if he stays fit, but now is not that time. Let him build up a body of work and maybe sneak in to a wider 6N squad for experience or injuries move him up the pecking order.

    Don't see the point in Henshaw or Henderson at this stage. Both would owe a performance if they are called on, been a while.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    World cup seedings are sorted after...

    personally, nothing about this squad surprises or disappoints me...



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I agree with this on Farrell - his performances have been good enough to warrant inclusion. He's 32, so he's not going to have a long career in green, but he could easily still be there and performing at a high level through the next RWC, and he's ahead for me of the likes of Hume, and a long way ahead of Hugh Gavin or Hugh Cooney right now.

    Dan Kelly is the outlier though - I suspect at a minimum he'll be playing for the A side against Spain.

    I think Nash might lose out to Tommy O'Brien - they are both predominantly right wingers.

    No real point in rehashing the Coombes discussion right now - I think Gleeson could well be involved against Spain though. Agreed it'll be too early for Edogbo right now.



  • Subscribers, Paid Member Posts: 44,287 ✭✭✭✭sydthebeat


    Bit of a red herring though.

    Top 6 teams in the rankings are drawn in band 1.

    I'm not sure even if we lost every game this November would be drop out of the top 6?

    Maybe someone can war game that for us?

    I personally expect about 3 or four changes / additions to that GT squad. Henshaw may not be named due to injury, and there will probably be a couple of "trainee" panelists added too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I think we feasibly could, but we would need to lose to all three of NZ, SA and Australia.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭Brief_Lives


    "Maybe someone can war game that for us?"

    I like that phrase..!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 52 ✭✭shimmieandshake


    Let's wait until the squad is actually picked, but fundamentally agree that Henderson would be a strange pick, and Henshaw doesn't have the form. Heard the Molecast comparing Henshaw to Rooney, in that he's one of four teenage debutants for Ireland in the pro era. He's played a huge amount of abrasive, high-level rugby. His 32 year-old body is probably several years 'older' than Beirne's 33 year-old body in terms of how much it has endured.

    Would like to see Osbourne at 12 for a tier one game, with JOB / Mack at 15 and TOB on the wing - but Osbourne at 15 for Leinster doesn't fill me with hope on this.

    An Osbourne/Gavin centre partnership vs. Japan would be ideal.

    Also hoping to see Clarkson start vs. one or two of NZ, Aus and SA. Would be grand if Casey is fit to do the same.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,037 ✭✭✭OldRio


    Virgin Media confirmed that they will cover the New Zealand match. It has also been reported that RTE will 'likely' cover the other Autumn Internationals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 406 ✭✭ingo1984


    Not as if porter is a destructive scrummager either. We need to find depth behind porter and if that's milne and Boyle so be it. Far too long was spent topping up healys pension to the detriment of developing any meaningful depth in the position.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,045 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    We would have to lose to Australia and or Japan and possibly lose 15+ to South Africa or New Zealand but even then. i doubt it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,356 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    The official 2025 AI's Ireland squad announcement is set for today (Wednesday) at 4pm.
    This series we have: New Zealand, Japan (and A Team playing Spain), Australia, and South Africa.

    For reference against, this was last year's squad:
    Last year Ireland also played four weeks in a row: New Zealand, Argentina, Fiji and Australia.

    Ireland Men’s Squad – Autumn Nations Series 2024:

    Forwards (19):
    LHP: Porter, Healy
    HKR: Kelleher, Herring, Heffernan
    THP: Furlong, Bealham, O’Toole
    LHL: Beirne, Ryan, Izuchukwu
    THL: J McCarthy, Henderson
    BSF: O’Mahony, Baird
    OSF: Van der Flier, Timoney
    NO8: Doris, Prendergast

    Backs (16):
    SHF: Gibson-Park, Murray, Casey
    OHF: S Prendergast, Crowley, Frawley
    LWG: Lowe, Stockdale
    ICE: Aki, McCloskey
    OCE: Ringrose, Henshaw
    RWG: Hansen, Nash
    FBK: Keenan, Osborne

    Training Panellists (5):
    J Boyle, G McCarthy, Clarkson, Kendellen, Bolton

    Based off that guess from GT, his proposed changes from last year are as follows:

    HKR: Sheehan missed last year through injury, and G McCarthy to be favoured over Herring, Heffernan and Stewart.
    LHP: J Boyle and Milne to fill the void left by Healy retiring.
    THP: Clarkson to be favoured over O'Toole and Aungier.
    LHL: Same.
    THL: Same.
    BSF: Baird and Prendergast to fight it out for the spot vacated by O'Mahony having retired.
    OSF: Same.
    NO8: Conan back in having missed last year through injury, to be favoured over Coombes and Deegan.

    SHF: Ben Murphy included to fill the space left by Murray retiring.
    OHF: Same.
    LWG: Same.
    ICE: Same.
    OCE: Same.
    RWG: T O'Brien to replace Nash presumably due to better recent performances (started both summer tests over Nash).
    FBK: J O'Brien to fill space left by Keenan being out through injury.

