Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

1118911901192119411951308

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    Ten Hag was sacked at; P 9 / W 3 / D 2 / L 4 / GF 8 / GA 11 / GD -3 / PTS 9

    Ten Hag, as poor as he was in the end after a rapid decline, at least had us in the top half of the table for two seasons, won two cups, and got us CL football his first season. As bad as it was in the end, and it was bad, at least we got something out of him.

    This season we stand at; P 6 / W 2 / D 1 / L 3 / GF 7 / GA 11 / GD -4 / PTS 7

    We've got nothing out or Amorim, absolutely nothing. There hasn't been a anything resembling a positive outlook since he took over, bar the odd isolated result and a failed Europa League run (in which his tactics, selection and subs in the final were abysmal). His biggest achievement at the club to date, and arguably his only notable one, has been to use his charming personality to gaslight the fans, and the media, into believing he's "honest" with his talk of "having to take the pain" to excuse nearly a year of utterly disastrous results. He's been United's worst manager in living memory to the point that he is actually a blind man's Ten Hag.

    If we don't win at Sunderland, Amorim simply has to get the bullet straight away after the match regardless, because that'll literally be a case of "anyone will do" simply because they can't actually do worse than Amorim, as his record is simply that bad.

    Because losing points to Sunderland, especially a loss, and we're definitely well in relegation territory. And that's not hyperbole or exaggeration.

    Amorim's league record has been seriously padded by performances against the promoted sides. Of the 34 points in 33 games he's won in the league, 13 have come against the promoted clubs in 5 games with a +7 goal difference in those 5 games.

    The record in the other 28 games against established non-promoted teams in the league stands at a brutal 21 points, and -20 goal difference. That is relegation form in any language.

    What's worrying is the promoted teams last season were the worst three promoted sides in PL history. They had the least amount of accumulated points of any set of promoted teams. They were easy pickings. This year, to date anyway, Sunderland, Leeds and Burnley (needed a last minute penalty to get past them, at home) don't look to be anywhere near as bad, and certainly look competent enough to get a few results against us.

    And if we start dropping points against promoted sides, we're in very serious sh!t, because our trajectory under Amorim (P28, 21 PTS, -20GD) against established league teams is most definitely relegation. That's not saying that'll happen, but that's the trajectory.

    A win against Sunderland might defer the inevitable, but anything other than a win and you may end this failure of a manager before we're staring at the championship.

    PS - Serious questions have to be asked of INEOS and how they're running the club as well.

    Because not removing Ten Hag after a disastrous season where the football was desperate and the coaching was obviously poor, and then compounding it by giving him 200m+ to spend only to have to do what everyone knew was inevitable after 9 league games into the season was an horrendous mistake, but having to fire another manager after another 200m+ summer investment after a far, far worse run of results just over a year later is simply unforgiveable.

    And if they double down on Amorim and keep him on regardless of results because he's "their guy" and they trust in him, and we're in worse trouble coming towards Christmas (does anyone honestly think this will get better?), then we may forget about INEOS ever taking the club forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭MercuryBoy


    I think the fact that they didn't sign any wing backs over the summer, plus Wilcox apparently overruling him on a midfielder and buying a striker instead, means that opinion within INEOS was divided on Amorin after the Europa League Final and they didn't go all in on him, which I think was wise as he has shown nothing to justify any faith…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,903 ✭✭✭keeponhurling


    Hadn't heard that about Wilcox. Why on earth would he overrule him on signing a midfielder ?!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    Because hojlund was rubbish?

    I'd also be taking what Laurie vaguely says with a pinch of salt. Overruled could be they disagreed and then talked it out and came to a decision.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,874 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I dunno how anyone thinks we can avoid defeat to Sunderland. Never mind beat them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,302 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    i dunno why it would be between a striker and CM. we are overloaded with 10's and didn't need to buy 2.

    the simple debate should have been do we want two 10's or one 10 and one CM.

    i had bruno down as my flop of the season if amorim persists playing him in the midfield 2. if i had concerns, surely amorim also had concerns. really he should play 10, buy 1 other 10, and spend the cunha/mbeumo funds on a CM.

    it was poor squad building during the summer. i presume that's wilcox' fault.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,049 ✭✭✭✭johnnyryan89


    Iraola should be a name at the top of their list to replace Amorim. He's out of contract next summer so I'd be trying to suss out his camp to see if he's willing to come in.

    His first season as manager he gets them their highest points total in the league. Breaks that record again in his second season. Come his third season he loses his first choice GK, CBs, and LB yet after five games in the PL with the joint second toughest opening five games according to opta he equals Bournemouths best start to a PL season after five games.

