Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

General Irish politics discussion thread

1277278280282283294

Comments

  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Surely the FG ministers like Humphreys and Vradakar that were in control of DSP over recent decades would have made sure there were strong control processes in place to prevent abuse?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,079 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    This is weird. Bust-up in II over trying to get Vicar St's licence removed because of an upcoming Bob Vylan concert.

    Independent Ireland leader Michael Collins has said he was “not happy at all” with a party councillor who has taken legal proceedings to try to stop a Dublin gig by punk-rap duo Bob Vylan.

    Mr Collins said he will be speaking to Linda de Courcy because of her objection to the licence of Vicar Street, saying it cannot be done in Independent Ireland’s name. The TD said he could not stand over a business losing its licence and the threat that could pose to up to 100 people’s jobs.

    Ms de Courcy, a South Dublin county councillor, told Dublin District Court on Monday that she was there on behalf of party TD Ken O’Flynn and would be objecting to Vicar Street’s dance and music licence. She added that it was due to serious concerns regarding the scheduled performance.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,008 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Linda seems to be a big fan of Isreal.

    https://dublinpeople.com/news/southside/articles/2024/11/20/sdcc-israel-vote/?amp=1

    Independent Ireland councillor Linda De Courcy said “there are currently 70 conflicts going on around the world; what is happening in Israel and Palestine is horrendous, but the same things are happening around the world.”

    “There are babies being slaughtered all around the world; why are we all just focused on one state?”

    “In fairness, they were attacked and they still have hostages that have still not been released,” and called the motion “a virtue-signalling waste of time.”

    “I don’t see the point in having these conversations when we can’t do anything about it.”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,008 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Three councillors attending the meeting, Councillor Linda De Courcy (IndIre), Councillor Ronan McMahon (IND), and Councillor Glen Moore (Irish Freedom Party) voted against.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,897 ✭✭✭✭briany


    Why do Sinn Fein keep on banging the drum for a border poll? That's not the way it works. You can't just agitate for one. Does the GFA not stipulate that a border poll will be called by the NI secretary at the point they judge that such a poll is likely to give a unification result?

    A cursory look at polling data suggests little to no chance of a border poll returning a unification decision, so did Sinn Fein forget the above GFA clause? This one, to remind everyone :-

    “The Secretary of State shall exercise the power under this section to make an order directing the holding of a poll if at any time it appears likely to him that a majority of those voting would express a wish that Northern Ireland should cease to be part of the United Kingdom and form part of a united Ireland.”



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,806 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Because it is their raison d'etre. They will likely immediately forget all the other promises they make if and when they ever get into power in Ireland and focus on something they have zero control over instead. They don't exactly hide it.

    Also it allows them to put pressure on the govt to do something (agitate for a border poll) that they know full well the govt won't (/can't) do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Long since been decreed by the courts (Raymond McCord case) that a SoS is not restrained in calling a poll. Summary of the findings:

    The court said that it is for Secretary of State for Northern Ireland “to decide what is, or is not, relevant to the decision-making process depending on the prevailing circumstances”. The judges ruled that neither the 1998 Belfast Agreement nor the Northern Ireland Act contained any such requirement that a policy be published by the Secretary of State. The judges said that the decision as to who should vote “is also a political judgment as to what is acceptable or appropriate in our community”.

    Such considerations might include an evaluation of potential factors which might impact on the poll. Such things may be changes in social attitudes in Ireland and Northern Ireland, taxation structures in both jurisdictions, Brexit and cross-border trading in Ireland. This might include an evaluation of agreements made between the European Union and the United Kingdom.

    For instance the SoS could decide that on foot of the Irish government publishing a plan/White Paper that a BP is 'likely' to pass. He/she can base their decision on a range of factors, demographics, electoral results, surveys, and social indicators or some other political reasoning.

    The point is, it is not just about 'opinion polls'.

    Hence the calls for a Border Poll, because that forces Dublin to come up with a plan/White Paper.
    The calls for Dublin to begin that process are coming from a wide range of sources not just SF anymore.

    NI Court of Appeal: ‘Constitutional value of flexibility’ not maintained by publication of border poll policy | Irish Legal News

    Summary of judgment - In re Raymond McCord (Border Poll).pdf



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,787 ✭✭✭✭Red Silurian


    Are we even allowed to ban Israeli products under EU trade rules? Very interesting if we are and surprising that other councils haven't followed suit.

