Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ireland Team Talk XII: Farrell's First Fifteen

1154015411543154515461641

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I'm only "objectively mis-quoting" someone if you choose to focus on the aspect that suits your argument.

    His comment was:

    Those are players "from" Leinster, not players who have been through Leinster Academy.

    That's an objectively incorrect statement, when almost 50% of the players on the list have been part of the Academy and the overwhelming majority were part of the sub-Academy structure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And the following line was…?

    Leinster Academy has done zero for a number of those players.

    He clearly wasn't talking about all those players, dude.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 755 ✭✭✭johnh6767


    40 is the size of the professional squad. Plus 20 academy players who don’t necessarily move to full contract



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    And it's a sentiment I don't agree with - the sub-academy is a part of the Academy and a layer in the process. The number of players on that list who were never part of the sub-academy or academy is low single digits.

    The overall tone of his message - the notion that Leinster had had no role in the development of those players - is what I disagreed with, not this silly nonsense now of nitpicking over single individual words.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And I have no issue with this post. I just don't see why you couldn't have made your point like this without mis-quoting him…



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,426 ✭✭✭Yeah_Right


    Is that overseeing organisation paying for the education, accommodation and giving the kid some money for living expenses? If yes then that organisation can definitely dictate where the kid goes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    I didn't mis-quote him - I've made that quite clear.

    But, why don't you let him worry about me apparently mis-quoting him instead of feeling the need to respond to virtually 75% of my posts here picking these silly arguments?

    Honestly - I've zero issue engaging with you in good faith on actual things about rugby, but to say I'm sick to the teeth of these exchanges would be an understatement.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    I guess the reason why is because I think accuracy and not misrepresenting people is important to a discussion…



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    You do and don't.

    It tends to depend on what angle of the discussion you're coming from.

    Anyway - I'm done with this, thanks.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,356 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    The discussion around Leinster Academy doing the heavy lifting for the other provinces implies most of the senior players at the other provinces have come through the Leinster Academy.

    I went through the current Munster Senior squad, and out of about 40 senior players, there are about 8 that have come through the Leinster academy, could quibble over a few at that, but most of those players developed away from Leinster before coming to Munster, and really only Milne and Lee Barron have recently joined Munster after their pathway to first team rugby looked to have stalled, I think they would have been released had they not moved on.

    So two points,

    1. Leinster do produce a lot of players, and when Leinster don’t need them they do move on and have careers elsewhere. All good.
    2. A lot of players have played in Leinster Schools and have gone into academies outside of Leinster, and many have gone on to senior contracts and remained in professional rugby. All good.

    Is there a problem with the current system? i.e. players move when their pathways are better elsewhere, usually either before the academy or sometimes a couple of years after being given a chance and deemed not required.

    Last point, a post mentioned Leinster Academy doing a lot of heavy lifting for the other provinces implies the players went through the Leinster Academy and the other academies weren’t producing players, but most of the listed players actually went through other academies. That was a misleading statement. If the statement had been that the Leinster underage and schools system was producing a lot of players for other provinces academies there might be a point Although I think there are only 2 current players in the Munster academy that came from Leinster, both props (where Munster have struggled to produce), Hadden and Foxe, both great prospects that chose the Munster pathway and perhaps didn’t have a Leinster pathway. Good luck to them. It keeps guys like that ticking along to senior level, where otherwise they could have lost a bit of development time.

    So, TLDR: Munster and I’d say Ulster too, are not relying on picking up players from the Leinster Academy in any way large numbers that could be considered heavy lifting, and the Connacht Academy seems to be doing very well at developing players also, but naturally there would be fewer home grown players at Connacht due to lower playing pool.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    As far as I can tell, Munster had 3 players from the 23 against the Sharks who came thru the Leinster academy. Is that heavy lifting or overly excessive? I wouldn't think so tbh.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,026 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    Whose developing the players in the sub academy, is it Leinster rugby or the schools?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    A huge amount of this analysis is based on your interpretation of the phrase "heavy lifting".

    So, to just take this back to brass tacks, I've looked at all four provincial squads and split out across three Tiers.

    Tier 1 is guys who have actually been part of the Leinster Academy and/or played senior rugby for Leinster. There are 18 players across the other three provinces who fall under this tier (8 at Connacht, 8 at Munster, 2 at Ulster).

    Tier 2 is guys from Leinster, who were not formally part of the Leinster Academy and signed to other provinces - there are 28 guys across the three provinces who fall under this tier (15 at Connacht, 6 at Munster, 8 at Ulster).