    This season they talked about PL ready when signing Cunha and Mbeumo. Watkins and Martinez were preferred by Amorim for the same reason. This line of thought should be followed when hiring the next manager. Frank was my pick the summer when ETH should have been moved on but after him Iraola is looking like a good pick.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 169 ✭✭MercuryBoy


    I heard him discussed on the NQAT Podcast, they pointed out that Bournemouth are the best high-pressing team in the Premier League, not sure if United's squad is suited to that…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,208 ✭✭✭thegreengoblin


    Very solid?? That has to be a wind-up surely? Have you never heard of having standards? He's one of the worst defenders I've ever seen playing for an elite level club. No pace, turns like a tank and has no positional sense whatsoever. He's actually the perfect on-field representation of the club over the last few years. Just because he has popped up with a few headers now and then over the years does not negate the fact he is a shocking defender.

    Brentford's first goal summed Maguire up perfectly. He steps back, then steps up in a panic but of course it's way too late and Thiago is off and running. I would guarantee you that strikers rubs their hands with relish when they hear hear he's on the team sheet.

    Just because he shouts at referees and never went on strike or leaked team news to the press doesn't mean he we should all forget the amateur league rubbish he produces on the pitch every single week.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,874 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I always think Maguires speed is exaggerated. Yes hes slow but hes not exactly a winger FFS. People must think Vidic was one of the worst defenders aswell.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,168 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    RA needs a win and good performance against Sunderland on Saturday or surely he's gone over the international break. I don't believe for a second that he's secure for the season, he's done nothing to justify that level of faith from the brains trust.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,470 ✭✭✭✭Father Hernandez


    I cannot believe we let our number 1 goalkeeper go and didn't replace him. Onana had to go, he was/is absolutely rubbish but we're left with Bayindir (equally as bad), Lammens (no idea if he's good, bad or indifferent) plus Tom Heaton (he's 39 and wasn't good enough the first time he was at the club).

    That sums up the transfer activity for me. We've gone into the season without a recognised number 1, that is criminal. INEOS have been here long enough, they haven't a clue.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,711 ✭✭✭Caustic


    He was so bad for the goal wasn't even the step up and step back that was the worst, his other two Cbs are standing in the oppositions half he should be up with then our at least on the half way line, he was absolutely asleep to be in his own half 10 yards behind them.

    There is no way he should be starting for us these days he just doesn't want to play in a team playing a high line his instinct will always be to be back further.

    It's not really his fault our squad is such a mess after all the years of the glazers and inoes have tried to do way too much bringing in a manager who wants to play a back 3 when we just don't have the squad for it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 90 ✭✭Mywifetoldme


    Lee Carsley as temporary manager?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭scottser


    Maguire was best in a low block, counter-attacking team. With his back to goal and facing an opposition press or set pieces he could clear everything that came into the box. Ask him to play a high line and he'll be exposed for his lack of pace though. His mare at United began when ETH expected him to play high up the pitch in a team that retains possession but that's not his game. In fairness, Maguire is only one of many players being asked to play outside of his strengths, not least Amorim using him as a last-minute sub at CF. Anyway, he'll be gone at the end of the season but he could still do a job for Everton or West Ham.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    Yoro and De Ligt are just as good at defending, if not better, and both certainly have the pace. The only reason Maguire gets game time is down to Amorim's system and his insistence on 3 at the back.

    A back 4 of Mazraoui/Dalot, De Ligt, Yoro and Shaw/Dorgu with Casemiro/Ugarte/Mainoo in front of them is a far more solid shape in terms of making use of what we have available. Plus it frees up Bruno to play further up front (where's he's at his best), with Cunha and Mbuemo playing wider off Sesko (as they did in their previous clubs).

    If needed Mount and Amad can play instead of Mbuemo/Cunha, and if Bruno isn't an option Cunha/Mainoo can drop in there with Amad/Mount/Mbeumo staying out off Sesko.

    When you look at it, we actually have options and cover in most positions in a 4-3-3 or a 4-2-3-1 formation, but the manager doesn't want that, and we end up putting square pegs in round holes, and playing lads out of position, and over-loading areas with two many similar type players and other area's with too few.

    You don't have to stick with 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1 long term, but it's more solid than what we have now. Start solid, make as best use of what you have, and adjust over time.

    Amorim's done the complete opposite.

    Post edited by randd1 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,924 ✭✭✭Whatsisname


    I may be catastrophising here and I don't necessarily think Bayindir was particularly bad compared to some of his performances at the weekend but I can think of a few clubs that got relegated almost purely because of how bad their keepers were over the years, Meselier at Leeds, Trafford at Burnley, Hermansen/Ward at Leicester. We know what Bayindir gives you, Lammens we don't. Surely you put in Lammens now (unless he's terrible in training) and then reconvene in January if its looking just as bad. I am sure we move up the table with a new manager and a system thats more suited to the squad, but if we stick with Amorim, he will keep us around the bottom of the league.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,168 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    He seemed to struggle with the pressure of being temporary England manager.

