Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Presidential Election 2025

1353354356358359501

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,997 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    I don't think it's that over blown to be honest.

    We have just 2 candidates now, that's very, very poor. Heather Humphreys is associated with the Orange Order and has absolutely no chance of being elected. (IMHO)

    In relation to MM, yes, I agree with you, his days are certainly numbered as the leader of FF.

    In terms of his replacement, I do not think Jack Chambers is the right candidate, reminds me far to much of Leo V.

    It'll be Jim, Michael or Darragh



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,162 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    We elect candidates. We don't elect supporters. I would not have voted for her, but I'm a great believer in including different points of view. Mostly Steen may not share my views, but once in a blue moon she says something I agree with.

    Overall I like our institutions and think they have been more effective than others in the West in blocking authoritarianism. I think though that we should not equate conservativism with anti constitutionalism. This do so risks pushing more to anti constitutionalism as I think happened in the US.

    Regarding the term "woke", it was originally coined by the Left. Then US Rep. Ayanna Presley (Democrat) some years ago called on supporters to be "woke".

    I think our democracy should reflect public opinion. This opinion is maybe 70% liberal on cultural issues (except maybe on trans issues where it's complicated because of issues like sports) and about 60-40 on favouring the free market Vs socialism.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,113 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    Surely when discussing him running you'd sit down and ask what property have you ever owned did, did you rent it out, did you register it, wouldnt that jog your memory.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭liamtech


    We can debate what it means to be far right. For me the right wing could be seen as semi-conservative on societal issues, and properly conservative on fiscal policy.

    The block i am referring to, is placed to the right of all of the above. It is akin to a 'Maga offshoot' in Ireland, and yes it remains fringe, AT PRESENT.

    What really cannot be debated is the fact that, to a man, they backed Maria Steens Nomination. Aontu would probably be the closest to Steen in terms of its views, and its origins. Toibin obviously fell out with SF over their stance on abortion, but Aontu went well beyond merely becoming a Pro Life version of Sinn Fein. I would not yet refer to it as, Far Right, but it is adjacent, and probably the most right wing party in Ireland (excluding the National Party, and other pseudo-political groups)

    As to the Christian Right, versus the Far right? Well, depending on ones own position, that could be argued as being a distinction without a difference. I see your point, but Steen herself did absolutely nothing to dissuade the obvious Far Right characters from supporting her. We could debate that, and what it meant.

    Frankly, i am happy for this group to go ahead, found a party, and run in elections. We are a democracy, and any attempt being made to 'shut them out' would be undemocratic. What was NOT undemocratic was Steens failure to be nominated. She tried to mount a late-in-the-day nomination bid, and lost out. The process wasnt unfair, or undemocratic. She ran out of time, and lost. And what is also not Undemocratic, is this election. Due to Fianna Fail ineptitude, we only have two candidates, in a democratic race. Its frustrating for those who dislike either candidate, but it remains a democratic campaign.

    Also attacking RTE's editorial integrity for 'failing to engage with anti-immigration activist' is ludicrous. They have the right to decide what meets their standards for coverage, and what doesnt.

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 335 ✭✭tarvis


    perhaps she needs to be asked wider questions in order to expand her messages -

    the debate presenters are the ones control ling the questions



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭almostover


    Is it not up to the 'social right' as you've termed them to get themselves elected onto local councils and get TDs elected to the Dáil if they wish to be represented more in Irish politics?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭liamtech


    I know what you mean RE supporters versus Candidates. Absolutely, i agree.

    That said, she didnt say a single word AGAINST the support she was visibly receiving from certain obvious bad actors.

    Since US politics has been mentioned in discussing this situation; i would remind people of how Trump dealt with receiving the support of David Dukes. Incoherant ramblings, saying he didnt know who that was, and wasnt aware of it, and, listen, people are entitled to support him etc etc

    Before i receive a pile-on of people attacking me, il state it clearly. NO, i am NOT likening Steen to David Dukes, or her supporters to the KKK.

    What i am saying is that, if Steen was as Squeeky clean as some have portrayed her, she should have placed a public rebuke on the Far Right Bloc. Yes they can vote for her if they wish, but she does NOT share their views. She didnt do that, and i think we need to acknowledge that.

