Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Donald Trump the Megathread part II - mod warnings in OP, Updated 06/06/25

1834835837839840842

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,864 ✭✭✭eightieschewbaccy


    I think that's an incredibly naive viewpoint if I'm honest. Trump has made it pretty clear that he enjoys such displays, in particular the totalitarian ones. I think there's honestly an ongoing effort to rationalize what he's doing.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,983 ✭✭✭yagan


    Trump said he could not send in national guard troops without any state governor's permission, yet this is what he has done in California.

    If you support the end of US democracy I can see why you'd support Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,738 ✭✭✭storker


    In the Democratic People's Republic of Trumpistan, everything is about Trump.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 767 ✭✭✭Escapees


    Thanks for validating my point.

    I would think you know pretty well that I don't support Trump. But trying to polarise things (like Trump ironically does) by implying that anyone you disagree with is a Trump supporter is childish to be honest.

    If the cops had been patroling the area instead and had detained someone for crossing police tapes, then there would be no story in this particular case.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,872 ✭✭✭✭looksee


    If the cops had been patroling the area instead and had detained someone for crossing police tapes, then there would be no story in this particular case.

    Yes, you really are missing the point here, aren't you?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,105 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    You think this random guy created protests such that Trump would send in the NG and the Marines and then decide that suddenly federal buildings needed protection and then put himself in garms way all to generate negative Trump headlines?

    Why the building taped off? What specific threats had it come under?

    What specifically did this guy do that warranted his arrest and dentetion? Was he really a threat to the building or the soldiers?

    There is nothing anti Trump about it. He has sent the Marines, a killing machine designed to kill US enemies and sent them into a US city under the flimsiest of reasons and now those troops are detaining civilians. A job the police are meant to do, and we'll capable of doing.

    But yeah, just another lined crossed as peoples right are errorded before their eyes but they want to give Trump every chance that he won't turn out to be the wannabe dictator that he is so obviously working towards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,208 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    With respect, that's not what I asked.

    I asked you if it was about the military, or Trump.

    To put it another way, do you think it is a coincidence that he organized it and it's being held on his birthday, or is truly about a celebration of the military.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,674 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    Not just a post of laughable nonsense, one that has your own shirt-tails showing for all to see.

    You groundlessly accuse others of bias for not considering the bare facts/evidence or the full story. Instead seeing only the perspective that fits their beliefs, and then you follow up with "given the the background of the ex-soldier detained and the likelihood he would be anti-Trump and his immigration policies, it would not surprise me in the slighhtest if he orchestrated the incident to generate negative publicity for Trump".

    Had you bothered to do what you accuse others of not doing, then you would know that is a complete load of steaming manure. The gentleman in question when interviewed made no reference to Trump or his immigration policies and said he was just taking a short-cut to the veteran affairs office in the building.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,165 ✭✭✭ilkhanid


    I presume you are referring to the Kent state shootings where four anti-war protestors were shot dead. it would not surprise me in the least, considering that Trump's goons have the potential to be even more thuggish than the National Guard at the time.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,724 ✭✭✭✭Igotadose


    Kent State University. I remember the pictures well. Nowadays, however, the Guard are much better armed than they were then. I doubt they're any better trained.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,878 ✭✭✭✭fullstop


    How about Reuters? Are they grifters too?!

    https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-allowed-keep-national-guard-los-angeles-more-protests-planned-2025-06-13/



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,674 ✭✭✭✭charlie14


    The U.S. military can detain trespassers on military installations under very specific U.S. codes, where they can either escort the person off the base or hand them over to the civil authorities. A post office, a courthouse or numerous other federal buildings are not military installations and them doing so in such cases is a violation of the Posse Comitatus Act. Neither is Homeland Security a civil authority to hand someone over too which according to another poster here is what they did with that civilian in LA

    Both Trump and the military have been playing fast and very loose with those U.S. codes as regards military instalations. In March the military announced that troops on the Mexico - New Mexico border would have "enhanced authorities" because they are on land now designated part of Fort Hauchuca Arizona - a military installation located more than a 100 miles away.

    Would you be happy to see them do the same by using some of that tape they used in that buildings`s garden to surround LA and designate the city as part of a some military base.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,926 ✭✭✭threeball


    Two democratic politicians targeted and shot late at night in two separate shootings by someone impersonating a police officer in minnesota. It'll come out in the wash but more than likely someone emboldened by Trumps rhetoric. Already being classed as politically motivated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,115 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Their spouses were shot as well.

    The lady politician, Melissa Hortman, and her husband have both died. The fact that it was someone impersonating a police officer (including having a car apparently) at a time when ICE officials refuse to identify themselves cannot be ignored.

    Yesterday, a GOP official accused Tim Walz and the Democratic Party as being the party of violence at a committee hearing, this suggests differently. America is in a very dark place. Marines detaining citizens, police being impersonated to assassinate politicians and the President holding a military parade where soldiers with different political ideals to him were told to exclude themselves.

    These times ae emblematic of Trumps Presidency.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,254 ✭✭✭✭breezy1985


    It's inevitable when you unleash the army on a population.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,487 ✭✭✭Wolf359f


    A military officer guarding a federal building is not operating or interfering with civilian law and order. They are not operating as civilian law officers, it is not a breach of the Posse Comitatus Act.

    The rules or regulations they operate under may be different on military bases, but afaik, the US constitution still applies on military bases on US soil. Outside a federal building or on a military base, in both situations they are not acting as civilian law enforcement.

