Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

1349350352354355390

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,914 ✭✭✭Nermal


    Happy to do what is required to ensure the Irish people inherit the country, not foreigners, crusd. And I think you will find that when the nation changes direction to once again serve its own people the birth rate will increase, because having children is not only an economic decision, but a spiritual one as well.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,883 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Hungary literally exempted women from income tax in an effort to increase the birth rate... It didn't work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,870 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Got proof most want to return home . They need to be housed in the near future and are added to the newly arrived numbers . They cannot be brushed under the carpet , 50% of Ukranian adults employed but the general population its 74% some get more on welfare if they have children than working .The mistake was to give them full social welfare . I reckon it will be an uphill struggle to get them working at the same rate as the general population .

    Post edited by rgossip30 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,870 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    How is that Ireland in the 80's not much immigration , 12-15% unemployment mass emigration and there was not a pension time bomb ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,278 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    The last line of this is truly bizarre . Well all of it but particularly that ..

    "The tiktok man will join his FFFG cronies with his snout in the NGO trough."

    Why would government politicians have their snouts in the Non Governmental Organisation 'trough ' ?

    "By then we will have 100s of 1000s of mostly but not exclusively Indians who have used our 3rd Level educational system and others using language schools to gain residency and repartriate family members who will all require Welfare assistance when the IT bubble bursts."

    If ..such a crash were to happen these would be the first to leave , as they are highly skilled educated workers . Not to mention that they would be more than entitled to claim welfare because they work and pay their taxes .

    But the won't ..they will move where the jobs are .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 854 ✭✭✭Hungry Burger


    Are they not proud as punch banging on about housing targets building circa 30k “homes” (Read: Tiny flats in massive blocks like something out of Soviet Ukraine) a year?

    How is that even making a dent in solving the housing crisis when 58k newcomers are arriving a year?

    It’d… wait for it… make you think they don’t care one jot about solving the housing issue, a more conspiratorial mind would say they are happy with the current situation.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,278 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Do you think that language fluency and living in predominantly rural areas have anything to do with it

    I would say all things being equal they have shown their resilience and willingness to work .

    Living on SW in this country is not an aspirational lifestyle for people long-term . Only for those who know no better generationally .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,870 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    You cannot predict the future so its just an opinion . To house these people in the future will cost the state far more than now !!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,870 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    Ukranians live in Soviet style apartment blocks so to build them here it would be what they are used to . I can say ultimately better than they had in Ukraine . Modular homes its a nightmare cost being bulit on the premise its only temporary for Ukranians . Then will be given to Irish citizens .



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 17,278 ✭✭✭✭Goldengirl


    Neither can you ...predict the future !

    But what you say makes no sense . No rational to explain what you are saying . At least I am giving reasons not just opinion based on bias .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,001 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    Because the birthrate was higher and the age distribution was lower.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,870 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    In the 1980's 450,000 emigrated so the higher birth rate was lessened .

    Post edited by rgossip30 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,870 ✭✭✭rgossip30


    So its bias to say that in the future Ukranians and asylum seekers will have to be housed nad makes no sense interesting . !!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,001 ✭✭✭Charles Babbage


    In 1980, the median age was 25.5 years, in 2025 it is 39.6 years.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 941 ✭✭✭Juran


    The cost of living as a pensioner is and will be significantly higher now and in the future compared to the 80's.

    Back in the 80's, I feel that older people (over 65) did not need much to live on, compared to now.

    If i think of my paternal grandmother and my maternal grandfather - the lived on the state pension. They owned their home, a weekly shop kept them going, made their own bread, had their own chickens, eggs, veg garden, etc.

    Neither of them had cars, relied on family and their bus pass to go to the shop, doctor and mass. Didnt go on holiday, electricity was the only household bill and it wasnt much compared with now (factoring in inflation, punt to euro FX, purchase power standard, etc). Installing a phone in the late 80's was a luxury for my granny, but her children called her from abroad, and phone line rental for pensioners was free I think. Medical care was low technology and generic common medicines. I suppose illnesses like cancer was not very common.