    Tier 3 is guys from other provinces who went to school in Leinster - there are 6 guys under this tier (4 at Connacht, 2 at Munster).

    Connacht:

    Tier 1: Jack Aungier, Peter Dooley, Temi Lasisi, Oisin Dowling, Josh Murphy, Sean O'Brien, Ben Murphy, David Hawkshaw

    Tier 2: Jordan Duggan, Sam Illo, David O'Connor, Paul Boyle, Cian Prendergast, Finn Treacy, Billy Bohan, Matthew Victory, Mikey Yarr, David Walsh, Aaron O'Brien, Sean Naughton, Conor O'Shaughnessy, Daniel Ryan, James Nicholson.

    Tier 3: Denis Buckley, Dave Heffernan, Harry West, Max Flynn

    Of the current Connacht Academy - 16 players, 9 are from Leinster schools.

    Munster:

    Tier 1: Jeremy Loughman, Michael Milne, Lee Barron, Roman Salanoa, Tadgh Beirne, Paddy Patterson, Tom Farrell, Andrew Smith

    Tier 2: Oli Jager, Sean O'Brien, Fionn Gibbons, Diarmuid Kilgallen, George Hadden, Ronan Foxe

    Tier 3: Fineen Wycherley, Josh Wycherley

    Ulster:

    Tier 1: Rory McGuire, Aitzol King

    Tier 2: Eric O'Sullivan, Cormac Izuchukwu, Nick Timoney, David Shanahan, Jack Murphy, Tom Brigg, Will de Klerk, Sam Berman

    Tier 3: None.

    By contrast, in Leinster - there is 1 player who would meet the Tier 1 definition for any of the other three provinces: Robbie Henshaw, and 1 Tier 2 player, John McKee.

    So, just step back from it all - there clearly is a pretty strong level of movement happening at all levels - both from the kind of established pros who feel they aren't going to get enough minutes at Leinster (guys like Peter Dooley, Josh Murphy, Michael Milne, Lee Barron) and guys from Leinster who don't get an academy offer there (examples at all three provinces).

    The concept that there needs to be considerably more of this type of movement doesn't look all that realistic to me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    "Development" is a nebulous enough concept, and there is no question now that the standard and quality of coaching in a lot of schools in Leinster is exceptionally high.

    That said though, Leinster Rugby do a huge amount of "coaching the coaches" etc and putting philosophies, structures and programmes in place that play a big role in bringing players along while they are still in school.

    After they leave school, some players will spend up to 2 years in the sub-academy and most will do at least 1 year, and there is a lot of development in that year too, particularly in areas like S&C, diet and nutrition, etc.

    There are very very few examples of guys who just pop out of school as fully rounded out athletes ready for pro rugby.

    And, fwiw, I'm not dismissing the work the other provincial academies do too. Cian Prendergast is a great example of a very talented young player, who benefitted a lot from good coaching and from getting opportunities early and has flourished. There are examples of guys like that across all three provinces.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Whatever about anything else, Tier 3 seems a bit of a reach, no?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    No, it doesn't really.

    It can't be both things - there are plenty of people here claiming Leinster are having no development impact on players who aren't formally part of the academy or sub-academy, and giving all that credit to the schools. If that's the case - the school deserve the credit for those 6 guys too.

    Those 6 guys are better players for playing in the Leinster Schools Cup.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    And equally it's also then evidence of an inherent advantage that Leinster have that the other provinces can't replicate to anywhere near the same degree.

    That works both ways too.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    What advantage is that?

    The presence or existence of boarding schools?

    Of the stronger Leinster rugby playing schools you're really only talking about Blackrock, Clongowes & Roscrea. Of late - there are probably more guys from Roscrea going to Munster and Connacht than there are going to Leinster. Schools like Wesley, King's Hospital, St Columba's etc are boarding schools (all three are mixed), but none have ever provided high numbers of potential pro rugby players.

    There are boarding schools in Munster with a known rugby focus (Rockwell, Glenstal, Bandon Grammar), and others too like Midleton, Newtown etc.

    There are loads of boarding schools in Ulster, including several prominent rugby schools (Royal School Armagh, Campbell College, Methody Belfast etc).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    It's bizarre to me when some posters deny what is an obvious inherent advantage…

    Plug the Munster schools pipeline from 10 years ago into the Leinster academy and vice-versa and do we still see the same outputs an international level as we're seeing now? I'm not at all convinced we do, for very obvious reasons.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 5,044 Mod ✭✭✭✭Lost Ormond


    Not boarding schools but fee paying day schools as well. talkng about Newtown and Midleton is madness. they are about the level of 3rds or 4ths in schools in Leinster. Loads of boarding in Ulster, not really and Methody isnt boarding.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,356 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Salanoa was not officially in the Leinster Academy, there is probably a story to be told about those few years before he decided to join Munster instead.

