Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Presidential Election 2025

1188189191193194498

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,662 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    I would have no issue at all with Steen being on the ballot or participating in the TV debates. I would disagree with many of her viewpoints but still would be relaxed enough about seeing her contest the election.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,603 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    This is a fairly weak reason IMO.

    This idea that Steen should be included because it brings balance or diversity doesn't really stack up, it falsely elevates the weight of her views to match those of the 3 candidates running so far.

    The composition of those on the ballot paper will reflect the diversity of the views of the electorate. The 3 candidates so far are endorsed by parties who represent massive chunks of the electorate. There's likely to be a 4th candidate endorsed by SF who represent another huge chunk.

    If people wanted to hear from the likes of Steen they'd elect politicians like Steen. The reality is that she represents a very small minority and this is why she is struggling to even meet the bar to be a candidate.

    What she wants here is to piggy back on the air time the other candidates will get to try push her narrative because she knows that nobody is really interested in what she has to say herself.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,869 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Spot on. If I could double thank this I would.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    "This idea that Steen should be included because it brings balance or diversity doesn't really stack up, it falsely elevates the weight of her views to match those of the 3 candidates running so far."

    Like Jim Gavin's views, really? You can't be serious.

    We weren't aware he had any till MM decided to back him and the the FF PP nominated him 42-29 against someone who actually has a track record of political opinions and running for election.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,810 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Further to Awec's point, that if people wanted to hear from the likes of Steen, they'd elect politicians like Steen - where was she during the local, European and general elections?

    Where was Ganley? Where were Dave Quinn or Katie Ascough or Breda O'Brien?

    Frankly, its an insult to the electorate that this group of people (institute, organisation, charity, lobby - take your pick) are evidently unwilling to put in the graft over decades to build a political base in lower order elections, yet cry foul when those within the system won't gladly helicopter drop one of their number into the presidential race.

    And before someone comes at me making comparisons with Jim Gavin as a parachute candidate, FF went looking for him as a person to embody their values as the already largest elected party of local government and the Oireachtas, so its entirely different to Steen and her hotch potch of randomers.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Whare was Jim Gavin???

    FF didn't 'go looking for him', MM did after he'd already been approached by FG to run in the Euros.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,603 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Jim Gavin is the candidate of Fianna Fáil. He is endorsed by the largest party in the Dail. His views will broadly align with FF views.

    He has earned the right to enter the contest as he has convinced the party that represents more people than any other in the State to back him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    All true and uncontested by me.

    However I do contest the suggestion that in regard to Steen being included it "falsely elevates the weight of her views to match those of the 3 candidates running so far" as you've claimed previously.

    Certainly true for HH and CC but not for JG.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,603 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    It's also true for JG because his views have been endorsed by FF. That is what gives him legitimacy. Yea, we aren't totally clear on what he thinks on a whole range of issues, but FF, as the largest party in the Dail, have pre-emptively said "this guy is our man and should be the next President" and this endorsement means we know he is broadly aligned with FF policy.

    Steen has nothing.

    There is a reason she is struggling to get to 20, her views are so niche that she's left scrambling for the crumbs around the fringes.

    If we imagine we lived in a fairytale world where Steen got the backing of FF and it was Gavin trying to get in at the edges it would be exactly the same, Steen would deserve to be running due to the backing of FF and I doubt anyone would be saying Gavin deserves a go at it cause of diversity.

    The reality will likely be there is no right wing candidate in the election and this is because there is pretty much no appetite for that sort of candidate in Ireland. They don't get to parachute in and hang off the coat tails of the mainstream candidates.

    Again, the ultimate diversity of the candidates will accurately reflect the diversity of Ireland. If they're all centrists or leftists then so be it, it's because Ireland is all centrist and leftist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,112 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    We don't need to spend the next month talking about a 3%ers views.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 39,626 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    They were used to being able to get politicians of any stripe to do their bidding with a thwack of a bishop's crozier.

    They're never going to get over the loss of that power, even though the sense of entitlement remains.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,603 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Maybe it's better that they see the 3%? As someone says, a long way from the Bishop's crozier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,869 ✭✭✭✭dulpit


    Except if they get a sympathy nomination from clueless tds they'll get equal weighting to the other 3 (or possibly 4 depending on sinn fein) candidates.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,783 ✭✭✭Bishop of hope




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,131 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Surely the system as it stands prevents candidates with views on extreme fringes of society from been elected. Nominations also difficult.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,603 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    The system as it stands ensures that if you want to run for President you need to have views that are shared by at least a half-decent portion of society. The bar isn't even that high, it just seems really high for people like Steen because her views are so politically irrelevant in Ireland.