    Pensioners of today and the future, need a lot more money to live on - household bills, medical insurance for many, rent will be a big issue for future pensioners, not all will own their house. Some will still be paying a mortgage. Running a car will be a big expense, its no longer a luxury. People dont change from a car to a bus pass once they reach 65. Cost of food (healthy) and fuel have skyrocketed. Also pet care, many now have pets and vet bills and food, dog walker, etc comes with a cost.

    They will need a lot more pension if they wants to continue the lifestyle they are used to .. eating out, holidays abroad, hobbies, gym membership, etc.

    Also with so much more advanced technologies and the high costs of these medical technologies, special targetedmedicines and more illnesses now, it costs the state a lot more in healthcare per capita now than it did back in the 70's, 80's. The state will also have to provide housing to the higher % who were never able to buy their own house.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,373 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    @Goldengirl wrote: "If ..such a crash were to happen these [talking about mainly Indians] would be the first to leave , as they are highly skilled educated workers ."

    This sounds a bit rubbish that they would be the first to leave. I wonder would you have any data to back that up?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 844 ✭✭✭maik3n


    I can't speak to any data but presumably since they are highly skilled educated workers, they would just be re-assigned to the same company in another part of the world or similarly a different MNC outside Ireland would snap them up fairly quickly.
    Failing that, they aren't just going to rest on their laurels and will up sticks and go looking for another job outside Ireland.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 315 ✭✭babyducklings1


    Good post just shows how much society has changed. More expectations, higher living standards and living longer. But on the other side of things, know people who retired and got rid of the two cars for one. Sensible stuff if not commuting for work etc.

    But you mention things like phone and back in the day as you say it was the landline now it’s mobile phone and associated bill plus bill for house internet, fibre or whatever. There are a lot more bills now that didn’t exist back then. For example no car nct back then, no internet bill ad I’ve said, no property tax, bins weren’t private companies or else council bond I think and cheaper than now.


    Bottom line is a lot more bills now and if people going into pension age are still going to be paying rent it’s not very good at all. I don’t know what the solutions are but cost of living has to be reasonable. I think we have to be more of a society that cares rather than putting people in survival mode, that’s a downgrade of living standards and peace of mind for people.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭briangriffin




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,883 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    Correction, it was initially for mothers of 4 children or more. They have now changed it to 2 or more. There's no indication it's increased the birth rate and it's been there since 2019.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,373 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    The data, however, suggests that it is mainly Irish people who leave during a crash such as in the financial crisis.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,695 ✭✭✭walus


    In the western world we are living in today money and individual happiness is what matters to people the most. These two things form the basis of consumerism whereby people get more joy from owning and consuming things than from creating and building things that last beyond their time. High stress (social media is always there to show someone who is more wealthy and more happy), falling standards of leaving and lowering birth rates are some of the signs of declining society. 

    Immigration, while it offsets the population decline, boosts the workforce and can help the governments with pressures on pensions and health care, reduces cohesion of the society and may cause housing crisis (see Canada for example).

    Lowering birth rates are dependent on multiple interacting factors ranging from economic & cost, through social, cultural and behavioural to policy, institutional and social support issues, and there is no easy solution. I believe that the birth rates issues cannot be solved in isolation without addressing other factors that contribute to a societal decline in the western world.

    We would have to look at reasons why the western society is in decline. There is a number of reasons why it may be happening, one being that this is civilisational life cycle. As the civilisation matures it increases the ‘abstraction factor’ and becomes more and more removed from its roots. Instead of having lots of babies, working hard and building great things for generations to come, people become more individualistic and concerned about their own personal benefits (cult of self), they ‘invest’ in making money and often speculate (i.e. bitcoin) as well as engage in rent seeking behaviour (extracting wealth from others) rather than actually work, build companies, hire people etc. Capitalism from focusing on society-wide wealth generation becomes dysfunctional and over time becomes focused on generating money only for the wealthy elites (financialisation of capitalism).

