Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Manchester United Thread 25/26 - Teamtalk/Transfers/Gossip Mod Note in OP 26.09.24

1118811891191119311941308

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,181 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    I would expect a competent organisation would brief that way regardless. The way they handled the ETH situation towards the end of the 23/24 season was hopelessly incompetent. Because they had been so public in the search, and everyone knew they wanted to sack him, they had to extend his contract as a sign of some confidence in him. And then they sacked him 2 months later with an extra year tacked onto the compensation. Hopeless.

    If they are now briefing that Amorim is their guy, then they have at least learned the lesson to lie. Hopefully they are talking to potential replacements a little more discreetly than they did last time. They should be 100% backing the manager until the morning Amorim is sacked and his replacement is announced a few hours later.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,225 ✭✭✭✭DrPhilG


    I don't know if it's a briefing, I just have a funny feeling they'll stick with him unless we're legitimately in relegation trouble and as bad as things are, I don't think we will be. Could very easily be back in the region of 15th by the end of the season though.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    He lost over 50% of his league games last season, to finish 15th.

    So far this year he has lost 50% of the league games, and currently sits 15th.

    But hey, if form didn't matter last season then why should it matter now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels


    Bit of a nothing post so don't have a go at me about the source but Romano said Xavi would take the united job.

    Makes sense...He's unemployed....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,261 ✭✭✭✭billyhead


    Hopefully its just the dreaded vote of confidence.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,302 ✭✭✭✭y0ssar1an22


    if they want him they better act fast.

    Xavi, Luciano Spalletti and Sergio Conceição have been approached by Al Ittihad after Blanc got sacked.Al Ittihad are now assessing managerial candidates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭Deise_2012


    why in god’s name would we go for Xavi?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭FourFourRED




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,511 ✭✭✭BenK


    For a big club we do think small at times.

    I actually can't believe people are talking about bringing Ole back, even as an interim. It's like in Father Ted where the priest goes, 'Is there anything to be said for another Mass?'.

    Ole, as much and all as I like him, had his go. He's done very little before or after his United stint too. Outside of his connection to the club what actually recommends him for it?

    It is genuine incompetence if the higher ups don't have several new candidates in mind for an interim / full time role after Amorim. If Ole's the answer I've lost all faith.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,342 ✭✭✭IncognitoMan


    There is zero benefit to say anything to the press other than you fully back the manager until you are ready to pull the trigger.

    Feels like we are just circling the drain now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,353 ✭✭✭✭DARK-KNIGHT


    Do you think its Amorims formation is just getting found out in the prem or that the players are that bad?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,673 ✭✭✭✭FourFourRED


    As an interim, why not? He got the team playing well when he came in as interim before. 8 wins in a row. We can’t win 2 in a row atm. Nobody is suggesting you give him the job full time. What happened after he was made permanent last time tells us that.

    Would hiring the right person permanently within a few weeks be better? Yes. Obviously. Ole is only being mentioned as an option if you feel you can’t get the right permanent manager right now. Some managers do not want to join other clubs mid-season. What do you do if Glasner, Iraola or Nagelsmann are identified as the top three and they all say “yep, but only in the summer” - do you then just go to Southgate because he will start immediately? In that scenario surely you want someone like Ole who knows the club very well, to try and get something out of the remainder of the season. Give the new manager a better platform to start from that what Amorim would leave behind in May.

    It is very early to be getting an interim for almost 85% of the season - people know that. Is there a better alternative interim if that is what’s needed? I don’t know.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,211 ✭✭✭✭bucketybuck


    The squad really doesn't suit it, and he also cannot improve or develop any of the players.

    Frankly, even if he changed systems tomorrow I don't think he would be successful, it gets overshadowed but in 11 months now he hasn't shown anything that suggests he can do anything with individual players. Who has he improved? What has all that vaunted "time on the training ground" achieved?

    Always be wary of a manager who needs 11 players before his style will work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,603 ✭✭✭randd1


    You could argue the system doesn’t suit the players, and it’s a fair argument given our personnel.

    But other managers have walked into different set-ups with inferior squads and implemented the same setup.

    What those managers managed to do though, was coach the players.

    That’s the thing about Amorim, why things have been so bad. The coaching has been horrible, it clearly has been.

    No players have improved individually under him, and our interplay, positional setup defensively, our pressing, movement, creativity, they’ve all gotten worse under him.

    It doesn’t matter the system, if the coaching is bad, it’ll show up regardless.

    And after 11 months of it, I can safely say that’s not going to change under Amorim.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,511 ✭✭✭BenK


    It would show a complete lack of imagination and would send the message that they genuinely haven't a clue what they're doing. Of all the managers out there, even on an interim basis, the best they can come up with is the same guy from a couple of manager's ago who's done nothing since?

    It's not like they'd be bringing in some steady hand with a proven track record. For me, even on an interim basis, it would be a completely pointless exercise that nobody would learn anything from. I genuinely think it would show nothing but incompetence from those in charge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 40,040 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    It really doesn't matter who is brought in as a caretaker.

    Mike Bassett England Manager could get more than one point per game.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,261 ✭✭✭✭billyhead


    Its shocking that Pochettino was sacked and won the Europa league while Amorim is still in charge.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,181 ✭✭✭✭Sand


    It is a bit of both. Player wise, the midfield is awful. The goalkeeper is awful. We're still utterly dependent on a young unproven striker. Play whatever formation you like, they will still be a big problem. A lot of that is an INEOS/recruitment problem, not an Amorim problem. Amorim himself being a bad fit for the squad is an INEOS/recruitment problem. Central midfield has to be a priority in January. Goalkeeper too if Bayindr is considered the best keeper at the club.

