Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Israel/Palestine Thread

1180918101812181418151949

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    The UN report gave multiple examples of "intent" and concluded that yes, Israel has committed Genocide.

    All that is now left is for the ICJ to legally conclude the case.

    Given the multitude of organisations, academics and politicians plus the majority of the world's population that see the Genocide and call it out, the ICJ case is a slam dunk.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,195 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    That cannot be right, random strangers on Boards are asserting all those experts are wrong



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Selective quotations to support a broken narrative.

    It's all they have.

    The argument is lost but the panicked clutching at straws is obvious.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    There is no "threshold" for genocide.

    There are clear parameters laid down.

    Israel has met every single parameter.

    You can argue, deflect, pull out all the whataboutery and use selective sources to justify your position.

    It's a lost cause. Those who justify it are on the wrong side of history.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,823 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    I think you misinterpreted their argument. They are wondering why posters are more annoyed by chants in protest marches than daily attacks on innocent kids- they didnt mention genocide. I guess they got your answer though in "children die every day". Though perhaps you should have used the term "children are killed every day".



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,035 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Trump needs to take a lot of responsibility for the troubles, things were quiet enough till he provoked things by moving the US embassy to Jerusalem



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Israel executed scores of its own citizens on Oct 7th. The IDF murdered surrendering hostages by sniper fire and bombed others to oblivion.

    It's so uncomfortable for the Israeli govt. that they continue to refuse an enquiry demanded by more than 80% of Israelis to get to the truth. Because the truth will out the depravity of those who have dragged Israel into the status of World Pariah.

    They are stained with Genocide and War Crimes forever.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    On the basis of the "ceasefire" Israel signed up with Lebanon, not long.

    Israel has a long track record on reneging on agreed ceasefires and sticking two fingers up to International Law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,229 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    https://www.rte.ie/news/middle-east/2025/1013/1538217-israel-hostages/

    All 20 remaining hostages were men. Is there a breakdown in sex for the remaining dead hostages? I assume they prioritised female releases first?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,485 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes, that's it : women, children and the elderly were prioritised for release first and Hamas mainly hung on to male IDF members..

    If you remember, young Irish girl Emily Hand was released only eight weeks after being taken.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It was "ONLY" eight weeks that she was held as a hostage. The use of language tells an awful lot.

    I see that Hamas have put back on their uniforms and are out killing their own people, anyone who they regard as a traitor.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,121 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Yeah — and one of the frustrating things is that a lot of people out there seem to demand that the crime be proved before it can be alleged and subjected to legal process. Whether one wants to go as far as saying that Israel is in the process of committing actual genocide against Gazan Palestinians or not, there is certainly a case to be answered and which should be answered. It certainly seems almost impossible to imagine at this point that the Israelis, even if one argued hard that it falls short of genocide, have committed serious war crimes.

    The wholesale destruction of Gaza alone — razed to the ground by the IDF in a context where the enemy being fought posed no existential threat to Israel and has virtually no offensive capability against the fully-mobilised Israeli military system — is evidence enough of war crimes, on top of everything else.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,035 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Aren't the Ukraine, Iranians etc doing the same?

    what country that was subjected to genocide not go after people who where working with those committing the genocide?

    Did the IRA not do the same. Jean McConvile to name but 1.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,485 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Don't pull that "You're a Hamas supporter" stuff on me. I have said repeatedly that both Hamas and Israel are terrorist entities, two sets of evil creeps. October 7th was a genocide, as has been the Israeli response.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 1,622 ✭✭✭Gerry T


    I never claimed that, It was because of WW11 and what happened to the Jewish people that the act of Genocide was recognised for what it is, a heinous crime against humanity. What happened in Ireland in 1845, measured by todays standards would in my opinion constitute a genocide. But that's a different discussion, for a different thread if you want to start one. What we are discussing is the acts the Israel nation are conducting on the Palestinian people. Its why Israel are under review by the ICJ for acts of genocide, the ICC want Netanyahu to show up for a charge of Genocide, I'm sure now there is peace he will go forward to clear his good name.

    A separate UN body has all ready concluded that what Israel is doing is Genocide, the utter shame of it. It's only time before the ICJ rubber stamps it and hopefully the ICC can get their hands on Netanyahu. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/israel-has-committed-genocide-gaza-strip-un-commission-finds

    Not everyone is being called Nazi/Hitler, its all focused on Israel/Netanyahu. Not everyone in Israel are backing Netanyahu, unfortunately for them they will carry that shame for the rest of their lives along with the guilty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,195 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    Israel have banned celebrations and the giving of interviews around the hostages they release. They, again, are controlling the narrative… we cannot possibly have human stories coming from Palestinians.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,229 ✭✭✭RoyalCelt


    I was thinking about that. Good decision on both sides in relation to that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,400 ✭✭✭✭Grayson


    You know that "only" is used as a comparison, it's not to imply that it's all ok.

    How come you only complain when Hamas kills civilians?

