Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Irish Property Market chat II - *read mod note post #1 before posting*

1926927929931932

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,340 ✭✭✭The Student


    LoLogic would suggest the estate agent data would be extremely accurate.

    Why would they make false claims? Think of this from their business perspective. The estate agent is managing the rental and getting 10% management fee so €1200 a year. The landlord sells to another landlord who buys with vacant possession so can rent the property for €1200 a month and the estate agent manages the property for the landlord and gets €1440 a year.

    While the above is a very simplistic example it suggests it is not in the estate agents benefit to lie about the landlords leaving the market.

    How many of the "new landlords" were existing landlords who decided to formalise the tenancy and register?

    With the increasing scrutiny of the private rented sector maybe the previously unregistered landlords did not want to tempt faith!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    Can you provide this estate agent data? I wonder why people with a vested interest wouldn't tell the whole truth or skew it to suit themselves?

    You do realise that not all landlords use management companies or estate agents to manage properties?

    And again this is a hypothetical scenario with no evidence to back it up.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,340 ✭✭✭The Student


    Was this data not provided in an earlier post in this thread? Based on the business logic I outlined above what business logic would benefit the estate agent to skew the data and lie?

    Surely a vested estate agent would want landlords to stay in the market as the management income is guaranteed frequent revenue to the estate agents.

    I am well aware that not all landlords use management company's but with the ever changing legislation some new landlords are using management.

    It is not a hypothetical scenario as it makes logical business sense.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    "Logical business sense" is as useful evidence as "I know the market".

    Can provide any data that shows that the number of landlords is decreasing?

    Anything to back up the statement that they are "fleeing the market"?



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,762 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Estate agents and various other vested interests push the landlords fleeing the market narrative to put pressure on government to scrap anti-landlord regulations.

    This is not surprising from property professionals and lobbyists. It was ever thus.

    What is surprising is how many people believe vested interests are preaching the gospel truth and the Central Statistics Office and RTB are deliberately peddling falsehoods with unreliable data.

    Sherry Fitzgerald said Sherry Fitzgerald said the pGovernment must pay “particular attention” to the recommendations made by the Housing Agency in respect of Rent Pressure Zones to increase the stock of rental properties nationwide.

    This comes following promises by the Government to review the current rent pressure zone system which include its abolition.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,400 ✭✭✭Blut2


    No, the only sourced data provided in this thread has showed all of numbers of tenancies, numbers of landlords, and numbers of properties being bought to let out increasing. Which would make the realistic emotive narrative something more like "landlords rushing to enter the rental market".

    The only evidence given in support of the "landlords fleeing the market" argument was a press release from Sherry Fitzgerald (who would have fairly obvious biases) that didn't actually reference any hard data.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 607 ✭✭✭sonyvision


    I'm seen houses in my local area in West Dublin going sale agreed then coming back on the market with unchanged asking price. The recent example is a house built 1998, refurbished in 2021 with large open plan kitchen, additional rooms down stairs rest is tidy and move in ready. It's gone sale agreed twice and back up for sale must be 5 months of the market.

    Note two other examples of houses up for sale a number a months with no moment.

    Anybody buying recently or selling see the market condictions starting to turn? Is the slowdown in house prices here and have people finally got low on money to trade up?.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,301 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    Are the properties smaller or bigger? Are there more people house by more landlords? Has the price gone up? Has the choice of properties diminished? Is it related to general property /population increase?

    Is it better now?

    Is it better for the future?

    Does one number answer everything?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    All of that is irrelevant to what we were discussing, there are now more landlords in the market.

    You can just admit that you were wrong in your statement instead of trying to move the goalposts to change what was being discussed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,305 ✭✭✭Emblematic


    I've never seen good evidence that there's a net exodus of rental properties from the market. The evidence, such as it is, shows the opposite. The other thing I think that needs to be questioned is the idea that large and increasing numbers of landlords, such as we have here, are a good thing for the country.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32 cleanfarmer2025


    Landlords are not leaving the market at all.

    All you hear is landlords complain all the time and threatening to leave. What are they going to do with their 300k cash if they sell up? Leave it in the bank and let it depreciate away every year? Not likely.



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,762 ✭✭✭hometruths


    The whole landlords fleeing the market thing is nonsense and is masking a bigger problem.

    Estate agents report high % of sellers are LLs and use this to lobby govt and influence policy, thus media and talking heads lap it up.

    Hiding in plain sight is the obvious issue that if number of LLs is actually increasing but higher percentages of sales are LLs selling, then it points to the biggest problem being the low total number of properties for sale.

    Not enough private households are selling, turnover in the market is very low compared to long term norms. The market is clogged up and this is the problem thats needs to be addressed. The attention is all focussed in the wrong direction.

    But this is lost in the widespread appetite for panic and doom and gloom. Sadly it's typical of commentary and analysis of the Irish property market at all levels.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,755 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    There is no evidence of an increase in LL's. The RTB says there is an increase if new registrations but thre is not an increase in properties available. It's hard to know if LL's are exiting bit there is nothing to indicate an increase in supply.

    You would presume that new supply would appear on daft, but there is little or no supply on Daft.

    However there are many things that can skew RTB figures. Take a situation where an individual has a house or apartment and is using a rent a room, moves in with a partner and then rents his home to his orginal tenant and another individual and registers with the RTB. There has been a certain amount of regularisation by LL's where they were not registered and have registered with the RTB over the last 2-3 years.

