Charlie Kirk.

I didn't watch the Oxford union video yet but I did watch the Cambridge union debate from a few months ago and he got absolutely destroyed by of most(not all) of the opposing debators, in the Cambridge debate(Link below). Debating starts around 28mins.

If you actually watched the Cambridge debate and somehow thought he won or destroyed the various opposing debators, well then, you are truly living in cuckoo land.

I urge you to watch the debate and judge for yourself. You'll see he is a racist, vaccine skeptic, sexist, and a fascist.

Firstly he was talking about black women. Secondly he was talking about women who were black.

Talk about arguing semantics.

"Dig up, stupid" comes to mind after reading the last page or so.

This really is a circular argument. He was talking about women of colour. What he said was vile racist garbage.

Let's go back to your previous point, do you think Michelle Obama, Joy Reid and Ketanji Brown Jackson are of lower intelligence? Brown Jackson graduated Magna Cum Laude and Obama Cum Laude. Obama and Reid benefited from affirmative action. Brown does not appear to have. Either way, they all got through the likes of Harvard and Princeton which is far from easy and two of them were incredibly distinguished in terms of their results. But you see nothing wrong with Kirk specifying that they are inherently dumber?

If anything, their success at Ivy League Universities is proof of how affirmative action very much so is necessary.

It has taken this man's unfortunate death to uncover how much of a bigot and piece of **** he really was.

The tolerant left wing posters here are dismissing anyone who suggests he is left wing as conspiracy theorists and at the same time going off on mad tangents about the far right.

Except that's not happening. It is unclear what the reasons for the killing or the political leaning of the killer were. All we have is the media waiting to pounce on any and all conjecture to generate clicks. Folks aren't dismissing anything, they're telling you to bite your tongue until we know more. Anyone making a definitive statement on the matter is jumping the gun. Including, and especially, Trump who did it within hours of the death to ignorantly claim it was done by a radical left-winger based off nothing but his own wet dreams.

As if the political leaning even matters. Did the right make as big a deal out of their affiliation when it was the republican guy who shot Trump? or 4 months ago when the Hortman's were killed in a politically motivated attack by a right-winger? This is the sort of hypocrisy folks are picking up on. Nobody is rejoicing in his death. Some are using it as an opportunity to rub others' faces in it, which is also wrong, but which is exactly what you're doing with your 'tolerant' dig.

Objectively the assassination of someone for their opinions is wrong by any metric but its being justified as Karma and God's will here by posters who proclaim their tolerance and virtue and denounce the demonic ideals of the conservative right.

Ah yes, the left……….famous for attributing everything to God and his almighty will.

I've seen more people make this erroneous claim than I have seen people celebrating his death or saying it was justified. Objectively the assassination of anyone for any reason is wrong by any metric. People are merely commenting on the fact that the irony is off the charts. The co-founder of a right-wing website which i) claimed covid wasn't a big deal and ii) fervently refuted calls for stricter gun control, especially in relation to schools, and who openly claimed that dying by gunfire is a small price to pay for having guns, is gunned down on a school campus not long after the other co-founder died of covid is just……..

I would like to see the full context of that, I have seen a fair bit of him and although I don't agree with a lot of what he stood for, I had never seen him say stuff like that, maybe the stuff I saw edited that type of stuff out or possibly the above has been edited to take something completely out of context to suit a certain narrative, from what I had seen previously the above would not be how he saw people of a different race.

What colour skin do thiose three women in particular have?

I've been catching up and still reading a lot of "radical left" and "left wing" being used to describe posters on here and just yet again would like to ask which communist principles these posters are showing in their response to this death that is having them called as such?