Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Presidential Election 2025

1361362364366367499

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,217 ✭✭✭golfball37


    Fair play to him. Not often a TD from one of the 3 main parties here puts their head above the parapet like that



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,377 ✭✭✭jmcc


    According to Mary Regan in the Indo, TDs are already discussing when and how Martin will be removed.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,443 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Of course there are FF TDs discussing MM's future, it would be startling news if they weren't.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,377 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Let's see if others follow. Think that the FF PP meeting is tomorrow night.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,510 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Re; Vote for Gavin

    A sizeable protest vote, only selecting Gavin, would almost certainly elect Connolly surely? Unless it's sizeable enough to win of course.

    Seems to me Connolly's support is solid while Humphreys needs Gavin voters and Gavin transfers to her.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,377 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Barry Cowen just called for a full and frank review of FF's selection process.

    https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2025/10/07/presidential-race-live-updates-jim-gavin-fallout/

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,188 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    They have been discussing that for nearly 10 years.

    The obvious break is when he steps down as Taoiseach.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,173 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    I see three options

    You support CC or HH and just give them your first preference vote (and second preference is probably not needed anymore in this case, but you can give it if you like)

    If you don't care who wins between HH and CC or you want a protest or spoilt vote you can vote Gavin only, and do not give a second preference to anyone.

    If you still want a say in the HH , CC selection, you can still vote Gavin (as a statement) and give your second vote to CC or HH.

    This is fully under control of every voter as part of the STV we have.

    Oh I guess you can spoil your vote in the tradition way also by voting for Dustin etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,908 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It would have been far less embarrassing for FF to just make Gavin apologise and pay the money back.

    He was gonna come 3rd anyway but it would have looked less a shambles than it is now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,631 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    More AI nonsense.

    There is no provision for a candidate to withdraw once validly nominated. Gavin will be on the ballot and votes for him will be counted as usual. All that's really happened is that he's ended his campaign.

    If only one candidate had been nominated then there would have been no election, but that is not the case here even if one of the other two ends their campaign also.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,503 ✭✭✭dmakc


    I see MM is out today with the old reliable gaza distraction. Might want to focus on Ireland for a change this week



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 984 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    On the whole it seems like this issue could have been handled and perhaps sorted out without causing such an embarrassment for JG and the party imo. Even the wronged person said they "couldn't get a hold of him". He could have played it off as being a busy man, and didn't receive the messages at the time, but once he realised the situation many years later he made it right with interest etc. Not that it wouldn't have been a bit of a scandal, but it would have been able to be navigated imo.

    I get the feeling that because the polls were against him anyway the heads of the party decided to throw him under the bus, but didn't realise they would stumble under with him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,144 ✭✭✭corkie


    @Hotblack Desiato Why are you pulling up days old posts of mine? I already retracted that and said I was in correct. That quote only applied before the nominations process closed (24th Sept) and I wasn't aware of that been required.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭liamtech


    I can only give my opinion on what is happening RE the bookies, and the election polling as a whole. Its kind of hard to explain this, but im gonna try, and happy to receive criticism. The nature of the election has totally changed now that there are only two candidates available to choose from. I predict a low turn out, probably the lowest in a while, and i truly believe this advantages CC, as opposed to HH.

    Its a longtime since studied any of this stuff. To keep it simple, i will only use 4 categories. Its all based on my opinion/speculation too, so happy to receive criticisms or disagreement.

    FOR Catherine Connolly

    Her base, those who agree with her views, and who have enthusiastically connected with her campaign. The base in particular, love her foreign policy stance, regardless of what experts may say. Broadly speaking, this group have connected with Connolly in a positive way, and support her no matter what. Some within this catagory, might indulge in speculations that the media/other-parties, are 'ganging up' on Connolly, which only serves to deepen their level of support. None of this is a surprise as Connolly is a vocally exciting candidate, and if you are a CC voter, your excitement will increase as the weeks roll on.

    • likeliness to turn out and vote: HIGH - they get to vote for THEIR PREFERRED candidate, which is good incentive to turn out and take part

    AGAINST Catherine Connolly

    Probably a large tent of voters with competing views. People, like me, who cant get behind her foreign policy stance. Other groups who would be more conservative in their views on both societal and economic policy. They have a negative view of Connolly, as being unsuitable for the role, but the degree to which they think her opponent is suitable varies wildly, especially in a two horse race. They may not have connected with Humphreys, so much as, they dont want Connolly.

    • likeliness to turn out and vote: Medium - dependent on their feelings for Humphreys, so this is less incentive to actually turn up. Some may turn up to BLOCK CC, but again, it wouldnt be as serious an incentive, depending on their feelings for HH.

    FOR Heather Humphreys

    Humphreys base, and generally conservatives, this group overlaps with those that are against Connolly. But we would probably all admit that, the Humphreys campaign is rather low key. She is an able politician, that shows tactical awareness, but HH is not an exciting candidate. Her road to getting on the ballot could be summed up by stating that the preferred candidate, who everyone wanted, pulled out. Her campaign is well organized but we could debate whether there is any real 'energy' around it. Its also likely that Humphreys receives a blow from todays budget, that even her support base might be susceptible to.

