Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Immigration and Ireland - MEGATHREAD *Mod Note Added 02/09/25*

1289290292294295387

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,170 ✭✭✭bilbot79


    Sorry I missed this response before.

    I don't think 'driven by social media' is a fair answer. It denies indigenous Irish people the right to suggest their fears are genuine and that their fear is that the country is being changed without their consent.

    'Of course integration can work, why not?' - I wonder is this too simplistic a take on the question. It would be easy for an immigrant to give this answer but unless there is an identical view from the local population, it is not working. The bar for true integration is higher than simply being here and working together, the issue is a powder keg. It's not working.

    Yes the person wearing a burqa is still a person. But I think it is a vile, reductive practise that erases the woman beneath. Western women fought against the odds for their right to be seen, be heard, to vote, to work. The burqa is a disgusting denial of their power and I think it's terrible that this misogynistic ideology has convinced those poor women that they have to conceal their individuality becuase their menfolk can't be trusted to hold themselves together if their faces were revealed. Add to that the fact that even if I did talk to one I would have no idea who I'm talking to.

    I am Irish, I grew up chatting to men and women in the pub. I have no doubt whatsoever that the woman wearing the burqa is a person underneath but I have no desire to talk to her because I need to see her face. The burqa is total anathema to integration. There is no greater way to say 'I will not integrate' than to wear a burqa.

    But don't worry too much Burqa-wearing women, it's your men I blame. Only hateful men would ever invent such a thing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,854 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    It’s honestly the most bizarre paradox that so many self proclaimed “progressives” will defend Islam and its practices to the nth degree

    They (rightly, in my view) abhor fundamentalist Christians that hold beliefs in common with Islam and yet are wholly permissive of Islam, it doesn’t make any sense.

    I suppose it just lays bare the total cognitive dissonance in their position - it’s not one borne out of genuine interaction with the actual reality of the issue, for them it’s more about the social currency of being able to shame others for pointing out the issues within Islam. They get to wag the finger and tell others they’re prejudiced (ironically, given Islamic attitudes to women and LGBT people). They don’t give a fùck about the reality, so long as they can fool themselves of their supposed moral superiority.

    If someone with a Christian background forced their wife never to show their face in public they would be aghast. But when Muslims do it? This is great, oh how “cosmopolitan” we are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭Joe 90


    I've lived in Ilford for 35 years now and that documentary sounds like the sanatised version. If it were only the Indians it might be okay.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,170 ✭✭✭bilbot79


    I try my best to explain my positions. I can think for myself and I don't subscribe to or get captured by far right rabbit holes. Is it so difficult to simply allow someone to be concerned about their country's future demographic?
    I don't hate anyone. How did any country ever have an identity if it's borders were left open to the world. Go back 4 years and immigration was 3k and now it's more like 30k. How do you expect people to not take a view on that??
    I don't know if memes are allowed but I made one to help lighten the tone when there is a racism/far right accusation.

    1000028228.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭BandyMandy


    The catholic Church lost its grip on Ireland years ago, which is a good thing, but now Islam is growing rapidly through migration. Just look at the challenges other countries are facing as a result. We're replacing one devil with anothe.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,166 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    Where's the racism?

    I've no issue with people of any ethnicity coming here legally to live among us and contribute to our society.

    I do have an issue with people coming here illegally and or bringing dangerous ideologies that will damage our society with them.

    It has nothing to do with skin colour or nationality, it's down to decisions individuals make in how they approach their own lives and how that impacts other people. It's pretty simple and not at all racist.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,317 ✭✭✭✭Quantum Erasure




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,166 ✭✭✭✭nullzero
    °°°°°


    I've met lots of lovely Muslims in my time but that belief system has some really serious issues to deal with.

    Ireland isn't immune from them unfortunately, we need to listen to the leaders in the middle east who have been warning Europe about these issues in recent times. They're struggling with fundamentalism themselves we can't bury our heads in the sand and we have to understand what these fundamentalist believe in order to be able to deal with the effectively.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,854 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    https://www.irishtimes.com/crime-law/2025/08/01/housing-shortage-not-an-excuse-for-states-failure-to-house-asylum-seekers-european-court-rules/

    I honestly think we should tell the ECJ to go **** themselves

    Accepting this ruling as binding will set up a two tier system in which a randomer from anywhere on the planet can touch down in Ireland, claim asylum and immediately have greater rights and legal protections than a homeless Irish citizen. The minister for Justice has said as much himself and honestly it would be an utter disgrace.

