Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Israel Launches strike against Irans Nuclear Programme

18384868889108

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 11,956 ✭✭✭✭Cluedo Monopoly


    What are you suggesting? That the polling company only picked 1000 people that were likely to love ethnic cleansing and killing people?

    What are they doing in the Hyacinth House?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 59,235 ✭✭✭✭walshb


    hmm, me thinks Israelis are a helluva lot more resourceful and resilient… remember, when Irish folks get a few inches a snow, our supermarkets are bled dry of jacks’ roll and Brennans!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    Why don’t you march over there with Paul Murphy and see how you get on with the locals.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 12,422 ✭✭✭✭AbusesToilets


    Unfortunately for Israel, and likely everyone else, the enemy gets a say too. Iran is much weaker militarily than most of its neighbors, but it does have a major geographic advantage. How well will the support from OPEC countries endure if Iran shuts down oil shipments for a prolonged period? Could also see Iran move to seriously destabilize Iraq too, stir up the large Shia population there.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,025 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Think Somali Pirates with access to heavy artillery and sea mines.

    They don't need to "close" it per se , they just need to make tanker captains refuse to go through

    Lob out a few sea mines or use their fast attack boats to zip out and take pot-shots at passing traffic.

    It's 21 miles wide at the narrowest point - Well within range of all sorts of stuff . A few trunk mounted short range missile platforms that could be out of sight in minutes could cause a huge amount of disruption.

    Even if they hit nothing they could still have a massive impact on traffic volume , Tankers won't want to take the risk that a lucky shot hits them.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,147 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    If Iran wants to close the straits or mess with oil supplies, okay but they would be cutting off the nose to spite the face in terms of their own crucial oil exports, not to mention direct neighbours and bigger players like China

    If they rile up stuff with e.g. their militias in Iraq - okay, but they'll face kick-back for taking out Israel strikes on Iraq who had nothing to do with it. Smashing up their own backyard will only earn them even more enemies in the region

    If they e.g. strike US assets in the region - with Trump in power they might get away with some optical minimized strikes but not much more than that

    They have some options but I'm not seeing any good options for them. They've painted themselves into a corner with an over reliance on proxies to do their dirty work and are now paying the price for that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,688 ✭✭✭timmyntc


    they have already struck US bases in Syria following the Fordow bombing



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,850 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    If Iran were so inclined, they could have set off dirty bombs in the centre of Tel Aviv. That they didn't would illustrate that they're not gagging for a chance to get wiped from the map.

    Trump created this situation by cancelling the nuclear deal in his first term and by being played like a fiddle by Netanyahu. If he hadn't backed up Israel's strikes, he would have looked weak to half of his base.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 231 ✭✭Bocadilloo


    Looks as though Tankers in the Hormuz region are expecting closure. Traffic has collapsed there now. Iran has also approved resolution allowing closure. Seems as though US markets are over confident and not expecting much of a response from Iran. Feels like they could be planning something major in response



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 4,605 ✭✭✭xhomelezz


    Nope. Asked for the link for a poll other poster mentioned, was provided with the link and dig a bit around it, because those figures were shocking to me. And found the article why those figures might be so high..and posted link to that article. Both are on the same site. Simple.

    Hit the switch to keep the lights on.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,089 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    And the actual shipping lane is just 2 miles wide in either direction. Insurance companies for the tankers won’t want them going through, therefore they won’t. And how many employees that work on those ships will want to risk their life. While militarily they don’t stand a chance against the US, they can close that lane regardless.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,089 ✭✭✭.Donegal.


    Reuters

    The US believes Iran could carry out retaliatory attacks targeting American forces in the Middle East soon, two US officials have told Reuters.

    One of the officials said the attack could happen within the next day or two.

    But the sources also told Reuters that Washington was looking for a diplomatic resolution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,850 ✭✭✭✭kowloon




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,637 ✭✭✭brickster69


    You might be very surprised soon enough. Bibi has got himself into a war off attrition which is the last thing he wants, within a fortnight he will be seeking a deal but he will be offered one he can't possibly accept.

    Israel's society won't be able to handle 6 months of conflict and hardship against a country with a ten times bigger population and a 70 times bigger area.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,767 ✭✭✭circadian


    The locals in Iran are in my experience, lovely people and don't really adhere to whatever propaganda driven bile you've been led to believe. They may appear conservative in public but are largely quite liberal and westernised in private, this comes from the older generations who remember life before the Islamic Revolution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,147 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Measured strikes and proxy attacks.

    Like after the Soleimani assassination. These are "light" strikes mainly used as projections.