    I'm disgusted when any killing, especially of civilians, occurs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭Lawlesz


    Guess your guys better restart bombing innocent kids so…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 686 ✭✭✭Lawlesz


    What has that got to do with my post? Are you back to deflecting again?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    It's a bit crazy - but what that poster said about no genocides during World War II is legally speaking, a fact. The genocide convention was not retroactive before 1949.

    The Nuremberg trials were tried under humanitarian principles that predate the convention - "crimes against humanity" as an existing example at the time.

    Now morally speaking, it's unquestionable imo what the holocaust was, and of course the genocide convention can influence how we perceive past atrocities like the famine as he/she referred to - but as they legally can't be declared, how can they be used as a metric to legally deny what is happening now?

    You have to look at what Israel are doing now vs the definitions of genocide in international law and argue it that way.

    I don't see many, if anybody, in here arguing against this doing that for some reason.

    Post edited by Miniegg on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Are you saying that the PIRA disappearing Jean McConville was right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Miniegg




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,035 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    No, what I'm saying is you should not be surprised that rounding up people who worked with the enemy is happening. it happens during and after ever conflict.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,399 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    More than likely the objective was to show the world what Israel is really about with regards to Palestine, and in that respect they achieved their result. A lot of people around the world have woken up to what that nation represents and what its long terms plans are in the region.

    It came at a hell of a price.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    You have to separate the legal issue of what is genocide from all of the noise surrounding what Israel did which was wrong and contained war crimes. Any poster that has done that has been wrongly vilified as being pro-genocide.

    That is why there hasn't been any genuine debate on the issue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,121 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    One of the lesser-mentioned horrific legacies of the Holocaust is that it set the bar of horror so high, in terms of the sheer numbers and the cold mechanical nature of it, that other acts of genocide are dwarfed under its shadow. In other words, when the Holocaust is used as a yardstick almost anything seems less horrific by comparison and, consequently, one can be drawn towards a thought process whereby identifying genocide is a function of comparison and not a case-by-case examination versus the written definition of the term.

    In that context, claimed genocides must be measured against the most explicit major examples like the Holocaust or Rwanda — in ignorance of the fact that genocides can vary in their duration, intent and method. More gradual, careful, impersonal acts of genocide can be carried out today using modern warfare techniques and propaganda. One need only consider that recurring line we keep hearing from pro-Israeli commentators — "If Israel really wanted to wipe the Palestinians out they could do it immediately, so clearly they don't want to" — to understand how perfectly conceivable it is that the perception of what is severe and transparent enough to be genocide can be used as a mask for a more carefully-managed genocide.

    Of course though, part of the enduring collective consciousness of the horror of the Holocaust is found in the fact that witnesses to it and survivors of it have been listened to and their stories given respect. It is made personal — and indeed it was personal, involving face-to-face interaction between Holocaust victims and those who detained, corralled, imprisoned and eventually murdered them. Gazan Palestinians have on the other hand been attacked, killed, maimed and their homes destroyed entirely impersonally. Murder by missile just doesn't resonate in the same way as murder by machete or murder by gas chamber — it's remote, impersonal and comes with a seemingly-supposed lesser level of intent and evil than face-to-face murder. The Gazans often only have themselves as witnesses, and their testimony is not given respect while those non-Palestinians who do witness the horror are derided as being puppeteered by Hamas.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 5,637 ✭✭✭dmcdona


    Israel was forced to cease their hostilities after bombing Qatar and alleged War Criminal #1 (at large) was forced to apologise by Trump (ironic of course).

    All that remains is for the current Israeli government to implode and they start eating each other alive. Time to get the popcorn out.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,398 ✭✭✭Ardent


    Hamas is definitely a big loser. They've lost a lot of support from the Palestinian people I'm sure and their leadership is either dead or hiding underground in foreign countries.

    Israel is also a loser in this conflict. Its international standing has been irreparably damaged but you get the feeling it cares less about that than it does about sending a message to Iran (and its terror proxies) about the lengths it will go to to seek revenge and safety in the region.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,478 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    But Blanche, almost no poster has done what you said. I am happy in engaging with other points of view if they are honest and in any way informed.

    Most posters here who deny genocide and warcrimes engage in use of completely illogical positions, baseless smearing of institutions (and countries including Ireland) who declare it, or outright slander of people giving their point of view in support of if.

    If a poster comes in here, like @Cordell, and says baselessly that the UN and virtually all humanitarian organizations and international medical bodies inside Israel and out, are antisemetic, without a shred of evidence, can we not deduce why somebody would do that?

    If they use proven disinformation, like Gaza's population has grown since October 7th, why can we not deduce something from that?

    If a poster, like yourself, cannot list one single criticism of the IDFs conduct towards Gazans (in an environment that included indiscriminate bombing, killing the girl in the car, the murder of aid workers and paramedics, bombing hospital and schools, the mass starvation of Gazans), whilst similarly putting baseless accusations of antisemetism on those who call them up on it, can we not guess to the motives? I may be wrong in what I think, but imo nothing else makes sense. Can you explain why you can't do it?

    I am all for genuine debate, but it has to be informed and logical.

    If one side of the debate depends on lies, smearing and baseless slander, people will react accordingly and it isn't our fault for doing so.



Advertisement
Advertisement