Richard Satchwell Found Guilty

OK, that's me told.

Well 50% of the proceeds of the estate would go to her next of kin - Satchwell would still get 50% to spend on junk food in the prison tuck shop.

The 1965 succession act covered property other than that held in joint tenancy - this loophole was closed about 5-6 years ago I believe - thus he can no longer benefit from Tina’s estate

I’m not familiar with what relations of Tina are alive - if mother, father- it would go to them first- if not then sisters, then cousins etc

At the right price someone will -aside from the crime committed there , and the excavation work by the Gardai , the house obviously needs a ton of work anyway - maybe knocking and rebuilding or knocking and just leaving it as a memorial site in the short term?
I’ve known other murder locations that lay to waste for decades - eventually they were rebuilt by someone - maybe it’s a passage of time that’s required here - 20-30 years

What are you on about? I answered your question with perfect clarification and also in my previous post-they don’t in any way contradict each other - you’re over reacting to absolutely nothing and you now look like a fool. Satchwell gets 50% of the proceeds of the sale of the house assuming it’s sold at some point - Tina’s family get the other 50% of the estate- I can’t make it any simpler for you. Any other possessions of Tina’s goes to her family- satchwell can’t inherit these due to the murder - the only thing that changed 6 years ago was that the loophole closed on joint tenancy’s - Satchwell would have inherited all of the house before that law was amended - over reaction much?

I presume senior counsel Brendan Grehan will be on the ball again?

For free!