Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Israel Launches strike against Irans Nuclear Programme

14344464849108

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭fergiesfolly


    I always presumed that the US and probably the UK too kept up communication with the Iranian opposition should an opportunity arrise to depose the ruling mullahs.

    This is such an opportunity. Overthrow the Iranian regime, open the country to democratic elections( I know, I know) and bring in a more liberal, west leaning government.

    What it means for the broader Middle East is up for debate, but means Israel is now the dominant power. Without Iran backing them, Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis are extremely isolated and effectively finished as a force. No one else will be coming to there aid.

    It also means that Israel can't use their go to mantra of being in imminent danger any longer and their oppression of Palestinians and West Bank will come under stronger scrutiny and sanction. Perhaps leading to a change of government and outlook within Israel itself. And then a better outcome for Palestine and the West Bank.

    Or perhaps Iran have a nuclear dirty bomb that's been sitting in Tel Aviv for the last 6 months waiting for a phonecall and we're all going to hell in a hand basket.

    Interesting time ahead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,095 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    What is required is the army to change sides and depose the current regime. The opposition has no power without them as shown by the failed revolution they had a few years ago in Iran. I just cant see at the moment any Army general going against the government and overthrowing them.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    TBH I'm not familiar with it all. I think Israel just want to set their nuke plan back years and cut the head off the snake and then leave and let someone else deal with the immediate fallout.

    It may end up like Iraq and the birth of ISIS all over again. There will be peace for a while, but then it will all kick off again. It's just kicking the can down the road.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,525 ✭✭✭fergiesfolly


    I'd have presumed constant barrage of military facilities that you're unable to stop would focus most generals minds. Being part of a future regime in some smaller capacity might be better than having a large capacity in a regime with no future.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    Well, it will have still weakened Iran with a tactical victory with very little cost to itself.

    The worst case for them is that the regime holds on and rebuilds over the next few years, at the very least, they have put back their nuclear program for years.

    Israel seems to be in it for the long haul. If the US won't get involved, there is chatter that the IDF may have to send in special ops to some of these nuclear sites and destroy them from the ground. Very high risk, but if they have complete air superiority, then perhaps it's worth the risk to them?

    If they cannot destroy all the nuclear sites from the air, then it will do as much damage as it can from the air to the military and political establishment over the next few weeks.

    I still think that Trump will give the go ahead though, I am not sure he will be like the latest round of fighting words from Iran.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 55,020 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    The same thing should also happen in Israel. The people should depose Netanyahu and his hardliners. A man wanted for War Crimes should not be a head of state anywhere. So the same applies in both countries.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,095 ✭✭✭Sudden Valley


    Bibi wont be deposed he will leave office after this conflict is over. I'm not sure the israeli public care when their army kills civilians in other countries or in Gaza. It seems his unpopularity is more to do with corruption.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 55,020 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Only because the world is watching. Israel did it's best to try and prevent the world from seeing what they are doing in Gaza but failed because everyone has a mobile phone now. If it was not the case then the death toll would be much higher but they are doing their utmost anyway now by starving the Gazans.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,662 ✭✭✭✭markodaly


    The enrichment sites are deep under ground.

    They can't hit them from the air.

    Apparently, they can with a GBU-57 but it would need multiple strikes. B2 bombers can carry 2 of them at a time.

    I did hear some analysts say they may need some boots on the ground ala special ops to verify the job is done and mine/destroy what's left.

    The US will do it if it wants to do it. The rest of the Gulf states would back blowing up Iran's nuclear facilities in secret. MBS himself has openly stated he does not want to see Iran with a nuclear weapon.

    No one is talking about a full scale occupation of the country. This operation would be limited to a few strikes at a few facilities. If Iran retaliates, it will be an escalation until Iran has no capacity to retaliate anymore.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 55,020 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    You could be right judging by the way many of them cheer on his actions but there are also those who do oppose him.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 13,851 ✭✭✭✭kowloon


    Does he not have prosecutions hanging over him if he leaves office?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,834 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Fairly sure the Israelis do not have this aircraft yet?

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to quit sniffing glue



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,962 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    You're not wrong in that a B2 could possibly do the Job.
    The issue is that "what could go wrong"

    1: Hit that facility from the air and there's a partially assembled weapon that's destroyed then you potentially have a major contamination problem that the US is obligated to go in and fix.

    2: Hit that facility from the air and there's a fully assembled weapon that detonates, you could start WW3.

    3: Get boots on the ground, you've a messy operation.

    And this is all just assuming there is one site, you don't put your eggs all in one basket.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,735 ✭✭✭paddyisreal


    there is a very slim change of regime change in Iran probably less than 10 percent also the chances of trump approving an attack opens up losing his support base in the states - he will chicken out. this all leave netan in a pretty **** situation. same leadership in Iran, probably put their nuclear plan back by a few weeks and trump will be exposed as not willing to back Israel when it matters . the regime change might not be in Iran....



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,390 ✭✭✭✭briany


    2 is probably out of the question. Atomic bombs require very specific things to make them go off. If anything the kinetic action of an outer explosion would make it less likely to detonate, not more.

    In scenario 1, contamination is risk, alright. I don't know if the U.S would feel compelled to help with that unless it affects allies in the region.

    Scenario 3 - the number of boots on the ground appear to already be substantial. This is in terms of Israeli special ops units, anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,644 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Eh, they have free democratic multi-party elections in Israel. They don't in Iran.

    It no longer amazes me that some of the Israel-haters don't have a clue about the rest of the Middle East, it just explains.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,916 ✭✭✭Enduro


    It's not a B-2. More than likely a drone.