    The US is expecting some of these after Fordow, and I'm sure a certain "level" of them will be tolerated after some political bluster. However the key point is that the Iranians can't do anything significant.

    Plus, due to the intensity of the current conflict, any such strikes in the near future will be under the microscope - and could risk riling up Trump.

    It's all just a dance and the Iranians have limited options. None of which will realistically stop Israel from bombing them and several of which could have the opposite effect (and draw more inclusion from Trump)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,685 ✭✭✭rogber


    Looks like Iran's bark was a lot worse than its bite and that basically there will be no meaningful attempt at retaliation. Total humiliation for their regime



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,868 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Yes. The rule based order is essentially - do as we say not as we do. It's a blunt instrument of US foreign policy used to get their way. The people who defend it know it's all bs, but I reluctantly have to agree with them the government here has to go along with the pretense because we are utterly dependent on the US. If the Government did start criticising the US Government it could have a disastrous impact on our economy. In that scenario people's convictions will be tested if there pockets start to become lighter. It's sickening and kind of depressing because what example is being set to children by all this. We don't condemn something based on any principle but rather who is doing it - if it's terrorism by the good guys, well that's fine and dandy



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,025 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Exactly - It's the "threat" that's the issue.

    If Lloyds or whoever say "No Insurance cover for shipping in the Strait of Hormuz until further notice" then that's that..

    No company will want to risk a multi-million dollar ship and its multi million dollar cargo if they have no insurance.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,147 ✭✭✭✭Dohnjoe


    Give it time. Remember, this reaction by Israel was years in the making.

    Again it doesn't look like Iran can do anything significant, but they most certainly will do something.

    That said, Israeli jets are freely flying over the country right now able to hit pretty much anywhere - and most of the upper echelons of high ranking heads of Iranian military are probably more worried about themselves and their families being eviserated by a suicide drone at 3am in the morning than they are about striking back right now.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,868 ✭✭✭✭nacho libre


    Yes. A likely choegraphed and feeble response that will be made out to be something significant for a domestic audience. However this also demonstrates that the Iranian leadership is quite rationale which belies the propaganda of the mad mullahs who fethised death over life



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,445 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    They can only do something that doesn't draw America in to direct conflict otherwise they are done. They know that.

    They appear very limited in what they can do to Israel now with Hezbollah and Hamas neutered as well and their missiles are just too costly for what they can hit by way of a major strike.

    They can, however, reasonably cheaply continue to cost Israel's economy vast sums of money every day with judicious use of what's left of their missile stockpiles even if not scoring major strikes. Israel's defence systems are grotesquely expensive per interceptor and so long as the threat goes on their economy is crippled to all intents and purposes.

    Strategically that seems like the best option for the regime at least to me while they get in to negotiation with the Trump admin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,115 ✭✭✭skimpydoo


    Iran has claimed more bombings today at nuclear plants. No mention of who did it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,481 ✭✭✭MFPM


    I've no doubt when composing your post there was a relevant point you were trying to make, alas it never made it!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,833 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Anyone seeing reports of a developing situation in Qatar? (Twitter and Reddit) But nothing from credible sources ye

    Edit : reports: Qatar issued an emergency airspace closure. Something is brewing.

    Edit 2: 10,000 US troops are based in Qatar. Iran may have made a decision to hit the base.

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    You mean tens of thousands of people chanting death to Israel and death to America continually on the news over decades, but sure your anecdotes are a better barometer of the publics opinions.



  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 17,025 Mod ✭✭✭✭Quin_Dub


    Exactly - It's not about actually destroying targets or sinking ships - It's the threat of it and the reaction to that threat.

    Like you say - Lob a few old/slow missiles in Israels direction each day and Israel has to shut down business and inbound/outbound flights while they deal with them , costing them huge amounts of money.

    Same for the Strait of Hormuz - Fire a few rockets in the general direction of the shipping lanes and it grinds to a halt even if they hit absolutely nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,767 ✭✭✭circadian


    Have you travelled through Iran? Because I have and met with friends families there, it's a country of 90+ million people. Of course the regime has it's ardent supporters, just as we see MAGA in the US. Doesn't mean the entire nation is like that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,769 ✭✭✭Potatoeman


    The leaders and shot callers are and have destabilised the countries around them over the last two decades. I’ve zero sympathy for them, get the lunatics out or deal with the shitstorm they’ve kicked up.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,637 ✭✭✭brickster69


    Qatar shuts it's airspace and multiple airlines now cancelling flights to the Gulf

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



Advertisement