Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Public Pay Talks - see mod warning post 4293

1233234235236238

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 179 ✭✭Alonzo Mosley


    You couldn't make it up ….. almost a full year and they're still sitting on their backsides.

    https://forsatradeunion.newsweaver.com/designtest/1194vtwek6b?lang=en&a=1&p=65567038&t=30063856#:~:text=F%C3%B3rsa%20pushes%20for%20local%20bargaining%20negotiations%20to%20begin&text=On%20Monday%2019th%20May%2C%20deputy,on%20local%20bargaining%20to%20begin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,571 ✭✭✭bren2001


    The first claim was submitted in December 2024. I'm unsure how they're sitting on their backsides for a full year.

    The government have sat on it for 5 months. In that time, a new government was formed.

    It's unacceptably slow but saying people are sitting on their backsides for a year isn't correct.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,262 ✭✭✭Daith


    Surprised at the inclusion of the Engineer grades. They always seemed quite niche. Even slightly odder to see the Engineer Grade 1 included.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 471 ✭✭skidmarkoner


    So is the local bargaining for an extra 1% and then that's it for the pay deal?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,262 ✭✭✭Daith


    1% increase in August, local bargaining in Sept and then two 1% increases next year.

    Then back to negotiations



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 950 ✭✭✭ledwithhedwith


    I'd imagine it includes the accountant grades as well



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 73,051 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Engineering grades are increasingly used for IT staff, and are well below market rate - if I was making a decision on where to put increases it would be Engineering grades and COs; but I'm clearly not!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,262 ✭✭✭Daith


    The Engineer 3 grade should be looked at anyway. Way too many small increments and a low starting salary.

    Engineer 2 and Eng 1 pay more than HEO/AO and AP (Standard) respectively.

    Most IT people in Civil Service are definitely on HEO/AP path.

    No objection to anything here, just could see a bit of a fuss if it happened.

    Though I agree that Eng grades should be used for IT staff more.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 530 ✭✭✭chipfox


    where did they agree to the 1% in september? the local bargaining agreement has a scope of 3% over the course of the current building momentum. the two 1% increases next year aren't because of local bargaining



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,329 ✭✭✭Guffy




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,571 ✭✭✭bren2001


    The 3% local bargaining is 1% in this deal and 2% the next deal isn't it? Its not all in the current building momentum

    The above may be what you mean.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,809 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    "2% in the next deal" is the equivalent of "the cheque is in the post" or "I promise I won't… in your…"

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 530 ✭✭✭chipfox


    where did the unions say the negotiated anything so far?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,571 ✭✭✭bren2001


    huh? I didn't say they've negotiated anything, i said the agreement is laid out as 1% this round and 2% in the next deal.

    Forsa have submitted 3 claims and not heard back:

    https://forsatradeunion.newsweaver.com/designtest/1194vtwek6b?lang=en&a=1&p=65567038&t=30063856#:~:text=F%C3%B3rsa%20pushes%20for%20local%20bargaining%20negotiations%20to%20begin&text=On%20Monday%2019th%20May%2C%20deputy,on%20local%20bargaining%20to%20begin.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 530 ✭✭✭chipfox


    i think i was just very confused. still frustrating about the local bargaining



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,203 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    There will be huge problems if it turns out that they'll be taking significant money back off staff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 530 ✭✭✭chipfox


    I don't see that as a problem. If you've been overpaid there is always an expectation to pay that back.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,203 ✭✭✭✭AndrewJRenko


    If they come looking for significant money that's long been spent, I see that as a problem. I'm aware of the legal position, but that doesn't make it any easier.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,262 ✭✭✭Daith


    Sorry but they'd easily do it to anyone else and argue it's to safeguard taxpayer's money. Don't see why it's any different.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,615 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    who is they?

    The civil service (seemingly) messed up the amount they deducted from their own staff’s pay. Why would “anyone else” be involved?

    I’d assume adjustments would be made to see existing staff pay slightly more over a period of time, and those in receipt of a current pension receive a slightly less amount over an agreed amount of time too.

    Hopefully bosses at NSSO who allowed this to happen will be suitably reprimanded (unlikely)



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 179 ✭✭Alonzo Mosley


    Just another distraction form local bargaining talks



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,615 ✭✭✭✭Dodge


    actually it seems to be only pension recipients that are effected. One senior civil servant owes €280k!

    Most are far less. It relates to those who took part in work sharing according to the Irish Times



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,809 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    The level of service provided by the NSSO is abysmal in general but this is a new low.

    If it was any other group of pensioners who were overpaid something though, (let's say fuel allowance) the politicians would all be talking about a "compassionate" and "sensitive" approach, etc etc and the opposition would be calling for it to be written off

    Chambers is just short of saying "they're civil servants, fúck 'em!"

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,274 ✭✭✭flas


    This seems to stretch back over 20 years? The nsso is up and running since 2014? Seems like problems inherited like most things they get the blame for, and they came across the legacy problems from the way the civil service used to handle their HR issues, which was sweep under the carpet. For the sheer amount of work there clearly isn't enough staff, whatever their many failings,



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 191 ✭✭nearby_cheetah


    Sigh. Let me be the only person to interject and correct you. Once again.

    https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/social-welfare/irish-social-welfare-system/claiming-a-social-welfare-payment/social-welfare-overpayments/

    An Overpayment can happen when you get an extra payment of an allowance, pension or any other benefit from the Department of Social Protection and you are not entitled to it.

    If you have been overpaid, the Department will inform you of:

    The reason(s) for the overpayment

    The amount involved

    And

    The way the Department proposes to get back the amount that has been overpaid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,809 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    That contradicts nothing in my post.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 191 ✭✭nearby_cheetah


    Yes it does.

    Your post suggests the involvement of the politicians including the Opposition and you're implying that civil servants are being unfairly targeted.

    My post has corrected you and showed you there is already an established, published and precedent procedure in place that does not involve politicians and which applies to groups that are not civil servants or ex civil servants; thereby clearly dismantling whatever spin you were trying to put out.

    You're welcome. I would hate to see anyone misled by your misinformation. I'm sure you feel the same, deep down.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 37,809 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    As usual you have corrected nothing.

    Nobody is denying that there is a procedure for collecting SW overpayments, that was implicit in my previous post.

    My post was about the political reaction. If many thousands of SW recipients were facing the prospect of significant deductions through no fault of their own, I maintain that the political reaction would be totally different - as would yours.

    I'm partial to your abracadabra,

    I'm raptured by the joy of it all.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,813 ✭✭✭Cape Clear


    An expectation but how far back does it go? If you've been under paying taxes by incorrectly claiming an allowance you were not entitled to I believe the onus to pay it back doesn't go further than 6 years.

    There's also a reasonable expectation that the state should have gotten it right first and that the ship has now sailed in terms of recouping it.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 950 ✭✭✭ledwithhedwith


    Anyone know if the local bargaining is to be paid on September 1st or it's just to be decided upon by that date? Are we likely to hear pretty soon if it's to be paid by that date?



Advertisement