Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/

Hamas strike on Israel

1153915401542154415451577

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,299 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I haven't seen a single IDF supporter on here. Neither have I seen a single supporter of genocide. There are those who hold the opinion that the legal definition of genocide hasn't been reached.

    The only posters I have seen against a two-state solution are those who call for a single Palestinian state, based on racist Hamas propaganda. They are denying the right of Israel to exist.

    The proposals for resettlement are wrong. They remind me of good republicans who have called for resettlement of unionists in the event of a united Ireland.

    To sum up, posters like me think that October 7th was horrific, that Israel, as a state, have a right to self-defence, that Hamas are an evil terrorist organisation intent on the genocidal elimination of Jews, that Iran are the main protaganists of instability in the region, directly, and through their proxies in Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis, that Hamas could bring peace at any time by releasing the hostages and surrendering, that a two-state solution is the best future, and that the resettlement of Palestinians is a bad idea. None of that makes me or others a supporter of the IDF, to present a reasonable position in those terms is just distraction and obfuscation.

    That you and others repeatedly fail to condemn Iran and Hamas creates a whole other set of questions.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,775 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Yes. The climb down by Iran in the recent war shows it to be propaganda. It seems the Iranian leadership possess the same preservation instinct as Putin so I can't see them ever using a nuke because they would surely know that's the end of their regime if they do so given Israel has hundreds of nukes to strike Iran with in return. The real problem is the strategic leverage it would give them- Israel could no longer act with impunity. It would also likely start a nuclear arms race in the region, which again would mean Israel looses hegemony in the region. In any case I don't believe Iran was building a nuke given the fatwa that was issued against them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,299 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Of course, Iran was enriching uranium to 60% just for the fun of it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,010 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    When the leaders of israel have arrest warrants out for war crimes then the threshold for using the self-defence argument has been passed. This has gone beyond self defence now and no regimes who commit war crimes such as hamas and the Israeli regime should be supported.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,775 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Of course let's ignore the US intelligence community assessment that Iran had not made a decision to weaponise their nuclear programme prior to the illegal Israeli attack. Also ignore that was Iran was in talks to come to agreement with America over its nuclear programme when Bibi decided to torpedoe those talks.

    Lets also ignore Bibi has been saying Iran was months away from building a bomb a bomb since 1995. The same man who told us Iraq had WMD , then when that lie was exposed he shifted the goalposts that he had intent to build a weapons programme . Which is now the strategy of those defending the Israeli attack on Iran.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,299 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Yeah, yeah, Iran is a benign nice country, treats its citizens brilliantly and only wants peace with all its neighbours, has no links to terrorist organisations and doesn't spend huge amounts on its security and military and is misunderstood.

    Nope, still not buying that schtick. The hatred of Israel in some posters blinds them to the reality of the Middle East.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,775 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    So just to be clear you condemn genocidal comments from Smotrich and the defence minister. You also prsemuably unreservedly condemn Katz's latest plan to effectively create a concentration camp for Palestinians in Rafah, whereby no Palestinians can leave it. Hamas are genocidal, but it's clear so is the state of Israel under its current government . Go ahead and condemn both instead of deferring to legal opinion that says Israel is not committing genoicide because it then looks like you are indeed trying to excuse the Israeli government otherwise



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,420 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    Latest episode of The Rest is Politics is interesting. Both hosts finally using the word genocide



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,000 ✭✭✭Miniegg


    That you and others repeatedly fail to condemn Iran and Hamas creates a whole other set of questions

    What are you talking about? Have you never bothered reading my posts?

    You absolutely have shown support for the IDF, and consistently spend your time online defending their brutal actions, or trying to downplay their massacres. I remember asking you about 20 times to tell me what specific actions commited by the IDF against Palestinians civilians do you condemn, and you did not answer once.

    You show constant disdain for Muslim civilians, men women and children, who are being massacred every day, and regularly post about them to show how bad their society is (mentioning marital rapes, treatment of women, gays) - pure stereotypical dehumanization of a people on a thread where people are appalled at them being massacred.

    I have condemned Hamas dozens of times, and proof is here in black and white to back it up, read through my posts. Its easy for me to condemn them, because I do, unlike your absolute inability to condemn the IDF

    I have no idea about Iran, but they sound like a bad bunch. Two absolute c*nts of regime's fighting each other is my take on it.

    My side is protection of civilians and always has, every post I have ever posted supports this. Most Irish people are like this, the racism and antisemetism accusations against us for holding a moral position is disgusting. Protection of civilians at all costs, in any other scenario, is not a controversial position to take.

    This is the only thread I have ever seen where people display this as a fault, as racism/ antisemetism, by the same people who routinely defend or downplay clear ethnic cleansing and genocide. It's extremely clear what side of that argument you are on.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,775 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    I never said Iran are the good guys. Israel and Iran are both bad actors.