    I'm not happy with the situation at all and I certainly don't agree with the national guard and Marines being called up without the governor requesting it. I'm simply pointing out that they are well within the law and constitution to detain civilians who trespass onto federal property when it's closed off.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,203 ✭✭✭✭briany


    It's really hard to see any one event happen which is going to initiate the kind of pushback necessary to pull America out of its lurch into authoritarianism. Every single event that could make this happen is buried in social media FUD within 24 hours and basically rationalised, equivocated and media-barraged away until people either don't know what to think or are just numb to it all. To top that off, online slacktivism makes people feel like they've done something when they really haven't, e.g. #nokings .

    And this is fertile grounds for fascism. When cynicism reigns and people just give up on knowing what's true, then the dictator can refashion the society to his/her liking.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,997 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    In terms of origin, I have no idea. I do know for a fact that the Chief of Staff of the Army had been looking for ways to publicly celebrate the 250th. (And I also know that one idea of mine crossed his desk a whiles ago but didn't get approved despite getting to that level). Whether the parade was one of those ideas which Trump decided to pile onto or was suggested by Trump in addition to whatever the Army had under consideration I cannot tell you, and I don't believe that anyone has made that decision-making process public.

    But the Army is taking it as an Army event regardless



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,115 ✭✭✭✭Tell me how


    Just saw a social media post where the speaker was retelling people in North Minnesota to NOT open the door to Law Enforcement because the suspect is still at large.

    That is a terrifying scenario to be in the midst of after 4 people were shot. Particularly in a gun happy climate such as the US is.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭spakman


    Even more so when actual officials are dragging people off the street and driving them away.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,313 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    When the speaker of the House is calling for a sitting Governor to be tarred and feathered and ICE Barbie is saying she's going to liberate cities from the Democrats with the help of the military, it's not surprising that something like this has happened. The blame lies fully with the regime and their inflammatory rhetoric.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,313 ✭✭✭✭extra gravy


    A quote from Walz only yesterday: "The road to authoritarianism is littered with people telling you you're overreacting."



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,262 ✭✭✭✭pjohnson


    A scriptwriter would be laughed out of it if they wrote a story like what America is these days.

    This is the soap opera they voted for and by all accounts they still seem to enjoy the lifestyle they wanted.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,997 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I'm afraid to say that precedent defies your rather definitive statement. If the US Supreme Court signed off on Federalised National Guard soldiers firing on protestors to ensure the mail got through (and the insurrection act was not invoked), I don't see that securing federal facilities like a post office would be much of a problem in law (Look up the Pullman Strike). It's worth noting also that the Governor of Illinois objected to the use of federalised troops which is part of what got it to the Supreme Court in the first place.

    See In Re Debs, 1895, which says (1) there is no obligation on the individual states to protect federal functions, so the feds can use whatever forces are necessary, (2) that the Army of the Nation, and all its militia, are at the service to the nation to compel obedience. The fact that things are not quite as cut and dry legally as some people think is why we are here in the first place. Should the Marines be there? I don't think so, though I wasn't exactly in the room when the decision was made. Are they allowed to be there? Precedent indicates "yes".

    To your last hypothetical, the city of LA, unlike certain properties within them, do not belong to the Federal Government.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,928 ✭✭✭✭Tony EH


    What you call "slacktivism" in such a blase manner is all that people have. What else can they do, that wouldn't involve some sort of violent reaction? Trump and his ilk are just itching for something more than protest marches to kick off so they can really go to town. They are waiting for any excuse, whatsoever, to "come down hard".



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 767 ✭✭✭Escapees


    Ah come on, do you really believe that someone with his background (ex-army, with citizenship gained through service - something Trump would presumably not be a fan of) happened to just take a 'short-cut' in the current climate by crossing through tapes and going off-path, and then happens to not hear several marines shouting at him to stop?! And on top of all that, you believe that if it was a stunt of sorts, albeit with good motivation, that the guy in question is going to admit this in an interview or mouth off about Trump or his immigration policies?!!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,208 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    "Whether the parade was one of those ideas which Trump decided to pile onto or was suggested by Trump in addition to whatever the Army had under consideration I cannot tell you"

    So, in your opinion, and from what you know, it is likely that this whole idea is Trump's.

    Does that not sound any alarm bells for you?

    Do you see how people internationally would view that? Akin to North Korea, China and Russia?

    I listed ten ingredients of a fascist and this fits right in there. I'd be happy to discuss which of the ten you think don't apply to him.

    I get you try to be the "adult in the room" when it comes to military questions in this forum, but I think you're displaying a reckless disregard to who and what your commander in chief

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 16,997 Mod ✭✭✭✭Manic Moran


    I very definitely did not say that. He seems to absolutely approve of the idea, which says nothing about the origin thereof.

    A parade for the 250th Army birthday is not a bad thing regardless of who came up with the idea, mind. Had there not been the coincidence of his own birthday, I strongly doubt it would have become this politicised.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,105 ✭✭✭✭Leroy42


    Yet. Trump obviously believes differently.

    The removal of states AI rights in the rax bill, his decision to send in NG and Marines without a request or a discussion with the state officials.

    But it's OK because Trump has managed to circumvent the norms but stay within the law by using arcane constitutional wordings, so nothing to worry about.

    He also openly attacks democratically elected officials if they dare to question him and openly bribes them and blackmails them with federal funds.

    But it's fine. I'm sure he will stop once he has LA sorted.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,320 ✭✭✭✭My name is URL


    It's just a coincidence that the man is having a military parade outside of his official home, while unrest is appearing outside of many other peoples homes. While the same Military are now threatening to arrest people in those homes. While other international matters will take attention away from domestic matters.

    How long before a state of national emergency is declared? Will anyone care by that point?

    Make everything seem normal and nothing will ever seem abnormal again



Advertisement