    • likeliness to turn out and vote: Medium/HIGH, but the level of support is lower than Connolly, no question. Humphreys is not exciting at all, and i think we could agree on that.

    AGAINST Heather Humphreys

    Another large tent of voters, which Connolly will hope to capitalize on. But a catagory filled with inconsistant and competing views. The 'never Fine Gael block', purest Fianna Fail voters, as well as those who always vote against large paties. Being a low key candidate, even Humphreys detractors lack energy. The degree to which they will turn out to vote depends on whether they like Connolly or support her views. Not as vocal as those critics of CC, but equally, may have decided not to take part at all- therefore, possibly no shows on the day

    • likeliness to turn out and vote: LOW- while some in this catagory will turn out simply to block HH, many may simply stay at home. This catagory probably lacks more energy, compared to all of the above.

    Being a two horse race, it becomes a question of backing one, against the other. If you feel one is not suitable, that doesnt necessarily mean you will vote for their opponent. Someone in this position, with regard to CC for example; Will a voter such as this bother to turn up? If the polls push Connolly ahead, they might not bother doing so, which is why i suspect low turnout will be a factor. 'Least Worst Option' elections tend to lack energy, unless something serious is at stake. And its debatable whether an Irish Presidential Election is seen as important by the electorate.

    My gut feeling is that CC remains a divisive candidate, but she remains supported by a large enthusiastic base. Compared to HH, who is less divisive but also lacks energy and excitement.

    Anyway, happy to discuss, this is just how i see it.

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭liamtech


    I buggered up my post above, as i was responding to several posts, both here, and on Current Affairs/IMHO - apologies if it appeared to come from nowhere - lol

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 363 ✭✭rdser


    Nothing like a good review/report to keep FF ticking away....they love a good report



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 926 ✭✭✭RickBlaine


    So JG's name will be on the ballot. Does that mean that if JG votes on election day, he won't be voting for himself!? How f*cking bizarre is that!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 984 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    The report will likely finalise around the time that FF is handing the reigns to FG, and MM is heading to retirement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,510 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Thing is, if the Martin/Chambers thing is not resolved before the election, are disgruntled FFers going to give Gavin a vote that the two can point to as support?

    Unlikely I'd imagine. Will they just not vote or vote for HH I wonder.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 562 ✭✭✭chrisd2019


    Receipts? No all misdemeanours are of a financial nature, your jumping to the wrong conclusions, keep researching !



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 984 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    Agree on the low turnout, but I think this will favour HH not CC personally.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,139 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    That is what I have started thinking. Some FF diehards who are livid at Martin. Might not bother voting. Or go for Connolly out of spite alone.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,188 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Yeah, I was saying something similar earlier. He could have said that he thought it was sorted and gone off to check. Come back the next day and say oops, there was an oversight, I will pay with interest and also make a donation to charity.

    Strange that wasn't what was done.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,563 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I don’t see HH winning - I’m gonna stick my neck out and say CC by a margin of at least 1.25 votes to 1- personally I think it will be a lot higher than that

    The groundswell of support across the “left”, coupled with a lot of government dissatisfaction coupled with a likely reduced FF turnout coupled with a now greatly reduced likelihood of significant transfers from JG to HH- means it’s CC’s for the taking



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 984 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    It's on the party for that. I mean there have been worse scandals in the past imo. Now I will say it is possible that there was a lot more to come out, and JG got out thinking he would be left alone (which he probably will be if he stays out of politics), but on the whole this should've been easy for them to handle. I get the feeling that they just didn't want to expend energy on it.

    In particular those who felt wronged by MM prob saw it as an opportunity to catch him on the hop. I really think that behind the scenes the knives are out for Martin, but those holding them will accept a new back room succession plan being put in place now, in lieu of collapsing the government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,563 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    I understand where you’re coming from but -SF have a huge under 35 level of support who actively participate in turning up at the polls - my personal belief is that they are more likely than not to turn up at this election - and are overwhelming CC supporters -on the other hand, the “older” demographic , whilst generally 2:1 the under 35s, are split - and with JG gone, who knows if they’ll even turn up - also, you would imagine that at least some FF voters will switch to CC on this occasion and especially the younger voters



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 984 ✭✭✭jesuisjuste


    I think that it is possible now that the search for scandals is going to die down a bit, and become more of a straight contest, as all parties recognise that there is more merit to having a legitimate president of any side vs a coronation. This will prob favour CC, but I still think HH is in with a good shout, albeit likely the underdog at this point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,377 ✭✭✭jmcc


    Very carefully worded. It isn't a direct attack on Martin and Chambers. They are the ones responsible for the process.

    Regards…jmcc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,188 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It is definitely CC's to lose from here, but she will be the most unsuitable President we have ever had.

    The President is not supposed to interfere in domestic policy, yet she is off at it today.

    She will not be welcome in Northern Ireland because of her support for a dissident republican.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 363 ✭✭rdser


    We should be looking for higher standards than that TBF. I know FFG operate that way, buts it's really not good enough anymore.

    Donation to charity FFS. It's 16years…saying oops and making a donation is just not acceptable from anyone wanting to be president.

    one thing is fairly clear after the last few days...FF haven't changed a bit. Still the same old gombeen party of bertie and co .



Advertisement