Charlie Kirk.

That's not true at all. It was the cartridges, not bullets, that allegedly had the messages/slogans. It is also stated that there were "anti fascist" messages too. What manufacturer letters could explain that?

Do you really think that the likes of the new york times and wsj dont fact check these things? Yeah, some anon on 4chan or whatever that forum is knows better though, lol.

Whats wrong with you,someone with a differing opinion than you was murdered and you're happy about it,and what law did he break that prompted some bigoted loon to murder him.Only scum condone his murder.

It wasn’t the “last” question :

“At about 12:20, he is asked by a member of the crowd: "Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?"

He replies: "Too many."

The questioner then states there had been five in 10 years and asks Kirk how many mass shootings there had been in that time.

"Counting or not counting gang violence?" Kirk replies.

Then a single shot is heard, which is believed to have been fired from the roof of the Losee Center, a building overlooking the quad.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy04p4x21e5o.amp

where in the original post where they condoning the murder? where were they expressing happiness? saying they werent surprised is not condoning it

people who say he was happy to talk/debate those who disagreed with him are full of sh!te, he was nothing more than a grifter who would refuse to engage on the actual topic and/or shift the goalposts as soon as he would see he was losing the 'debate' - as soon as he was against actually knowledgeable opponents rather than random students he was shown for what he was, nothing more than a charlatan

be honest. It is a very strange take from the OP. Saying that they’re not surprised he was killed for how he debated is a strange thing to say

You tried to justify the murder,you're not fooling anybody,like I said,only scum would try to justify /celebrate he murder.

who is celebrating it? could maybe argue there is an element of justifying it but thats a poor and arguably inflammatory way of putting it as in this case they were 'justifying' it in the sense of 'one could see how this might happen' rather than 'what happened was completely justified'

he was far from knowledgeable though, he just thought he was

RRead Closed thread,lots of examples,most insinuated he had it coming for his stance on certain issues.

Some much hate in world now, everyone has there own agenda. Crazy world.

I disagree Some posts were quite explicit in their delight at the murder and some others were mealy mouthed but it was clear that they were happy.

Your unwavering ability not to see the coincidence that a person who advocated for prevalence of guns and accepting gun deaths to protect the 2nd amendment was killed by a gun persevered though.