    On a separate note I must highlight the utter contempt I have for Nick Henderson and the Irish Refugee Council - in a time when so many systems etc of the country are totally fúcked, they use our own tax money to make us liable ruinous pay outs to randomers with no connection to the state, meanwhile every month the record homelessness figures for Irish citizens are broken. Honestly what is even the point of being a nation state anymore when it’s gotten to this absurd point.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭BandyMandy


    Oh, what about this ruling, has the EU overturned the high courts outcome? https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2025/0730/1526125-ihrec-appeal-ruling/



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 486 ✭✭briangriffin


    I absolutely agree with you, modern social justice warriors believe unerringly in intersectionality, that there might be a conflict where minorities might have values that are anathema to each other and even the values of the progressive types defending them doesn't matter. What matters is personal moral superiority, you can absolutely criticise the catholic church and all its scandals and mock the collective people who follow "God" but if you criticise a religion which has its own unique brand of misogyny and radical fundamentalism because that religion is a minority religion it ticks the correct "oppresion" box. I can absolutely say I do not want ireland to become a majoirty Muslim country because of our history our current societal values, culture and traditions which would be at odds with many of the stricter tenents of Islam. Is that islamaphobic? I dont think it is anymore than saying i dont want to see catholic parish priests telling men and women they are going to hell if they use contraception. Are the posters on boards who criticise Catholicism catholiphobic?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,070 ✭✭✭ArthurDayne


    Good research. Can you tell me what rules I would have to consider as regards flying a Pride flag in the states of Utah and Montana ? Can you tell me what direction Christian conservatism in America is going as regards female reproductive rights? Ted Cruz recently spoke about how the Bible informs his views on Israel's ongoing slaughter of Palestinian Muslims — do you think he is the only one?

    All of this in the country where the vast majority of infant American males are subjected to genital mutilation via circumcision without consent. Or — in my innocence and naivety — is circumcision of infant males not genital mutilation ?

    But of course, the Muslims must be singled out — because Muslims are incompatible, right?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,170 ✭✭✭bilbot79


    We aren't currently being outbirthed by hordes of American Bible Bashers. Mind you the last time Protestants marched down O'Connell St it wasn't at all pretty.

    I found myself looking at this post through the lens of Brian Griffins last post there and it really does hit home the extent to which some people will stop at nothing to defend the minority no matter what.

    I think your last sentence, though sarcastic, is correct. Islam needs to be singled out because it is incompatible.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 182 ✭✭BandyMandy


    That carry on has been happening for years with eu citizen, not surprised it's still happening with our new non - eu citizen...... We need to use facial identity if claiming welfare assistance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,335 ✭✭✭Jinglejangle69


    Over half of the homeless in Ireland are foreign nationals.


    Has been that way for a decade. Don’t be fooled.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,077 ✭✭✭InAtFullBack


    And there it is in plain black and white, for all to see, for what it is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,405 ✭✭✭lmao10


    Fine post. I noticed with these kinds of posts, you never get direct answers to the questions. The far right types demand answers to their questions but usually don't answer direct questions as you have posed here. Hopefully you'll get responses. Pride flags banned, controlling what women want to do with their bodies, using scripture to justify genocide. It's ghastly stuff. 80% of American men circumcised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,405 ✭✭✭lmao10


    How does this post add to discussion? All this will do is force the conversation to descend to a level where mod input would be required. Responding with something like that is not helpful to the discussion. Perhaps you could give your thoughts on the points raised in the post?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,854 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    What about, what about, what about

    Those American places you’ve named are equally regressive and I would not like to see their religious mores being implemented in Ireland

    I also absolutely think circumcision of infant males is genital mutilation - what do you think about it? All Muslims are circumcised

    And finally and most importantly, are we seeing many migrants coming here from Utah or Montana?

    No, we’re not - so how about we focus on the regressive ideologies that held by the people that are actually coming here, because that’s actually relevant to Ireland

    If and when we begin to see an influx of Utah Mormons or bible bashing evangelicals I would absolutely be open to a critical discussion of their beliefs.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,170 ✭✭✭bilbot79


    Which 'far right types' exactly? Stop trying to pigeon hole people into the racist slot. This is another racism diversion tactic, the thread is being held back by it.

    Fwiw I think Arthur Daynes tends to go way off on irrelevant tangents like he did in that post. We aren't discussing America or Americans. There isn't a potential Bible Basherification of Ireland to deal with right now but there is a potential Islamification and that's why there is a conversation about it.

