Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Continued use of traditional cards

  • 08-06-2025 06:06PM
    #1
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭


    Have any clubs moved away from traditional scorecards to electronics cards, etc.

    Or have there been any recent innovations in your club relating to the continued of physical cards?

    Given the large overheads in the printing and storage of physical scorecards - has anyone sought to moved away (partially or whole) from physical cards.

    All opinions welcome



«1

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,477 ✭✭✭big_drive


    Seems to be physical cards everywhere in Ireland. Think I read some place that it's all on apps in Australia



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,025 ✭✭✭JVince


    In Australia you can be sure of the weather.

    Imagine here on a wet and windy Saturday on a links course, getting out the app and entering a score and asking Nick Junior, age 84, to do the same 🤣



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,873 ✭✭✭✭fullstop




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,307 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    one club I'm in uses app based scoring now for some competitions

    its a pain in the arse, wouldn't recommend it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭Golfgraffix


    we have it in ClubNet but it’s not used much. In tests a fourball took almost 11 minutes longer to play 18 when using scoring for all 4 players.

    We also saw late starts as players trying to set up.

    We are testing OCR at the moment that will scan and enter a written card. Working well so far.

    If any club would like to test.

    J



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 19,945 Mod ✭✭✭✭slave1


    I appreciate a good map on a course I'm unfamiliar with and also a signal is not guaranteed on your phone

    My stuff on Adverts, mostly Tesla Pre Highland Model 3

    Public Profile active ads for slave1



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,916 ✭✭✭coillcam


    We don't have great mobile coverage around the course. In my experience helping some of the seniors, some struggle with technology and need to put on glasses. So I can see it being very time-consuming and frustrating.

    I've always thought about this to speed up the score entry process but had no faith in clubv1 ever doing something. I would love to hear more; please PM me if you prefer.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,307 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    I would say an average of about 30% of cards are filled in correctly.

    The other 70% tend to be all over the place, with some a lot worse than others,

    Eg putting the strokes and points and markers scores in the correct columns

    I’d love to see how OCR works when the cards are all over the place



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭Corkey123


    The scanning of cards could be a viable option. My experience with OCR has been hit and miss in the past, but it might have moved on since.

    Love to get a look at that option Golfgraffix.

    Given Mobile coverage issues and the inclination towards slowing play down - Mobile Apps are not yet a viable option. However a partial move from 'retaining' physical cards could be an option, particularly if scanning is incorporated.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 890 ✭✭✭thewobbler


    I do agree with the above. OCR has potential, but the problem it’s trying to solve (ie efficiency) is probably beyond it. If a man has to take time to make careful, legible marks on his card, then pull out and scan an app to read it, then take time to double check it was scanned properly, then surely he might as well go to the bother of opening and closing an app, and entering the score directly.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,350 ✭✭✭CalamariFritti


    I do occasionally help out with closing the competitions in my club. You dont review all of the cards but you have to check the ones the computer says are in the prizes. Of course I also get to see my own cards when marked by someone else.

    Lets just say what I get to see matches more or less the average golfer's skills in repairing pitch marks and raking bunkers. Half the time people dont even seem able to put the sticker on right. Its like mad squirrel stuff.

    Before 'the computer' doing the cards must have been an absolute nightmare.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭Golfgraffix


    so we are trying to get AI to work with the OCR result, so things like 1 on a par 5 would be flagged.

    For clubs on our platform we also have the GI number so we can use AI to prompt for errors where a outlier score is received.

    Early days but results are promising



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,989 ✭✭✭Russman


    Honestly it seems to me to be a solution looking for a problem.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭Corkey123


    There certainly is a problem to be solved here. I help admin the setup and closing of comps at my Club. We close and publish on the same day as the Comp all year around - facilitated by Club volunteers. We can have up 700+ cards a week, all requiring collection, collating and storage - let alone printing, etc.

    Much of the associated admin can be offset by basic changes to procedures, but before we can make signification reductions in admin, we’ll need a technological solution.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,989 ✭✭✭Russman


    I've acted as Comp Sec in my club, granted it was before WHS came in and all that entailed. I'm pretty much aware of what goes into it and all the volunteer work required. I totally get that volunteers are usually plentiful when planning a roster in January, but in reality it will come down to the same 3/4 guys doing 90% of it for the year.