    If there are a bunch of currently hidden people out there who want someone like Maria Steen for President they should ensure that in the general and council elections they vote for candidates that align with Maria Steen and then she will have no trouble getting onto the ballot in 7 years time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Jim Gavin was chosen by MM because he's a minor sporting celeb and subsequently endorsed by the FF PP because of that and their leader's backing. He has no history of public campaigning on any political issue and was previously approached by FG also due to his celeb status. Maria Steen, has a history of campaigning on political issues including the Family and Care referendums of 2024 where she supported the 'No' side which overwhelmingly won. Her views don't need 'elevating' they're already well known and recorded.

    "Again, the ultimate diversity of the candidates will accurately reflect the diversity of Ireland. If they're all centrists or leftists then so be it, it's because Ireland is all centrist and leftist"

    Well if it's the case that 'Ireland is all centrist and leftist' then why exclude candidates who aren't?

    If it's true then they will be rejected overwhelmingly by the electorate. But perhaps there's a certain doubt about the result that motivates exclusion, I believe it does.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,603 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    You can believe whatever conspiracy theory you want.

    It doesn't matter why or how Gavin ended up being endorsed by FF, all that matters is that he was.

    If FF endorsed Ronald McDonald he'd have more legitimacy to run than Maria Steen. Her being active before is of no consequence, she's loud but she's politically irrelevant.

    It would be the exact same if some other ultra-left lunatic type wanted to get on the ballot because "diversity".

    Why not let her run anyway? Because the Constitution enforces that if someone wants to be President they need to have views that are aligned with at least a half-decent chunk of society.

    If you really believe she deserves a public soap box to put forward her fringe ramblings then you should make sure that in the next election you vote for a candidate that aligns with her. If you can find one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    "If you really believe she deserves a public soap box to put forward her fringe ramblings then you should make sure that in the next election you vote for a candidate that aligns with her. If you can find one."

    You're so off the mark with that un-solicited advice. LOL

    Anyway I'm not going over old ground. I've made my views clear but those who choose to misread them will still do so whatever more I add.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,810 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    So you're saying that they didn't go looking for him, but they did go looking for him?

    Not easy being you....



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    It was MM's idea is what I'm saying. Came as a surprise to most members of the FF PP not to mention ordinary party members. After all JG wasn't even in FF.

    He was approached because he's the former manager of the Dublin senior football team.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,188 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Not as simple as that.

    He is a decorated former Irish Defence Forces Officer with significant diplomatic experience, a man with a tremendous public service record there, and also at the IAA, where he is COO. He also chaired at least one Citizen's Assembly and was Chairperson of an Inner City Task Force as well as the man who reformed and changed Gaelic Football, so no matter what you think of him or what he has done, he wasn't picked because he is the former manager of the Dublin senior football team.

    That is like saying MLMD ended up leader of Sinn Fein because she was a former member of FF.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 78,504 ✭✭✭✭FrancieBrady


    He was approached because he's the former manager of the Dublin senior football team.

    It would be an interesting poll - what people knew of Gavin before he was anointed by Micheál.

    I am a GAA member and supporter and had no idea what Gavin had done outside of football. I wouldn't know because it is of no importance to me what my own county manager did outside of football either.

    I'd imagine an awful lot of people had no idea either. So he was definitely picked because of the Dubs link.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Exactly.

    Not putting the guy down but he was picked because he had a distinguished career as the Dublin Senior Football manager not for any other reason.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,111 ✭✭✭Ozymandius2011


    Theres usually at least 1 Independent candidate in presidential election. Arch liberal Fintan O'Toole wrote an Irish Tines article arguing that while he wouldnt vote for her, Maria Steen should be allowed to run.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,442 ✭✭✭Cyclingtourist


    Not a fan of FoT but on this we're in complete agreement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭Aurelian


    I could be wrong but were there independent candidates before 1997? It looks like 2018 was a bit of an aberration with the 3 dragons and now things are reverting a bit more to the party political norm.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,131 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    All those types want to use the nominations for is a cheap nationwide platform, to get more gullible followers if they disingenuously clip parts of a debate etc

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,810 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    100% true.

    Which compounds my earlier point. Where are they to be seen for the hard graft elections, the Councils and the Seanad and the 5th and 6th seats in Dáil Ceantair.

    They simply aren't serious about making a difference, only about grandstanding.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,112 ✭✭✭✭expectationlost


    This historian https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eoin_O%27Mahony_%28politician%29 in 66 who only got one council and this republican socialist politician https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patrick_McCartan was actually nominated by Oireachtas members in 45 and got 20% of the vote, he tried again in 56 and got 2 council nominations.

    Post edited by expectationlost on


Advertisement