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,669 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Yes, I would view Steen as a 'right leaning Catholic conservative'. The likes of Malachy Steenson and McGuirk might be supporting her, but one wonders just how much they really have in common with her.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,582 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    You’re half right- the sign of a good answer to any question by a politician is to include the key messages you want the electorate to hear, regardless of the question asked - I haven’t seen any of the 3 /now 2- candidates do that successfully. If you’re continually asked about gaza or Europe or Russia etc, at some point you need to just move the interviewer on in whatever way you can and start raising your election manifesto - which I might add, was extremely poor for all 3 candidates also - I’m hoping the RTE debate will allow candidates to set out their stall better around what they will do as president - and if they fck up the answer to that, then absolutely they deserve the criticism they’ll get



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 44,272 Mod ✭✭✭✭Seth Brundle


    Maria Steen is not in national politics and never has been. She dipped a toe in this time around and found that not enough politicians wanted to back her politics (despite her self-entitled moaning afterwards).

    Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/ .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,173 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    I agree in some ways but Jim should have used it to his advantage, highlight the first citizen element of the role, and that he is not a politician with well versed political speech. He is a citizen just like the majority of us and he would do he best to work on his public speaking skills into the future.

    You know like HH promise to improve her Irish.....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,328 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Indeed it is and so far they've failed to organise as a competent and likable group. This is on them, but political inertia is a problem in ireland. New parties generally fail unless they are formed as splinters from existing who already have elected representatives. Even then the track record of survival is low.

    In any case, it was a space that was largely occupied by both FG and FF but the progressive wing has taken over FG and to be honest FF doesn't know what it stands for.

    The ordinary voter doesn't have the means to change this, they can only interact with what is put in front of them. The two main parties acted together to shut out opposition or an alternative from outside the existing system. You can say well that's the rules we have and everyone has to play by them. Yes, but because rules exist, doesn't make them democratic or means they are beyond question. The rules exist to prevent those not fit for office from running but it's also sets the bar so high that it allows for fit candidates to be blocked. It is the latter especially that's problematic.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,162 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    We saw in Northern Ireland where the attempts to exclude SF from politics led. The danger is further radicalisation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭almostover


    There is literally nothing stopping any citizen running for local councils or the Dáil. Once you are 18 years of age (council), 21 for the Dáil, resident in the country and a citizen you can run for public office.

    The presidential office is held to a higher bar. If the 'social right' wants to make in-roads in Irish politics, local government and the Dáil is the place to start.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,328 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Yeah, she's firmly in the Catholic conservative camp so her opinions on gender, LGBT, where there is a specific Catholic position would be easy to infer and be firmly on the right.

    The other hot topic of migration is harder to determine. If she strictly followed Catholic teaching, charity, patience and tolerance for the poor and marginalized is a core belief. Those views typically wouldn't align with the emergent right here.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,582 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    Its a trick pony that only works if you’re actually delivering results for the people - the issue isn’t FF/FG shutting out SF- the issue clearly now is that SF was shut out AND FF/FG have failed to sort any of the major issues- housing likely the #1 issue which also then impacts immigration, rising costs etc etc etc

    The next election will be devastating for FF - they can’t hold back the left tide any longer - Labour better get their acts together as currently they look asleep



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭almostover


    Nobody is being excluded from Irish politics, literally nobody. Once, you are over 18 (council) / 21 (Dáil), are resident in the country and a citizen then you can run for public office. The standard is set higher for the president.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭liamtech


    Thats a very valid point pal, i cannot deny that. I dont know how we can deal with this type of movement. It succeeded with breaking through in the US, the UK, Hungary, and in many other areas it is fast growing.

    Honestly, i hope its clear to you at least: All i am doing is giving my opinions, which are backed up by facts. I think the best way to fight this growing radicalization, is to highlight it, and refuse to allow it to 'disguise' itself as something more respectable. Using terms like 'establishment', 'elites', in refernce to run of the mill politicians; movements wanting to defund RTE - in my honest opinion, they are clearly representative of a growing movement. And its appealing to many disaffected voters. We just need to reach out to those voters, and message them directly. And if nothing else, warn them of bad actors attempting to recruit them.

    Its a tight-rope too because along the way, we invariably get caught up in debates with genuine moderates who might seem to derail our positions, as being undemocratic, or being a 'smear' on more respectable conservatives.

    Anyway, happy to discuss, although probably off topic for this thread.

