Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

19919929949969971868

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 14,077 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    the "issues" with trans athletes in sports is complete bollocks. The new wedge issue for right wing grifters to vent their spleens over. The fact Newsom, and others, have bought into the nonsense being pedaled by the right is a travesty.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,009 ✭✭✭Hamsterchops


    So what is Newsoms latest stance on this issue?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,728 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,216 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    This is brilliant stuff

    The fact it's upsetting the Trump supporters is just icing on the cake.

    Post edited by Timberrrrrrrr on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,688 ✭✭✭valoren


    The worst (and best) thing you can do to a narcissist is laugh at them. Those pastische tweets do that by brilliantly taking the piss out of Trumps posting style.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,356 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    The nominee has done a "TACO" on his proposal.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 42,787 ✭✭✭✭eagle eye


    I notice you don't try and challenge any lengthy post.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,356 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Did Trump make another geographical location error, this time referring to Moscow and Leningrad?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,216 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    And he (or the MAGA loons) cant even complain because it's a perfect copy of his posting style.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,464 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    That's the best one yet, keep mocking the fragile little toddler. He'll be calling Elmo to ban Newsom from Twitter 😂



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,781 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Is there an app to transcribe a block of text into Trump caterwaul or does Newsom rely on a pool of blindfolded monkey typists to come up with those missives?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,925 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    This is true, but it takes balls, because the narcissist will lash out, and in this case, the man has a ludicrous amount of power.

    By provoking him you may ultimately bring about his downfall, but by being the provocateur, you might not be around to see it.

    In the grand scheme of things, there are probably only a few dozen people in the world who could stand up to Trump in this way, in the knowledge that if Trump lashes out, he'll be able to raise the middle finger straight back at him, and the governor of California is one of those people.

    Ban billionaires



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,565 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    Trump worshippers getting upset because Newsom is tweeting in a Trump style is absolutely priceless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,623 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    It'd be nice if Newsom or some other Democrat took actual charge and put an actual plan together

    Maybe that could be a rallying cry.

    Hey, democrats; get off X and into a real fight.. you useless fukheads



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,633 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    If things are going so well for the GOP in swing states, then you would imagine the same would be happening in states where they have a majority, so why are they attempting to gerrymander districts in Texas ?

    The numbers registered as Reblican or Democrates will not guarantee either party the next election. It will not even guarantee that they vote as they are registered on the day.

    The voters registering as Independent or third party will decide it, and according to NBC news 25 June 2025 the partisan affiliation data compiled by Ballotpedia for the 33 states territories and districts that publish registration data by voter party affiliation have the Democrates on 37%, Independents and third party on 32% and Republicans on 31%.



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,135 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    What do you expect them to do exactly?

    They are taking court cases. State republicans are trying to stymie attempted gerrymanders and Newsome is threatening responses if they go ahead. They are going to the media etc.

    There is nothing else they can do - America voted for this and they are getting it.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,717 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I guess its possible that the various democrats, strategists and analysts are all wrong and that Newsom is on the wrong track. (In which case that doesn't bode well for his 2028 bid)

    But looking into it, Palast points to four states as where such activites he claims cost the election. Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, 60 votes between them. 42 would have had to flipped.

    The argument may hold more weight in states under Republican control and in which Democrats did not win the elections.

    Michigan, for example, had a Democratic governor, a democratic state house and a democratic state senate. This complete Democrat control, we are expected to believe, managed to stack the deck in favor of Trump by setting the rules to purge sufficient Democrat voters that in the statewide election of November 2024, the voters of Michigan elected a Democrat senator, at the same time as a Republican president. And for those who might claim misogyny, the Democrat was a woman, the Republican a man.

    Wisconsin, also under a Democrat governor, faced a tougher challenge for the forces of fairness. The State house and senate were both under Republican control. Using their nefarious powers (insufficient to override the governor), they managed to stack the deck sufficiently that not only did they lose seats to Democrats in both houses, but they also managed to see their man lose in the statewide election for US senator to the Democrat woman.

    Those two states alone account for sufficient EC votes that the election would have been decided.

    The voters of the state were happy enough to vote for Democrats. Without having looked into their policies, i would assume that those democrats who won had positions and were closer in attitude to those of their voters than Harris, otherwise they would have failed as Harris did. How does Palast explain the difference in success between Democrat senate candidates and the failure of the Democrat Presidential candidate out of the exact same voting population who voted? I submit it likely that the voters did not connect with Harris and her message, something which Duckworth and Slotkin seem to have managed.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,623 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    I expect them to put somebody out to lead them. Even if it's pretending



  • Moderators, Sports Moderators, Paid Member Posts: 33,135 Mod ✭✭✭✭Podge_irl


    The person who leads them will be Jeffries if he takes over the House next year and absent that it is anathema to the US political system to them to appoint a "leader" before that. What do you think said Leader will even do?