    No country other than the U.S. will ever have a B-2. And the U.S. will be replacing it with the B-21 over time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,965 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Just googled 'drone that looks like a B2' and discovered the 'Lockheed Martin RQ-170 Sentinel'.

    Sentinal.png

    Which is what this looks like. The real B2 has more of a zig zag pattern across the back of it.

    Screenshot 2025-06-18 144858.png


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 55,020 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Would you think that the Palestinians in the WB or Gaza appreciate their '' free multi-party elections '' in Israel seeing that those free multi-party elections result in even more depravity against them than the previous regime?

    It no longer amazes me that some can't see past their noses.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 31,644 ✭✭✭✭blanch152


    Are you now an advocate for the abolition of democracy? Or are you a Trumpian who doesn't like elections when they produce a result you don't like?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,637 ✭✭✭brickster69


    "Iran has launched over 400 ballistic missiles and some 1,000 drones at Israel since the start of the conflict on Friday, according to fresh data from the IDF.

    Of the ballistic missiles, just over 20 impacted urban areas in Israel, causing casualties and extensive damage. 24 people have been killed in Israel and more than 500 wounded. The casualty figures are far below what the IDF anticipated when it planned the operation against Iran, according to military officials. Of the 1,000 drones, fewer than 200 reached Israel's borders and entered Israeli airspace. However, not one of the drones impacted Israel. All were either intercepted by the Israeli Air Force and Navy, or fell short before reaching Israel."

    An amazing interception rate considering what has been filmed, probably just a one off.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,916 ✭✭✭Enduro


    (1) I would imagine that the contamination problem at the remote Irianian Uranium purification lab would be considered as a lot less dangerous than the problems that would be caused if the Iranians were to use their Uranium to manufacture a weapon and set it off anywhere near a population centre.

    (2) Nuclear weapons do not easily detonate. There is a reason they are so hard to create. None have ever accidentally detonated anywhere ever. Even if there was a fully assembled and armed functional Nuclear weapon there, it is more likely to be destroyed than detonate.

    (3) I doubt the Americans have any intention to get boots on the ground in Iran.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 36,965 ✭✭✭✭o1s1n
    Master of the Universe


    Bit of a pot, kettle, black with that last sentence.

    Your post makes it sound like you'd prefer a theocratic authoritarian regime with a Supreme Leader rather than a democracy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,712 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    I think you said the quiet part loud there revealing your dislike of democracy. It explains a multitude mind.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    What's the video supposed to show? I only count 1 missile impacting. You won't see most interceptions as they are up in the atmosphere and above.

    You're seeing (I'm open to correction) iron dome trying to pick off ballistic missiles that have slipped through the other layers of defence (David's sling, Arrow, Patriot, Thaad etc...)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,637 ✭✭✭brickster69


    It shows a dozen air defence missiles were fired trying to take one Iranian missile and failed, yet Israel claim they shoot down 95% of ballistic missiles.

    "if you get on the wrong train, get off at the nearest station, the longer it takes you to get off, the more expensive the return trip will be."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,629 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    They made no such claim in that statement. They only mention about 20 impacting civilian areas. They have not released (for bloody obvious reasons) how many impacted military targets.

    The video proves absolutely nothing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,962 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    In relation to point 1, yes specific timing is required to set one off, that doesn't mean it can't happen.

    Natanz and Fordo are not that remote, Isfahan is only 80km to the south. 4 Million people live there.
    Iranian winds generally blow south. They could iradiate 5-10% of the population.

    It's going to require boots on the ground. No one wants that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,135 ✭✭✭lumphammer2


    That would be good yes ….. there should be no king-like figures in Iran …. i.e. supreme leader …. but the factions need to be brought together ….. some moderate from the IRI side like Masoud Pezeshkian or Hassan Rouhani would have to do business with someone from the opposition side like Reza Pahlavi ….. you'd have to form something stable like this …. it has to be remembered there is still support for IRI albeit a more moderate form ….. and you cannot ignore this sector of Iranian society ….. likewise there is support for the Pahlavis and you cannot ignore that sector either ……

    Netanyahu needs to be gone without question ….. even if you had the Iran issue solved in his favour Netanyahu would no doubt find a new enemy …. e.g. Turkey ….. and blame them for this and that like they now do Iran and once did Iraq ….. plus as long as Netanyahu and his kind is there the Palestine conflict will go on and on …. it needs settlement …..

    The cult of Trump needs to go ….. speaking of king-like figures ….. Trump has not done one positive thing since he got elected ….. and a lot of his more moderate MAGA supporters are beginning to recognise that …… I predict that if Trump gets involved in this war that is the end of him ….. it is one thing most Americans do not want ….. and why many voted for Trump even though anyone who studied him deeper know his anti-Iran views from the last term and his initiation of an Iran war in January 2020 stopped by COVID 19 ….. hawkish Republicans want this war ….. more moderate MAGA politicians don't ….. Trump has a choice and if he goes with the former ….. that's it for him ….. he will confirm to the people he is yet another hardline Republican warmonger more concerned with doing the dirty work for a corrupt Israeli despot than making America great again …….



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 3,916 ✭✭✭Enduro


    Absolutely nobody thinks that Iran currently has an armed functional nuclear weapon. The chances of setting off a non-existent nuclear weapon are exactly 0%. That means it can't happen. Please feel free to provide any link to show that any of that is not true.

    Even if they had an armed functional nuclear weapon there, the chances of it accidentally detonating are pretty slim.

    Why would it require boots on the ground? Most actual experts seem pretty sure that a sequence of accurately delivered MOPs is capable of destroying Fordo.



Advertisement