    It'll be interesting to see if they include a few training panellists, seeing as three of them will probably now be included as full squad members (J Boyle for Healy, G McCarthy for Herring/Heffernan, Clarkson for O'Toole), Kendellen is currently injured, but perhaps Bolton could be called in again and maybe as a full squad member this time, his recent form is good at the moment in my opinion and Lowe is getting older.

    I would think we could use a centre as our centres are aging, so perhaps Hugh Gavin (started 13 against Portugal).
    We could use another lock too so perhaps Tom Ahern or Darragh Murray or both (both played the summer tests).
    And perhaps a back row, perhaps one of Brian Gleeson, David McCann, Sean Jansen or James Culhane. We seem to be short on openside flankers and Van der Flier is getting older, so perhaps Scott Penny could be an option.
    We will surely need another scrum-half as Casey is currently injured, so perhaps Nathan Doak as cover there. If they want to bring in someone younger/less experienced in Ireland squads perhaps Fintan Gunne or Matthew Devine could be training panellists.

    Post edited by Jump_In_Jack on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,031 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    I'd like to see more of a dig into the provinces, perhaps even start 4-5 different uncapped players per match to give them a flavour of the international scene. There's a lot of talent that I think will do very well at club level this year we need to bleed in.

    Without trying to downplay, these are only friendlies - we need fit and fighting youngsters for the 6N and WC much more than we need to beat any team in November



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,539 ✭✭✭✭Clegg


    Porter has his moments where he struggles in the scrum, but I think Milne is particularly poor at that aspect and lags far behind the former. I've watched him for years and he just hasn't improved. Which is a shame because he's an excellent ball carrier, especially close to the line.

    I've more hope for Boyle as he's younger and has more time to improve. Struggled a lot against Wales in last seasons Six Nations, but you'd hope he can get better. Still only 23.

    As for not developing depth, I think Healy was still a better loose head than either until last season. Definitely a more solid scrummager at the very least.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Agree with this. I'm probably highest on Paddy McCarthy of our LHP options - think he has more size than Boyle and he's looked capable as a scrummager so far (albeit hasn't been hugely tested). He's not as dynamic a carrier as Milne or Boyle, but he's more direct and aggressive than Boyle I think, and I think he's more effective than either of them in defensive rucks and tackling.

    Edit: This international window is too early for him though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,724 ✭✭✭theVersatile


    I wouldn't be at all surprised to see a squad that conservative. Id imagine any of the young guns will be held for the A game.

    Third hooker and third nine could be changed but don't see much outside of that. Agree Henderson probably shouldn't be there but also think he probably will be



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,532 ✭✭✭ionadnapóca


    I would be surprised because they do need to start integrating some fresh blood. The backrow would be another example.

    vdF

    The gap down from him is stark.

    Irish rugby have had the luxury over the last 25 years of been able to roll between:

    Wallace, Gleeson*, SOB, vdF, Leavy, Conners and back to vdF.

    *Gleeson had a great stint before the reemergence of Wallace Mark II.

    POM

    Have to say it - there is nobody in the squad (or in the pipeline) close to POM either. Leadership/Aggressiveness/Edge whatever it is he had; it was a vital ingredient to the team.

    Baird

    He's such a different player and person to POM. Was disappointed that he didnt grasp his chance v England in 6N. Leinster really need to keep him at 6 and Stop switching him back and forth between lock.

    7.Doris & *8.Gleeson*

    Is this the future solution to backing up vdF?

    IF Gleeson keeps developing . He looks very promising.

    Doris is still out 'Shoulder surgery'. (Not what you need as a BR Forward) but he to me is the only guy who could substitute what vdF can do.

    e.g.

    Top tackler (24), many of them superb. 2 breakdown steals and played big part in a counter-ruck turnover. 14 carries. Broke 3 tackles and 5 passes

    Doris to focus more into a tackling, carrying, all-action hero type who will play the 80mins.

    *Gleeson

    I think he is ready for international rugby already. Why not play him at 8 v Japan? He is showing all the physical characteristics necessary for the role. He will also bring another much needed explosive carrying option.

    Im confident if Farrell thinks he's ready he wont be afraid to pick him in the squad.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,769 ✭✭✭crusd


    Great to see us planning for the future. Only way it seems to break into the squad now is if someone in your position is injured or retires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,239 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    I don't see the value of not trying out new players. We can play the same tired team as last year vs NZ and lose again. Is anything gained from that? Play the younger guys, who are generally in better form anyway. As ever, it's a terrible message to send to new players that it doesn't matter how well you go, the incumbent will get picked anyway if fit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,769 ✭✭✭crusd


    On the point that ranking may be the priority. Even a worst case scenario where we lose to NZ, Aus and SA by > 15 points, we would still need either Argentina to beat England or Scotland to beat NZ to drop out of the top 6



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,888 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    What side would you pick to face NZ in Chicago?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 755 ✭✭✭johnh6767


    Rotating a squad too soon doesn’t sound like a great idea either. Balance is essential



Advertisement