    They both have destabilised that region and funded terrorists groups over the years. You might want to deny it but even ex US and Israeli officials admit that Likud were happy to court Islamists over the years. We even had an ex mossad chief admitting on tv that Israel assisted Al Nusra in Syria



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,299 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    When I see the peace between Israel and Egypt, between Israel and Qatar, between Israel and the Saudis and Emirati, despite them being seen as traditional enemies, I can see that Israel can be at peace if the conditions are there. Iran has no allies, it has caused problems in Lebanon, Syria and Yemen, as well as in Gaza. The difference is stark.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,579 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Israel hasn't caused problems in Lebanon and Gaza…?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,775 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Israel has routinely cause problems outside its borders over the years.

    There might be some chance for peace between Iran and Israel if both the Ayatollahs and Likud were out of the picture.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,669 ✭✭✭walus


    That is all in line with the 1996 Clean Break strategy. Iran is the last country remaining on the list. The chance for peace is non-existent. Ultimately, a strong Iran is what prevents them from achieving Greater Israel and regional hegemony.

    ”Where’s the revolution? Come on, people you’re letting me down!”



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,911 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    Israeli critics of the regime are far less optimistic. They argue that it's default position is to be in a stand off, or even at war with its neighbours, a perpetual 'Cold War' so to speak. Living in peace and harmony with the neighbouring states would almost be an alien experience for them. Part of the problem is that they don't see themselves as equals with any of the countries of the Middle East, but far superior to them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,299 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I disagree, there has been peace between Israel and Egypt now for decades.

    The real problem is the Iranian regime and its jihadi tendencies. Even fellow Arabs and Muslims recoil from them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,299 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    I have already said in the post that you have quoted that I am against resettlement of Palestinians and that I support a two-State solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,911 ✭✭✭✭Strazdas


    The current government of far right extremists in Israel hardly lends itself to a peaceful and harmonious future going forward (irrespective of anything going on with the flaky Iranian regime). Some of Netanyahu's cabinet are even more hardcore and fanatical Zionists than he is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,299 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    At worst, that is only a temporary feature of the Israeli landscape as it is a democracy. At best, you are overly pessimistic.

    With Iran, there is no possibility of change. Its vows of Death to the West and its commitment to the destruction of Israel cannot change with an election. There is nothing flaky about their support of terrorism for the last three decades and nothing flaky about their enriching uranium for fun to 60%.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 799 ✭✭✭Fuascailteoir




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,579 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Do the Palestinian inhabitants of the West Bank, Golan and Arab East Jerusalem get a vote in this "democracy"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,471 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Nuclear weapons are hyperbolic, nobody would really use them. But I bet if Hamas got their hands on the ability to create concentration death camps they'd use them to put jewish people into without any schools, or work or places of worship, and prevent them from leaving until they die.

    If Hamas could do that, they would. Israel have been able to build such camps for decades, and they never have. This is proof that Israel are democratic and western and have ethics, while Hamas are evil maniacs who only want jews to suffer and die.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,010 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Israel has ethics yet is being run by a war criminal. They are obviously better than Hamas but worse than the PA in charge of the West Bank. Also hardly ethical to continue to colonise land in the West Bank.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 799 ✭✭✭Fuascailteoir


    Obviously missed the news in the last day or two



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 8,579 ✭✭✭Odhinn


    Again - Do the Palestinian inhabitants of the West Bank, Golan and Arab East Jerusalem get a vote in this "democracy"?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,471 ✭✭✭✭Akrasia


    Damn right they took too long.

    But they didn't even devote the entire podcast to this topic.

    They came to the realization that Israel are completely unquestioningly committing genocide, a crime against humanity, against the people of Gaza, and then moved on to another topic. (Albeit another war)

    Now that they know what is happening over there, finally, they should be much more strident in holding people to account for anything that enables this to continue.

    Chomsky(2017) on the Republican party

    "Has there ever been an organisation in human history that is dedicated, with such commitment, to the destruction of organised human life on Earth?"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,420 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    The best time to plant a tree was yesterday. The second best time was today.

    They acknowledged that they were late. So did Sanders. Both of these in the space of 18 hours

    A tide is shifting



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,503 ✭✭✭brickster69


    USA announced they have sanctioned Francesca Albanese, the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories.

    I would laugh my cap off if she ended up with a Nobel peace prize.

    rubio.jpg

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 792 ✭✭✭batman75


    I saw a clip on X of Israeli tourists being told to leave a restaurant in Spain. I can't help but think Israeli's don't realise how much they are hated around the world. The world is disgusted by the genocide in Gaza. By the ethnic cleansing in the West Bank. The world will not forget or forgive.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,138 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    and you think the above is proper and right? These tourists are what, terrorist killers now? Their nationality is enough to treat them like pariahs? Would you have been of the same view when Irish people were heavily targeted/discriminated against in England during the troubles?



Advertisement