Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - Mod Warning updated in OP 12/2/26

18828838858878881863

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,744 ✭✭✭yagan


    The founding fathers owned slaves so not sure how Obama would have fared with them.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,712 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Sortof. The ruling applies with that specific plaintiff on that particular type of request for relief so, yes, as of today, it only affects those individuals which have asked. It does not prohibit other forms of collective relief such as class or third party, it just means the appropriate requests must be made. It's worth noting that one of the concurring opinions confirmed the rights, for example, of a state to request an injunction to prevent enforcement against the residents of its state whilst also cautioning the lower federal courts that there are rules in place already to determine when such a broad third party relief is appropriate, and to not go about making all state claims on everything into broad collective relief or else we'll end up in the same place as before, just through a different route.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,712 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I wouldn't be so sure of that. A few may well have still been around when it took over a year and a half to replace Trimble.

    Long Supreme Court vacancies used to be more common | Pew Research Center

    image.png image.png

    The McConnell antics certainly set back common convention to an earlier time, but were no means unprecedented or contrary to the way the country used to work.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    In fairness Norms are there for the breaking- especially if they’re not doing society any good - what MAGA are doing is establishing new norms and conventions that suit mainly white Right Wing America- we’ve seen the recently established norm of inclusivity of LGBGT+ somewhat eroded - we’ve also seen the norm of laisse faire to poor working class but non criminal immigrants also eroded - replaced with the norm of intolerance.

    It’s a good lesson on how norms can change very quickly in society given just a few set of circumstances. Norms in Ireland took decades to erode and it was a slow journey for tolerance to take hold- but we’re already seen cracks in parts of society and quite a right wing element remerging - sites like boards.ie are very important right now in allowing reasoned debate and discussion.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 37,426 ✭✭✭✭Penn


    It's why pointing out hypocrisy by the GOP is pointless; they dont care. McConnell knew stonewalling the confirmation hearings due to being close to the election had absolutely no true justification or basis in precedent. He also knew the time would come when the same thing happened for a GOP President (likely didn't know it'd happen so soon and while he was still Senate Leader). Either way, it didn't matter. He didnt care about any kind of hypocrisy or precedent. Whatever suited him and the GOP, that's all that mattered.

    Trump, McConnell et al don't care how much you can show how hypocritical they are. As fun as it is to do, they simply do not care. Regardless what they said yesterday, they'll do whatever they need to benefit themselves tomorrow.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,350 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    I was a bit surprised to see that the SCOTUS decision came on the day it shut down it's current law term, bringing any legal motions likely to be presented to SCOTUS to a close. The other obvious effect of the SCOTUS ruling is that it is likely to give Trump the idea that he can use the power to issue E.O's liberally without SCOTUS reining him in.

    In line with the latest ruling, there is it's previous ruling on the extent to which the term "Presidential Official Duties" can be stretched by Trump. SCOTUS declined to lay down the parameters outside which Trump [or any other president for that sake] cannot step.

    Ref the jurisdictional reach of the rulings and/or orders that the different courts [below SCOTUS], that's something outside my ken so I wont comment on how one court can issue orders that will set aside orders of other courts except to state the obvious; an appeals courts can plainly set aside a bad or malicious order of a different court, as appeals against bad or malicious orders is plainly why the appeals courts were created.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,215 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Lads

    They're setting up a fùcking concentration camp (they'll deny that's what it is) for 5000 people in Florida!

    20250628_213831.jpg


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 569 ✭✭✭pad406


    I know the whole concept of people's rights are rapidly disappearing in the US but this is just cruel. I'd imagine even convicted criminals would be entitled to some form of basic humane accommodation at a higher level that this.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,854 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    Perfect time to set it up with hurricane season! They really are treating them like second class citizens humans. They really ain't far off ratting on their neighbours and having non citizens wear an identifying badge or armband.