    I don't think there's 70 conflicts in the world but certainly we should have a similar ban on Chinese, Saudi and Russian goods



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    In effect, the courts found that the SoS could not be forced to outline reasons for a non-decision or to set out his criteria in advance. Some people build it into more than that.

    However, any decision to hold a border poll would be subject to judicial review on the basis that the SoS' reasoning was unreasonable, in the same way that a planning decision would be subject to judicial review.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Absolutely, the provision is there for JR.

    And anyone or two or three of those could be seen as 'reasonable'.

    Doesn't change the point, a SoS is not solely constrained to use 'opinion polls' in their decision making process.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,521 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    But if the polls show that a border poll doesn't have any real chance of having even a close vote - is it not better to wait? (I don't actually know where the polling currently is - if it was close then they should go ahead)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Not IMO.

    If the government had a plan in place and polls said No, then yes, obviously wait.

    As the SDLP now say, they have waited long enough to see what Dublin proposes.

    Also, you have what seems like a dichotomy in polling, there is no majority for a UI, but you have majorities in both jurisdictions that want a BP.

    Why is that/ The only reason that makes sense is that people want to see a Plan.

    Support for independence in Scotland went from 32% to almost parity after the publication of the White Paper.

    IMO an actual plan for a UI changes the game re: polls. And yes, I accept it could go either way in polls.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    No SoS is going to risk a decision being overturned in the Courts. Neither are they going to risk the wider political risks and implications of prematurely breaking up the UK and encouraging independence in Scotland, and potentially Wales.

    Consequently, any rational SoS will wait and wait. As a result, the dreaming of a border poll will go on and on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SoS and government make decisions all the time that risk being overturned by JR, The most recent being around the Protocol.

    Whatever about that, the lack of a plan here is becoming more and more untenable across a range of political thinking.

    Say what you want, but our neighbours are not politically stable at the moment and anything is likely to happen. It is almost criminally negligent for us not to be preparing. We only have to look at the cause of that political instability with our neighbours - a referendum which was not properly prepared for.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,806 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    "When will there be a border poll" genuinely belongs in the General British Politics thread as that is where it will be decided. And no one who pays any attention to UK politics would think there is a remotest chance in hell of it happening any time soon.

    SF also of course know this, but that is the beauty of being in opposition - the things you demand don't actually have to be achievable.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    The opinion poll at the weekend had a united Ireland as a priority for 2% of the population. No government will even look at a plan until that is close to 10%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    SF call for a BP on the basis that the SoS can decide at any time to call one - simple as that. And because they know that the calling of a BP will force the government to come up with a plan.

    I pay partial attention to UK politics and enough to know that anyone saying they are expert in predicting how things will go there is deluded. Reading the General British Politics thread is enough to tell you that much.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,806 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Then they should be focusing their lobbying efforts on Westminster.

    It is hard to know where British politics is going, but it is not hard to know that it is not going towards a border poll - unless you somehow think that would be a Reform priority. Labour can't afford the distraction and, fundamentally, no one cares enough about it at the moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    That is your opinion.

    Plenty of others out there about how things might change very quickly.

    “The working group is not pushing for a referendum on Northern Ireland’s constitutional future in any way. But we are saying that such a vote might be legally required in the not-too-distant future.

    Calling a Border poll without clear plan would be unwise, experts warn – The Irish Times


    There is now just a six percentage points separating those who’d vote ‘Yes’ (36%) to unity if a border poll were held tomorrow and those who’d vote ‘No’ (42%).

    A year before there was a 12 percentage point difference between the two groups and just six years previously the margin stood at 33 points.“A change in the views of 3% of respondents from ‘No’ to ‘Yes’ (thus making both 39%) could present cause for consideration by the secretary of state,”

    Narrowing margin on constitutional question to bring border poll pressure on secretary of state – The Irish News



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    All nonsense.

    There is no requirement on the SoS to say we are having a poll in three weeks, as you say yourself, he is not constrained, so he could easily say, I have decided, subject to a credible plan, to hold a border poll in three years time, because the opinion polls and election results are such that it is likely to pass.