    But Amorim and his system are a bad fit for the squad. Mazroui is a good right back. But is being asked to play wing back whenever Amad is not being asked to. The squad has no clear cut wing backs, apart from maybe Dorgu. Bruno is a good #10 but he's clearly not got the discipline to be a central midfielder. It was worth trying him there given how few midfielders are in the squad, but it hasn't worked.

    3 at the back can work in the Premier League. Conte won a title with it, and Crystal Palace beat Liverpool playing it just today. But Amorim has played 33 PL games and lost more than half of them. And there is no evidence of him trying to find a solution. I remember posting last December when the warning lights were already flashing that Amorim needed to find a way to win games, anyway, anyhow. Here we are almost 10 months later and he still hasn't found a way.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,777 ✭✭✭Iseedeadpixels




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    The same could be said for many Interim options. By definition you're not going to get a perfect interim manager because if they were that good, they'd have a job at a top club right now. And the vast majority of high profile managers out of work will not accept an interim role as it cheapens their status.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    I'm not sure whether the interim option is suitable for the PL in 2025. Most teams have very high quality managers which wasn't the case back in 2018 when Solskjaer did well as an interim. A lot of the games are more tactical and it's no longer good enough to just have better players and a good man manager. You need to have more IMO or else you will continue to get turned over by Iraola, Glasner, Howe, Emery, Silva, Hurzeler etc.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,261 ✭✭✭✭billyhead




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,903 ✭✭✭keeponhurling


    The key to whether the system works is wingbacks.

    I'm of the opinion that most decent players can play this system. Good defenders can play 3,4 or 5 at the back. (note Maguire, Shaw and Dalot also struggle in a back 4). Decent midfielders can play in a 2 or a 3 etc. For keeper it makes no difference really.

    Wingback is very specialist and you must have good wingbacks for this to work. A squad needs 3 or 4 of these to allow for injuries/rotation. It is not the case that just any fullback or winger can easily become a wingback. We have Dorgu who has potential but is young and the jury is still out on.

    It's beyond belief how they didn't sign even one in the summer. Were they even linked with any?

    Look at Dalot on Saturday. He offered virtually zero going forward, all the attacks need to go through the middle or the left. Mbeumo or Bruno needs to get dragged out to help him. Dorgu's delivery leaves a lot to be desired. Sesko/Hojlund are left isolated and without service. We score among the least goals in the whole division.

    (I know Dorgu crossed for Sesko to score on Saturday, but it wasn't even a good cross really, the keeper had a couple of chances to clear it)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 216 ✭✭Terence Rattigan




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I don't believe that stories that Amorim will be given a full season regardless.
    I think he is very close to the sack unless we see a change in some of his approach and certainly the results.

    I do think he should be sacked this week - cause otherwise we are waiting more months? We should still beat Sunderland, so I don't think they sack him after that and heading into the International Break, and is defeat to Liverpool sackable when we get back? I would doubt it. Its games like Sunderland and Brentford that will/should cost him im - not Liverpool/City



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    I think his apprach ot th eformation isn't working, and that the players are bad. I think we need to change the players in a lot of cases, but I am no longer trusting that he gets what we need from new players.

    He seems unable to coach a plan, consistently, into the side. We can look good and organized vs Arsenal, we can look bewildred and battered by the most basic of attacks vs Brentford.

    Even if you don't blame him for the goals (there were enough players in the right positions for all of them) our inability to control any part of the game, at all, over any time in the game is more on him than the goals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,937 ✭✭✭✭Mitch Connor


    and just to put it down… my prediction of our 'solution': Southgate with Carrick as his assistant. not saying that is what I want but I reckon its a decent chance of happening.

    As for what I want… no clue. Don't see any obvious gettable targets - feel like Xavi is gonna be most spoken about cause he is available. Iriola probably the best choice (possible) from the PL.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    I don't think INEOS will work that way. Woodward and others, yes. But INEOS want to succeed, are under pressure to succeed and are more attuned to data people + expert opinion (there are none I can see that think Amorim can turn this around). I don't see them thinking that a win v Sunderland will change anything. I think they will have made their minds up by now that change is required and they will be sounding out options and trying to put a plan in place. Amorim will stay until this is figured out, unless he loses to Sunderland and things become unbearably toxic. In which case they'll be under immense pressure to sack him and bring in someone like Fletcher while they sort out what they're going to do.

    And I know people will say they should have had this stuff planned already because Amorim was poor last season and it can't come as a huge shock that we find ourselves in this position now. Understandable but I don't think it's reasonable because different managers are always becoming available/unavailable and circumstances change, so there's only so much forward planning you can do.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,409 ✭✭✭scottser


    Surely the directorate can tell him to change his formation because we are too easy to read and to play against? He was hired as a head coach, not a manager with a 'philosophy', and he should able to set up a team to play any formation. Isn't that what good coaches do? And if it's failing on the pitch in real time, a good coach should be able to sub players in to compensate? And more to the point, is it not a failure of the directorate to give RA clear instruction that his 'process' is not working, given the huge dataset and resources he has at his disposal?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 577 ✭✭✭Seattle


    I don't think they'll go for Southgate. People view him as a safe pair of hands because of his England record and that's his selling point. I can see how that would be attractive in our current situation - aim for a manager with a fairly high floor even if there's questions with regards the ceiling he can reach. BUT, I don't think you can even assume that this is what you'll get from Southgate because international football is so different to 2025 PL football. You can't really compare. Southgate is totally unproven in an environment like that and they can't afford to take a risk on someone unproven imo.

    I think it'll be a current PL manager or some other manager that has a proven game model at a high level (Luis Enrique for eg. but he's v unlikely right now). They're in a position where they can't afford to gamble on an unknown quantity - they need to have a fairly high degree of certainty that the manager's game model will work in the PL.



Advertisement