    Alligator Alcatraz…..Speaking of Alcatraz, did Trump ever follow through reopening it in California…. speaking of California, has he followed up with tariffing non American movies?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 31,323 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    https://apnews.com/article/florida-alligator-alcatraz-immigration-detention-trump-desantis-0597dd71a0cfcbc819b82929c03466cd

    This does indeed look like a recipe for a disgusting, inhuman disaster, lots of protests going on apparently but the detention centre is being assembled.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,780 ✭✭✭amandstu


    Think they mentioned a passenger reporting her uber driver to ICE on CNN a few nights back.

    That is the America we love.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,623 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    It's why pointing out hypocrisy by the GOP is pointless; they dont care.

    Just keep calling them nazis. Not even important ones. Not even worthy of the capital N. Not even the 'just following orders' ones.

    Those people are just so braindead and bereft of their own minds that they agree with whatever tf is said by 'daddy'



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 24,350 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    It'll be some disaster if this bill passes.

    The Building Trades Union are firmly against it.

    20250629_001405.jpg

    And Elon Musk has also come out against it which is significant moreso in how that might influence Senators Moreno than me caring what he says. He enabled this clown, he shouldn't be praised for pushing back on him.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,916 ✭✭✭threeball


    All the whinging is a bit late now. They all knew what they voted for. I'd imagine millions of tradesmen and their families voted for him but just assumed he fcuk someone else over and not them. These guys work alongside undocumented Latinos every day and heard what he said about them and happily voted for him.

    To paraphrase full metal jacket, America is a giant shít sandwich and everyone's gonna have to take a bite.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,561 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    LOL…Alligator Alcatraz.

    That sounds like the greatest grindhouse B movie ever made. A 42nd street, missed opportunity, treasure.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,854 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    It's just getting so hard to have any sympathy for Americans these days.

    Those tradesmen thought as they were working for themselves, maybe a wee small business, that the pro business candidate was ideal for them (ignoring his first term and his 4 bankruptcies). I'm baffled by the excuse trotted out 'it's not what I voted for'…. yeah it's exactly what you voted for! Now is the time to own it!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,887 ✭✭✭pgmcpq


    And when a “split circuit” occurs the SC makes the final decision. But in this case there is no “split”. No court has questioned birthright citizenship. In this case the SC has stepped in to curtail the power of lower court . As a practical matter you would then have to apply for an injunction in every circuit- or even every district to stop the implementation of an executive order. So once again another check and balance has been trashed.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 17,712 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    Or they can be done by class or third party.

    Your argument fails on implementation grounds. There have been such injunctions declared with increasing frequency. One every four days on average since Trump took over. Conservatives tend to pick judges in smaller districts, liberals pick them in larger districts (but all have the same legal effect). To enact a policy, a government needs to win each and every court case which comes up. If the first attempt to gain an injunction, they try again in the next circuit. To stall a government policy, the plaintiffs just need to win in one place.

    So to try your theory, at what point is a decision rated to have no split? When two federal districts have ruled? Five? What if after your threshold of (say) five is reached, a sixth court rules otherwise? Suddenly it’s not split any more, is there the same force? And what is the statute or regulation which may indicate the answer to this question? And is not the lack of a split a likely result of forum shopping to begin with?

    This is not the first time in US legal history that the US government has done something with national effect which is (or is going to be) found to be unconstitutional, and national injunctions until this century have not been the way of doing things. The system has not been changed, and the outcome is binary. There isn’t something more unconstitutional than something else, they are or they are not.

    What will happen next is that there will be a new tack taken. Instead of individual plaintiffs seeking national relief, there will be a new series of suits tailored for collective relief. Is the standard for that a bit higher? Sure. But as you point out, there is little doubt of the end result so it seems likely that that standard in this case will be met.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,916 ✭✭✭threeball


    6 bankruptcies. He rolled 2 in to 1 twice as they were at similar times but different businesses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    “I'd imagine millions of tradesmen and their families voted for him but just assumed he fcuk someone else over and not them.”

    I’m pretty sure that’s exactly why they voted for him - they dumped the traditional values of respect for fellow man and honest work for chasing the dollar and promised riches from a snake oil salesman .



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,793 ✭✭✭✭Oscar_Madison
    #MEGA MAKE EUROPE GREAT AGAIN


    This is essentially a MAGA message to those thinking of entering America illegally- don’t.