    One I have personally come across is where a LL had multiple properties, he transferred 4 of them ( not his total portfolio) to his four adult children 3 of whom had there own homes who continue to rent them and I presume have registered with the RTB. The 4th moved into the property that was transferred to him. The LL has disposed of at least one more which was purchased by an owner occupier. So we have a net decrease in supply of two and a possible increase in RTB registrations of three.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,762 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Again this is just anecdotal observations used to cast doubt on CSO and RTB data.

    This is exactly why we cannot solve the current problems.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,755 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    I am not sure about CSO figures. Last census was 2022, the RTB has indicated an increase in registrations. However ask anyone looking for a property to rent is there much out there. All we hear about is of evictions which h the RTB has made harder and harder

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,762 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Ok, so do you think asking anyone looking for a property if there is much out there contradicts RTB data showing an increase in tenancies and landlords?

    I believe this doesn't have to be contradictory. It is is possible to have shortage of supply on the market and an increase in tenancies and landlords.

    And if that is correct it requires a different approach to solve the problem, than if the number of landlords/tenancies are genuinely falling and the RTB data is unreliable.

    That is why it is such an important distinction, and it is damaging to rush to rubbish the best available data we have.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,931 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    A few years ago there was the LLs stuck at the lower end of the market exiting and that was causing average rents to jump >10% but that cohort will all be long gone by now.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 20,755 ✭✭✭✭Bass Reeves


    There is always a bottom 10% of any market and rents are rising so fast there is an incentive to leave properties empty for 24 months to reset rents or because of high property prices to sell.

    Slava Ukrainii



  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,762 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Pretty good argument for a stiff meaningful vacancy tax. And it would also solve the problem of doubt over the RTB figures.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 2,931 ✭✭✭PommieBast


    Remember saying during Covid that I thought a lot of LLs would hold out the extra few months to get over the two year threshold. Never got round to looking at the 2023 stats to see whether this came true as I was long gone by then.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Subscribers, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,762 ✭✭✭hometruths


    Revenue now getting in on the act with data to disprove the LLs fleeing the market scaremongering.

    It should be obvious to anybody that if Revenue data shows almost 4 out every 5 new homes are being bought by LLs it is not surprising that RTB data shows rental stock is increasing.

    https://www.rte.ie/radio/radio1/clips/22538693/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,301 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    Not true SF interpretation of Revenue. Lots of things said match what I said with small landlords being pushed out and large companies replacing them. But according to these figures the number of new landlords is only 4% by small landlords not even new landlords. Can you marry these figures up with the increase in landlords and tenancies?

    When the new rules come in where owning 5 or more rentals comes in expect to see an increase in the number of landlords. If first time buyer are buying 2nd house that means some are buying old rentals as no landlord is buying a previous rental. It is a lot more complex than you think



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,624 ✭✭✭tigger123


    Is there any counter argument to the claim that 79% of private homes sold in Dublin were bought by landlords?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,301 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    Where is the proof other than a claim by SF? Your statement is wrong anyway if you actually listened to what they said



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,457 ✭✭✭Rocket_GD


    I wouldn't be lecturing people on what is wrong, still waiting for you to admit that you were wrong from last week.

    Post edited by Rocket_GD on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,624 ✭✭✭tigger123


    Didn't they the data as a response to a Parliamentary Question?

    I'm not being difficult, I'm genuinely asking.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,024 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    I'd be interested in hearing this too, just about to give that recording a listen. Absolutely shocking if true.

    I have noticed that a lot of houses selling over the last few years around me in D7 all seem to have AirB&B lock boxes appear out front a few months later. Wouldn't be registering in that 79%, mind you.

    So if the 79% is true it would be even higher if you factored in AirB&B too



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,624 ✭✭✭tigger123


    If it is true, its genuinely shocking.

    Btw, I'm not trolling or on the wind up here, I just know how often these things have claims and counter claims.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,024 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Good post from Reddit Ireland where someone ran some of the numbers from the stats, don't look to be adding up against SF's 79% claim:

    'No, I can't see where they are getting 79% from.

    The stats on house purchases are in table HPA02 from the CSO, and it splits the types of buyers into:

    • First‑Time Buyers (FTBs): People buying their first home
    • Former Owner‑Occupiers: People moving from one home to another
    • Non‑Occupiers: Buyers purchasing property without living in it, e.g. mostly landlords or buy‑to‑let investors
    • Non‑Household Buyers: Various entities that are not individuals like private companies, charitable organisations, State bodies, pension funds, Approved Housing Bodies (AHBs), Local Authorities etc.

    The breakdown for each (2024) for County Dublin:

    Buyer Category

    Volume of Sales (2024)

    Proportion of Total Sales (%)

    Household Buyer - Former Owner-Occupier

    9,903

    41.7%

    Non-Household Buyer

    6,203

    26.1%

    Household Buyer - First-Time Buyer Owner-Occupier

    6,181

    26.0%

    Household Buyer - Non-Occupier

    1,473

    6.2%

    Total

    23,760

    100.0%

    About 80-90% of dwellings bought by Non‑Occupiers and about 20% of dwellings bought by non‑Household Buyers could be classed as "bought by a landlord". A small proportion of Former Owner-Occupier and First-Time Buyer Owner-Occupier might be landlords too (67.7% of purchases).

    So, I think the proportion of dwellings bought by landlords in County Dublin in 2024 was ~15%.

    I don't see how they got 79% without some massaging of figures.

    They might have restricted their stats to a small geographic area e.g. DCC or part of, or just new homes (rare in DCC), and specifically new apartments in DCC.'



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,301 ✭✭✭Ray Palmer


    Your lack of understanding is not my problem. I am not wrong you didn't understand and still don't. The headline quote is a weird reference to new builds not ALL purchases so misleading and you fell for it



Advertisement