    Paddy Patterson left the Leinster academy to join the Munster academy so that’s also a bit different.

    But minor enough quibbles, at least there was a good bit of effort put in to gathering that info together so thank you for doing that.

    Edit: Some sources report Salanoa of having been in the Leinster academy from 2018 to 2020, so he probably was for those 2 years.

    Post edited by Jump_In_Jack on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Salanoa is a prime example though of where the lines can be blurred between Academy and Sub-Academy, he was in the Leinster sub-academy from September 2017 when he moved to Dublin (came for a trial in December 2016).

    He was a relative novice to the game of rugby when he arrived (he had played in his final year of high school in Hawaii), and got 3 years of coaching from Leinster (including making 3 appearances for the Leinster senior team) before moving to Munster in 2020.

    Regardless of whether he was ever part of the formal academy or not (and his biography on Munster Rugby states he was), it's clear as day Leinster Rugby are owed a lot of credit for his development.

    On Paddy Patterson - he's absolutely a guy who belongs in the Tier 1 list I listed out. He played all his age grade rugby with Leinster, was in the Leinster academy, played 3 times for the senior Leinster side. He moved to Munster on a short term deal initially because of an injury crisis, and stayed on (Leinster made a bad call to back Nick McCarthy and Cormac Foley instead).



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,253 ✭✭✭Hey_Ho_Lets_Go_3


    Salanoa was officially in the leinster academy.

    As described by Munster rugby: https://www.munsterrugby.ie/2020/05/18/squad-update-sammy-arnold-conor-oliver-roman-salanoa/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    There obviously are advantages, but it's also too reductive and dismissive to just want to constantly attribute Leinster's greater successful in player production (particularly over the last 15 years or so) to just simple demographics.

    I've said it before, but all of the key inherent advantages have been in existence as long as rugby has been played here - population advantages, private schools etc - and were absolutely all the case in the 2000's etc - so why has the gap become so significant in the past 15 years or so?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    Sorry, you're right about the boarding now being gone in Methody (it was still there around the time I was in school).

    Midleton and Newtown are schools that play rugby - they're not entirely dissimilar in size to Clongowes (though granted both are mixed), but very comparable in size to Roscrea, so the statement "about the level of 3rds or 4ths in schools in Leinster" isn't relevant.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    To be fair you've gone from:

    "What advantage is that?" i.e. implying there aren't any.

    to

    "There obviously are advantages" i.e. admitting there are.

    And to be fair, I've never just attributed Leinster's greater successful in player production (particularly over the last 15 years or so) to just simple demographics.

    I've always admitted Leinster are also now incredibly well run, which wasn't always the case.

    Both of those things can be true.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    My comment "what advantage is that?" - wasn't denying the existence of any advantages, rather it was asking you to clarify which specific advantages you were claiming was a feature, hence why the next sentence was "The presence or existence of boarding schools?"

    But, here we are again debating minutiae of wording rather than the actual substantive point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,342 ✭✭✭✭aloooof


    Wording isn't minutiae when you're attributing things that haven't been said. That's literally the substantive point. But yes again here we are.

    But look we agree - Leinster are very well run AND have inherent advantages the others can't replicate. Right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,886 ✭✭✭FtD v2


    The advantages bestowed by private schools is overblown at times - it's not an aspect exclusive to Leinster by any means. If you strip out the NIQs, IQ abroads or guys from Leinster in the wider Munster squad, you still have c. 19 guys who went to private schools within Munster.

    The three most successful schools in the Munster Schools Senior Cup (PBC, CBC and Rockwell), who between them have won 80% of all Munster Schools Senior Cups, are all private, fee paying schools. PBC and CBC are substantial all-boys schools with relatively large enrolments in an Irish context. The fees for these schools are also substantial.

    Leinster obviously have the larger quantum of private schools, but in recent years the production of players has still been relatively concentrated to a handful of select schools even there.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,356 ✭✭✭Jump_In_Jack


    Fair enough if he was, he was probably in the full academy for a couple of years and I would guess he was being lined up for a development contract but Munster offered a full senior contract and he felt the pathway in Munster was more secure at that time. That's only my recollection of what happened, could be wrong.



Advertisement