    Money becomes one common factor that is used to evaluate one’s position in the society and every one uses it to compare themselves with others. People only pretend to work and the Immigrants come in to do the actual work. For thousands of years people lived knowing that they can only be truly happy as a part of a group, community and society. The biggest penalty back then was for one to be expelled from their community. Today the biggest fear that people have is have no money and that is the sign how abstract the western world has become. Societies become unable to work in unity and collectively as fragmentation of social cohesion and identity occurs. The elites exploit the middle class, the middle class exploits the workers. Wealth gap widens and may eventually lead to social unrest and conflicts. At this late stage of the demise we can see decline in democracy and freedom. At that point society collapses.


    Of course this model is very simplistic and imprecise. We can argue if all this is natural or intentional all week. 

    If this is natural, then nothing can be done and that lowering birth rates cannot be fixed.

    However, regardless of why it happens, immigration is not a contributing factor, it is rather something that the governments falsely see as a solution as they are incapable of analysing and solving problems caused by very complex systems such as a society.
    They are simply trying to cure symptoms and not the cause.

    The solution is to stop the demise and make the western civilisation rise again.

    Post edited by walus on

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,551 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    The skilled people who have nothing such as a mortgage or dependants will leave.

    The people who will never work will stay and milk the system.

    The people with mortgages and need to stay and work will be taxed to the hilt to pay for the wasters.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,598 ✭✭✭enricoh


    Was it the garda head brass or our politicians that told us last year there was no connection between immigration and crime. Court translation costs have risen to 10 times what it was a decade ago, imagine what it would have risen by if there was a link!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,328 ✭✭✭prunudo


    The signs have been there, posters have been saying it, whether through naivety or skin in the game, some just don't want to see or admit that there is serious change afoot.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,695 ✭✭✭walus


    I read somewhere a while ago that in Denmark 64% of refugees (these were Palestinians I believe) that came to the country in around 1992 had criminal records by 2019. What is worse, around 23% of their kids also had criminal records.
    Of course, this was a very specific and small (<400) group of people, so not a very representative sample. However, it shows what can happen when the immigrants who, for various reasons (i.e. culture, values, religion etc.), don't assimilate with the society. Not sure if larger studies of this issue had been undertaken.

    Post edited by walus on

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Posts: 3,065 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    The Taoiseach was on the radio with Ciara Kelly just now.

    Blamed the housing crisis on Councils not zoning enough land. Didn’t mention immigration.

    Said the country is in its way back to pre Famine levels of population and that is a ‘good thing’. Again didn’t mention immigration.

    You have to despair.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,816 ✭✭✭ericzeking


    Houses and concrete and people and traffic everywhere, huzzah.

    GDP innit.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,732 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    Not really surprising with Micheal in charge.

    Remember, he's the one who effectively handed over the job of Taoiseach to Tony Holohan, NPHET and the HSE only a few years ago.

    No wonder then that he'll do what he's told by our "friends" in the EU who are more than happy to see Ireland take the problem off their hands while their own electorates actually stand up for themselves.

    Plus he will likely step down when the job rotates back to FG during the course of this Government and he's well insulated from the effects that the ordinary public are experiencing as a result of this mess.

    Citing Famine level population as a good thing though is an odd one for someone who seems to play up on the Irish language and history - although he's not entirely wrong with the analogy.. Overcrowding in houses, people struggling to pay rent, division between the people and the Government, an agenda at play that's not in the interests of Ireland and its people, limited resources being diverted away from those same people... Etc.

    He probably should have thought that one through a bit more!

    Post edited by _Kaiser_ on


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,417 ✭✭✭Elmer Blooker


    the people with mortgages who work hard and get nothing for their taxes vote for the ‘system’ time and time again and will continue to do so, do they not get what they deserve?



Advertisement