    I'm just not convinced, with the age profile of club golfers (apologies for stereotyping anyone !), you'll get buy in from the vast majority. I'm all for advances, but telling some of our older golfers they have to log into an App and do x,y,z etc etc. that's before we even consider unreliable wifi & coverage, someone not having a smartphone or leaving their phone at home and a myriad of other logistical issues. John went off and Jim didn't attest his score on the app. Can't contact him, his phone is off, he's out of coverage bla, bla. Its just a nightmare waiting to happen IMHO. Card and pencil is so much simpler and its all entered on a PC terminal anyway already. Just put an "Attest" button requiring a different GI number, on the existing score entry portal amd don't bother keeping the cards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,870 ✭✭✭Golfgraffix


    I get all that and don’t necessarily disagree but there is an appetite for it. We are asked regularly.

    I think some of the issue is GI’s requirement that the physical cards are kept for so long.

    I think score entry on an app hole by hole is not the way to go (yet) but a device either in app or at the terminal that scans the card, keeps an image of it and uploads the score is a step forward.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,200 ✭✭✭OEP


    I agree. The issue isn't necessarily with cards - it's having to review the cards. Why don't we just scrap this as you say, given everything is entered into the computer anyway.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,831 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    That assumes everything is entered into the computer correctly. Pretty much a miracle if it is. You get hole scores transposed, pick ups marked as hole not played or just plain errors on scores.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,145 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    I doubt they review every card anyway.

    A few from the top and bottom of the pile is all that's checked I'd say.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,144 ✭✭✭billy3sheets


    One thing often overlooked from paper cards is to put the name of the club on the marking side. I served as Handicap Secretary in my club and so often you'd get a photo or scan of a card and have no idea what course it is for.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭Corkey123


    agreed an “attest” button would helpful on the input terminal.

    Post edited by Corkey123 on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,062 ✭✭✭Yeah Right


    When I was in Donabate, you entered your score on the computer and then you dropped your physical scorecard into a sealed box in the dressing rooms. I was under the impression that this was done to get the results out quickly….i.e….you don't need to collect and check all 150 cards for veracity, you just let the computer figure out the winners and then check only the winning cards.

    The rest of them can be checked for HC purposes at your leisure. Quick results while not causing undue stress on the volunteers.

    There was a computer in Corrstown also, but it was only ever working maybe 10% of the time I went to use it.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,307 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB


    I would seriously doubt any committee is checking every card for handicap purposes.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,831 ✭✭✭✭prawnsambo


    I was a handicap secretary for two and a half years spanning CONGU and WHS. I checked every card.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,307 ✭✭✭✭Seve OB




  • Administrators Posts: 55,145 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    Yea but how many cards would there have been in your club comps?

    There could be 200+ cards on a weekend comp at my club, there's no way anyone is checking 200 cards.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,025 ✭✭✭JVince


    You'd be surprised at how quickly you can do that if doing it regularly. I have three "golf events" i manage for fundraisers each year and it would be 70 -120 players. We do insist that points are entered before being handed in and you'd have a cursory look at every cards we'd be looking for overall, F9, B9 and par 3's + visitors. Those under 30 points don't need too much attention, but the others do so that there's no question over the awarding of prizes.

    You'd also see "patterns" even on a year to year basis as 70% + would be attending for several years, so my guess its easier on a week by week basis.



  • Administrators Posts: 55,145 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭awec


    When you say checking cards, what are you referring to?

    That the points total in the computer matches the points total on the card?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,989 ✭✭✭Russman


    Absolutely. I know when I used to do it, we'd check obviously the winning scores, and probably anything within 2 or 3 shots of the prizes. I found there was usually a fairly big drop off in scores though, you'd have the winning scores and maybe a few more close, but the vast majority would be way off the pace.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,025 ✭✭✭JVince


    Points total and that they were correctly added. The closer you got to the prizes, the closer your score was checked.

    The reality is about half just needed a quick glance as they won't be in contention for any prize.

    Once you were within 3 or 4 points of prizes, scores were checked fully. We did have a card recently where the points were added wrongly by 3 points (omitted a hole) and it pushed the player into 3rd. (technically they signed for a wrong points total - but we're not strict)



Advertisement