    It’s disgusting, it’s inhumane - but unfortunately a lot of America will lap it up and will feel “safer” .strange I know but “feeling safe” was a big part of the MAGA election campaign - they’re scaring the bejazuz out of anyone illegal and unfortunately that’s what half of Americans that voted, asked for.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,151 ✭✭✭✭odyssey06


    He's just fulfilling his campaign promises. I remember that excuse being rolled out on the thread.

    Of course, the campaign promise he is fulfilling is to be a racist feathering his own nest.

    It couldn't be the campaign promises about fighting cost of living, price of eggs, or anything to do with ordinary people's working lives… because that was an obvious pack of lies from the get go.

    "To follow knowledge like a sinking star..." (Tennyson's Ulysses)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,887 ✭✭✭pgmcpq


    The purpose of an injunction is to prevent injury to a party while a decision is reached. It is not a ruling on merits. As an example, let’s not deport someone to be imprisoned in El Salvador before we find out who they are. Let’s not deport anyone until they have birthright citizenship. So “implementation” is very much the point. Injunctions are used precisely in situations where a constructing a class action would take too long.
    As for what is a “split circuit” or not. There is no split if there is one uncontested ruling. On the rare occasions there is the SC will step.
    You are correct, the number of injunctions have risen in recent decades and especially since Trump has returned as President. This is a symptom of a consolidation of power in the Presidency - notably since 9/11. However, with Trump specifically, it’s a sign of a president that is attempting to rule with no regard of any constitutional restraint.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,361 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    On promises. It doesn't matter about the specifics. Foreign wars, inflation, jobs going off shore.

    Most people don't understand the complexity behind these.

    But they understand feelings. And Trump makes them feel better. He makes them feel like someone is working for them. Speaking their language.

    Essentially they are afraid. Afraid of the world changing around them. The same desire to go back to the way it was is in play as it was in Brexit. Some unknown, undefined previous time were everything was better.

    And Trump promises that. And while he continually fails to deliver he does continue to attack those that he believes, and therefore they do, for all the problems.

    The problem is not that the Iran attack didn't achieve what Trump claimed, the problem is the media hate America and want it to fail.Etc



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    Trump saying that America has won mineral rights in the Congo / Rwanda peace deal-

    Wonder what the price of that will be-?-



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,744 ✭✭✭yagan


    Only a nation with enormous feeling of self privilege and importance could reelect a bridge burner.

    It's not really reported as we in Ireland swim in anglosphere news but the surplus of consumer goods that had been bound for the US are now diverted to Europe and more critically Chinese export licenses for the export of critical refined rare earth materials are favouring EU industry while the US continues to be sidelined.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,350 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    Just keeping with your Para 3 above, the "This is not the first time… one where something the US Govt has dome with national effect which is (or is going to be) - and national injunctions until this century…. what was the way of doing things until now to provide relief from an unconstitutional act of Govt?

    It seems to me that a majority in SCOTUS have let the Trump Govt away with an unconstitutional action in respect to the Trump move against the Birth-right wording contained in the constitution by closing the door on arguments against what Trump has done without deciding if Trump deliberately acted in an unconstitutional manner. Trump's lawyers had argued that the wording of the Birth-right clause MEANT one thing (something he agreed with) and not what others argued it MEANS. It's not as if Trump acted in a wishy-washy way here, he clearly aimed to alter the constitution without going the constitutional way of amending it.

    With the present SCOTUS sittings closed (unless SCOTUS is going to sit behind closed doors out of session, or in emergency session) no judge can sit in judgement on Trump's unconstitutional acts. The 6-3 majority in SCOTUS seems to have closed its doors to ensure no one can do anything about Trump's actions within the law.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,350 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious


    He is still trying to find third-party countries to accept the people he is expelling from the U.S.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 690 ✭✭✭michael-henry-mcivor


    By taking mineral rights from foreign countries- ?-

    If they want to stay American- then stay out of other lands-

    Can't be that hard to understand- even for a yank-



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,350 ✭✭✭✭aloyisious




Advertisement
Advertisement