    Sic semper tyrannis - thus always to Tyrants



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭almostover


    Ah stop, the largest party in the Dáil (FF) is going to have a devastating GE performance almost 5 years from now? Where have you got the information for this clairvoyance? They've rightly messed up this presidential campaign, but some of the hyperbole coming out now is off the charts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,328 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Thats as naive as saying that there is nothing preventing someone from a drug addled and poor community making it out of that situation. Technically there's not but in reality there are huge barriers to be overcome

    Incumbent advantage is enormous and politics has huge momentum and inertia that makes it very challenging as an outsider to overcome.

    There is a firmly right wing cohort of about 30% of the electorate that appears to be politically homeless. If they vote they have to compromise to a far greater extent than the left voter where a spectrum of choice exists. Who is to blame for that? Well in this instance the two main parties conspired, as the rules permit, to block that choice.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭almostover


    Where are you getting this 30% figure from? What's your source on that?

    Do you know how democracy works at all? If your policies are popular enough then you will get elected. Yes, the main parties have an advantage. But if the people want change they can vote for it. We haven't done so yet, albeit we have come very close in the last few elections.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,621 ✭✭✭crossman47


    And that 30% don't vote on social issues in general elections - they are decided on basics like economy, health, etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 869 ✭✭✭batman75


    I suspect Jim Gavin must be rueing his decision to run for the presidency. The whole tenant story is highly embarrassing. For me as a punter its more the owing the tenant money for years than not registering with the tenancy board. Though that does open up some questions.

    It's not plausible for him not to realise he was getting money into his account that was not due to him and he would have known the source so to not reimburse is plain dishonest and to keep it for so long is immoral. Those in Dublin GAA may still see him as a hero but I imagine his stock with the general public has plummeted.

    The true tragedy of this presidential race is the paucity and quality of contenders. I think the whole selection process needs to be looked at. Political parties shouldn't be able to exclude someone from running. The Presidency should never be a toy to score political victories. It should be seen to put in place a person of dignity, intelligence and charisma who best represents the Irish people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,162 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    These voters are rightwing but often in a Catholic context rather than the unholy alliance with billionaires and Thatcherite/ Reaganite cuts to welfare seen elsewhere. Law and Justice party in Poland are an example , combining cultural conservatism with generous welfare, at least for groups like families with children.

    American and British conservatism have some features that owe more to Max Webers concept of the "Protestant Work Ethic" when it comes to policies on tax, business deregulation, union busting and welfare cuts.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 723 ✭✭✭GalwayGaillimh


    If Humphreys withdraws is that automatic election for Connolly?

    Si Deus Nobiscum Qui Contra Nos



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,832 ✭✭✭almostover


    That's pretty much what Aontú are. Liberal on fiscal policy, conservative on social policy. They have candidates in the local and general elections if people wish to vote for this position. Nobody is excluded.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,162 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    I dont consider myself a conservative, but I am only a liberal in terms of supporting individual freedom. I am anti authoritarian, but for me that includes respecting the freedom of those I disagree with. I believe in the State as something higher than one political party or ideology, save for the Constitution.

    I oppose censorship of opposing political views by Irish citizens. I was concerned the Hate Speech bill could be misused like similar laws were misused against Gaza activism in Britain, France and Germany.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,328 ✭✭✭MrMusician18


    Yeah, I agree him running was a mistake. His stock is a good bit lower now than it was previously. If he'd kept out of it, you'd have seen board positions and chairmanships in his future. Now though? Seems unlikely.

    As for him not realising the money was in his account, it is possible. I'm not that wealthy but it's possible I wouldn't notice the extra money. That said he was under financial stress and this tenant went to some lengths to contact him so due to that it's not plausible he didn't know.

    I wonder if the tenants left the country and he thought he'd never see or hear of them again. He had a reasonably public profile as Dublin manager so it would have been easy to embarrass him into paying them back in that period. Perhaps they didn't know?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,864 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    She would not have won but I don't believe she deserved to be on the ballot as the body she represents ,i.e. The Iona Institute, is very sinister and has an agenda.

    I'm all for democracy and choice but not people running for the presidency with an agenda. Steen would have brought the debate back to family issues, religion, abortion etc. which is not what the job is about.

    A person who is against issue such as same sex marriage and contraception should not be head of state.

    Also, if she had got on the ballot then interference/influence from conservative right wingers in the USA would have influenced the campaign and provided financial support.

    Her candidacy would have been similar to Conor McGregor's who everyone was glad to see not on the ballot but they share similar supporters but nobody minded McGregor not being selected.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28,864 ✭✭✭✭murpho999


    You're not communicating anything, it just goes straight to a spoilt votes pile and forgotten about.



Advertisement