    Work could begin then. No point in wasting money on a plan that may never be put to a poll. A plan could cost €20m to put together. We could build many useful bike sheds with that money.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    There is no requirement on the SoS to say we are having a poll in three weeks, 

    as you say yourself,

     

    he is not constrained,

     so he could easily say, I have decided, subject to a credible plan, to hold a border poll in three years time, because the opinion polls and election results are such that it is likely to pass.

    Quite simply this is a guess, some might say, a hopeful guess.

    Neither are sound policy for not preparing for change.

    We have not learned from Brexit, we will end up rushing something that did not need to be rushed.

    And that is the increasing pressure the government are coming under from more than SF. Deny as you might.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,806 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Of course it is my opinion. Everything everyone says here is their opinion.

    But a border poll is ultimately dependent on British politics, not Irish. It is not even about whether things change on the ground in NI quickly. Labour are simply not going to cause even more turmoil in their current government with this and Reform will probably stick bloody Kate Hooey as SoS if they get in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    But a border poll is ultimately dependent on British politics, not Irish.

    This is the naïve thinking that pervades among some.
    The physical 'calling' of the poll is in the gift of the British, that is a given.
    Anyone who thinks it will be called without consultation with Dublin is a fool tbh.

    Dublin beginning to plan will be the signal. The back channel work will begin and an announcement is made. Watch the ire and foot - stamping from the anti-UI folk if a Plan is mentioned or if the government begin one. They know only too well what it means and where it will end - a BP.

    And we might only be a change of leader away from that happening.





  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    It seems that everything you say is a fact, but everything that others say is a guess or an opinion.

    It is actually very sound policy.

    (1) You do not waste money on a plan that may never be used.

    (2) You do not unnecessarily upset people by making a plan that may never be used.

    (3) When a view is reached that a united Ireland might be a good idea, you take steps to put that in motion

    (4) You give sufficient time to that process to ensure that a fully costed plan with implications for everyday life are clearly explained to avoid the result of Brexit.

    (5) You set a reasonable deadline of three years to ensure that the process actually happens.

    After that, you have an informed Border poll. Your idea is putting the cart before the horse, a really really stupid idea of a policy.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,806 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    Of course it will be called in consultation with Dublin - I suspect they wouldn't do it if Dublin objected. But if London doesn't want it for their own reasons they simply won't. It will be dead in the water. I could not possibly care less if a BP is called, but you are displaying a massive naivety about the state of British politics and the Irish govt's ability to influence it.

    Anyway, I'll leave it there, there are enough NI threads.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,472 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Well your former go to party - the SDLP are saying they have waited too long for Dublin to say the time is right.

    1 A plan for something that may happen imminently is not a bad idea. It almost criminal not to be ready or at least partly so.
    2 People are going to be 'upset' that will never change.
    3 Part of finding out if it's a 'good idea' is to plan for it. You would do it if you were considering a road or a house. Draw up a plan and have a look.
    4 No reason that cannot begin and that is why more and more are putting pressure on Dublin to begin.

    5 Timeframes to allow transition or discussion are fine and normal.

    I advocate for a comprehensive Plan first then a BP.

    *P.S. I agree with Podge, you have been told this stuff before. No need for me to do it again.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    (1) A border poll isn't going to happen imminently. Labour have ruled it out during their current government, the Tories have ruled it out for ever, how is it going to happen imminently?

    (2) The point sailed over your head. No need to upset people when nothing is happening.

    (3) Yeah, draw up the plan when the numbers add up. Don't waste time on plans that are for things that aren't going to happen. One of the reasons projects like the A5 don't happen is because time is wasted by SF on things like this.

    (4) Three years between the decision for a border poll and the actual referendum give plenty of time.

    (5) Three years to draw up a plan is plenty of time, if it can't be done, the project will fail and people will vote accordingly.

    No need to answer, it is taking up too much of the thread.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,016 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope


    Very Benign budget for me today. I run my own business, no tax breaks, but my fuel costs will rise substantially for my machinery and transportation vehicles. Fcuk carbon tax, punished for having no alternative means available that can do my work without the diesel and petrol. The stay at home crews all getting good rises, while mine and others like me will see our pockets lightened.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭harryharry25


    Paschal Donohue giving Claire Byrne a present after she questioned him today shows exactly what's wrong with this country



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,128 ✭✭✭harryharry25


    1000027715.png

    No doubt the tax payer has paid for this gift too cause ya can be guaranteed Paschal didn't pay for it



Advertisement
Advertisement