Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Presidential Election 2025

1381382384386387517

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,094 ✭✭✭MFPM


    The comments by Jennifer McNeill are odious as a frame for the question. HH doubling down on it..



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,754 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    HH criticising CC on her remarks on whether or not she would employ a rapist. CC had earlier said she would have to consider it. HH asking how do women feel when they hear that. HH says "I would not employ a rapist". CC responds 'I was speaking in terms of rehabilitation'. CC also says she has spoken up for women who have been victims. She is now being asked if she represent banks in home repossession cases. CC replies that a barrister is obliged to take cases unless there is a conflict of interest.

    HH accuses CC of "insulting our friends…insulting France…insulting Germany".

    HH just spoke some Irish again just now. Says she learned it in school, but entered the world of work where she didnt have the opportunity to use it, and "if you dont use it you lose it". She then said she went to the Donegal Gaeltacht and it was coming back to her, and she actually "writes very good Irish", and is "committed to the Irish language" "like Mary McAleese".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,605 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    Concerning the Eirigi lady I doubt anybody is opposed to rehabilitation on principle, but surely if it is to be credible it has to be accompanied by a period of, so to speak, decontamination accompanied by genuine remorse. One should be a tad sceptical of people that claim they're all fine now,they're reformed, that they're not hanging out with that gang anymore, this is the last of this sort of thing, they're cleaning up and moving on, going straight and choosing life. Employing somebody straight out of the Big House, who's only out on probation, in a senstive place, seems a little..…premature to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    She remained as Minister until 23 January 2025, so the notification would only have been due this year and rates only payable this year.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Surely she could have used the Conflict of Interest clause due to her membership of the Galway Housing Action Group. The money probably was too good to turn down for that reason.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,871 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    HH just blamed a "young person" for the social media mistake 😂

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 183 ✭✭spark_tank


    Catherine doubling down on the Irish by using it to open most answers. It's a big plus for her but I don't think she should push it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,914 ✭✭✭blackwhite


    When someone continues to describe themselves as a "political prisoner" any reasonable person might see that as a warning sign about how genuine the remorse actually is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 183 ✭✭spark_tank


    And she accepted their apology! Very big of her.



  • Administrators Posts: 56,211 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    It's being used by another FG TD (David Maxwell) as a constituency office.

    Again, this is easily found out on Google.



  • Advertisement
  • Administrators Posts: 56,211 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    No notification is due. The fact that it is not her using it is irrelevant.

    The office is still a constituency office. Humphreys didn't need to notify anyone of anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,094 ✭✭✭MFPM


    I asked this of anther poster who has a similar view but from what i can see he didn't respond…What's your time limit for 'rehab' after jail - 6 months, 12 months, 6 years?...Does rehab only begin after release, time in prison doesn't count for you? How do you measure rehab, how do you decide what's suitable employment after you've decided a person is rehabilitated?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,754 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Does the presenter seriously expect an Irish president to go around condemning the US, our largest single trading partner? What about Irish jobs in US multinationals?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,471 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Voting for Heather Humphreys over Catherine Connolly is not a "betrayal" of the left. It's a preference in this 1 election when the powers of the winner are essentially zero.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,988 ✭✭✭Ardillaun


    It looks like we’ll be subjected to a dreary litany of overhyped micro-scandals until the election delivers us. Has anybody checked their bins yet?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Humphries is a woeful speaker in comparison to CC. Just woeful.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,871 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Sometimes integrity is more important than money.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Administrators Posts: 56,211 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    This question is a total red herring. Putting an exact time on it is stupid, it's not like they will magically wake up one day a totally changed person.

    But it is reasonable to suggest that someone convicted of something as serious as this lady was should have to demonstrate over a very long period of time after release from prison that they are no longer a danger to society before being given access to Leinster House.

    Like, do you honestly think that once someone gets out of prison that the slate is wiped completely clean and we just forget about a person's past? This is not how it works.

    Vetting exists for a reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,871 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    "it's one of the levers".... spoof

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    For a rapist to have any contact in a role with children or vulnerable women, such as working in the Aras - NEVER

    For a terrorist offence with firearms and membership of an organisation wanting to overthrow the State in a role in the national parliament - NEVER

    Those are extreme examples though. Here is one for you. As someone who clearly believes in reconciliation, how long before a pedophile can go back working with children?

    Now, there are lots and lots of other offences, lots and lots of other working places, and it will depend on the circumstances.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 183 ✭✭spark_tank


    Jesus Heather give an opinion on something, anything!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,871 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    No chance !

    She is like a fish in a goldfish bowl. Mouth is opening but nothing coming out.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,754 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    HH condemns Putin, saying "he has brought war to Europe". CC responds we need to be a voice for peace. HH responds "thats what Chamberlain said".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    That was a blow on Connolly.

    She then lost her way and couldn't remember what she was asked for the last question.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,754 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    After HHs reference to Neville Chamberlain in response to CC's "voice for peace" remarks on Ukraine, the presenter asked CC was she "echoing Chamberlain". CC retorted that she was evoking Frank Aiken.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,871 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    That all you got? 🤣

    Put away the lemons.

    Even Jim Gavin did better than HH in that debate !

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 183 ✭✭spark_tank


    The last question about if keepie-uppies is her party piece? Catherine will be delighted that was mentioned.

    Heather then confirmed that she has no party piece… There must be a personality or an opinion in there somewhere!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,754 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Is the debate over? Or is it continuing after the news?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,468 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Two tired looking candidates I have to say.

    Heather more animated but putting herself in cul de sacs, reaching for answers when asks what she had actually done on stuff was awful tbh.

    Connolly's calm and slow answering not to her benefit at times but I think she managed the hit stories well - barrister and rapist questions specifically.

    Not sure if the dial will move much after that at all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,248 ✭✭✭Burt Renaults


    To address the question about the hypothetical paedophile working with children… as their crimes were borne out of a compulsion, rather than a sexual attraction, almost none of us are qualified to say whether he or she could ever be rehabilitated to the extent that allowing them to work with children would be safe.

    Crimes borne out of ideology aren't the same. We've had reformed terrorists in the Dáil before. I haven't read anything that suggests Ursula Ní Shionnain didn't turn over a new leaf after being jailed. Quite the opposite, in fact. It appears to be a non-story, as far as most people are concerned. That's certainly what the most recent poll suggests anyway. It's the kind of story that should probably have been sat on until the moratorium, for maximum effect.



Advertisement
Advertisement