Hamas strike on Israel

Go for it. I'm still waiting for you to answer my question, don't think I'll be forgetting.

Quite telling the questions you avoided and the blatant hypocrisy. Why wouldn't the Arabs want control? they made up 2/3 of the population in 1948 and most of the Jewish population had only arrived there in the previous 25 years. In 1920, the Arab's were 85% of the population, but were not afforded any rights to create a country in the intervening years. How do people who just arrived get the same right to a country as the people who lived there for centuries. And of course knowing your defence of the existence of Northern Ireland over the years, lets not forget the hegemony the Unionists got with the same numbers and that was with moving the lines to create a majority, so you can drop the hypocritical BS about Arabs wanting dominance.

It was the decisions of Western powers with Balfour/Sykes-Picot, whilst ignoring the wishes of the Arabs that helped create the ethnic divisions. The only people who did the research and rejected the Zionist project predicted exactly what would happen as early as 1920, but they were ignored by those same western powers. That is what is sad, everything has happened as was forewarned, the UN decision also ignored those predictions.

If the US really wanted to, they could sort this in no time, but that would require Israel to make compromises which the US will not force them to do. If the US threatened to cut off arms supplies, the Israelis would fall into line real quick.

Is he referring to the fact it's not a full member but instead a non member observer state? Along with the Vatican mind you. You need a two thirds majority in the vote which they'd get but without any vetos from the 5 countries who have them. I'm guessing this is where the issue arises.

China, France, Russia, the UK, and the US have veto power.

Argentina, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Nauru, Fiji, Tonga, Palau, Nauru, Micronesia, Hungary, US and Israel voted against so with really only the US stands in their way of full membership.

Your stupid **** question makes no sense mo Charizard

It was not. But again, thanks for showing how utterly stupid you are.

I'd link you to a resource for that but not enough professionals exist to fix it

Mod Edit: Warned for personal abuse

Lay out in plain terms whatever question it is you are asking

Ah can it, a pair of pro IDF sycophants slapping each others arses is all that is. Absolutely pathetic.

I literally provided you with a quote from a respected conservative politician, former minister etc, where he claims the below was said to him:

And there's another fundamental problem in this negotiation, which is that I was speaking to somebody who's very, very senior in Israeli national security, very close to Netanyahu. Who said to me, of course, when the hostages are returned, we will then have no reason not to wipe Gaza off the face of the earth.

So how are you supposed to get a deal together when Hamas feels the hostages are their one guarantee on some form of restraint by the Israelis, that it's the only thing that's holding the Israelis back from going even further?

Why would they honestly return the remaining hostages if... The sense they get is that when they return those remaining hostages, Netanyahu will just radically increase and redouble his efforts to wipe them all out. Why would they do that?

Will you sit there and slander him, as you did me, as a Hamas supporter? Is he saying Hamas are right to have taken hostages? Is he lying do you think? To what end?

It is absolutely pathetic.

Answer my question - how can you say with any certainty that the release of those hostages will not result in a ramped up genocide of Gazans? Why should a guarantee not being sought to ensure their safety?

All I am getting is that we should take the word of wanted war criminals, currently engaging in a genocide against said people, that it won't happen. It's mind bogglingly stupid.

The Palestinian hostages held since pre Oct 7th?

If civilians are allowed to live, absolutely.

Notice how I answer all questions. Funny that isn't it.

It is critical for peace in the middle east that the Zionist ideology is consigned to history. It is this ideology which permits the society in Israel to back a genocide. Israel a country born out of a holocaust is perpetrating genocide. It beggars belief. The hunted have become the hunter.

All those Jews who chose to look away, who chose to stay silent, who chose to cheer on genocide whether they be within Israel or outside have betrayed the memories of those who died in the Holocaust. Israel is clearly a broken society fuelled by irrational hatred of the native people of Palestine.

A society running on hate can never have peace either with its neighbours or itself. Gaza must be a watershed. The turning of the tide for the Palestinian people. The darkest chapter in their recent history must soon allow the turning of a page to a brighter future.

The international community must turn the screw on Israel until it collapses from within. The cruel inhumane society must be made to look at what it has done. To answer for their blatant inhumanity. For each and every perpetrator of genocide to face justice.

Your answer to the issue is to allow Hamas to continue committing war crimes by retaining the hostages. And you then have the hypocrisy to criticise others as war criminals?

The same hostages that Macron has called to be released, those taken by Hamas on October 7th.

Unbelievable. You just cannot stop lying.

Did you read the quote?

Answer my question.

how can you say with any certainty that the release of those hostages will not result in a ramped up genocide of Gazans? Why should a guarantee not being sought to ensure their safety?