    We can't just bat away these challenges by saying 'Shur the (Insert some sort of Western people) in (Insert some Western country) are doing (Insert terrible things) so we should just take the inexorable march of poor Islam on the chin'



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 9,551 ✭✭✭Backstreet Moyes


    Does it ever dawn on you that you hate what you are pushing for.

    Far right clowns are idiots and they don't like gay people or women's rights.

    The ideology of people you cheer for throw gay people off roofs and women have no rights.

    You hate far right people but push for the acceptance of an ideology who have far far far worse hate for gays and women's rights.

    I mean honestly and sincerely honestly, are you serious with your posts?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 29,728 ✭✭✭✭_Kaiser_


    I think that's the point and the goal of people like the late Peter Sutherland and his similarly-minded modern counterparts - to undermine the concept of nations and individual cultural/national identity so that ultimately the idea of a United States of Europe can be realised.

    All of these goals are on record (I posted Sutherland's comments only a week or so ago), so it's not surprising that the hugely ironically named European Court of "Justice" has towed its own ideological line with this one.

    Justice for immigrants apparently is more important than justice for the natives who have to deal with the consequences and fund it while becoming second-class citizens in their own country!

    Small wonder then that more and more people are hardening their views on this whole issue and why the attendances at the protest marches have been growing in recent months.

    With this ruling, the ECJ is effectively validating the preferential treatment of randomers arriving with the hand out over the needs of those people who have lived here all their lives and for generations. Certainly this can't be called a conspiracy theory anymore!

    I've been sceptical of the EU and it's long term agenda since the Financial Crash and how it was handled - more specifically, how smaller nations - including Ireland! - were treated by our supposed allies! This judgement is just another validation of that scepticism.

    Yes we've benefited immensely from an economic standpoint (but let's not forget these companies that have based themselves here have made massive profits as well from the arrangement - it's not a one-sided deal), but the longer term impacts on our political system, representation, and sovereignty have been equally massive, and not in a particularly good way when judgements like this can override the decision of our courts.



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Today's topics of the thread

    Is Ireland becoming islamified. (At 1.6% of population have we joined the crusades on the wrong side)

    How being against racism will mean you actually hate the gays and the wimmins

    and finally

    Is Peter Sutherland the real mastermind behind the great replacement plan.

    👆🏿🤣🤣

    Which one of those is the thread topic I should stick to mods?

    Mod Edit: Warned for baiting and trolling

    Post edited by Necro on


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I have to say the whataboutery has reached shocking levels. Imagine if, on any other thread in this forum, a post about the abuse of women was greeted with “but what about the pride flags”. I realise that a lot of the pro-mass-immigration posters feel their hearts are in the right place, and they are the “good guys” but I think they may have lost their way somewhat. Controlled immigration is not evil. Nearly every country does it. Canada, Australia, Denmark, Sweden. It’s not some mad nazification of the country to behave responsibly. A bit of calm and rational thinking is needed. The gold rush is over, it is time we acted like a real country.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,170 ✭✭✭bilbot79


    You literally are just rubbishing the points instead of taking them up. If you oppose then you should be taking the following approach

    -Oppose Islamification claim - create argument to show how Islamification will not occur or why it would be ok if it does

    -Promoting Islam promotes the things you hate like gay persecution and oppression of women's rights - create argument to show how Islam does not persecute gays or oppress women's rights

    There is literally no point in making racism comments anymore. Everyone knows youre thinking it, it's baked in. Just argue the points themselves.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,854 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    Any interest in engaging with anything and actually contributing to the discussion or will it just be the snide remarks this morning?



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Which of the three topics would you like to rationally discuss.

    We can use facts and statistics then to address any one of these points.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,854 ✭✭✭Stephen_Maturin


    I’ve already made my point above, you’re welcome to engage or not, but I don’t really understand this craic of coming onto a discussion forum to then sit there and throw jabs from the sidelines without actually making any points



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    So you believe Ireland is at risk of becoming Muslim?

    You believe that being assist racism means you hate gays and women in Ireland.

    And you believe Peter Sutherland is leading the great replacement plan in Ireland?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,170 ✭✭✭bilbot79


    I'm not up to speed on Peter Sutherland but the other two points have been made at length in other posts. What more do you need? It's over to you to provide rational responses instead of 'You're a racist, I have the moral high ground'



Advertisement