Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Presidential Election 2025

1212213215217218517

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,580 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Is there a reason that no former or retiring President as ever nominated a candidate?

    Simply because the optics would not look good?

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152




  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    The Green Party has formally endorsed Catherine Connolly.

    Unlikely to be a game changer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,195 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    If Sinn Fein think that Sinn Fein endorsing Catherine Connolly is a "game-changer", that is likely to annoy the other left-wing parties as if they are just the supporting cast for MLMD while at the same time making the rest of us think meh, they could have done that two months ago.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 79,468 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    Carlow says no to Sheridan.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,024 ✭✭✭For Petes Sake


    And, bizarrely, Waterford has backed Kieran McCarthy.

    Sheridan needs one of Offaly or Meath now, and if he can get one then he goes to Louth with three in his back-pocket, and you'd have to think Louth will give him the 4th.

    Not a fan of Sheridan personally and think he's a bit of a chancer, but I'm enjoying the council campaign. Really intriguing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,783 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,796 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Waterford says no to Sheridan and to Steen, but nominates former Cork city mayor Kieran McCarthy. The only standout thing about him, apparently, is that he can hold a tune.

    But really the miss out of both Carlow and Waterford for Sheridan is a gut punch for his putative campaign.

    To amend my earlier post, I would put the chances for both Sheridan and Steen at less than 50/50 now.

    Sheridan goes to Meath and Offaly on Monday, but FF and FG have solid control of both, and when you add in SF members being whipped after tomorrow's announcement, I'd suggest he hasn't a prayer of gaining either.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,783 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    put the chances for both Sheridan and Steen at less than 50/50 now.

    Sheridan's surely way less, probably more like 5/95?

    although councils do funny things as our friends in the sunny south east have just demonstrated…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,885 ✭✭✭Downlinz


    I assume the framing will be on five opposition parties + Independents uniting behind a single candidate which is relatively unprecedented and historic rather than Sinn Fein thinking of themselves as King (or Queen) makers.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,882 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    McCarthy is very much into history and conducts such tours in Cork and writes on the subject. He is not an oddball TMK. Pity his effort wasn't more structured. Steen has 13, needs 3, then the II 4.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,005 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    I'll never figure out why they vote the way they do in Waterford. Not just this, but electing useless TDs like Mary Butler again and again and again and then complaining when they do nothing for the area. It's bizarre.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,796 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Exactly.

    I can't foresee what FF and FG Councillors might be out there trying to make a name for themselves like that loo-lah in Tipperary.

    But realistically it would take several of them to defy the whip for it to help him, and this late in the game that is less likely.

    So maybe 70/30 against is where he is at now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 41,005 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    How many other councils has he presented to?

    This is not a serious campaign by any stretch of the imagination. If you're putting yourself forward as essentially a joke candidate, you are an oddball.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra
    I'm raptured by the joy of it all



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,884 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    That's Blanch's party 🙂. I hope they advise a makeover etc.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,884 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    Very much looking forward to Path to Power and Ivan's take on the election.

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth house?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,322 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    They may have consulted the membership, but people like Lynn Boylan don't even know who the candidate is going to be.
    So in reality, a select elite in SF are dictating things.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,369 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    Sheridan needed to get in fast before people started to ask about who this guy really is.



  • Site Banned Posts: 4,164 ✭✭✭Oíche Na Gaoithe Móire


    It's something that would possibly need Constitutional Change, but the longer the race goes on the more my thinking is changing.

    Firstly, I don't particularly like any of the 3 candidates nominated by the parties.

    I appreciate a party has the right to use the whip and ensure its members vote for their nominated candidate.

    I also understand the need to have a system to filter out the dross that appears for every presidential election.

    However, whether you agree with her politics or not, someone like Steen, is qualified and can articulate her views. Sheridan has credibility and might appeal to a younger demographic. The party block, if it results in only the present 3 on the ballot, will leave a lot of people disillusioned.

    I wouldn't vote Steen, she's a little too extreme on some issues for me.

    But the control of our political parties over who we can vote as our Uachtarain seems a little too tight this time round. I can't for the life of me get in the least excited about Connolly, Gavin or Humphreys.

    My first vote was in 1997 and I voted McAleese, in 2011 MDH. I was happy voting for both that they'd be good presidents.

    That's my tuppenceworth. I respect everyone's opinions and don't intend to get into a to and fro with anyone. I want to relax this evening and post a bit of light stuff on the Late Late thread!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,439 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    The parties have an established voter base which isn't the case for Steen.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,439 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    A few but that he only announced his campaign at the start of the September … https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2025/09/06/singing-ex-lord-mayor-kieran-mccarthy-joins-colourful-cast-seeking-nomination-for-presidency/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Aurelian


    Im not disagreeing with you but I wonder if we are misunderstanding why it was setup in the first place e.g to basically be a borderline government appointed functionary who wouldn't get political and embarrass the government like the Governor General did.

    If you look at it as the French system in reverse. Their President chooses a PM from the avaliable elected representatives, our elected representatives provide us with a selection of Presidential candidates to choose from.

    I'm not saying it's right but maybe it wasn't setup to create this big politically popular "Presidential" President.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,439 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost




  • Site Banned Posts: 4,164 ✭✭✭Oíche Na Gaoithe Móire


    I understand, but similarly I doubt Dev set it up for candidates like Gavin to be parachuted in.

    The Governor General was the King's rep from the 1922 Constitution and was turned into an embarrassment as part of the dismantling of the Treaty.

    If I felt there was one strong candidate among the 3, I wouldn't be arguing at all. It's just the way I feel this time round.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,276 ✭✭✭ForestFire


    I presume a council can nominate more than one candidate? Or are they restricted to one nomination?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,796 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Indeed. Just bet on the opposite outcome to whatever he says, and you'll be quids in.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,086 ✭✭✭Homelander


    Not going to quote the above post but I completely agree that I've come around to think there has to be another way for the process that can't just be stonewalled.

    Someone suggested a minimum threshold of signatures from the public and I'd completely agree with something of that nature. Though it'd want to be a fairly high threshold, that said.

    Gavin, Humphreys and Connolly for me is a case of voting for who I dislike the least as the representative of this country on the global stage.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 32,750 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,580 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Yeah I know what you mean. I went from thinking statesman/stateswomanship, symbolism etc to “Could I put up with xyz for 7 years?” the live debates have not even started yet!

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



Advertisement
Advertisement