    Put your money where yer mouth is... Subscribe and Save Boards!

    https://subscriptions.boards.ie/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    He needs a lot more than that tbh. A win v Sunderland won't and should not change anything. We need to draw a line under this regardless, it's only a matter of timing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,301 ✭✭✭✭PARlance


    Maguire more than likely started on Saturday due to his ability in the air / Brentford's attacking threat. Not saying he should be starting, but it's as if Amorim can't cope with all that the Prem throws (pun intended) at him.

    He knows the Maguire can't play the high line, yet he knows/thinks he needs Maguire for his aerial ability at times. He is widely accused of sticking to his formation too stubbornly, and he does, but on the other hand, he hasn't been stubborn or brave enough to play the players who suit that style.

    If he knows Maguire can't play his system, then (barring major injury problems) he should have the courage to just play the players who can play it.

    I would much prefer seeing us concede from a long throw due to Yoro or Heaven not yet being physical enough for example rather than seeing us concede a goal we've seen many times before. There would be some hope with the former, these younger CBs will get stronger over time. There's just hopelessness when you see Maguire being turned so high up the pitch, that will never not be a problem.

    There is a sense that we a going nowhere with Amorim, that's certainly my feeling. He has the courage to stick with his style but isn't backing that courage up by playing the players to suit it. Maguire can't play in his 3 at the back, Bruno can't play as one of his CM two... His persistent with these things, much more than what system he plays, is what gives me no hope.

    Similarly to the CB situation, I would have much more hope seeing Mainoo in there, even if he isn't quite up to it yet than seeing Bruno there who we know will never be suited to it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 90 ✭✭Mywifetoldme


    Won 5 drew1.

    What I would give for that as an United manager. 83.33% win rate.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,208 ✭✭✭thegreengoblin


    No one is saying he should be breaking 10 seconds for the 100 metres. Vidic's positional sense and awareness covered for his lace of pace. Maguire can't even say that. The best defenders know where to be and when to be there.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 187 ✭✭Anything4883


    Why has he dropped Yoro ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭Pete Moss


    The Magic 8 Ball he uses for footballing decisions told him to do it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    he's a young CB who doesn't need to be starting every game? He thought the height of and aerial ability of De Ligt and Maguire would be more important with Casemiro out?

    Not every decision is 100% wrong or ununderstandable or without merit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 187 ✭✭Anything4883


    Its 1 game a week!! I think he probably should be starting every week…… Use him when we have him. This lad will be swiped up by Real Madrid at any moment.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,342 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    And therein lies the problem.

    Ruben needed specialist players. Wing backs, midfielders etc…

    They know Ruben is a system manager. They hired him because that is presumably the direction they have decided to go.

    So why would you then deny him essential components to play that system?

    Are they afraid of ANOTHER STYLISTIC CHANGE after Rubin.

    So they do not see any overlap with a potential next appointment needing wing backs?

    How exactly is this any different from Woodward and Murtough and their reactionary leadership?

    If they were at that stage in the summer then Ruben should have been sacked there and then. You don't undercut him and send him out to fail then.

    Ruben has made his own bed with his poor decisions as well but once again another manager at Man Utd is being let down by those above him.

    Back to square 1 again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,261 ✭✭✭✭billyhead


    He should have gone in the Summer. This blind faith Ineos have in him is madness.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,468 ✭✭✭FrankN1


    Change the manager. If he doesn't work, change it again and in the meantime keep refreshing the team and getting the recruitment right. Eventually it will click and when a manager shows great signs of progress and has a bad patch. Give him time when it's earned.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    except the players he has generally deployed there have not be specialist wing backs - more so winger, previously. And we have not signed specialist wingbacks - we have signed one player for the role. and that player has played (previously) left back, right back, wingback and winger.

    They have been clear, since has appointment, that it isn't about buying niche players for one manager, its about buying versatile talented players that can adapt to different systems.

    Being able to adapt to our current system would be nice tbf.

    I do think he was let down, by us not getting a central midfielder most of all. and i think the club would have let every manager down in the same way most likely. I think they (wrongly) looked at the next 3 summers rather rather than the immediate issue and need in midfield. And I think Amorim was in these conversations, and i think he was part of the decision making process and I think he bares responsibility for the prioritization that was made. The only real difference, imo, is getting Sesko and Lammens over Watkins and Martinez.



Advertisement