    They have no power. They control no organ of government. If the Trump administration were even remotely competent they would be formalising much of what they are doing by legislation but they are too awful to manage that. But they control the Executive, the Legislature and also the Judiciary. There is nothing that can be done and I have no idea what exactly people expect as opposition.

    Americans had the chance to oppose this and they instead chose to support it. They don't get another chance til Nov 26.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,623 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    They have no power. They control no organ of government.

    It seems like they don't want it either tbh



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,216 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    And the poking of Trump continues, hes gonna lose his shìt soon 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,361 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    You think the Dems don't want power? Despite constantly running for election and being in power only 8 months ago?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,238 ✭✭✭Field east


    can , at

    can , at all those levels, behave as an opposition to what they are all deciding on by:-

    (1) pointing out the negative effect they might have on, how they are going to impact on the majority of the population

    (2) present alternative proposals

    (3) make sure that the ‘ relevant ‘ statistics get into the public domain eg. Food price trends, the way debt is trending, level of unemployment , jobs created, inflation trend, level of federal investment, etc, etc, and compare all to , for example ,the Biden era



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,535 ✭✭✭✭Jelle1880


    There's several that do though, the problem is that the mainstream media in the US (apart from a few exceptions) are sane washing what he does so it's not shown a lot, because they fear his retaliations. The amount of insane softball questions Karoline Leavitt gets asked is pathetic.

    They don't want to pay out settlement fees to him.

    Newsom, Katie Porter, Jasmine Crockett, AOC, Pete Buttigieg,… are a few examples off the top of my head.

    But as said above, they don't have any actual power to stop anything.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,917 ✭✭✭threeball


    What is it with this nonsense of being a registered Republican or Democrat, like you're supporting a football team. Why would anyone tell anyone what your ties are and what way you're inclined to vote. Its a completely absurd idea. Surely anyone worried about getting taken off a voter register should just go get registered as Republican then vote against them on the day. If the GOP want to sow chaos, that can work both ways.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,157 ✭✭✭✭salmocab


    it is just like sport. Lots tie their allegiance regardless. They wear T-shirts and buy flags they are morons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,428 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    In most states, being registered to one party means you get to vote in the primaries for candidates (not just Presidential elections, but local and state elections too). So being registered to one party means you can help try to have your preferred candidate as the one who is nominated to run for whatever position.

    I believe in some states, if you're an independent or not registered to one party, you can still vote in one party's primaries, but then can't vote in the other. Then some states, the primaries are open and everyone can vote.

    Yes, it's a completely absurd idea (one amongst many in their political system), but even outside of the morons with so many political bumper-stickers on their car that they have to drive with their head out the window like Ace Ventura, it does give a benefit to some who might be more moderate to vote for party candidates who aren't MAGA-morons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,584 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    And contribute or "chip in" *shudder* to the campaign.

    Absolutely f**king ridiculous

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,538 ✭✭✭Glaceon


    My father-in-law is a staunch Republican but a registered Democrat. He does it for sabotage, he votes for the bad candidate in primaries to give the Republican a better chance!



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 28,401 ✭✭✭✭Peregrinus


    In addition to what Penn said, it helps to understand that, to someone accustomed to how things work in Europe, American political parties are strange creatures. They're not membership-based organisations. You can't "join" the Republican Party or the Democratic Party. At the state and county level the parties are effectively committees controlled by state or local politicians who are Republican or Democratic, as the case may be. There aren't branches or cumainn that you can join so that you get to elect party officers, branch meetings, discuss policy, etc.

    If you want to be politically active you can involve yourself in political campaigns that may be organised by politicians who may be Republican or Democratic, but this isn't considered to be "joining" the Republican or Democratic parties. But it does mean that you might get selected by the local party and sent as a delegate to the national convention, where as well as rubber-stamping the candidate who has won the primaries you also get to rubber-stamp the party platform that has been drafted by a political committee.

    If you want to be involved in selecting candidates the, as Penn says, you register with the state as a Republican or a Democrat, and you vote in the primary elections, which are organised and run by the state, not by the parties.



Advertisement
Advertisement